generated from coulomb/repo-seed
Workplan consistency improvement workplans
This commit is contained in:
148
workplans/STATE-WP-0049-workplan-execution-queue.md
Normal file
148
workplans/STATE-WP-0049-workplan-execution-queue.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,148 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
id: STATE-WP-0049
|
||||
type: workplan
|
||||
title: "Workplan Execution Queue and Activity-Core Handoff"
|
||||
domain: custodian
|
||||
repo: state-hub
|
||||
status: proposed
|
||||
owner: codex
|
||||
topic_slug: custodian
|
||||
planning_priority: medium
|
||||
planning_order: 49
|
||||
created: "2026-05-23"
|
||||
updated: "2026-05-23"
|
||||
state_hub_workstream_id: "dd06578f-20b3-4473-bab3-8810eae29f39"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# STATE-WP-0049 - Workplan Execution Queue and Activity-Core Handoff
|
||||
|
||||
## Goal
|
||||
|
||||
Create a controlled way to prioritize, sequence, parallelize, and schedule
|
||||
ready/active workplans, while keeping State Hub responsible for observable
|
||||
state and leaving autonomous execution orchestration ready to move to
|
||||
activity-core.
|
||||
|
||||
## Context
|
||||
|
||||
Changing a workplan from `proposed` to `active` can mean several different
|
||||
things: start coding now, put it at the top of a queue, run in parallel with
|
||||
other work, or wait for a human-selected launch window. State Hub should model
|
||||
that intent cleanly without becoming an unbounded task factory.
|
||||
|
||||
The likely long-term split is: State Hub stores and exposes queue state,
|
||||
priorities, dependencies, and handoff records; activity-core owns schedules,
|
||||
automations, and agent dispatch.
|
||||
|
||||
## T01 - Define Queue Semantics
|
||||
|
||||
```task
|
||||
id: STATE-WP-0049-T01
|
||||
status: todo
|
||||
priority: high
|
||||
state_hub_task_id: "b69e3c7d-46be-4e88-b039-7aa82d653b53"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Define execution queue states, ordering fields, concurrency hints, and launch
|
||||
modes for workplans. Include at least manual, queued, scheduled, immediate,
|
||||
sequential, and parallel intent.
|
||||
|
||||
Done when queue semantics are documented without overloading lifecycle status.
|
||||
|
||||
## T02 - Separate Lifecycle From Execution Intent
|
||||
|
||||
```task
|
||||
id: STATE-WP-0049-T02
|
||||
status: todo
|
||||
priority: high
|
||||
state_hub_task_id: "4f48b4d4-7232-4e36-b4a2-03aaef684ab4"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Design schema/API changes so `status` remains the canonical lifecycle field and
|
||||
execution intent lives in separate planning/execution fields.
|
||||
|
||||
Done when `active` no longer has to imply "dispatch a coding agent right now."
|
||||
|
||||
## T03 - Add Prioritized Workplan Stack
|
||||
|
||||
```task
|
||||
id: STATE-WP-0049-T03
|
||||
status: todo
|
||||
priority: high
|
||||
state_hub_task_id: "9237b778-4c83-4ebe-942e-79bae29aaa45"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Implement a prioritized stack or queue view for candidate workplans using
|
||||
planning priority, planning order, dependencies, readiness, blockers, and
|
||||
optional concurrency grouping.
|
||||
|
||||
Done when a human can choose what starts next from a clear ordered list.
|
||||
|
||||
## T04 - Add Launch Request Records
|
||||
|
||||
```task
|
||||
id: STATE-WP-0049-T04
|
||||
status: todo
|
||||
priority: medium
|
||||
state_hub_task_id: "a8366495-fd66-436e-b423-e24c3ffadbc9"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Introduce a durable launch-request or handoff record for "please start this
|
||||
workplan" events, including requested actor, mode, priority, repo, branch
|
||||
preference, and whether immediate agent pickup is desired.
|
||||
|
||||
Done when UI/API actions can request implementation without losing intent in a
|
||||
plain status patch.
|
||||
|
||||
## T05 - Define Activity-Core Boundary
|
||||
|
||||
```task
|
||||
id: STATE-WP-0049-T05
|
||||
status: todo
|
||||
priority: high
|
||||
state_hub_task_id: "2ebf5186-9a92-476a-ac62-3588cc51fb31"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Document which responsibilities belong in State Hub and which should move to
|
||||
activity-core. State Hub should expose state and requests; activity-core should
|
||||
own scheduling, wakeups, and agent dispatch when available.
|
||||
|
||||
Done when the boundary is explicit enough that implementation can proceed in
|
||||
State Hub now without trapping orchestration there permanently.
|
||||
|
||||
## T06 - Dashboard Controls
|
||||
|
||||
```task
|
||||
id: STATE-WP-0049-T06
|
||||
status: todo
|
||||
priority: medium
|
||||
state_hub_task_id: "7d1c9ec7-8130-4f26-92ae-754c6f28ea48"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Add dashboard controls for queue ordering, launch mode, parallel/sequential
|
||||
intent, and manual versus immediate pickup.
|
||||
|
||||
Done when a user can move a workplan into the queue without accidentally
|
||||
starting work, or explicitly request immediate pickup when desired.
|
||||
|
||||
## T07 - Handoff And Scheduling Tests
|
||||
|
||||
```task
|
||||
id: STATE-WP-0049-T07
|
||||
status: todo
|
||||
priority: medium
|
||||
state_hub_task_id: "f819907b-0409-411e-82d1-564c2d543f86"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Add tests for queue ordering, launch-request creation, dependency-aware
|
||||
eligibility, and the State Hub/activity-core boundary contract.
|
||||
|
||||
Done when execution intent can evolve without contaminating lifecycle state.
|
||||
|
||||
## Acceptance Criteria
|
||||
|
||||
- Workplan lifecycle status is separate from execution intent.
|
||||
- A prioritized workplan stack supports sequential and parallel pickup.
|
||||
- UI/API actions can request immediate or deferred work explicitly.
|
||||
- State Hub remains the state and handoff layer; activity-core remains the
|
||||
natural owner for scheduling and agent dispatch.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user