Seeded personal organization control repo
This commit is contained in:
47
REVIEW_RHYTHM.md
Normal file
47
REVIEW_RHYTHM.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
|
||||
# Review Rhythm
|
||||
|
||||
## Purpose
|
||||
|
||||
The review rhythm keeps the system useful without turning it into bureaucracy.
|
||||
|
||||
## Daily Capture
|
||||
|
||||
Goal: remove pressure from memory.
|
||||
|
||||
Suggested practice:
|
||||
|
||||
- Capture loose items in `inbox/`.
|
||||
- Do not classify everything immediately.
|
||||
- Do not convert ideas into commitments during capture.
|
||||
|
||||
## Weekly Review
|
||||
|
||||
Goal: restore orientation.
|
||||
|
||||
Suggested checks:
|
||||
|
||||
- What is active?
|
||||
- What is critical?
|
||||
- What is waiting?
|
||||
- What became noisy but not important?
|
||||
- What should be moved from inbox into an area card?
|
||||
- What should be explicitly parked as incubating?
|
||||
|
||||
Use `templates/weekly-review.md`.
|
||||
|
||||
## Monthly Landscape Review
|
||||
|
||||
Goal: prevent drift.
|
||||
|
||||
Suggested checks:
|
||||
|
||||
- Are activation levels still correct?
|
||||
- Is Binky still A3, or has it stabilized?
|
||||
- Is Helix moving the production capability forward?
|
||||
- Is Coulomb migration clearer?
|
||||
- Are Sloppers, WhyWhyNot, and Plenitude still safely incubating?
|
||||
- Are any repos/projects creating stress without clear value?
|
||||
|
||||
## Burnout Guardrail
|
||||
|
||||
If the system feels heavy, reduce the number of active commitments before adding structure.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user