generated from coulomb/repo-seed
- INTENT.md: declare umbrella as the home for shared contracts; document umbrella-first MVP decision (code lives here until subsystems stabilize) - wiki/SharedContracts.md: vocabulary, state enums, relation types, selector taxonomy, event vocabulary, viewer adapter contract, canonical text normalization, rect-registry contract - wiki/DependencyMap.md: allowed dependency edges; folder layout + lint-rule strategy during umbrella-first phase - history/2026-05-24-initial-assessment.md: alignment review, technical risks, and the umbrella-first pivot rationale - workplans/CE-WP-0001..0004: four ralph-compatible workplans covering foundations, PDF review slice, form binding + visual guide, and citation card export — implementing PRD §20 end-to-end Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
156 lines
7.9 KiB
Markdown
156 lines
7.9 KiB
Markdown
# Dependency Map — citation-evidence
|
|
|
|
This document describes the **allowed dependency edges** between the
|
|
subsystems of the citation-evidence ecosystem. It is the cycle-prevention
|
|
contract.
|
|
|
|
It complements `SharedContracts.md` (which says *what* is shared) by saying
|
|
*who is allowed to depend on whom*.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## 1. The rule
|
|
|
|
> Types flow downward from `citation-engine`. Behavior flows upward into
|
|
> specialised repos. No subsystem may import another subsystem's behavior
|
|
> unless this map shows an edge.
|
|
|
|
The umbrella repo `citation-evidence` is allowed to depend on every
|
|
subsystem; nothing depends on the umbrella.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## 2. Allowed edges
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
┌───────────────────────┐
|
|
│ citation-evidence │ (umbrella)
|
|
└───────────┬───────────┘
|
|
│ depends on
|
|
┌──────────────────────────┼────────────────────────────┐
|
|
▼ ▼ ▼
|
|
┌───────────────┐ ┌────────────────┐ ┌────────────────┐
|
|
│ citation- │ │ evidence- │ │ citation- │
|
|
│ work │ │ binder │ │ engine │
|
|
└──────┬────────┘ └────────┬───────┘ └────────┬───────┘
|
|
│ │ │
|
|
│ depends on │ depends on │ depends on
|
|
│ │ │ (nothing —
|
|
▼ ▼ │ leaf node)
|
|
┌────────────────┐ ┌────────────────┐ │
|
|
│ evidence- │ │ evidence- │ │
|
|
│ anchor │ │ anchor │ │
|
|
└──────┬─────────┘ └────────┬───────┘ │
|
|
│ │ │
|
|
│ depends on │ depends on │
|
|
▼ ▼ ▼
|
|
┌────────────────┐ ┌────────────────┐ (citation-engine)
|
|
│ evidence- │ │ citation- │
|
|
│ source │ │ engine │
|
|
└────────┬───────┘ └────────────────┘
|
|
│
|
|
│ depends on
|
|
▼
|
|
┌────────────────┐
|
|
│ citation- │
|
|
│ engine │
|
|
└────────────────┘
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
In tabular form:
|
|
|
|
| Repo | May depend on | Must not depend on |
|
|
|--------------------|--------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
|
|
| `citation-engine` | (nothing — it is the leaf) | every other subsystem |
|
|
| `evidence-anchor` | `citation-engine` | `evidence-source`, `citation-work`, `evidence-binder`, `citation-evidence` |
|
|
| `evidence-source` | `citation-engine` | `evidence-anchor`, `citation-work`, `evidence-binder`, `citation-evidence` |
|
|
| `evidence-binder` | `citation-engine`, `evidence-anchor` | `evidence-source`, `citation-work`, `citation-evidence` |
|
|
| `citation-work` | `citation-engine`, `evidence-anchor`, `evidence-source`| `evidence-binder`, `citation-evidence` |
|
|
| `citation-evidence`| all five subsystems | (nothing else in the ecosystem) |
|
|
|
|
Notes:
|
|
|
|
- `evidence-source` does NOT depend on `evidence-anchor`. When an ingestion
|
|
pipeline needs to know "could a selector resolve here?", the answer comes
|
|
through events, not direct calls.
|
|
- `citation-work` does NOT depend on `evidence-binder`. Linking evidence to
|
|
form fields is a separate workflow; the review workspace should function
|
|
without it. A separate "evidence-backed form" application composes work +
|
|
binder + engine.
|
|
- `evidence-binder` does NOT depend on `evidence-source`. When a binder needs
|
|
source context, it asks `evidence-anchor` to resolve the annotation, which
|
|
in turn knows nothing about how the document was ingested.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## 3. Communication channels
|
|
|
|
Direct imports are allowed only along the edges above. Where two subsystems
|
|
need to coordinate without being allowed to import each other, they use one
|
|
of these indirect channels:
|
|
|
|
| Channel | Owner | Notes |
|
|
|---------------------------------|------------------|---------------------------------------------------------|
|
|
| Shared event bus | `citation-engine`| Vocabulary frozen in `SharedContracts.md` §4 |
|
|
| Shared types package | `citation-engine`| Re-exported through `@citation-evidence/engine` (post-extraction) |
|
|
| Rect registry | `evidence-binder`| Used by form UI, evidence sidebar, viewer adapter |
|
|
| Persistence interfaces | `citation-engine`| Concrete adapters in subsystems but interfaces in engine|
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## 4. During umbrella-first MVP
|
|
|
|
While all code lives in `citation-evidence/src/`, the rule is enforced by
|
|
**folder structure** and **lint rules**:
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
citation-evidence/src/
|
|
shared/ ← what will become citation-engine (types + contracts)
|
|
engine/ ← what will become citation-engine (services)
|
|
anchor/ ← what will become evidence-anchor
|
|
source/ ← what will become evidence-source
|
|
work/ ← what will become citation-work (UI)
|
|
binder/ ← what will become evidence-binder
|
|
app/ ← the umbrella reference app
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Lint rule (to be added in WP-0001):
|
|
|
|
- `engine/` may import only from `shared/`.
|
|
- `anchor/` may import only from `shared/`, `engine/`.
|
|
- `source/` may import only from `shared/`, `engine/`.
|
|
- `binder/` may import only from `shared/`, `engine/`, `anchor/`.
|
|
- `work/` may import only from `shared/`, `engine/`, `anchor/`, `source/`.
|
|
- `app/` may import from any.
|
|
|
|
Violating these rules in MVP is a lint error, not a runtime error. When
|
|
subsystems extract into their own repos, the lint rule disappears and the
|
|
package boundary enforces the same constraint.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## 5. Why these rules
|
|
|
|
1. **`citation-engine` as the leaf** prevents the most common monorepo pathology:
|
|
the "core" repo accumulating UI/IO dependencies because it was easier than
|
|
inverting a dependency.
|
|
2. **`citation-work` ⊄ `evidence-binder`** keeps the review workspace usable
|
|
even when there is no form context (e.g. just collecting evidence for a
|
|
report).
|
|
3. **`evidence-binder` ⊄ `evidence-source`** keeps binding logic from
|
|
accidentally caring about ingestion details.
|
|
4. **No subsystem depends on `citation-evidence`** — the umbrella is a
|
|
composition point, not a library.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## 6. Change process
|
|
|
|
Adding an edge to this map is a change to the contract.
|
|
|
|
- New edges require a short ADR in `docs/decisions/`.
|
|
- Removing an edge requires a refactoring plan (where do consumers go?).
|
|
- The MVP itself is an exception: edges that turn out to be wrong during
|
|
umbrella-first development are recorded as "deferred reshape" items in the
|
|
relevant workplan, not as ADRs.
|