W1: Document user-scope MCP config location in ~/.claude/CLAUDE.md —
adds verification and re-registration commands, warns against
settings.json (saves ~12K tokens per registration session).
W2: scripts/register_project.sh + make register-project —
5-step automation: API health → topic lookup → MCP check →
CLAUDE.md from template → progress event.
W3: state-hub/scripts/project_claude_md.template —
parameterised CLAUDE.md with {PROJECT_NAME}/{DOMAIN}/{TOPIC_ID}
placeholders; used by register_project.sh.
W4: Add custodian_topic_id + domain to all 6 canon project charters —
lets agents grep for topic IDs without touching the API.
W5: state-hub/mcp_server/TOOLS.md — compact 30-line tool reference
card; replaces reading the full server.py (~350 lines).
W6: Switch .mcp.json to absolute path + PYTHONPATH env so cwd is not
required; add scripts/patch_mcp_cwd.py for post-registration fix.
Update ~/.claude.json to match (cwd kept for belt-and-suspenders).
W7 (SessionStart hook) deferred: no SessionStart hook type in Claude
Code; PreToolUse with empty matcher fires before every tool call.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
1.5 KiB
1.5 KiB
id, type, title, status, owners, created, updated, scope, tags, custodian_topic_id, domain
| id | type | title | status | owners | created | updated | scope | tags | custodian_topic_id | domain | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CUST-PRJ-COUL-2026-000001 | charter | Coulomb.social — Project Charter v0.1 | active |
|
2026-02-24 | 2026-02-24 |
|
|
36c7421b-c537-4723-bf75-42a3ebc6a1dc | coulomb_social |
Coulomb.social — Project Charter v0.1
Purpose
Build a co-creation platform and socio-economic experiment that enables humans and AI agents to collaborate on challenges with clear rules, incentives, and evolving governance.
Problem
Current collaboration systems either:
- centralize control (slow, bureaucratic), or
- decentralize without governance (chaotic, unsafe). Mixed-intelligence societies require explicit interaction rules.
Outcome
A platform where:
- challenges and solutions are exchanged with clear obligations
- trust and reputation emerge from traceable behavior
- rulesets can evolve and be ported across spaces (“jurisdictions”)
- agents can participate under bounded permissions
Boundaries (v0.1)
- Prove core loop before scaling: challenge → work → deliverable → acceptance → reputation.
- Governance is a first-class product feature, not a later add-on.
Success criteria (v0.1)
- A small number of users (and agents) can co-create reliably with low coordination overhead.
- Rule enforcement and auditability prevent obvious failure modes.