Files
shard-wiki/SCOPE.md
tegwick 3e0c05a2b3 research: local-first workspaces cohort deep dive (Anytype/AFFiNE/AppFlowy) — CRDT substrate; UC-64/65
Combined cohort memo for the three open-source local-first all-in-one
workspaces, studied together because they share the trait none of the
prior eleven systems had: the store is a CRDT (Anytype any-sync, AFFiNE
Yjs/y-octo, AppFlowy Yrs). The cohort thesis: CRDT changes the adapter
math — the backend performs conflict-free merge itself (shard-wiki must
not impose git/text merge; speak the CRDT via a replica or stay
projection/overlay), history is a CRDT update log (supplement not git),
and the attach surface is a replica or self-host sync endpoint, with
Anytype adding P2P (no single endpoint) + E2EE (opaque). Added UC-64
(CRDT-synced shard with native merge), UC-65 (P2P/decentralized shard,
no single canonical endpoint); enriched UC-36/47/48/51/55/57/58/61.
Catalog now 65 UCs. Architecture for SHARD-WP-0002 T11/T14: merge-model
capability (proposed 13th spectrum: none/git/native-CRDT), CRDT-replica
substrate + P2P/no-central-endpoint attach mode, endpoint-model
capability, MCP as an integration surface. Boundary: CRDT local-first
candidate shards — attach a replica/projection as pages, respect native
merge, never re-drive their sync; not substrates and not the federation
layer.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-14 16:21:08 +02:00

2.9 KiB
Raw Blame History

SCOPE

One-Liner

Git-based Markdown wiki orchestrator and federation layer — early-stage scaffold with intent, research, and specification groundwork; domain model not yet implemented.

Mode Of Operation

Close the gap between this file and INTENT.md by exploring the problem space (research/), reviewing inbound demand (demand/), refining specifications (spec/), and implementing through registered workplans (workplans/). Learnings update both SCOPE and INTENT where necessary.

Current Status

Layer State
Code Python package scaffold (src/shard_wiki/, smoke tests only)
Intent INTENT.md established; authorization-in-core amendments drafted
Research yawex prior art; c2 origins; federation concepts; wikiengines overview (research/260608-*/); XWiki/TWiki/Foswiki deep dives (research/260613-*/); Xanadu + ZigZag + Roam + Obsidian + Notion + Joplin + Logseq + local-first workspaces (Anytype/AFFiNE/AppFlowy) deep dives & shard-spectrum synthesis (research/260614-*/)
Demand NetKingdom integration asks captured, not yet negotiated
Spec Architecture blueprint drafted; UseCaseCatalog 65 UCs from research; PRD/TSD scaffolds
Work SHARD-WP-0001 active (6 tasks); SHARD-WP-0002 active (16 tasks: T1T10 federation + T11T16 adapter contract)

In Scope (today)

  • Establishing repository documentation structure and specification groundwork.
  • Federation design informed by yawex prior art (page resolution, namespaces, derived views, provenance, overlays).
  • Authorization model design (delegated authentication, core authorization).
  • Shard adapter contract and wiki page model (to be specified, then implemented).
  • Git-backed coordination journal for information spaces.
  • State Hub workplan registration and consistency sync.

Out Of Scope (today)

  • A standalone wiki engine UI or rendering pipeline.
  • Authentication, credential storage, or user directory implementation.
  • Hard-coded editorial, sync, or conflict-resolution policy.
  • Generic file mirroring independent of wiki-page semantics.
  • Production deployment, multi-tenant operations, or enterprise IAM rollout.

Boundary Rule

shard-wiki orchestrates wiki-shaped content across heterogeneous shards. It provides mechanisms (federation, projection, overlay, patching, reconciliation); policy (canonical source, conflict preference, access rules) remains explicit and configurable. Identity comes from pluggable providers; authorization decisions live in core.

Current Planning

Design work is tracked in workplans/SHARD-WP-0001-yawex-requirements.md (yawex-derived resolution, namespaces, overlays) and workplans/SHARD-WP-0002-federation-architecture.md (federation architecture, decisions, tradeoffs). Specification outputs land in spec/. Inbound integration asks remain in demand/ until reviewed and promoted into spec or workplans.