generated from coulomb/repo-seed
Add self-scoping review UI
This commit is contained in:
@@ -56,17 +56,25 @@ are committed.
|
||||
|
||||
2. Read the comparison report.
|
||||
|
||||
3. If the report says `regression`, inspect forbidden capabilities, misplaced
|
||||
3. Open the curator UI at `/ui/self-scoping` to compare the golden profile and
|
||||
assessment artifact side by side.
|
||||
|
||||
4. When an earlier baseline assessment exists, use the same page's two-run
|
||||
comparison to judge old output against the new challenger.
|
||||
|
||||
5. If the report says `regression`, inspect forbidden capabilities, misplaced
|
||||
features, and known regression patterns first.
|
||||
|
||||
4. If the report says `needs_review`, inspect missing expected capabilities and
|
||||
6. If the report says `needs_review`, inspect missing expected capabilities and
|
||||
source evidence before choosing old or new output.
|
||||
|
||||
5. If the report says `candidate_improvement`, still confirm that the
|
||||
7. If the report says `candidate_improvement`, still confirm that the
|
||||
hierarchy, source refs, and native-utility boundaries make sense.
|
||||
|
||||
6. Record the decision as an assessment outcome before changing the active
|
||||
baseline.
|
||||
8. Record the decision as an assessment outcome before changing the active
|
||||
baseline. The UI writes append-only outcome records under
|
||||
`docs/self-scoping/outcomes/`; it does not rewrite historical assessment or
|
||||
golden-profile artifacts.
|
||||
|
||||
## CI Use
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user