research: MojoMojo deep dive (Perl Catalyst DB-backed wiki); UC-81

SHARD-WP-0003 T8. Classic relational-DB-backed wiki: Catalyst/DBIx::Class app,
pages + path tree + full history in SQL tables, Markdown body in a column, no
file store and no content API. Anchors the direct-DB-read binding (map schema
-> page model + journal); DB version rows = a third history source beside git
commits and RCS files. UC-81. Enriched UC-02/40/36/34. Marks T8 done.
Feeds SHARD-WP-0002 T14/T13/T11.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
2026-06-14 20:54:40 +02:00
parent 1e962a0aef
commit e0c3d0699c
6 changed files with 208 additions and 6 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
# 260614 — MojoMojo deep dive
Deep dive on **MojoMojo**: a **Perl Catalyst / DBIx::Class** DB-backed wiki — hierarchical
pages, attachments, inline (AJAX) editing, Markdown content, and **page history in
relational version tables**. The classic **MVC DB-backed** contrast to the file-store
classics: no file store, no real content API → attach by reading the **relational store
directly**.
- `findings.md` — architecture, the DB schema shape, capability profile, INTENT mapping, UC
seed (UC-81), architecture notes for SHARD-WP-0002, open questions, sources, traceability.
Catalog yield: UC-81 (attach a **DB-backed wiki with no file store/API** by reading its
relational store directly — pages + version tables — and importing DB-resident history to the
journal). Enriched UC-02/40/36/34. Feeds SHARD-WP-0002 T13 (history portability), T14
(direct-DB binding).

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,133 @@
# MojoMojo — deep dive (findings)
**Date:** 2026-06-14 · **Source:** SHARD-WP-0003 T8 · **Subject:** MojoMojo, a Perl
Catalyst wiki/CMS.
## Why this dive
The file-store classics (TWiki, Foswiki, Oddmuse, UseMod) keep pages as files; the modern
SaaS keep them behind APIs. MojoMojo is the **classic relational-DB-backed** wiki — a
Catalyst MVC app over **DBIx::Class** with pages and their history in **SQL tables**, and
**no file store and no first-class content API**. It anchors the *"attach by reading the
database directly"* hard case the adapter contract must account for (T13/T14).
## 1. Architecture
- **Stack:** Perl **Catalyst** (MVC web framework) + **DBIx::Class** (ORM) over a relational
DB (SQLite / PostgreSQL / MySQL). Templating via Template Toolkit.
- **Content:** **Markdown** (Text::MultiMarkdown) is the page markup — so the *body* is
Markdown, but it lives **in a DB column**, not a file.
- **Pages are hierarchical:** a **path tree** (`/parent/child`) modeled as rows with
parent/lineage relations — structure is relational, not directory-based.
- **Versioning:** each page edit creates a **new version row** (a `page_version`-style
table) — full revision history lives in **DB version tables**, with author/timestamp.
- **Features:** inline **AJAX editing**, **attachments** (stored as DB rows / blobs +
metadata), diffs, RSS feeds, full-text search, per-page permissions.
## 2. The attach problem — DB or nothing
MojoMojo exposes its content through the **web app** (HTML) and the **database**; there is
**no clean REST/GraphQL content API** and **no file store**. So a shard adapter has two
realistic paths:
1. **Direct relational read** (preferred): read the `page` + `page_version` (+ `content`,
`attachment`) tables via DBIx::Class schema — pages, the path tree, and **full history**
are all there, importable to the coordination journal (UC-41-style history import, but
from **DB version rows** rather than RCS/git).
2. **HTML scrape** (fallback): parse rendered pages — lossy, last resort.
This makes MojoMojo the **direct-DB-read** binding archetype: the canonical store is a
relational schema, and the adapter's job is to map that schema to the wiki page model +
journal.
## 3. Capability profile
| Dimension (synthesis spectrum) | MojoMojo |
|--------------------------------|----------|
| Attachment mode | **direct DB read** (relational); HTML-scrape fallback; no file store, no API |
| Addressing granularity | page (row); path tree via lineage rows |
| Content identity | DB page id; path as human key |
| Identity vs placement | row id vs path lineage (separable) |
| Structure | **relational**: page rows + parent/lineage; attachments as rows |
| History | **DB version tables** (per-edit version rows, author/timestamp) |
| Merge model | app-level last-writer; DB transactions |
| Native query | SQL over the schema (not a wiki query language) |
| Translation | **Markdown body in a DB column** — minimal translation, but extraction needed |
| Write granularity | page (row) per save |
| Operational envelope | a Perl app + its DB; direct DB access needs credentials |
| Access grant | per-page permissions in DB; app auth |
| Content opacity | transparent if you can read the DB |
| Provenance | author/timestamp on version rows |
## 4. INTENT mapping
### Reinforcements
- **Backend-neutral page model**: the body is **Markdown** — once extracted from the DB
column it maps directly; the adapter's work is **schema→page-model**, not format
translation.
- **History portability** (T13): DB **version rows** are a third history-source shape beside
git commits and RCS files — importable to the journal as discrete revisions with
author/timestamp.
- **Graceful degradation**: even with only DB read (no API), MojoMojo is a usable
read/projection/backup shard; with DB write it could be write-through, but carefully
(app invariants).
### Divergences (boundaries / notes)
- **No file store, no API** ⇒ the **direct-DB-read** binding is a first-class attach mode the
contract must name (alongside file-store, in-engine host, external-API, CRDT, P2P) — or a
sub-mode of "external store" where the medium is **a relational schema** (T14). Reading a
third-party app's DB is **coupling to its schema** (versioned, may drift across MojoMojo
versions) — a stated risk (UC-43 backend-swap analogue at the schema level).
- **Writing by direct DB** risks violating app invariants (lineage, version counters,
search index) — default to **read/projection/overlay**; write-through only with the app's
cooperation.
### What to keep
1. **Direct-DB-read as a named binding** for DB-backed engines with no file/API (UC-81),
mapping a **relational schema → wiki page model + journal**.
2. **DB version rows as a history source** for the journal (T13), beside git and RCS.
3. **Schema-coupling caution** — treat the schema as a versioned interface that can drift
(relates UC-43).
## 5. UC seed
| # | Seed | Disposition |
|---|------|-------------|
| UC-81 | Attach a **DB-backed wiki with no file store / no API** (MojoMojo) by reading its **relational store directly** (page + version tables), mapping schema → page model and **importing DB-resident history** to the journal | **new** |
| — | DB attach vs file attach | enrich **UC-02** / **UC-40** |
| — | DB version-table history import | enrich **UC-36** |
| — | relational page rows / lineage as structure | enrich **UC-34** |
## 6. Architecture notes for SHARD-WP-0002
- **T14 (binding):** add **direct relational read** as a binding (or external-store sub-mode
whose medium is a SQL schema) for DB-backed engines lacking a file store or API; HTML
scrape is the lossy fallback. Schema is a **versioned coupling** (drift risk, UC-43).
- **T13 (history portability):** **DB version rows** = a history source alongside git commits
and RCS revisions — import as discrete journal entries (author/timestamp).
- **T11 (capability):** "has-file-store" / "has-API" are **absent** here; "has-readable-DB"
is the capability — a sparse profile relying on schema knowledge.
## 7. Open questions
1. Does shard-wiki sanction **direct third-party DB reads** as a binding, or restrict them
(schema coupling/drift) to a documented best-effort mode? How is schema drift across
MojoMojo versions handled (UC-43)?
2. Is **write-through by direct DB** ever allowed (risking app invariants), or are DB-backed
no-API engines read/projection/overlay/backup only?
## 8. Sources
- MojoMojo — github.com/mojomojo/mojomojo; metacpan MojoMojo (Catalyst app, DBIx::Class
schema: Page / PageVersion / Content / Attachment)
- Catalyst + DBIx::Class framework docs (architecture context)
- prior: `research/260613-twiki-deep-dive/` (file-store classic contrast, UC-40/41)
## 9. Traceability
New UC **UC-81** carries the marker **⊙** in the wikiengines column of
`spec/UseCaseCatalog.md`. Enriched: UC-02, UC-40, UC-36, UC-34. Architecture cross-refs:
SHARD-WP-0002 T14 (direct-DB binding), T13 (DB version-row history), T11.

View File

@@ -33,4 +33,5 @@ when multiple files or sources are involved. Findings here inform `spec/` and
| 2026-06-14 | `260614-forge-wikis-deep-dive/` | Gitea · GitLab · GitHub wikis — a wiki is a separate `.wiki.git` of Markdown; git-clone universal, wiki API capability-varying (GitHub git-only); git IS the store (resolves UC-68 race); the home case; UC-76/77 |
| 2026-06-14 | `260614-tiddlywiki-deep-dive/` | TiddlyWiki — entire wiki (content + app) in one self-contained HTML file = whole-file write-granularity extreme; Node `.tid` file-per-tiddler substrate (git-diffable); tiddler/field records, filter-expression query; UC-78 |
| 2026-06-14 | `260614-ikiwiki-deep-dive/` | ikiwiki — wiki compiler: git-canonical Markdown source → static HTML (derived publish/projection); git-distributed clone federation + XML-RPC pinger (third federation flavor); UC-79 |
| 2026-06-14 | `260614-quip-deep-dive/` | Salesforce Quip — closed-SaaS live docs + embedded spreadsheets/live apps; REST + lossy HTML import/export; Salesforce enterprise ACL; external-API payload-format facet + inline-object page model; UC-80 |
| 2026-06-14 | `260614-quip-deep-dive/` | Salesforce Quip — closed-SaaS live docs + embedded spreadsheets/live apps; REST + lossy HTML import/export; Salesforce enterprise ACL; external-API payload-format facet + inline-object page model; UC-80 |
| 2026-06-14 | `260614-mojomojo-deep-dive/` | MojoMojo — Perl Catalyst/DBIx::Class DB-backed wiki; pages + history in SQL tables, no file store/API → direct-DB-read binding; DB version rows as history source; UC-81 |