Add self-scoping review UI

docs/self-scoping/README.md

@@ -13,6 +13,8 @@ instead of relying on memory or screenshots.
   repo-scoping capability truth.
 - `workflow.md` explains how to run challenger assessments, interpret outcomes,
   and decide whether to update the golden profile or fix the engine.
+- `outcomes/` stores append-only reviewer decisions created from side-by-side
+  comparisons.
 - `../schemas/self-scoping-assessment.schema.json` defines the immutable
   assessment-run artifact shape.
 
@@ -35,6 +37,12 @@ assessment. Compare the challenger to the golden profile and to the negative
 seed. Reviewers should be able to choose whether the old result, new result, or
 neither is better, then store that judgement as a new assessment outcome.
 
+The curator UI exposes this loop at `/ui/self-scoping`. It reads the golden and
+assessment JSON files from this directory, highlights missing, forbidden, and
+misplaced hierarchy entries, and records reviewer preference without mutating
+the compared artifacts. The same page can compare two assessment runs directly
+so reviewers can choose whether the old baseline or new challenger is better.
+
 ## Export Command
 
 Export a completed analysis run as a challenger artifact: