Complete TEGWICK-WP-0002 personal project intake scaffold
Establish the capture-to-commitment pipeline with INTAKE.md, structured agent-tasks/ and decisions/ layouts, and seed the first prioritized workstream (TEGWICK-WP-0003 Binky critical path visibility).
This commit is contained in:
46
decisions/DEC-002-root-control-repo.md
Normal file
46
decisions/DEC-002-root-control-repo.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
|
||||
# Decision: Confirm tegwick-control as root control repo
|
||||
|
||||
Status: Open
|
||||
Date: 2026-06-22
|
||||
Record: DEC-002
|
||||
|
||||
## Context
|
||||
|
||||
Multiple organizations (binky, helix, coulomb, sloppers, whynot, plenitude)
|
||||
each may eventually have their own control repositories. The landscape needs a
|
||||
single personal operating layer that coordinates without absorbing all work.
|
||||
|
||||
## Options
|
||||
|
||||
### Option 1 — tegwick-control is the root control repo
|
||||
|
||||
`tegwick-control` holds the personal landscape map, cross-org priorities, and
|
||||
intake pipeline. Organization-specific control repos (e.g. `whynot-control`)
|
||||
handle domain-specialized intake.
|
||||
|
||||
### Option 2 — Shared neutral repo
|
||||
|
||||
A non-personal-named repo serves as root; tegwick-control becomes one area
|
||||
among equals.
|
||||
|
||||
### Option 3 — Defer
|
||||
|
||||
Operate with tegwick-control as provisional root until another structure proves
|
||||
necessary.
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision
|
||||
|
||||
Pending human confirmation.
|
||||
|
||||
## Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
(To be filled when accepted or rejected.)
|
||||
|
||||
## Consequences
|
||||
|
||||
If Option 1 is accepted, landscape reviews, activation guardrails, and
|
||||
cross-org workstream priority default to this repository.
|
||||
|
||||
## Review
|
||||
|
||||
Revisit if a second root-level control repo creates conflicting priorities.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user