Seeded personal organization control repo
This commit is contained in:
65
OPERATING_MODEL.md
Normal file
65
OPERATING_MODEL.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
|
||||
# Operating Model
|
||||
|
||||
## Purpose
|
||||
|
||||
This operating model defines how `tegwick-control` is used to reduce decision fatigue, keep important topics visible, and enable safe agent-assisted progress.
|
||||
|
||||
## Core Rules
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Everything has a place
|
||||
|
||||
Unplaced topics create mental load. Every relevant topic should eventually have a home.
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Not everything is active
|
||||
|
||||
A topic may be important without being active.
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Commitments are different from options
|
||||
|
||||
Options can be collected freely. Commitments require ownership, next actions, and consequences.
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Agentic work must be bounded
|
||||
|
||||
Agents should receive clearly scoped tasks with explicit allowed changes, expected outputs, and approval boundaries.
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. The system must protect energy
|
||||
|
||||
The purpose is continuous progress, not constant pressure.
|
||||
|
||||
## Work Classes
|
||||
|
||||
| Class | Meaning |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| Commitment | Something that must be done |
|
||||
| Option | Something that may be valuable |
|
||||
| Exploration | Something unclear that needs investigation |
|
||||
| Decision | Something that requires choosing |
|
||||
| Waiting | Something blocked by another person/system |
|
||||
| Routine | Something recurring |
|
||||
| Someday | Valuable but inactive |
|
||||
|
||||
## Review Surfaces
|
||||
|
||||
| Surface | Purpose |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| `TASKS.md` | Current actionable work |
|
||||
| `DECISIONS.md` | Open and resolved decisions |
|
||||
| `PROJECT_LANDSCAPE.md` | Major topic map |
|
||||
| `areas/` | Per-topic notes and control cards |
|
||||
| `WORKPLAN.md` | Sequenced setup plan |
|
||||
| `inbox/` | Temporary capture area |
|
||||
|
||||
## Commitment Rule
|
||||
|
||||
No item becomes a commitment merely because it is interesting, important, or emotionally charged.
|
||||
|
||||
A commitment should have:
|
||||
|
||||
- an owner;
|
||||
- a clear next action;
|
||||
- a reason for acting now;
|
||||
- a defined review surface.
|
||||
|
||||
## Agentic Coding Rule
|
||||
|
||||
No implementation work should be delegated to an agent until the target repo, intended outcome, boundaries, and approval requirements are clear.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user