docs: start CUST-WP-0025 hub-core extraction

This commit is contained in:
2026-06-06 19:33:53 +02:00
parent 6629826f36
commit f46f461720
2 changed files with 157 additions and 14 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,120 @@
# Hub-Core Extraction Boundary
Last reviewed: 2026-06-06
## Purpose
This note starts `CUST-WP-0025-T05` by translating the original hub-core idea
into a current implementation boundary. The State Hub implementation no longer
lives under `the-custodian/state-hub`; the authoritative source checkout is
`/home/worsch/state-hub`, and the planned package target is
`/home/worsch/hub-core`.
The extraction must preserve a clean FOS split:
- `hub-core` owns reusable hub primitives.
- `state-hub` becomes the first dev-hub implementation and keeps development
coordination concepts such as topics, workstreams, tasks, decisions,
dependencies, SBOM, token accounting, and kaizen agents.
- Future hubs such as ops-hub and fin-hub depend on `hub-core` without pulling
in dev-hub coordination tables.
## First Package Slice
Create `/home/worsch/hub-core` as a uv-managed Python package with this initial
layout:
```text
hub_core/
__init__.py
database.py
models/
__init__.py
base.py
domain.py
managed_repo.py
agent_message.py
tpsc.py
schemas/
__init__.py
domain.py
managed_repo.py
agent_message.py
tpsc.py
routers/
__init__.py
domains.py
repos.py
messages.py
tpsc.py
policy.py
```
This slice avoids the models that currently carry dev-hub foreign keys. It is
large enough to prove packaging, import style, SQLAlchemy metadata ownership,
router dependency injection, and State Hub compatibility before the more
entangled surfaces move.
## Extract Now
These State Hub files are suitable for the first extraction after import-path
rewriting and small router seams:
| Source in `/home/worsch/state-hub` | Target role |
| --- | --- |
| `api/models/base.py` | Declarative base, timestamps, UUID helper. |
| `api/models/domain.py` | Core domain identity; remove relationships to dev-hub-only models from core. |
| `api/models/managed_repo.py` | Core repo registry; make `topic_id`, SBOM, and sync timestamps extension fields or keep them in dev-hub until a second pass. |
| `api/models/agent_message.py` | Generic agent inbox and thread model. |
| `api/models/tpsc.py` | Third-party service catalog/snapshot primitives. |
| `api/schemas/domain.py` | Core domain schemas; split dev-hub counts from generic read models. |
| `api/schemas/managed_repo.py` | Core repo schemas; keep dispatch/scope-health schemas in dev-hub. |
| `api/schemas/agent_message.py` | Generic message schemas. |
| `api/schemas/tpsc.py` | Generic TPSC schemas. |
| `api/routers/messages.py` | Mostly self-contained generic router. |
| `api/routers/tpsc.py` | Generic catalog and GDPR report router. |
| `api/routers/policy.py` | Generic policy document router if policy roots become configurable. |
## Needs An Adapter Seam
These are still part of the target architecture, but the current State Hub
implementation is coupled to dev-hub concepts:
| Surface | Coupling to resolve |
| --- | --- |
| `Domain` and `domains.py` detail views | Counts topics, workstreams, extension points, and technical debt. Hub-core should expose a domain summary hook that dev-hub can implement. |
| `ManagedRepo` | Contains `topic_id`, SBOM fields, and state-sync timestamps. Keep minimal repo identity in core, then add dev-hub extensions. |
| `CapabilityRequest` | Points at workstreams and tasks. Hub-core needs generic context fields or optional extension references before extraction. |
| `ProgressEvent` | Points at topics, workstreams, tasks, and decisions. Hub-core should define event identity, type, summary, detail, author, and timestamps, with hub-specific subject references added by each hub. |
| MCP tools in `mcp_server/server.py` | Generic tools are mixed into a single dev-hub server module. T06 should create a base registration class that receives API client/config dependencies and lets dev-hub add its own tools. |
## Keep In Dev-Hub
The following State Hub areas should not move into hub-core during T05:
- Topics, workstreams, tasks, decisions, dependencies, and flow state.
- Extension points, technical debt, interface changes, SBOM, token events, and
contribution accounting.
- Dashboard-specific loaders and Observable views.
- Workplan-file parsing and consistency reconciliation.
- Kaizen agents, scope health, dispatch views, and recently-on-scope reports.
## Verification Plan
The first hub-core commit should pass these checks before State Hub is refactored
to import it:
1. `python3 -m compileall hub_core`
2. A minimal import test that imports every model, schema, and router module.
3. SQLAlchemy metadata inspection proving the initial core tables are registered.
4. A FastAPI smoke app that mounts the extracted routers with an injected
`get_session` dependency.
5. `cd /home/worsch/state-hub && make test` remains green before and after the
editable `hub-core` dependency is introduced.
## Next Step
Create the `/home/worsch/hub-core` package with only the first package slice,
commit that seed independently, then return to `/home/worsch/state-hub` for the
first import-based refactor. Do not rename State Hub to dev-hub until T05-T08
prove the shared package boundary.

View File

@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ status: active
owner: custodian
topic_slug: custodian
created: "2026-03-20"
updated: "2026-03-20"
updated: "2026-06-06"
state_hub_workstream_id: "293a74fe-a85a-4ad6-8933-23d52a72fe8b"
---
@@ -119,9 +119,16 @@ Document the OIDC contract as `canon/standards/iam-profile_v0.1.md`:
## Phase 2 — Hub Extraction & Dev Hub Rename
**Goal**: Extract generic hub-core package; rename state-hub to dev-hub.
**Repo**: the-custodian (extraction), hub-core (new repo)
**Repo**: the-custodian (governance and workplan), `/home/worsch/state-hub`
(authoritative source), `/home/worsch/hub-core` (new target repo)
**Runs in parallel with Phase 1.**
**Current repo reality (2026-06-06):** `CUST-WP-0043` completed the State Hub
repo extraction, so this repository now keeps only the `state-hub/README.md`
pointer. Phase 2 implementation work must read and refactor the standalone
`/home/worsch/state-hub` checkout, while this workplan keeps the coordination
record in `the-custodian`.
### Extraction Boundary
**Generic hub-core (~17 MCP tools, ~6 models, ~6 routers):**
@@ -136,19 +143,27 @@ Document the OIDC contract as `canon/standards/iam-profile_v0.1.md`:
```task
id: CUST-WP-0025-T05
status: todo
status: in_progress
priority: high
state_hub_task_id: "04bf480c-8847-4a89-a4f2-e7c5fc51088d"
```
Create `hub-core` as a standalone repo with `pyproject.toml` (uv-managed).
Extract from state-hub:
Create `/home/worsch/hub-core` as a standalone repo with `pyproject.toml`
(uv-managed). Extract from `/home/worsch/state-hub`:
- Generic SQLAlchemy models (Domain, AgentMessage, CapabilityCatalog, CapabilityRequest, ManagedRepo, TPSC*, ProgressEvent)
- Generic Pydantic schemas
- Generic FastAPI routers (domains, repos, messages, capability_requests, tpsc, policy)
- Alembic migration templates for core schema
- Shared utilities (slug resolution, pagination, trailing-slash normalization)
Implementation start (2026-06-06): reviewed the standalone State Hub source and
captured the first extraction boundary in
`docs/hub-core-extraction-boundary.md`. Several candidate "generic" models still
reference dev-hub tables (`topics`, `workstreams`, `tasks`, `decisions`), so the
initial package slice should start with base DB primitives, domains, repos,
messages, TPSC catalog/snapshots, and adapter seams for progress and capability
requests rather than a blind file copy.
### T06 — Hub-core FastMCP base server
```task
@@ -193,7 +208,7 @@ priority: high
state_hub_task_id: "daf1d8ac-b55a-4692-b359-2671ddf6fc8a"
```
Refactor the state-hub codebase:
Refactor the standalone `/home/worsch/state-hub` codebase:
- Replace generic models/routers/schemas with imports from hub-core
- Keep dev-specific code (topics, workstreams, tasks, decisions, etc.) in state-hub
- Ensure all existing tests pass with the new import structure
@@ -209,13 +224,13 @@ state_hub_task_id: "2148a804-7d6a-4e26-b1a8-08da24929c88"
```
Rename across all integration points:
- `state-hub/mcp_server/server.py`: name="state-hub" → "dev-hub"
- `/home/worsch/state-hub/mcp_server/server.py`: name="state-hub" → "dev-hub"
- `~/.claude/CLAUDE.md`: 3 locations (registration commands, references)
- `state-hub/scripts/register_project.sh`: validation checks
- `state-hub/scripts/patch_mcp_cwd.py`: config checks
- `state-hub/custodian_cli.py`: config checks
- `state-hub/scripts/project_rules/session-protocol.template`: template text
- `state-hub/api/main.py`: service metadata response
- `/home/worsch/state-hub/scripts/register_project.sh`: validation checks
- `/home/worsch/state-hub/scripts/patch_mcp_cwd.py`: config checks
- `/home/worsch/state-hub/custodian_cli.py`: config checks
- `/home/worsch/state-hub/scripts/project_rules/session-protocol.template`: template text
- `/home/worsch/state-hub/api/main.py`: service metadata response
### T10 — MCP config migration script
@@ -226,7 +241,7 @@ priority: medium
state_hub_task_id: "5953f129-089d-4d90-bbe5-f86da4eac1bf"
```
Create `state-hub/scripts/migrate_mcp_config.py` that:
Create `/home/worsch/state-hub/scripts/migrate_mcp_config.py` that:
- Reads `~/.claude.json`
- Renames `mcpServers["state-hub"]` to `mcpServers["dev-hub"]`
- Preserves all other settings
@@ -258,7 +273,7 @@ state_hub_task_id: "e55ae544-3cea-485e-80d5-a9696ef97b96"
```
Gate: all of the following must pass before Phase 2 is considered complete:
- `cd state-hub && make test` — full test suite
- `cd /home/worsch/state-hub && make test` — full test suite
- `make fix-consistency REPO=the-custodian` — workplan ↔ DB sync
- `make check-consistency-all` — all registered repos
- Manual smoke test: start dev-hub MCP server, run get_domain_summary from a domain repo
@@ -269,6 +284,14 @@ Gate: all of the following must pass before Phase 2 is considered complete:
**Depends on**: Phase 2 (hub_core available), Phase 1 (identity for service auth).
**Repo**: ops-hub (new standalone repo, registered under custodian domain)
**Inventory-first implementation slice (2026-06-05):** `CUST-WP-0047`
carves out the minimum useful part of T14/T16/T18 before the full standalone
`ops-hub` scaffold exists: a repo-owned service inventory contract, an initial
service/location/evidence seed, and the handoff path for Inter-Hub widgets and
activity-core probes. The T13-T19 tasks below remain the long-term ops-hub
implementation; the inventory slice produces input artifacts that the eventual
ops-hub repo can ingest rather than replace.
### T13 — Create ops-hub repo from hub-core scaffold
```task