# Processing & Processing.js — deep dive (findings) **Date:** 2026-06-14 · **Source:** SHARD-WP-0004 T4 · **Subject:** Processing (creative coding) and Processing.js / p5.js — **the sketch *is* the document**, rendered live at view time in the browser. ## Why this dive Low-priority, enrichment-focused. Processing tests a page-model edge the notebooks (T2/T3) didn't: a page that is **wholly a program whose presentation *is* its running output** — no separate input/output cells, no prose envelope. The defining question: what is a "page" when **the rendered form is a live computation evaluated at view time**? It feeds UC-54 (computation-defined content) and UC-55 (non-Markdown / executable content) and sharpens the **live↔snapshot** axis named at T6. ## 1. Program-as-page - A **Processing sketch** is a program (`setup()` + `draw()`) whose output is a **canvas of visual/animated/interactive content**. There are no "output cells" — **the program's execution is the content**. - **Processing.js** (Resig, 2008; now largely **p5.js**) runs sketches **client-side in the browser** on ``. The page ships the **source**; the **rendering happens at view time** in the reader's browser — no server, no pre-rendered artifact required. - So the durable artifact is **text (the sketch source)**; the *presentation* is a **live, view-time derivation** of that source (a derivation-projection, T1) — with the twist that the derivation runs **in the viewer**, continuously (animation/interaction), not once. ## 2. The view-time / live-render dimension This adds a wrinkle beyond Jupyter's *captured* outputs (UC-84) and Mathematica's CDF: - **No captured output at all by default** — unlike a notebook, a sketch typically stores **only source**; there is nothing cached. The output exists only when executed. - **Continuous & interactive** — `draw()` loops; mouse/keyboard drive it. The output is **time-based and interaction-based**, so any static capture is a **single frame** (or a recording) — it cannot represent the artifact faithfully (shared limit with Mathematica `Dynamic` and, more extremely, Strudel T5). - **Client-side execution = a capability + trust surface** — running arbitrary sketch code in the viewer is an execution capability with sandboxing concerns; shard-wiki must treat "render live in the viewer" as an explicit, gated capability, never an automatic behavior. ## 3. INTENT mapping (enrichment-only — no new UC) ### Reinforcements / refinements - **Executable-as-page (UC-54/55).** Processing is the cleanest **"the whole page is the program"** case: content = source text, presentation = view-time live render. Strengthens the page model's need to represent **executable content whose rendered form is derived at view time**, distinct from notebooks (which interleave cells + captured outputs). - **Derivation-projection, view-time variant (T1/UC-83).** The render is a derivation- projection that runs **in the viewer, continuously** — extends the projection model: a derivation may be *materialized ahead* (CDF/nbconvert) or *run at view time* (sketch). - **Live↔snapshot axis (T6).** With **no cached output** and **continuous/interactive** rendering, the only static form is a **snapshot frame or recording** — a concrete point on the live↔snapshot axis; honest treatment offers the snapshot and **marks it as a frame of a live artifact**, never as the artifact. - **Capability + trust gating.** "Execute in the viewer" is an explicit capability with a sandbox/trust boundary — mechanism-over-policy: whether to run, sandbox, or only snapshot stays configurable. ### Boundaries - shard-wiki is **not a sketch runtime**; default is **attach the source + offer a captured snapshot/recording**; live in-viewer rendering is a gated capability. Source is canonical; the render is a degrading, view-time projection. ## 4. UC disposition (enrichment-only) | Mechanism (findings §) | Catalog UC / thread | |------------------------|---------------------| | Sketch = program-as-page; presentation = view-time live render (§1) | UC-54 (enriched: executable/view-time content), UC-55 (enriched: non-Markdown executable) | | Render = derivation-projection run **in the viewer, continuously** (§1, §2) | links UC-83 (view-time variant) | | No cached output; continuous/interactive → static = snapshot frame only (§2) | links UC-84, live↔snapshot axis (T6) | | Client-side execution = capability + trust/sandbox surface (§2) | links UC-35 (capability-awareness) | **No new UC** — Processing is design prior art reinforcing executable-as-page; its contribution is the **view-time, no-cached-output, continuous-render** point on the projection/liveness model. ## 5. Architecture notes for SHARD-WP-0002 - **T12/T15 (page model):** represent **program-as-page** — a page whose canonical content is **source text** and whose presentation is an **executable render**; no inherent cached output (contrast notebooks). Non-Markdown executable content type. - **T16 (projection):** add a **materialization timing** facet to derivation-projection: **ahead-of-time** (CDF/nbconvert/static HTML) vs **at view time** (sketch render); and a **continuity** facet: one-shot vs continuous/interactive. Continuous → static is a snapshot frame/recording on the live↔snapshot axis (T6). - **T11 (capabilities):** "execute/render in the viewer" is a capability with a **trust/ sandbox** sub-concern; default off → snapshot. ## 6. Open questions 1. Is **view-time execution** ever offered (sandboxed in-viewer render), or does shard-wiki always degrade program-as-page to a captured snapshot/recording? (Capability/trust policy.) 2. Should **materialization timing** (ahead-of-time vs view-time) and **continuity** (one-shot vs continuous) be explicit projection metadata, alongside the live↔snapshot axis? (Recurs at T5.) ## 7. Sources - `processing.org`; **p5.js** (`p5js.org`); Processing.js (Resig) history; `` / client-side rendering model. - prior: `research/260614-jupyter-deep-dive/` (captured vs no-cached output, UC-84); `research/260614-mathematica-deep-dive/` (`Dynamic`/CDF, snapshot-only); `research/260614-squeak-pharo-deep-dive/` (live↔snapshot axis). ## 8. Traceability **No new UC** (enrichment / design prior art). Enriched: UC-54, UC-55; links UC-83 (view-time derivation-projection), UC-84 (no-cached-output contrast), UC-35 (execute capability + trust). Architecture cross-refs: SHARD-WP-0002 T12/T15 (program-as-page, source-canonical/ render-derived), T16 (materialization-timing + continuity facets on the live↔snapshot axis), T11 (view-time-execute capability + sandbox).