generated from coulomb/repo-seed
tegwick
2e9675ccab
Move the framework PRD from specs/ to docs/ and remove the misplaced specs/ directory. Document repository layout in AGENTS.md and SCOPE.md: generic material in docs/, project-specific MVP artifacts in projects/coulomb-pricing/, execution tracking in workplans/.
1229 lines
28 KiB
Markdown
1229 lines
28 KiB
Markdown
# ProductRequirementsDocument.md
|
||
|
||
# Adaptive Pricing
|
||
|
||
## Version
|
||
|
||
0.1
|
||
|
||
## Status
|
||
|
||
Draft
|
||
|
||
## Repository
|
||
|
||
`adaptive-pricing`
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
# 1. Purpose
|
||
|
||
Adaptive Pricing is a pricing intelligence and execution platform for discovering, validating, optimizing, and operating pricing strategies across the full lifecycle of products, services, communities, platforms, and marketplaces.
|
||
|
||
The product supports pricing from the earliest inception of an idea through exploration, introduction, growth, maturity, saturation, and decline.
|
||
|
||
Adaptive Pricing treats pricing not as a static billing configuration, but as a lifecycle-spanning learning and control capability.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
# 2. Product Thesis
|
||
|
||
Pricing is one of the most important mechanisms for discovering product-market fit.
|
||
|
||
A product team does not merely need to know:
|
||
|
||
> What should we charge?
|
||
|
||
It needs to understand:
|
||
|
||
> What value are we creating, for whom, under which conditions, at what cost, against which alternatives, with which risks, and through which commercial model?
|
||
|
||
Adaptive Pricing helps builders answer these questions systematically.
|
||
|
||
The product shall provide a practical framework for:
|
||
|
||
* forming pricing hypotheses
|
||
* understanding cost floors
|
||
* exploring value ranges
|
||
* analyzing market competition
|
||
* selecting pricing models
|
||
* designing pricing experiments
|
||
* simulating economic outcomes
|
||
* exposing safe pricing choices to customers
|
||
* optimizing seller economics
|
||
* translating pricing decisions into executable payment-provider configurations
|
||
|
||
The long-term ambition is to become an **auto-regulating market value exploration pricing engine**.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
# 3. Problem Statement
|
||
|
||
Pricing decisions are often made too late, too statically, and with too little evidence.
|
||
|
||
Common problems include:
|
||
|
||
* pricing is considered only after a product is already built
|
||
* cost structures are poorly understood
|
||
* willingness to pay is guessed rather than explored
|
||
* customer value is not connected to price
|
||
* competitive alternatives are not modeled explicitly
|
||
* pricing experiments are informal and hard to compare
|
||
* payment-provider configuration becomes hidden business logic
|
||
* discounts are granted without understanding LTV impact
|
||
* usage-based pricing is introduced without cost attribution
|
||
* dynamic pricing damages trust when it is not explainable
|
||
* pricing is not adapted to lifecycle stage
|
||
* customer preferences are not used as pricing intelligence
|
||
|
||
Adaptive Pricing addresses these problems by making pricing hypotheses, models, observations, simulations, constraints, and executions explicit.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
# 4. Unique Value Proposition
|
||
|
||
Adaptive Pricing supports pricing throughout the complete product lifecycle, beginning before the product exists.
|
||
|
||
Unlike billing systems, payment providers, subscription managers, or revenue platforms, Adaptive Pricing is not primarily concerned with invoice execution.
|
||
|
||
Its core value is to help teams discover and operate economically valid pricing models.
|
||
|
||
Adaptive Pricing combines:
|
||
|
||
1. **Pricing intelligence**
|
||
Understanding value, cost, competition, risk, customer behavior, and lifecycle stage.
|
||
|
||
2. **Pricing model design**
|
||
Defining reusable, composable, testable pricing models.
|
||
|
||
3. **Pricing experimentation**
|
||
Structuring and evaluating evidence about willingness to pay and value perception.
|
||
|
||
4. **Pricing simulation**
|
||
Comparing pricing alternatives before activation.
|
||
|
||
5. **Customer-tunable pricing**
|
||
Allowing customers to adjust pricing trade-offs while preserving seller economics.
|
||
|
||
6. **Pricing execution**
|
||
Translating validated pricing models into payment-provider artifacts.
|
||
|
||
7. **Pricing governance**
|
||
Keeping pricing decisions explainable, auditable, bounded, and lifecycle-aware.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
# 5. Core Concept
|
||
|
||
The core object of Adaptive Pricing is not the price.
|
||
|
||
The core object is the **Pricing Hypothesis**.
|
||
|
||
A Pricing Hypothesis captures a belief about value, willingness to pay, cost, risk, customer behavior, competition, or pricing mechanics.
|
||
|
||
Examples:
|
||
|
||
* Customers will pay a monthly subscription for access to a community and its knowledge assets.
|
||
* Usage-based AI functionality should be priced based on actual provider cost plus a working margin.
|
||
* Customers prefer predictable monthly cost over low base price with volatile overage.
|
||
* Annual commitment justifies a lower unit price.
|
||
* Volume discounts are only economically valid when tied to minimum turnover commitments.
|
||
* Enterprise customers value support, compliance, and SLA more than raw usage volume.
|
||
* A product in exploration should optimize for learning, while a mature product should optimize for margin and retention.
|
||
|
||
Adaptive Pricing helps validate, refine, reject, and operationalize such hypotheses.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
# 6. Lifecycle Model
|
||
|
||
Adaptive Pricing shall support pricing work across the following lifecycle phases.
|
||
|
||
## 6.1 Idea
|
||
|
||
The product does not yet exist.
|
||
|
||
Primary questions:
|
||
|
||
* Who might receive value?
|
||
* What pain or desire is addressed?
|
||
* What alternatives already exist?
|
||
* How expensive is the problem?
|
||
* What pricing patterns might fit?
|
||
* Which willingness-to-pay assumptions should be tested?
|
||
|
||
Supported capabilities:
|
||
|
||
* value hypothesis capture
|
||
* customer segment assumptions
|
||
* alternative and competition mapping
|
||
* early pricing pattern suggestions
|
||
* research task generation
|
||
* initial value-range estimation
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 6.2 Exploration
|
||
|
||
The product concept, prototype, or early offer is being tested.
|
||
|
||
Primary questions:
|
||
|
||
* Will anyone pay?
|
||
* What will they pay for?
|
||
* Which value metric seems plausible?
|
||
* Which pricing model creates the least friction?
|
||
* What must be learned before scaling?
|
||
|
||
Supported capabilities:
|
||
|
||
* pricing experiments
|
||
* pilot pricing
|
||
* customer interview capture
|
||
* willingness-to-pay research
|
||
* cost floor estimation
|
||
* value metric exploration
|
||
* early pricing model comparison
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 6.3 Introduction
|
||
|
||
The product enters the market with first paying customers.
|
||
|
||
Primary questions:
|
||
|
||
* Which pricing model converts?
|
||
* Which customer segments respond?
|
||
* Which costs matter?
|
||
* Which pricing promises must be stable?
|
||
* What price communication works?
|
||
|
||
Supported capabilities:
|
||
|
||
* launch pricing models
|
||
* early revenue analysis
|
||
* adoption-friction detection
|
||
* introductory offers
|
||
* pricing-page variant comparison
|
||
* basic customer segmentation
|
||
* early margin analysis
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 6.4 Growth
|
||
|
||
Customer base and usage expand.
|
||
|
||
Primary questions:
|
||
|
||
* Which segments are most valuable?
|
||
* Which customers expand?
|
||
* Which pricing model scales?
|
||
* Which usage metrics correlate with value?
|
||
* Which packages increase adoption and revenue?
|
||
|
||
Supported capabilities:
|
||
|
||
* segmentation analysis
|
||
* expansion revenue analysis
|
||
* usage-based pricing analysis
|
||
* packaging optimization
|
||
* pricing model simulation
|
||
* LTV comparison
|
||
* churn and retention analysis
|
||
* commitment and discount evaluation
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 6.5 Maturity
|
||
|
||
The product has stable demand and known customer segments.
|
||
|
||
Primary questions:
|
||
|
||
* How should margin be optimized?
|
||
* How should plans be packaged?
|
||
* Which customers are underpriced or overpriced?
|
||
* Which discounts are economically justified?
|
||
* Which pricing model best supports retention?
|
||
|
||
Supported capabilities:
|
||
|
||
* margin optimization
|
||
* plan consolidation
|
||
* customer-level profitability analysis
|
||
* pricing governance
|
||
* discount policy modeling
|
||
* renewal pricing
|
||
* portfolio pricing
|
||
* dynamic recommendation
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 6.6 Saturation
|
||
|
||
Growth slows and competition increases.
|
||
|
||
Primary questions:
|
||
|
||
* How can market position be defended?
|
||
* Which bundles improve retention?
|
||
* Which segments remain attractive?
|
||
* Which price changes create risk?
|
||
* Which offers should be simplified?
|
||
|
||
Supported capabilities:
|
||
|
||
* competitive repricing analysis
|
||
* bundle evaluation
|
||
* retention pricing
|
||
* churn-risk pricing analysis
|
||
* portfolio comparison
|
||
* migration offers
|
||
* customer cohort analysis
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 6.7 Decline
|
||
|
||
The product is being harvested, replaced, migrated, or retired.
|
||
|
||
Primary questions:
|
||
|
||
* Should the product be maintained, migrated, harvested, or sunset?
|
||
* Which customers should be moved to another offer?
|
||
* Which price supports long-tail maintenance?
|
||
* Which commitments should no longer be accepted?
|
||
|
||
Supported capabilities:
|
||
|
||
* sunset pricing
|
||
* migration pricing
|
||
* long-tail profitability analysis
|
||
* contract risk analysis
|
||
* simplified maintenance pricing
|
||
* customer transition offers
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
# 7. Product Scope
|
||
|
||
Adaptive Pricing shall provide a practical product framework for pricing intelligence, pricing model design, simulation, recommendation, and execution.
|
||
|
||
## 7.1 In Scope
|
||
|
||
Adaptive Pricing shall support:
|
||
|
||
* pricing hypothesis management
|
||
* pricing model definition
|
||
* pricing lifecycle modeling
|
||
* cost floor analysis
|
||
* value range exploration
|
||
* market competition analysis
|
||
* pricing experiment design
|
||
* customer segment analysis
|
||
* usage and cost attribution
|
||
* LTV modeling
|
||
* pricing simulation
|
||
* pricing recommendation
|
||
* customer-tunable pricing
|
||
* constraint evaluation
|
||
* payment-provider synchronization
|
||
* audit and explanation of pricing decisions
|
||
|
||
## 7.2 Out of Scope
|
||
|
||
Adaptive Pricing shall not become:
|
||
|
||
* only a billing system
|
||
* only a Stripe wrapper
|
||
* only a pricing research document collection
|
||
* only a dashboard
|
||
* only a dynamic pricing tool
|
||
* only a discount calculator
|
||
* only a SaaS subscription manager
|
||
|
||
Billing providers remain execution backends.
|
||
|
||
Adaptive Pricing owns the pricing intelligence, pricing model, constraints, and lifecycle logic.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
# 8. Target Users
|
||
|
||
## 8.1 Primary Users
|
||
|
||
* founders
|
||
* builders
|
||
* product owners
|
||
* SaaS operators
|
||
* platform operators
|
||
* marketplace operators
|
||
* community operators
|
||
* pricing strategists
|
||
* revenue operators
|
||
* customer success teams
|
||
* sales teams
|
||
* AI agents assisting with product and pricing decisions
|
||
|
||
## 8.2 Secondary Users
|
||
|
||
* finance teams
|
||
* business analysts
|
||
* growth teams
|
||
* product marketers
|
||
* investors
|
||
* procurement advisors
|
||
* implementation partners
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
# 9. Key User Needs
|
||
|
||
Users need to:
|
||
|
||
* reason about pricing before the product is finished
|
||
* make pricing assumptions explicit
|
||
* compare alternative pricing models
|
||
* understand cost floors
|
||
* estimate value ranges
|
||
* evaluate market alternatives
|
||
* choose value metrics
|
||
* identify economically valid discounts
|
||
* avoid accidental margin destruction
|
||
* expose pricing flexibility safely
|
||
* understand customer trade-offs
|
||
* operationalize pricing decisions without manual provider setup
|
||
* explain pricing recommendations to stakeholders
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
# 10. Core Product Capabilities
|
||
|
||
## 10.1 Pricing Hypothesis Management
|
||
|
||
The system shall allow users to capture, structure, evaluate, and refine pricing hypotheses.
|
||
|
||
A pricing hypothesis may relate to:
|
||
|
||
* customer segment
|
||
* value proposition
|
||
* willingness to pay
|
||
* cost structure
|
||
* competition
|
||
* lifecycle phase
|
||
* pricing model
|
||
* commitment level
|
||
* discount rule
|
||
* usage metric
|
||
* outcome metric
|
||
* payment terms
|
||
* customer preference
|
||
|
||
Each hypothesis should have:
|
||
|
||
* statement
|
||
* rationale
|
||
* affected offering
|
||
* lifecycle phase
|
||
* confidence level
|
||
* evidence
|
||
* related experiments
|
||
* status
|
||
* decision history
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 10.2 CostFloor Modeling
|
||
|
||
The system shall help users understand the minimum economically viable pricing boundary.
|
||
|
||
CostFloor shall consider:
|
||
|
||
* fixed costs
|
||
* variable costs
|
||
* payment-provider fees
|
||
* support cost
|
||
* onboarding cost
|
||
* infrastructure cost
|
||
* third-party API cost
|
||
* human effort
|
||
* working capital
|
||
* risk buffer
|
||
* target minimum margin
|
||
|
||
CostFloor shall not be treated as the final price.
|
||
|
||
It is a lower economic boundary.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 10.3 ValueRange Exploration
|
||
|
||
The system shall help users estimate and refine the range of prices that may be justified by customer value.
|
||
|
||
ValueRange may be informed by:
|
||
|
||
* customer interviews
|
||
* willingness-to-pay research
|
||
* observed usage
|
||
* customer outcomes
|
||
* saved cost
|
||
* generated revenue
|
||
* reduced risk
|
||
* time saved
|
||
* emotional value
|
||
* community value
|
||
* switching cost
|
||
* strategic importance
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 10.4 MarketCompetition Modeling
|
||
|
||
The system shall help users compare an offering against alternatives.
|
||
|
||
Alternatives may include:
|
||
|
||
* direct competitors
|
||
* indirect competitors
|
||
* manual workarounds
|
||
* internal build options
|
||
* open-source alternatives
|
||
* agency or consulting substitutes
|
||
* doing nothing
|
||
* existing customer workflows
|
||
|
||
MarketCompetition should influence pricing strategy but not mechanically determine price.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 10.5 Pricing Model Definition
|
||
|
||
The system shall allow users to define pricing models from reusable primitives.
|
||
|
||
Supported primitives should include:
|
||
|
||
* fixed fee
|
||
* subscription
|
||
* one-time fee
|
||
* setup fee
|
||
* usage meter
|
||
* included usage
|
||
* overage
|
||
* credits
|
||
* prepaid packages
|
||
* volume tiers
|
||
* graduated tiers
|
||
* stairstep tiers
|
||
* minimum commitment
|
||
* annual commitment
|
||
* contract duration
|
||
* discount
|
||
* rebate
|
||
* bundle
|
||
* feature package
|
||
* support package
|
||
* SLA package
|
||
* outcome fee
|
||
* success fee
|
||
* cancellation flexibility
|
||
* payment term adjustment
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 10.6 Customer-Tunable Pricing
|
||
|
||
The system shall allow sellers to expose selected pricing parameters as customer-tunable.
|
||
|
||
Customer tuning may include preferences such as:
|
||
|
||
* lower monthly base price
|
||
* higher included usage
|
||
* lower usage price
|
||
* stronger budget predictability
|
||
* higher flexibility
|
||
* lower upfront payment
|
||
* lower long-term cost
|
||
* higher support level
|
||
* shorter contract
|
||
* longer commitment
|
||
* prepaid usage
|
||
* volume discount
|
||
|
||
Customer tuning shall not produce arbitrary discounts.
|
||
|
||
When a customer changes tunable parameters, the system shall solve remaining non-fixed parameters so that seller economics remain valid.
|
||
|
||
A tuned model shall be valid only if it satisfies seller-defined constraints.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 10.7 Comparable Customer LTV Evaluation
|
||
|
||
The system shall support a seller-side metric tentatively named:
|
||
|
||
`average_comparable_customer_lifetime_value`
|
||
|
||
This metric estimates expected lifetime value for a customer under a given pricing configuration compared with similar customers, segments, usage expectations, risk profiles, and contract conditions.
|
||
|
||
Customer-tuned pricing configurations shall be evaluated against a reference model:
|
||
|
||
`most_favorable_predefined_model`
|
||
|
||
A customer-tuned model should only be valid if:
|
||
|
||
```text
|
||
average_comparable_customer_lifetime_value(tuned_model)
|
||
>= average_comparable_customer_lifetime_value(most_favorable_predefined_model)
|
||
× required_improvement_factor
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
The required improvement factor shall be configurable by the seller.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 10.8 Boundary Condition Evaluation
|
||
|
||
The system shall evaluate pricing configurations against explicit boundary conditions.
|
||
|
||
Boundary conditions may include:
|
||
|
||
* cost floor
|
||
* minimum margin
|
||
* minimum turnover
|
||
* minimum commitment
|
||
* payment-provider fees
|
||
* expected usage variance
|
||
* support effort
|
||
* onboarding effort
|
||
* contract duration
|
||
* churn risk
|
||
* default risk
|
||
* upfront investment risk
|
||
* capital lockup
|
||
* operational capacity
|
||
* service-level risk
|
||
* abuse risk
|
||
* compliance constraints
|
||
* tax constraints
|
||
* accounting constraints
|
||
* customer segment eligibility
|
||
* sales approval thresholds
|
||
* maximum discount exposure
|
||
|
||
Boundary conditions shall be inspectable, testable, and explainable.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 10.9 Pricing Simulation
|
||
|
||
The system shall allow users to simulate pricing models before execution.
|
||
|
||
Simulations should support:
|
||
|
||
* expected revenue
|
||
* expected cost
|
||
* gross margin
|
||
* contribution margin
|
||
* cost per customer
|
||
* revenue per customer
|
||
* LTV
|
||
* churn sensitivity
|
||
* usage sensitivity
|
||
* payment fee sensitivity
|
||
* customer segment mix
|
||
* adoption assumptions
|
||
* risk scenarios
|
||
* discount exposure
|
||
* capacity pressure
|
||
|
||
Simulation results shall be comparable across pricing models.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 10.10 Recommendation Engine
|
||
|
||
The system shall generate pricing recommendations based on observed data, hypotheses, lifecycle stage, constraints, and simulations.
|
||
|
||
Recommendations may include:
|
||
|
||
* increase price
|
||
* decrease price
|
||
* change pricing model
|
||
* introduce usage-based component
|
||
* introduce minimum commitment
|
||
* reduce discount
|
||
* add plan tier
|
||
* remove plan tier
|
||
* introduce annual commitment
|
||
* add credit package
|
||
* add overage
|
||
* change included usage
|
||
* segment customers differently
|
||
* run pricing experiment
|
||
* collect more evidence before changing price
|
||
|
||
Recommendations shall include rationale, confidence, risks, and supporting evidence.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 10.11 Pricing Execution
|
||
|
||
The system shall translate validated pricing models into payment-provider artifacts.
|
||
|
||
Payment providers may include:
|
||
|
||
* Stripe
|
||
* Paddle
|
||
* Chargebee
|
||
* Lago
|
||
* Orb
|
||
* m3ter
|
||
* custom billing systems
|
||
|
||
For Stripe, the system should eventually support automated management of:
|
||
|
||
* products
|
||
* prices
|
||
* recurring subscriptions
|
||
* metered usage prices
|
||
* usage records
|
||
* tiers
|
||
* coupons
|
||
* discounts
|
||
* subscription configurations
|
||
* invoices
|
||
* billing periods
|
||
* tax-relevant metadata
|
||
* product metadata
|
||
* lifecycle states
|
||
|
||
The Adaptive Pricing model shall remain the source of truth.
|
||
|
||
Payment-provider state shall be generated, synchronized, reconciled, and audited.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
# 11. Functional Requirements
|
||
|
||
## 11.1 Pricing Knowledge
|
||
|
||
### FR-001
|
||
|
||
The system shall maintain a registry of pricing hypotheses.
|
||
|
||
### FR-002
|
||
|
||
The system shall maintain a registry of offerings.
|
||
|
||
### FR-003
|
||
|
||
The system shall maintain a registry of customer segments.
|
||
|
||
### FR-004
|
||
|
||
The system shall maintain a registry of pricing models.
|
||
|
||
### FR-005
|
||
|
||
The system shall maintain a registry of pricing experiments.
|
||
|
||
### FR-006
|
||
|
||
The system shall maintain a registry of pricing observations.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 11.2 Lifecycle Support
|
||
|
||
### FR-010
|
||
|
||
The system shall assign lifecycle phases to offerings.
|
||
|
||
### FR-011
|
||
|
||
The system shall recommend pricing activities based on lifecycle phase.
|
||
|
||
### FR-012
|
||
|
||
The system shall allow lifecycle phase transitions to be recorded.
|
||
|
||
### FR-013
|
||
|
||
The system shall preserve pricing history across lifecycle phases.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 11.3 Cost, Value, and Competition
|
||
|
||
### FR-020
|
||
|
||
The system shall model fixed costs.
|
||
|
||
### FR-021
|
||
|
||
The system shall model variable costs.
|
||
|
||
### FR-022
|
||
|
||
The system shall model payment-provider fees.
|
||
|
||
### FR-023
|
||
|
||
The system shall calculate CostFloor.
|
||
|
||
### FR-024
|
||
|
||
The system shall capture ValueRange assumptions.
|
||
|
||
### FR-025
|
||
|
||
The system shall capture MarketCompetition assumptions.
|
||
|
||
### FR-026
|
||
|
||
The system shall associate evidence with cost, value, and competition assumptions.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 11.4 Pricing Models
|
||
|
||
### FR-030
|
||
|
||
The system shall define pricing models using composable primitives.
|
||
|
||
### FR-031
|
||
|
||
The system shall distinguish fixed, seller-controlled, customer-tunable, calculated, and constrained parameters.
|
||
|
||
### FR-032
|
||
|
||
The system shall version pricing models.
|
||
|
||
### FR-033
|
||
|
||
The system shall compare pricing model versions.
|
||
|
||
### FR-034
|
||
|
||
The system shall mark pricing models as draft, experimental, active, deprecated, or retired.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 11.5 Customer-Tunable Pricing
|
||
|
||
### FR-040
|
||
|
||
The system shall allow sellers to expose selected parameters for customer tuning.
|
||
|
||
### FR-041
|
||
|
||
The system shall calculate dependent parameters when customer-tunable parameters change.
|
||
|
||
### FR-042
|
||
|
||
The system shall reject tuned configurations that violate seller constraints.
|
||
|
||
### FR-043
|
||
|
||
The system shall explain why a tuned configuration is valid or invalid.
|
||
|
||
### FR-044
|
||
|
||
The system shall compare tuned configurations with predefined reference models.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 11.6 LTV and Economic Evaluation
|
||
|
||
### FR-050
|
||
|
||
The system shall calculate expected revenue for a pricing model.
|
||
|
||
### FR-051
|
||
|
||
The system shall calculate expected cost for a pricing model.
|
||
|
||
### FR-052
|
||
|
||
The system shall calculate expected margin for a pricing model.
|
||
|
||
### FR-053
|
||
|
||
The system shall estimate customer lifetime value.
|
||
|
||
### FR-054
|
||
|
||
The system shall support average comparable customer LTV calculations.
|
||
|
||
### FR-055
|
||
|
||
The system shall support configurable required improvement factors.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 11.7 Boundary Conditions
|
||
|
||
### FR-060
|
||
|
||
The system shall define boundary conditions.
|
||
|
||
### FR-061
|
||
|
||
The system shall evaluate pricing configurations against boundary conditions.
|
||
|
||
### FR-062
|
||
|
||
The system shall explain boundary condition violations.
|
||
|
||
### FR-063
|
||
|
||
The system shall support approval thresholds for risky configurations.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 11.8 Simulation
|
||
|
||
### FR-070
|
||
|
||
The system shall simulate pricing models under configurable assumptions.
|
||
|
||
### FR-071
|
||
|
||
The system shall compare multiple pricing scenarios.
|
||
|
||
### FR-072
|
||
|
||
The system shall simulate customer segment mixes.
|
||
|
||
### FR-073
|
||
|
||
The system shall simulate usage variance.
|
||
|
||
### FR-074
|
||
|
||
The system shall simulate discount exposure.
|
||
|
||
### FR-075
|
||
|
||
The system shall simulate lifecycle-specific strategies.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 11.9 Recommendations
|
||
|
||
### FR-080
|
||
|
||
The system shall generate pricing recommendations.
|
||
|
||
### FR-081
|
||
|
||
Recommendations shall include rationale.
|
||
|
||
### FR-082
|
||
|
||
Recommendations shall include confidence.
|
||
|
||
### FR-083
|
||
|
||
Recommendations shall include risks.
|
||
|
||
### FR-084
|
||
|
||
Recommendations shall reference supporting observations.
|
||
|
||
### FR-085
|
||
|
||
Recommendations shall distinguish between suggested research, suggested simulation, suggested model change, and suggested execution.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 11.10 Execution Integrations
|
||
|
||
### FR-090
|
||
|
||
The system shall maintain payment-provider-independent pricing definitions.
|
||
|
||
### FR-091
|
||
|
||
The system shall map internal pricing models to payment-provider artifacts.
|
||
|
||
### FR-092
|
||
|
||
The system shall synchronize active pricing models with payment providers.
|
||
|
||
### FR-093
|
||
|
||
The system shall detect drift between internal model state and provider state.
|
||
|
||
### FR-094
|
||
|
||
The system shall maintain an audit trail of pricing execution.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
# 12. Non-Functional Requirements
|
||
|
||
## 12.1 Explainability
|
||
|
||
All recommendations, simulations, validations, and rejections shall be explainable.
|
||
|
||
## 12.2 Auditability
|
||
|
||
Pricing decisions and changes shall be reproducible from recorded data, assumptions, and model versions.
|
||
|
||
## 12.3 Provider Independence
|
||
|
||
Pricing models shall not depend structurally on a single payment provider.
|
||
|
||
## 12.4 Extensibility
|
||
|
||
New pricing primitives, constraints, integrations, and lifecycle playbooks shall be addable without redesigning the core model.
|
||
|
||
## 12.5 Trust Preservation
|
||
|
||
Adaptive pricing shall avoid hidden exploitation. Customer-facing adaptive pricing should be understandable, bounded, and based on explicit trade-offs.
|
||
|
||
## 12.6 Regulatory Awareness
|
||
|
||
The system shall support governance and audit features needed for fair, explainable, and compliant pricing practices.
|
||
|
||
## 12.7 Agent Readiness
|
||
|
||
The system shall be usable by both humans and AI agents. Important concepts, assumptions, and decisions shall be represented in structured, machine-readable form.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
# 13. Conceptual Data Model
|
||
|
||
## Offering
|
||
|
||
Represents a product, service, community, marketplace, platform, or bundle that may be priced.
|
||
|
||
## Pricing Hypothesis
|
||
|
||
Represents a testable belief about value, cost, competition, customer behavior, or pricing mechanics.
|
||
|
||
## Pricing Model
|
||
|
||
Represents a structured commercial model composed of pricing primitives.
|
||
|
||
## Pricing Primitive
|
||
|
||
Represents an atomic pricing component such as subscription, usage meter, discount, commitment, or outcome fee.
|
||
|
||
## Pricing Parameter
|
||
|
||
Represents a configurable value inside a pricing model.
|
||
|
||
## Boundary Condition
|
||
|
||
Represents an economic, operational, legal, or strategic constraint.
|
||
|
||
## Pricing Experiment
|
||
|
||
Represents a structured attempt to validate or falsify pricing hypotheses.
|
||
|
||
## Pricing Observation
|
||
|
||
Represents evidence collected from customers, usage, revenue, interviews, market research, or experiments.
|
||
|
||
## Customer Segment
|
||
|
||
Represents a group of customers with similar needs, economics, risk, usage, or willingness to pay.
|
||
|
||
## Pricing Scenario
|
||
|
||
Represents a simulated pricing configuration under explicit assumptions.
|
||
|
||
## Pricing Recommendation
|
||
|
||
Represents a suggested action based on evidence, simulation, lifecycle state, and constraints.
|
||
|
||
## Payment Execution Mapping
|
||
|
||
Represents the translation from internal pricing model to payment-provider artifacts.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
# 14. Pricing Governance
|
||
|
||
Adaptive Pricing shall support governance for pricing changes.
|
||
|
||
Governance capabilities should include:
|
||
|
||
* model versioning
|
||
* approval workflows
|
||
* discount policies
|
||
* customer communication requirements
|
||
* grandfathering rules
|
||
* lifecycle-state rules
|
||
* risk thresholds
|
||
* provider synchronization logs
|
||
* audit history
|
||
* rollback support
|
||
|
||
Pricing changes should not be treated as casual configuration edits.
|
||
|
||
They are product, business, customer, and trust decisions.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
# 15. Success Metrics
|
||
|
||
Adaptive Pricing is successful if users can:
|
||
|
||
* capture pricing assumptions early
|
||
* convert assumptions into pricing hypotheses
|
||
* design experiments to validate willingness to pay
|
||
* understand cost floors
|
||
* estimate value ranges
|
||
* compare market alternatives
|
||
* define pricing models structurally
|
||
* simulate economic outcomes
|
||
* expose safe customer pricing choices
|
||
* preserve seller economics under customer tuning
|
||
* identify invalid discounts
|
||
* generate explainable pricing recommendations
|
||
* execute pricing models through payment providers
|
||
* keep pricing models auditable and lifecycle-aware
|
||
|
||
Business success may be measured by:
|
||
|
||
* improved pricing confidence
|
||
* reduced manual pricing work
|
||
* fewer invalid discounts
|
||
* better margin visibility
|
||
* better lifecycle fit of pricing models
|
||
* improved customer conversion
|
||
* improved retention
|
||
* improved average comparable customer LTV
|
||
* faster pricing experiment cycles
|
||
* lower payment-provider configuration errors
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
# 16. Product Boundaries
|
||
|
||
Adaptive Pricing should integrate with payment providers, analytics systems, CRM systems, product usage systems, and financial tools.
|
||
|
||
However, it should not become a replacement for all of them.
|
||
|
||
The product’s durable center is:
|
||
|
||
> pricing knowledge, pricing reasoning, pricing simulation, pricing governance, and pricing execution mapping.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
# 17. Development Horizons
|
||
|
||
## Horizon 1 — Pricing Knowledge Foundation
|
||
|
||
Establish the core model:
|
||
|
||
* offering
|
||
* lifecycle phase
|
||
* pricing hypothesis
|
||
* cost floor
|
||
* value range
|
||
* market competition
|
||
* pricing model
|
||
* pricing primitive
|
||
* pricing observation
|
||
|
||
## Horizon 2 — Simulation and Recommendation
|
||
|
||
Add:
|
||
|
||
* pricing scenarios
|
||
* lifecycle-aware playbooks
|
||
* economic simulation
|
||
* recommendation logic
|
||
* risk and constraint explanation
|
||
|
||
## Horizon 3 — Customer-Tunable Pricing
|
||
|
||
Add:
|
||
|
||
* tunable parameter surfaces
|
||
* constraint solving
|
||
* comparable customer LTV comparison
|
||
* safe customer preference trade-offs
|
||
|
||
## Horizon 4 — Execution Automation
|
||
|
||
Add:
|
||
|
||
* Stripe integration
|
||
* additional payment-provider integrations
|
||
* provider drift detection
|
||
* automated price creation
|
||
* subscription and usage billing synchronization
|
||
|
||
## Horizon 5 — Auto-Regulating Pricing
|
||
|
||
Add:
|
||
|
||
* continuous market value exploration
|
||
* automated recommendation loops
|
||
* bounded adaptive pricing
|
||
* pricing health monitoring
|
||
* lifecycle-aware auto-regulation
|
||
* trust-preserving dynamic pricing
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
# 18. Strategic Positioning
|
||
|
||
Adaptive Pricing should become the pricing capability layer for offerings built on
|
||
this framework and related product ecosystems.
|
||
|
||
It should also be useful as a standalone product for builders, founders, SaaS teams, platform operators, marketplace creators, and AI-assisted business development workflows.
|
||
|
||
The product should occupy the space between:
|
||
|
||
* pricing research
|
||
* product strategy
|
||
* revenue operations
|
||
* billing infrastructure
|
||
* customer preference modeling
|
||
* economic simulation
|
||
* payment-provider automation
|
||
|
||
Its defining claim:
|
||
|
||
> Adaptive Pricing helps builders discover, validate, optimize, and execute pricing models from the first idea to the final lifecycle stage.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
# 19. Open Questions
|
||
|
||
The following questions require further research and refinement:
|
||
|
||
* How should ValueRange be estimated before customer data exists?
|
||
* Which pricing experiment formats should be supported first?
|
||
* How should average comparable customer LTV be defined precisely?
|
||
* Which pricing primitives should be considered canonical?
|
||
* How should customer-tunable pricing be presented without confusing customers?
|
||
* Which fairness rules should constrain adaptive pricing?
|
||
* How should lifecycle phase transitions be detected?
|
||
* How should payment-provider drift be reconciled?
|
||
* How should pricing recommendations be validated before execution?
|
||
* Which pricing decisions should require human approval?
|
||
* How should AI agents participate in pricing exploration safely?
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
# 20. Summary
|
||
|
||
Adaptive Pricing is a lifecycle-spanning pricing intelligence and execution platform.
|
||
|
||
It helps builders reason from early pricing hypotheses to executable pricing models. It supports cost floor analysis, value range exploration, market competition modeling, pricing experiments, simulations, recommendations, customer-tunable pricing, and payment-provider execution.
|
||
|
||
The product is not merely about automating billing.
|
||
|
||
It is about making pricing an explicit, adaptive, evidence-based, and trustworthy product capability.
|
||
|