initial priming commit

This commit is contained in:
2026-02-24 12:01:37 +01:00
parent 62e743ec9a
commit c7046a79e0
33 changed files with 799 additions and 15 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
---
id: CUST-CPT-FOER-2026-000001
type: concept
title: "Foerster Capabilities — Seed Concepts v0.1"
status: active
owners: ["Bernd", "Custodian"]
created: "2026-02-24"
updated: "2026-02-24"
scope:
domains: ["Foerster Capabilities"]
sensitivity: internal
tags: ["concepts", "cybernetics", "capabilities"]
---
# Foerster Capabilities — Seed Concepts v0.1
1. **Non-Trivial Machine** — a system whose output depends on internal state/history, not only current input.
2. **Governability** — degree to which an environment/controller can constrain and steer the system.
3. **Reliability** — stability of behavior under expected conditions; predictability of failure modes.
4. **Adaptivity** — capacity to adjust behavior in response to changing environment and feedback.
5. **Reflexivity** — capacity to model/self-reference its own behavior and update based on that model.
6. **Autonomy** — ability to set and pursue goals with limited external control.
7. **Sovereignty** — autonomy plus control over critical dependencies (resources, memory, tooling).
8. **Capability Vector** — multi-dimensional description placing a system in capability space.
9. **Interaction Envelope** — boundary conditions within which safe, intended interaction holds.
10. **Control Surface** — set of levers available to govern a system (policies, tools, incentives).

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
---
id: CUST-PRJ-FOER-2026-000001
type: charter
title: "Foerster Capabilities — Project Charter v0.1"
status: active
owners: ["Bernd", "Custodian"]
created: "2026-02-24"
updated: "2026-02-24"
scope:
domains: ["Foerster Capabilities"]
sensitivity: internal
tags: ["taxonomy", "systems-theory", "agency", "governance"]
---
# Foerster Capabilities — Project Charter v0.1
## Purpose
Create a systems-theoretic taxonomy of computational agency grounded in Foersters Non-Trivial Machines, integrating behavior, resources, interaction properties, and governability.
## Problem
Existing capability classifications are fragmented (complexity, architecture, AI tasks, cybernetics, governance/risk). We lack a shared multidimensional map.
## Outcome
A rigorous capability space:
- dimensions such as governability, reliability, adaptivity, reflexivity, autonomy/sovereignty
- operational tests / indicators where possible
- mappings from systems (agents/services/orgs) into the space
- connections to governance and risk controls
## Boundaries (v0.1)
- Establish vocabulary, dimension definitions, and orthogonality discussions.
- Produce diagrams and examples rather than chasing completeness.
## Success criteria (v0.1)
- A paper-grade outline + a stable diagrammatic “map”.
- A small library of example classifications (LLM agent, company process, service).

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
---
id: CUST-RDM-FOER-2026-000001
type: roadmap
title: "Foerster Capabilities — Roadmap v0.1"
status: active
owners: ["Bernd", "Custodian"]
created: "2026-02-24"
updated: "2026-02-24"
scope:
domains: ["Foerster Capabilities"]
sensitivity: internal
tags: ["roadmap", "taxonomy", "paper", "dimensions"]
---
# Foerster Capabilities — Roadmap v0.1
## Phase 0 — Dimension Definitions
- Define each dimension with: intrinsic/extrinsic aspects, tests, failure modes
- Resolve overlaps and dependencies (orthogonality work)
## Phase 1 — Map & Classification Protocol
- Capability space diagram(s)
- Classification checklist and rubric
- Example classifications
## Phase 2 — Governance Mapping
- Link capabilities to governance controls and risk envelopes
- “Permission design” implications for agents
## Phase 3 — Publication Package
- Preprint structure
- Glossary and diagrams
- Reference implementation of classification tool (optional)