Files
repo-scoping/wiki/ProductRequirementsSpecificationV0.1.md

7.1 KiB
Raw Permalink Blame History

ProductRequirementsSpecV0.1

Repository Scoping Requirements

Product Requirements Document (PRD)

Repository Scoping (v0.1)


1. Purpose

The Repository Scoping provides a structured, inspectable orientation layer for code repositories by mapping them from abilities → capabilities → features → implementation → evidence.

It enables developers, architects, and agents to:

  • understand what a repository is useful for
  • inspect how it implements that usefulness
  • compare repositories based on real functionality
  • search repositories using natural language

2. Problem Statement

Modern code repositories suffer from orientation opacity:

  • usefulness is unclear from structure alone
  • README files are incomplete or misleading
  • functionality is scattered across code
  • reuse decisions rely on tribal knowledge

This results in:

  • wasted time exploring repositories
  • duplicated work
  • poor architectural decisions
  • low reuse of existing assets

3. Goals

3.1 Primary Goal

Enable users to register a repository and understand its usefulness within minutes via an inspectable ability map.


3.2 Secondary Goals

  • enable natural language search across repositories
  • provide traceability from abstraction to code
  • establish a foundation for proof-of-ability integration
  • support both human and agent interaction

3.3 Non-Goals (v0.1)

  • full automated benchmarking
  • advanced ontology enforcement
  • marketplace features
  • monetization features
  • full CI/CD integration

4. Users

4.1 Developer / Architect

  • needs to find reusable functionality
  • needs to understand unfamiliar repos quickly

4.2 Repository Owner

  • wants their repo to be understandable and discoverable

4.3 Registry Curator

  • ensures quality and correctness of extracted data

4.4 Agent / Automation

  • queries registry programmatically

5. Core Concepts

Ability     = why the repository is useful
Capability  = what behavior it provides
Feature     = how the behavior is exposed/implemented
Evidence    = why the capability can be trusted

6. Product Scope (MVP)

6.1 Included

  • repository registration
  • repository analysis (semi-automated)
  • ability/capability/feature extraction (assisted)
  • human review and correction
  • searchable registry
  • inspectable repository view

6.2 Excluded

  • automated full-code understanding engine
  • distributed indexing
  • deep static analysis
  • real-time synchronization
  • full dependency graph modeling

7. Functional Requirements


7.1 Repository Registration

FR-01

User can register a repository via Git URL.

FR-02

System validates repository access.

FR-03

System stores repository metadata.


7.2 Repository Analysis

FR-04

System clones or accesses repository contents.

FR-05

System extracts:

  • languages
  • structure
  • interfaces (API, CLI, etc.)
  • documentation files
  • tests

7.3 Ability Extraction

FR-06

System generates candidate abilities based on:

  • README
  • documentation
  • examples

FR-07

Each ability includes:

  • name
  • description
  • confidence
  • source references

7.4 Capability Extraction

FR-08

System identifies candidate capabilities from:

  • modules
  • APIs
  • tests
  • code structure

FR-09

Capabilities include:

  • inputs
  • outputs
  • linked abilities
  • description

7.5 Feature Extraction

FR-10

System identifies concrete features:

  • endpoints
  • CLI commands
  • modules
  • configuration interfaces

FR-11

Each feature includes:

  • type
  • implementation location
  • linked capability

7.6 Evidence Linking

FR-12

System identifies potential evidence:

  • tests
  • examples
  • benchmarks
  • docs

FR-13

User can manually attach evidence to capabilities.


7.7 Review and Curation

FR-14

User can review extracted abilities, capabilities, features.

FR-15

User can edit, delete, or merge entries.

FR-16

User can approve registry entry.


FR-17

User can search using natural language.

FR-18

System maps queries to abilities/capabilities.

FR-19

Search results include:

  • repository name
  • matching ability
  • matching capability
  • confidence

7.9 Inspection UI

FR-20

User can view repository profile.

FR-21

UI shows hierarchical structure:

Ability → Capability → Feature → Code

FR-22

User can drill down to:

  • feature details
  • code locations
  • evidence

7.10 API Access

FR-23

System exposes API endpoints for:

  • search
  • repository retrieval
  • capability lookup

8. Non-Functional Requirements


8.1 Performance

  • search results returned within < 2 seconds
  • repository analysis < 2 minutes for medium repos

8.2 Scalability

  • support 1001,000 repositories (MVP)
  • architecture allows later horizontal scaling

8.3 Usability

  • repository can be registered in < 2 minutes
  • inspection view understandable within 1 minute

8.4 Extensibility

  • schema versioned
  • ability to extend capability model later

8.5 Reliability

  • analysis failures do not corrupt registry
  • partial results allowed

9. Data Model (Simplified)

Repository:
  id
  name
  url
  description
  metadata

Ability:
  id
  name
  description
  confidence

Capability:
  id
  name
  description
  inputs
  outputs
  ability_refs

Feature:
  id
  name
  type
  location
  capability_refs

Evidence:
  id
  type
  reference
  capability_refs

10. User Experience


10.1 Key Screens

1. Repository Registration

  • input URL
  • confirm metadata

2. Analysis View

  • detected structure
  • proposed abilities/capabilities/features

3. Review Interface

  • edit/approve entries

4. Search Page

  • natural language search
  • result list

5. Repository Profile Page

  • ability map
  • drill-down navigation
  • code links

11. Success Metrics


11.1 Product Metrics

  • time to understand a repository < 5 minutes
  • number of repositories indexed
  • number of successful searches
  • user engagement with inspection view

11.2 Qualitative Metrics

  • “I understand what this repo does now”
  • “I found something reusable”
  • “This saved me time”

12. Risks


12.1 Extraction Quality Risk

  • automated inference may be inaccurate

Mitigation: human review required


12.2 Over-Complexity Risk

  • ontology becomes too heavy

Mitigation: keep schema minimal in v0.1


12.3 Adoption Risk

  • users may not contribute metadata

Mitigation: provide value via auto-analysis first


13. Future Extensions

  • integration with CI/CD for live updates
  • ability benchmarking integration (ties back to GIL)
  • capability maturity scoring
  • dependency graph across repositories
  • marketplace / discovery layer
  • automated code reasoning agents

14. Positioning

The Repository Scoping is the missing orientation layer between raw code and practical reuse—making repositories understandable, comparable, and actionable.

xxx