generated from coulomb/repo-seed
Fixes B-2. Capability profiles are verified, not self-asserted: the contract ships a versioned conformance suite that exercises each declared verb/position against observed behaviour; passing is an admissibility precondition (lying profiles rejected at registration); mismatch reported as a capability diff. Makes I-3 / §6.5 sound rather than aspirational. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
spec/
Specification files that guide and guardrail implementation.
Background on document types: InfoTechPrimers on coulomb.social.
| File | Status | Role |
|---|---|---|
CoreArchitectureBlueprint.md |
draft for review | Whole-system architecture — layers, abstractions, load-bearing decisions (synthesised from all research) |
ProductRequirementsDocument.md |
draft scaffold | What the product must deliver |
TechnicalSpecificationDocument.md |
draft scaffold | How the system is built |
UseCaseCatalog.md |
draft | 84 use cases promoted from c2 + yawex + ~23-system research |
ArchitectureBlueprint.md |
draft | Access, history, and identity sub-blueprint (the L0–L4 authorization ladder; referenced by CoreArchitectureBlueprint §9) |
Promote material from research/ and reviewed items from demand/ into spec
before treating it as implementation authority.