chore(consistency): sync task status from DB [auto]

Updated by fix-consistency on 2026-06-22: - update .custodian-brief.md for feature-control
Normalize agent instructions and workplan frontmatter (STATE-WP-0067)
2026-06-22 23:21:38 +02:00 · 2026-06-22 23:16:24 +02:00 · 2026-06-22 17:47:36 +02:00 · 2026-06-19 20:48:28 +02:00 · 2026-06-16 01:34:23 +02:00 · 2026-06-15 00:42:14 +02:00
37 changed files with 2515 additions and 19 deletions
--- a/.claude/rules/agents.md
+++ b/.claude/rules/agents.md
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+## Kaizen Agents
+
+Specialized agent personas available on demand via the state-hub MCP.
+
+**Discover:** `list_kaizen_agents()` — returns all agents with name, description, category
+**Load:** `get_kaizen_agent("tdd-workflow")` — returns full instructions; read and follow them
+
+Common agents:
+
+| Agent | Category | When to use |
+|-------|----------|-------------|
+| `tdd-workflow` | testing | Step-by-step TDD8 workflow for any feature |
+| `code-refactoring` | quality | Code quality analysis and safe refactoring |
+| `test-maintenance` | testing | Diagnose and fix failing tests |
+| `requirements-engineering` | process | Prevent interface/mock mismatches upfront |
+| `keepaTodofile` | process | Maintain TODO.md during work |
+| `project-management` | process | Track status, determine next steps |
+| `datamodel-optimization` | quality | Optimize dataclasses and data structures |
+
+All 17 agents: call `list_kaizen_agents()` for the full list.
--- a/.claude/rules/architecture.md
+++ b/.claude/rules/architecture.md
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+## Architecture
+
+<!-- TODO: Describe the key design decisions and component structure.
+     Key modules, data flows, external integrations, state machines, etc. -->
+
+## Quick Reference
+
+`~/state-hub/mcp_server/TOOLS.md` — MCP tool reference
--- a/.claude/rules/credential-routing.md
+++ b/.claude/rules/credential-routing.md
@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
+# Credential and access routing
+
+**Audience:** Codex, Claude Code, Grok, and custodian agents that call **llm-connect**
+for inference. Run this check **before** requesting secrets, API keys, SSH access,
+login tokens, or database passwords — in any repo, not only `ops-warden`.
+
+ops-warden **issues SSH certificates only** (`warden sign`, `cert_command`). Every
+other credential need belongs to another subsystem. **Do not** message
+`ops-warden` on State Hub expecting a secret value; the reply is a pointer, not a key.
+
+### Lookup (do this first)
+
+```bash
+warden route find "<describe your need>" --json
+warden route show <catalog-id> --json
+```
+
+Requires the `warden` CLI from `~/ops-warden` (`uv tool install .` or `uv run warden`).
+
+| Agent runtime | How to orient |
+| --- | --- |
+| **Codex / Grok** (shell, HTTP State Hub) | `warden route` commands above; inbox `to_agent=feature-control` is for coordination, not secret vending |
+| **Claude Code** (MCP when available) | `get_domain_summary("custodian")` for workstreams; **still** use `warden route` for credential ownership |
+| **llm-connect** (inference service) | Never put secret retrieval in prompts; route custody to OpenBao/operator paths surfaced by `warden route` |
+
+### Quick routing table
+
+| I need… | Owner | ops-warden executes? |
+| --- | --- | --- |
+| SSH cert (`adm`/`agt`/`atm`) | ops-warden | **Yes** — `warden sign` |
+| API key, DB password, provider token | OpenBao (`railiance-platform`) | No — route only |
+| Login / OIDC / MFA | key-cape / Keycloak | No — route only |
+| Authorization decision | flex-auth | No — route only |
+| activity-core → issue-core emission | activity-core + issue-core | No — `warden route show activity-core-issue-sink` |
+| SSH tunnel | ops-bridge (+ `cert_command` from warden) | No — route only |
+
+### Anti-patterns (do not do these)
+
+- `POST /messages/` to `ops-warden` asking for `ISSUE_CORE_API_KEY`, `OPENROUTER_API_KEY`, etc.
+- Inventing `warden secret`, `warden login`, `warden bao`, `warden tunnel` — they do not exist
+- Pasting secrets into Git, State Hub, workplans, logs, or chat
+
+### Other capabilities (reuse-surface)
+
+Non-credential capabilities are usually discovered through **reuse-surface** federation
+(`reuse-surface` registry / `capability.*` indexes). Credential routing is inlined in
+every repo's agent instructions because it is high-frequency, high-risk, and easy to
+get wrong.
+
+**Canon:** `~/ops-warden/wiki/CredentialRouting.md` · catalog `~/ops-warden/registry/routing/catalog.yaml`
--- a/.claude/rules/first-session.md
+++ b/.claude/rules/first-session.md
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
+## First Session Protocol
+
+Triggered when `get_domain_summary("infotech")` shows **no workstreams**.
+The project is registered but work has not yet been structured.
+
+**Step 1 — Read, don't write**
+- `~/the-custodian/canon/projects/infotech/project_charter_v0.1.md` — purpose, scope
+- `~/the-custodian/canon/projects/infotech/roadmap_v0.1.md` — planned phases
+- Scan repo root: README, directory structure, existing code or docs
+
+**Step 2 — Survey in-progress work**
+Look for TODOs, open branches, half-finished files. Note done vs. started but incomplete.
+
+**Step 3 — Propose workstreams to Bernd**
+Propose 1–3 workstreams — each a coherent strand, weeks to months, anchored to a
+roadmap phase. **Wait for approval before creating.**
+
+**Step 4 — Create workplan file first, then DB record (ADR-001)**
+```
+workplans/FEATURE-WP-NNNN-<slug>.md   ← write this first
+```
+Then register in the hub:
+```
+create_workstream(topic_id="f39fa2a3-c491-414c-a91b-b4c5fcc6139c", title="...", owner="...", description="...")
+create_task(workstream_id="<id>", title="...", priority="high|medium|low")
+```
+
+**Step 5 — Record the setup**
+```
+add_progress_event(
+    summary="First session: structured infotech into N workstreams, M tasks",
+    event_type="milestone",
+    topic_id="f39fa2a3-c491-414c-a91b-b4c5fcc6139c",
+    detail={"workstreams": [...], "tasks_created": M}
+)
+```
+
+<!-- Delete or archive this file once past first session -->
--- a/.claude/rules/repo-boundary.md
+++ b/.claude/rules/repo-boundary.md
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+## Repo boundary
+
+This repo owns **feature-control** only. It does not own:
+
+<!-- TODO: List what belongs in adjacent repos, e.g.:
+- SSH key management → railiance-infra/
+- State hub code     → state-hub/
+-->
--- a/.claude/rules/repo-identity.md
+++ b/.claude/rules/repo-identity.md
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+**Purpose:** Open feature based multi-vendor, multi-tenant, multi-scope feature availability and provisioning engine.
+
+**Domain:** infotech
+**Repo slug:** feature-control
+**Topic ID:** f39fa2a3-c491-414c-a91b-b4c5fcc6139c
--- a/.claude/rules/session-protocol.md
+++ b/.claude/rules/session-protocol.md
@@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
+## Session Protocol
+
+Dev Hub (State Hub API): http://127.0.0.1:8000
+MCP server name in `~/.claude.json`: `dev-hub`
+
+**Step 1 — Orient**
+
+Read the offline-safe brief first — it works without a live hub connection:
+```bash
+cat .custodian-brief.md
+```
+Then call the MCP tool for richer cross-domain context when MCP tools are exposed:
+```
+get_domain_summary("infotech")
+```
+If MCP tools are unavailable in the current agent session, use the REST API:
+```bash
+curl -s "http://127.0.0.1:8000/state/summary" | python3 -m json.tool
+```
+If the hub is offline: `cd ~/state-hub && make api`
+
+**Step 2 — Check inbox**
+With MCP tools:
+```
+get_messages(to_agent="feature-control", unread_only=True)
+```
+Mark read with `mark_message_read(message_id)`. Reply or act on coordination
+requests before proceeding.
+
+Without MCP tools:
+```bash
+curl -s "http://127.0.0.1:8000/messages/?to_agent=feature-control&unread_only=true" \
+  | python3 -m json.tool
+curl -s -X PATCH "http://127.0.0.1:8000/messages/<id>/read" \
+  -H "Content-Type: application/json" -d '{}'
+```
+
+**Step 3 — Scan workplans**
+```bash
+ls workplans/
+```
+For each file with `status: ready`, `active`, or `blocked`, note pending
+`wait`/`todo`/`progress` tasks.
+
+**Step 4 — Present brief**
+
+1. **Active workstreams** for `infotech` — title, task counts, blocking decisions
+2. **Pending tasks** from `workplans/` + any `[repo:feature-control]` hub tasks
+3. **Goal guidance** — if `goal_guidance` in summary:
+   - `needs_workplan`: surface as top action — *"Repo goal '{title}' has no workplan yet"*
+   - `alignment_warnings`: flag if active work is not aligned with current goal
+4. **Suggested next action** — highest-priority open item
+5. **SBOM status** — flag if `last_sbom_at` is unset for this repo
+
+If no workstreams: follow First Session Protocol (`first-session.md`).
+
+**During work:** `record_decision()` · `add_progress_event()` · `resolve_decision()`
+
+> State Hub is a *read model*. Bootstrap tools (`create_workstream`, `create_task`)
+> are First Session Protocol only. Work structure belongs in repo files (ADR-001).
+
+**Session close:**
+With MCP tools:
+```
+add_progress_event(summary="...", topic_id="f39fa2a3-c491-414c-a91b-b4c5fcc6139c", workstream_id="<uuid>")
+```
+Without MCP tools:
+```bash
+curl -s -X POST http://127.0.0.1:8000/progress/ \
+  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
+  -d '{"topic_id":"f39fa2a3-c491-414c-a91b-b4c5fcc6139c","workstream_id":"<uuid>","event_type":"note","summary":"what changed","author":"codex"}'
+```
+If workplan files were modified, ensure the local copy is up to date first:
+```bash
+git -C <repo_path> pull --ff-only
+cd ~/state-hub && make fix-consistency REPO=feature-control
+```
+For repos where implementation runs on a remote machine (e.g. CoulombCore),
+use the combined target which pulls before fixing:
+```bash
+cd ~/state-hub && make fix-consistency-remote REPO=feature-control
+```
+**C-15** (DB task ahead of file) is normal in multi-machine workflows — writeback
+will sync the file to match DB.  **C-16** (repo behind remote) blocks all writes
+until you pull — intentional to prevent clobbering remote progress.
--- a/.claude/rules/stack-and-commands.md
+++ b/.claude/rules/stack-and-commands.md
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+## Stack
+
+<!-- TODO: Fill in language, frameworks, and key dependencies -->
+- **Language:**
+- **Key deps:**
+
+## Dev Commands
+
+```bash
+# TODO: Fill in the standard commands for this repo
+
+# Install dependencies
+
+# Run tests
+
+# Lint / type check
+
+# Build / package (if applicable)
+```
--- a/.claude/rules/workplan-convention.md
+++ b/.claude/rules/workplan-convention.md
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
+## Workplan Convention (ADR-001)
+
+File location: `workplans/FEATURE-WP-NNNN-<slug>.md`
+ID prefix: `FEATURE-WP-`
+
+Work items originate as files in this repo **before** being registered in the hub.
+
+Canonical workplan/workstream frontmatter statuses are:
+`proposed`, `ready`, `active`, `blocked`, `backlog`, `finished`, `archived`.
+Use `proposed` for a newly drafted plan, `ready` after review against current
+repo state, and `finished` when implementation is complete. `stalled` and
+`needs_review` are derived health labels, not stored statuses.
+
+Closed workplans may be moved to `workplans/archived/` with a completion-date
+prefix: `YYMMDD-FEATURE-WP-NNNN-<slug>.md`. The frontmatter id remains
+unchanged; the prefix is only for quick visual reference.
+
+Small opportunistic tasks discovered during another session use **Ad Hoc Tasks**:
+`workplans/ADHOC-YYYY-MM-DD.md`, workstream slug `adhoc-YYYY-MM-DD`, and task ids
+`ADHOC-YYYY-MM-DD-T01`, `T02`, etc. Use adhocs only for low-risk work completed
+directly. Promote anything requiring analysis, design, approval, dependencies, or
+multiple planned phases into a normal workplan.
+
+Ecosystem todos from other agents arrive as `[repo:feature-control]` hub tasks —
+visible at session start. Pick one up by creating the workplan file, then registering
+the workstream.
+
+Task blocks use this shape:
+
+```task
+id: FEATURE-WP-NNNN-T01
+status: wait | todo | progress | done | cancel
+priority: high | medium | low
+state_hub_task_id: "<uuid>"         # written by fix-consistency — do not edit
+```
+
+Status progression is `todo` → `progress` → `done`; use `wait` for waiting or
+blocked work and `cancel` for stopped work.
+
+<!-- Ralph Loop rules and HEUREKA sequence: ~/.claude/CLAUDE.md — do not duplicate here -->
--- a/.custodian-brief.md
+++ b/.custodian-brief.md
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
 <!-- custodian-brief: generated by fix-consistency — do not edit manually -->
 # Custodian Brief — feature-control

-**Domain:** helix_forge  
-**Last synced:** 2026-06-14 19:42 UTC  
+**Domain:** infotech  
+**Last synced:** 2026-06-22 21:21 UTC  
 **State Hub:** http://127.0.0.1:8000 *(adjust if running on a remote machine)*

 ## Active Workstreams
@@ -13,6 +13,6 @@
 ## MCP Orientation (when available)

 If the state-hub MCP server is reachable, call:
-`get_domain_summary("helix_forge")`
+`get_domain_summary("infotech")`
 This provides richer cross-domain context.
 If the MCP call fails, use this file as your orientation source.
--- a/.repo-classification.yaml
+++ b/.repo-classification.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+repo_classification:
+  standard: Repo Classification Standard
+  version: '1.0'
+  classified_at: '2026-06-22'
+  classified_by: agent
+  category: project
+  domain: infotech
+  secondary_domains: []
+  capability_tags: []
+  business_stake:
+  - technology
+  - product
+  - operations
+  business_mechanics:
+  - coordination
+  - operation
--- a/AGENTS.md
+++ b/AGENTS.md
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@

 **Purpose:** Open feature based multi-vendor, multi-tenant, multi-scope feature availability and provisioning engine.

-**Domain:** helix_forge
+**Domain:** infotech
 **Repo slug:** feature-control
 **Topic ID:** `f39fa2a3-c491-414c-a91b-b4c5fcc6139c`
 **Workplan prefix:** `FEATURE-WP-`
@@ -101,19 +101,62 @@ curl -s -X PATCH "http://127.0.0.1:8000/tasks/<task_id>" \

 ---

-## Local Developer Workflow
+## Credential and access routing

-This repository is documentation- and planning-focused (no source code, no traditional build/test/lint/install/run toolchain).
+**Audience:** Codex, Claude Code, Grok, and custodian agents that call **llm-connect**
+for inference. Run this check **before** requesting secrets, API keys, SSH access,
+login tokens, or database passwords — in any repo, not only `ops-warden`.

-**Verification and development commands (add to future sessions as needed):**
- Orient and review: `cat .custodian-brief.md` ; `cat INTENT.md SCOPE.md AGENTS.md README.md` ; `ls workplans/`
- Check hub state (requires local state-hub API): use the curl commands documented in "State Hub Integration" and "Session Protocol" sections above.
- After any workplan or doc changes: From `~/state-hub` checkout, run `make fix-consistency REPO=feature-control` (syncs markdown task statuses into hub DB, updates brief, populates state_hub_* IDs).
- Update task status in workplan files (use search_replace or equivalent) then re-run fix-consistency.
- Log required progress: `curl -s -X POST http://127.0.0.1:8000/progress/ ...` (see protocol).
- To verify changes post-fix: Re-`cat .custodian-brief.md`, re-`ls workplans/`, re-check task statuses in files vs hub queries, confirm no drift.
+ops-warden **issues SSH certificates only** (`warden sign`, `cert_command`). Every
+other credential need belongs to another subsystem. **Do not** message
+`ops-warden` on State Hub expecting a secret value; the reply is a pointer, not a key.

-No `make install`, `make test`, `make lint`, `make build`, or `make run` apply yet (pure docs repo). If implementation artifacts (e.g. OpenFeature wrappers, providers, or example code) are added later, define and document the appropriate commands here and in relevant workplans.
+### Lookup (do this first)
+
+```bash
+warden route find "<describe your need>" --json
+warden route show <catalog-id> --json
+```
+
+Requires the `warden` CLI from `~/ops-warden` (`uv tool install .` or `uv run warden`).
+
+| Agent runtime | How to orient |
+| --- | --- |
+| **Codex / Grok** (shell, HTTP State Hub) | `warden route` commands above; inbox `to_agent=feature-control` is for coordination, not secret vending |
+| **Claude Code** (MCP when available) | `get_domain_summary("custodian")` for workstreams; **still** use `warden route` for credential ownership |
+| **llm-connect** (inference service) | Never put secret retrieval in prompts; route custody to OpenBao/operator paths surfaced by `warden route` |
+
+### Quick routing table
+
+| I need… | Owner | ops-warden executes? |
+| --- | --- | --- |
+| SSH cert (`adm`/`agt`/`atm`) | ops-warden | **Yes** — `warden sign` |
+| API key, DB password, provider token | OpenBao (`railiance-platform`) | No — route only |
+| Login / OIDC / MFA | key-cape / Keycloak | No — route only |
+| Authorization decision | flex-auth | No — route only |
+| activity-core → issue-core emission | activity-core + issue-core | No — `warden route show activity-core-issue-sink` |
+| SSH tunnel | ops-bridge (+ `cert_command` from warden) | No — route only |
+
+### Anti-patterns (do not do these)
+
+- `POST /messages/` to `ops-warden` asking for `ISSUE_CORE_API_KEY`, `OPENROUTER_API_KEY`, etc.
+- Inventing `warden secret`, `warden login`, `warden bao`, `warden tunnel` — they do not exist
+- Pasting secrets into Git, State Hub, workplans, logs, or chat
+
+### Other capabilities (reuse-surface)
+
+Non-credential capabilities are usually discovered through **reuse-surface** federation
+(`reuse-surface` registry / `capability.*` indexes). Credential routing is inlined in
+every repo's agent instructions because it is high-frequency, high-risk, and easy to
+get wrong.
+
+**Canon:** `~/ops-warden/wiki/CredentialRouting.md` · catalog `~/ops-warden/registry/routing/catalog.yaml`
+
+<!-- REPO-AGENTS-EXTENSIONS -->
+<!-- Append repo-specific agent instructions below this marker.
+     The state-hub template sync preserves content after this line. -->
+
+---

 ## Workplan Convention (ADR-001)

@@ -138,7 +181,7 @@ anything needing analysis, design, approval, dependencies, or multiple phases.
 id: FEATURE-WP-NNNN
 type: workplan
 title: "..."
-domain: helix_forge
+domain: infotech
 repo: feature-control
 status: proposed | ready | active | blocked | backlog | finished | archived
 owner: codex
--- a/CLAUDE.md
+++ b/CLAUDE.md
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+# feature-control — Claude Code Instructions
+
+@SCOPE.md
+@.claude/rules/repo-identity.md
+@.claude/rules/session-protocol.md
+@.claude/rules/first-session.md
+@.claude/rules/workplan-convention.md
+@.claude/rules/stack-and-commands.md
+@.claude/rules/architecture.md
+@.claude/rules/repo-boundary.md
+@.claude/rules/credential-routing.md
+@.claude/rules/agents.md
--- a/docs/ConsumerBrief-FeatureControl.md
+++ b/docs/ConsumerBrief-FeatureControl.md
@@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
+# Consumer Brief: Feature-Control (for Adopting Repositories)
+
+**Status:** Draft (expanded from canon-interface-card.md post WP-0003)  
+**Date:** 2026-06-14  
+**Modeled on:** info-tech-canon/infospace/agent/briefs/consumer-brief.template.md and interface-card.schema.yaml (per canon practices).  
+**Purpose:** Reusable brief for any consuming repo adopting feature-control. Use in State Hub, ralph sessions, or as attachment to adoption workplans.
+
+## Project Identity
+- **Producer:** feature-control (helix_forge domain)
+- **Consumer:** [Insert your repo slug/project, e.g., "my-new-saas-app"]
+- **Relationship:** Low-impact integration for feature availability control.
+
+## Produced Concepts (What feature-control Provides)
+- Thin OpenFeature wrapper + EvaluationContext builder (canon projections).
+- FeatureRegistry (Git-backed FeatureDefinition with lifecycle/ownership).
+- Resolver + FeatureDecision (EvaluationScope, multi-signal composition, rich explainability).
+- LocalProvider (for dev/tests; extensible to real OF providers).
+- Scored UseCaseCatalog (MVP/Architecture-Driving views per helix-forge standard).
+- Canon-aligned terminology (EvaluationScope, Feature as ProducerCapability extension; explicit ITC-ORG/ACCESS/LAND/GOV mappings).
+- Pilots, examples, and adoption guide (for quick start).
+
+## Consumed Concepts (from InfoTechCanon and Related)
+- ITC-ORG: Actor, Agent, Membership, Ownership, Tenant/Org patterns.
+- ITC-ACCESS: Entitlement, Grant, AuthorizationDecision (signals only; not replaced).
+- ITC-LAND: Environment, Deployment, Service, Repository, RuntimeResource.
+- ITC-GOV: Decision, Control, Evidence, Policy, ProducerCapability, PurposeFit, ScopePressure.
+- ITC-TaggingStandard: Feature categories.
+- ITC-TASK: Lifecycle reviews/remediation.
+- OpenFeature spec: EvaluationContext, FlagEvaluationDetails (reason/variant/metadata), provider model, safe defaults.
+- (See docs/canon-mapping.md for full table with ownership/gaps.)
+
+## Consumer Purposes / Demand
+- Low-impact adoption for repos (human + agentic devs): Minimal code changes, typed keys, local tests, no backend lock-in.
+- Multi-scope control: Tenant, agent, environment, domain, etc. (via EvaluationScope).
+- Operational safety and cost control: Kill switches, degraded modes, compute path disabling.
+- Governance and explainability: Lifecycle metadata, decision explanations, audit.
+- Agent capability gating (with separate tool auth).
+- Backend reversibility and GitOps (declarative registry + runtime overrides).
+
+## Scope Pressure / Fit
+- Current pain in consumer: [Insert: e.g., "ad-hoc booleans, tenant-specific code, flag debt, expensive paths running unnecessarily, unclear agent controls"].
+- How feature-control helps: Canonical model, OF surface, scored UCs for prioritization, canon mappings for interoperability.
+- Fit with consumer INTENT/SCOPE: [Insert mapping; e.g., "Your 'user can do X' maps to feature key 'your.domain.x'; tenant controls align with your multi-tenant model."]
+
+## Produced Artifacts / Interfaces (for Consumer)
+- SDK: feature-control-sdk (Python; thin client + providers + registry + resolver).
+- Docs: AdoptionGuide.md, scored UCC, canon-mapping.md, mvp_pilot.py, sdk-examples/.
+- Registry baseline: features.json (Git-committed FeatureDefinitions).
+- Consumer brief template: This file (adapt for your project; attach to your workplans/brief).
+
+## In Scope for This Consumer Adoption
+- Integration of SDK/wrapper + context + evaluations.
+- Feature registration and basic governance.
+- Local/dev adoption + pilot validation.
+- Mapping of your features to the scored UCC for MVP selection.
+
+## Out of Scope (for Initial Adoption)
+- Full production backends/adapters (deferred per WP-0003 scores).
+- Deep entitlement self-service or complex approvals.
+- Non-Python implementations (adapt the concepts via OpenFeature).
+
+## Open Questions / Risks for Consumer
+- [Insert project-specific: e.g., "How to export generated keys for our TypeScript frontend? Backend choice for production?"]
+- General: See WP-0003 open questions (backend, generated keys, etc.).
+
+## Evidence / Next Steps
+- Pilot your adoption using docs/pilots/mvp_pilot.py (adapt for your UCs).
+- Create consumer workplan (e.g., "Adopt feature-control") with tasks from the AdoptionGuide.
+- Validate: Low effort, explainable decisions, scoped control, no backend dep.
+- Contribute back: New UCs, patterns, or canon extensions via State Hub.
+
+**Attach this (customized) to your project's .custodian-brief.md, workplans, or adoption sessions for traceability.**
+
+See the full FeatureControlAdoptionGuide.md for step-by-step instructions and the reusable agent prompt. This brief ensures alignment with canon consumer practices (purpose-fit, scope pressure, interface cards). 
+
+Ready for your specific project? Provide details and we'll customize/generate the artifacts.
--- a/docs/FeatureControlAdoptionGuide.md
+++ b/docs/FeatureControlAdoptionGuide.md
@@ -0,0 +1,206 @@
+# Feature-Control Adoption Guide for Consuming Repositories
+
+**Status:** Draft (post WP-0003 MVP)  
+**Date:** 2026-06-14  
+**Audience:** Developers, architects, and AI agents integrating feature-control into new or existing projects (consuming repos).  
+**Based on:** FEATURE-WP-0003 MVP implementation, scored UseCaseCatalog.md, canon-mapping.md, canon-interface-card.md (modeled on info-tech-canon consumer briefs), pilot examples, PRD/INTENT boundaries.
+
+This guide provides a practical, step-by-step process for adopting the feature-control framework. It ensures low-impact integration, canon alignment (EvaluationScope, ITC-ORG/ACCESS/LAND/GOV mappings), and use of the scored use cases for prioritization.
+
+## 1. Prerequisites and Orientation
+Before starting:
+- Read the core docs in this repo (or the feature-control package):
+  - [INTENT.md](../INTENT.md): Stable intent, boundaries (OpenFeature-first, no auth/entitlement ownership, GitOps + runtime).
+  - [specs/ProductRequirementsDocument.md](../specs/ProductRequirementsDocument.md): Requirements, data models, architecture.
+  - [specs/UseCaseCatalog.md](../specs/UseCaseCatalog.md): Full catalog **with scoring applied per helix-forge UseCaseScoringStandard.md**. Use the summary table, MVP/Prototype/Architecture-Driving views to prioritize (e.g., high Value + low-moderate Cost for early adoption).
+  - [docs/canon-mapping.md](../docs/canon-mapping.md): Explicit mappings (e.g., Feature → ProducerCapability extension; EvaluationScope → ITC-ORG Membership + ITC-LAND dims). Avoid redefining canon terms.
+  - [docs/canon-interface-card.md](../docs/canon-interface-card.md): High-level consumer view (produced concepts, consumed ITC models, purposes, scope pressure).
+  - [docs/pilots/mvp_pilot.py](../docs/pilots/mvp_pilot.py) and [docs/sdk-examples/](../docs/sdk-examples/): Concrete usage examples.
+- Understand key canon-aligned concepts:
+  - **EvaluationScope / TargetingScope**: Replaces bare "scope" (platform, tenant, agent, etc.). Maps to Memberships + Landscape resources.
+  - **FeatureDecision**: Rich (value, reason, source, scope, etc.) for explainability.
+  - **Context**: Projection from ITC-ORG (actors/agents), ITC-LAND (services/envs), ITC-ACCESS signals.
+- Check your project's alignment with INTENT boundaries (mechanism over policy; overlay before mutation; capability-aware adapters).
+
+**Read the brief for the target project** (`.custodian-brief.md`) and its AGENTS.md/INTENT.md to map your features to the scored UCC.
+
+## 2. High-Level Adoption Flow (Based on Scored UCC)
+Follow the recommended workflow from the helix-forge standard (capture → normalize → classify → score → select → implement). Prioritize from the UCC summary:
+
+**MVP Candidates (strong for first integration, per scoring):**
+- UC-A1: Adopt in new repo (core path; high user/business/strategic/proof value).
+- UC-A2: Local/test provider (high proof/learning; low effort).
+- UC-C1: Enable for tenant (multi-tenant control).
+- UC-D3: AI agent capability (agent-first class).
+- UC-E1: Disable compute-heavy per tenant (cost governance).
+- UC-E4: Emergency kill switch (operational safety).
+- UC-G1: Register with lifecycle (governance/hygiene).
+
+**Supporting/Prototype:**
+- UC-G3: Explain decision (explainability core).
+- UC-H1: Provider switch (reversibility).
+
+**Later/Enhancement:** Complex self-service, full analytics (lower urgency or higher cost per scores).
+
+**Architecture Drivers (implement early for understanding, even if deferred):** Those with high Architecture Score (cross-repo, canon impact, policy, reuse, compute, observability) — e.g., A1, E1, D3, G1.
+
+## 3. Step-by-Step Integration (Low-Impact, per UC-A1/A2)
+1. **Add the SDK**:
+   - For Python projects: Add `feature-control-sdk` as a dependency (current: local via `pip install -e` from this repo's pyproject.toml; future: PyPI).
+   - Minimal: Copy `src/feature_control_sdk/` into your project initially.
+   - Optional: `openfeature-sdk` for real providers (backend-agnostic per design).
+
+2. **Initialize the Client** (thin wrapper):
+   ```python
+   from feature_control_sdk import FeatureControlClient, LocalProvider, FeatureRegistry, Resolver
+
+   client = FeatureControlClient(domain="your-service")  # Optional OF domain
+   ```
+
+3. **Set up for Dev/Tests (LocalProvider, no backend)**:
+   ```python
+   local_values = {
+       "your.domain.capability.feature": True,  # Use canonical keys
+       # Simulate overrides/signals
+       "tenant:acme:your.feature": False,
+       "kill:your.feature": False,
+   }
+   client.set_provider(LocalProvider(local_values))
+
+   # For rich feature-control logic (MVP mode, no full OF needed):
+   reg = FeatureRegistry("features.json")  # Git-committed baseline
+   # (Populate from registry or hardcode for pilot)
+   resolver = Resolver(reg, local_values)
+   client.set_resolver(resolver)
+   ```
+
+4. **Build Evaluation Context** (canon-aligned):
+   Use the `_build_context` logic or manual dict. Project from your system's facts (users, tenants, agents, services):
+   ```python
+   context = {
+       "targeting_key": "user-123",  # Per OF spec
+       "actor_type": "human",  # or "agent"
+       "tenant_id": "acme",
+       "domain_id": "your-domain",
+       "agent_id": "my-agent-v1" if agent else None,
+       "environment": "production",
+       "service": "your-service",
+       "roles": ["user"],
+       "plan": "premium",
+       # Signals
+       "entitlement": True,  # From your entitlement system (ITC-ACCESS)
+   }
+   ```
+
+5. **Evaluate Features** (standard OF surface + rich control):
+   ```python
+   enabled = client.get_boolean_value(
+       "your.domain.capability.feature",  # Canonical key (from registry)
+       default=False,
+       context=context
+   )
+   # For rich explain (UC-G3):
+   decision = client.explain("your.domain.capability.feature", False, context)
+   print(decision.reason, decision.scope)  # e.g., "tenant_policy", "tenant:acme"
+   ```
+
+6. **Register Features (Governance, per UC-G1)**:
+   - Maintain a `features.json` (or registry export) in Git as declarative baseline.
+   - Example definition (matches PRD/UCC):
+     ```json
+     {
+       "feature_key": "your.domain.capability.feature",
+       "name": "Your Capability",
+       "description": "...",
+       "owner": "your-team",  # ITC-ORG
+       "category": "release",  # ITC-Tagging
+       "default_value": false,
+       "safe_fallback": false,
+       "lifecycle_state": "active",
+       "expected_lifetime": "long_lived",
+       "tenant_configurable": true,
+       "documentation": "docs/features/..."
+     }
+     ```
+   - Use `FeatureRegistry` to load/validate/register (enforces owner, temp review dates).
+   - In consuming code: Import or discover keys (stub scanner for UC-A3).
+
+7. **Test and Adopt**:
+   - Use LocalProvider for unit/integration tests (deterministic, network-free; UC-A2).
+   - Pilot your features using `docs/pilots/mvp_pilot.py` as template (adapt for your UCs).
+   - Measure: Adoption effort (should be <1 small task), explainability, control without redeploys.
+   - For real providers: Configure OF provider (e.g., Unleash adapter) behind the client (H1 support).
+
+8. **Governance and Advanced**:
+   - Enforce lifecycle in your registry (temp features get Tasks per ITC-TASK).
+   - Use `explain()` for support/debug (UC-G3).
+   - Audit changes (stub in pilot; expand per G4).
+   - For agents: Pass `actor_type: "agent"` + `agent_id` in context (D3 support; still enforce tool auth per boundaries).
+
+## 4. Mapping Your Project's Features
+- Review your project's INTENT/SCOPE/UCC (or equivalent).
+- Map to feature-control UCC: E.g., "user can do X" → feature key like `your.domain.x` (per FR-3 naming).
+- Score/prioritize using the standard (or copy from our scored UCC).
+- Start with high-MVP-fit: Adoption + 2-3 core controls (tenant/agent/compute/kill).
+- Register in your Git baseline; control via context (tenant_id for multi-tenant, agent_id for AI).
+
+## 5. Common Pitfalls and Boundaries (from INTENT/PRD)
+- **Do not** use features for auth (FR-8): Always pair with your authz system.
+- **Do not** confuse with entitlement: Feature control composes but doesn't own (UC-F1).
+- Client-side never enforces security.
+- Start with local provider; add real backends later (backend-agnostic).
+- Commit `features.json`/registry to Git for GitOps baseline.
+
+## 6. Validation and Next Steps
+- Run the adapted pilot: End-to-end for your MVP UCs.
+- Check: Decisions explainable? Controls per scope (no cross-tenant)? Tests without backend?
+- Metrics: Adoption time, decision coverage, compute savings.
+- If it fits: Proceed to production hardening (e.g., real providers, full audit, adapter contracts).
+- Report back: Update your project's docs/brief with adoption status. Consider contributing patterns back (e.g., new UCs or canon extensions).
+
+## 7. Agent/AI Support Prompts and Skills
+**Reusable Prompt Template** (for Grok, Claude, Cursor, etc.; copy-paste into your agent):
+```
+You are an expert at adopting the feature-control framework (OpenFeature-based, canon-aligned multi-scope feature availability control from the feature-control repo).
+
+Follow this exact step-by-step guide from docs/FeatureControlAdoptionGuide.md:
+[PASTE THE FULL GUIDE ABOVE]
+
+For the current project (describe briefly: [e.g., "a new multi-tenant SaaS app in Python with user/engine/agent actors, compute-heavy features, need for tenant/agent controls"]):
+
+1. Identify 5-10 candidate features from the project's scope/intent.
+2. Map them to the scored UseCaseCatalog.md (prioritize MVP/Architecture-Driving).
+3. Propose canonical feature keys (per naming convention).
+4. Generate the integration code: client setup, context builder (using canon projections), evaluations, registry definitions (in JSON), tests with LocalProvider.
+5. Create a simple pilot script adapted from mvp_pilot.py.
+6. Note any canon gaps or custom UCs.
+7. Ensure compliance with INTENT boundaries.
+
+Output: Updated code diffs, new files (e.g., feature_flags.py, features.json, tests), and a brief adoption report referencing the scoring and canon-mapping.
+```
+
+**Dedicated Skill/Agent Recommendation**:
+- **Yes, create one**: A "feature-control-adopter" skill or ralph-style prompt.
+- Example skill file (add to your agent's skills dir or `docs/skills/adopt-feature-control.md`):
+  - Trigger: "adopt feature-control in this project" or "/adopt-fc".
+  - Behavior: Load this guide + canon-mapping + scored UCC + pilot as context. Walk user/agent through steps, generate code, validate against acceptance.
+- For ralph-workplan users: Tie a consumer workplan (e.g., "Adopt feature-control") to this prompt.
+- Enhancement: Integrate with State Hub (e.g., new workplan for consumer adoption in a target repo, using get_domain_summary for context).
+- This repo can host the canonical version; consumers copy/adapt.
+
+## 8. Gaps and Future Support (from WP-0003 Open Questions)
+- Full backend providers (Unleash/Flagsmith adapters) and production config.
+- Generated constants/key discovery (beyond stub).
+- Deeper entitlement integration and tenant self-service.
+- Full adapter contracts (for non-Python or custom backends).
+- Publishing the SDK (PyPI, versioning).
+- More pilots/examples for other languages/UCS.
+
+**Next Step Recommendation**:
+- If you have a specific new project/repo in mind (e.g., "my-new-app"), tell me the path or details — we can run a guided adoption session using the prompt above, generate the exact files, and create a consumer workplan (e.g., MYAPP-WP-0001-adopt-feature-control).
+- Create a new workplan here (FEATURE-WP-0004-feature-control-adoption-toolkit) to formalize the guide, skill, and consumer brief.
+- Expand the canon-interface-card.md into a full ConsumerBrief.md (per info-tech-canon templates).
+
+This makes feature-control immediately usable for new projects while providing the requested guides/prompts/skills. The MVP gives a working foundation; we can iterate based on real adoption feedback.
+
+Ready to proceed with a specific project or create the new artifacts? Provide details! (We'll log progress and sync via State Hub.)
--- a/docs/pilots/mvp-pilot-report.md
+++ b/docs/pilots/mvp-pilot-report.md
@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
+# MVP Pilot Validation Report (FEATURE-WP-0003-T06)
+
+**Date:** 2026-06-19  
+**Pilot:** `docs/pilots/mvp_pilot.py`  
+**Tests:** `tests/test_registry_resolver.py`, `tests/test_sdk_wrapper.py` (incl. UC-H1)
+
+## Scope
+
+End-to-end validation of the WP-0003 MVP against the scored UseCaseCatalog MVP selection.
+
+## Use cases exercised
+
+| UC | Description | Result |
+|----|-------------|--------|
+| UC-G1 | Register with lifecycle | Pass — registry validates owner, temp review_date |
+| UC-A1/A2 | Adopt with wrapper + local provider | Pass — thin client + LocalProvider, no backend |
+| UC-C1 | Tenant enable | Pass — `tenant.preview` scoped to `acme` vs `globex` |
+| UC-D3 | Agent capability | Pass — `agent.extract` evaluated with agent context |
+| UC-E1 | Compute disable per tenant | Pass — `compute.heavy_ocr` disabled for tenant |
+| UC-E4 | Emergency kill switch | Pass — kill signal overrides tenant/default at runtime |
+| UC-G3 | Explain decision | Pass — `client.explain()` returns reason/source/scope |
+| UC-H1 | Provider switch | Pass — `test_h1_provider_switch_without_business_code_change` |
+
+## Observations
+
+- **Adoption effort:** Single-script pilot; a consuming repo can integrate in one small task using the SDK + LocalProvider pattern (aligns with UC-A1 scoring).
+- **Explainability:** Decisions include `reason`, `source`, `scope` — sufficient for MVP governance (UC-G3).
+- **Runtime control:** Kill switch and tenant overrides applied without redeploy (local values mutated in-process).
+- **Compute savings:** Pilot demonstrates disable path; real savings measurement deferred to production adapter work.
+- **Canon alignment:** Evaluation uses tenant/agent context dimensions consistent with `docs/canon-mapping.md` (EvaluationScope).
+
+## Fit vs scored catalog
+
+The MVP UCs selected in WP-0003 (A1, C1, D3, E1, E4, G1, G3, H1) are all demonstrated. Deferred items from the catalog remain appropriate for follow-on work:
+
+- Full tenant self-service (higher cost/risk)
+- Experimentation analytics
+- Complex approval workflows
+- Production backend adapters (Unleash/Flagsmith/flagd)
+
+No catalog adjustments required for the MVP boundary.
+
+## Ready for next workplan
+
+Pilot and automated tests satisfy T06 acceptance. Recommended follow-ons (per WP-0004 Production Hardening section):
+
+1. Real OpenFeature provider adapters
+2. Entitlement signal integration depth
+3. SDK packaging (PyPI) and multi-language examples
+4. Adoption validation in a real consuming repository
--- a/docs/pilots/mvp_pilot.py
+++ b/docs/pilots/mvp_pilot.py
@@ -0,0 +1,112 @@
+"""
+MVP Pilot script for WP-0003 T06.
+
+Demonstrates core MVP UCs using the implemented components:
+- UC-G1: register with lifecycle
+- UC-A1/A2: adopt with wrapper + local
+- UC-C1: tenant enable
+- UC-D3: agent capability
+- UC-E1: compute disable per tenant
+- UC-E4: kill switch
+- UC-G3: explain decision
+
+Run: PYTHONPATH=src python3 docs/pilots/mvp_pilot.py
+
+Shows no redeploy for changes, explainable decisions, canon alignment.
+"""
+
+from feature_control_sdk import (
+    FeatureControlClient,
+    LocalProvider,
+    FeatureDefinition,
+    FeatureRegistry,
+    Resolver,
+)
+
+print("=== MVP Pilot: feature-control core ===\n")
+
+# 1. Registry (UC-G1)
+reg = FeatureRegistry("/tmp/features.json")  # "git" baseline
+reg.register(FeatureDefinition(
+    feature_key="compute.heavy_ocr",
+    name="Heavy OCR",
+    description="GPU heavy for docs",
+    owner="doc-team",
+    category="compute_control",
+    default_value=False,
+    safe_fallback=False,
+    lifecycle_state="active",
+    expected_lifetime="long_lived",
+))
+reg.register(FeatureDefinition(
+    feature_key="agent.extract",
+    name="Agent Extract",
+    description="For agents",
+    owner="ai-team",
+    category="agent_capability",
+    default_value=False,
+    safe_fallback=False,
+    lifecycle_state="active",
+    expected_lifetime="long_lived",
+))
+reg.register(FeatureDefinition(
+    feature_key="tenant.preview",
+    name="Tenant Preview",
+    description="For tenants",
+    owner="product-team",
+    category="release",
+    default_value=False,
+    safe_fallback=False,
+    lifecycle_state="proposed",
+    expected_lifetime="short",
+    review_date="2026-12-31",
+))
+reg.save()
+print("Registered features (UC-G1 satisfied):", reg.keys())
+
+# 2. Local values + resolver for control logic
+local_values = {
+    "compute.heavy_ocr": False,  # default
+    "agent.extract": False,
+    "tenant.preview": True,
+    "kill:compute.heavy_ocr": False,  # no kill
+}
+# Simulate tenant override for preview
+local_values["tenant:acme:tenant.preview"] = True
+
+resolver = Resolver(reg, local_values)
+
+# 3. Client with resolver for feature-control rich mode (even without full OF)
+client = FeatureControlClient()
+client.set_resolver(resolver)
+
+# Contexts
+tenant_ctx = {"tenant_id": "acme", "actor_type": "human", "user_id": "u1"}
+agent_ctx = {"actor_type": "agent", "agent_id": "inv-class", "tenant_id": "acme"}
+other_tenant = {"tenant_id": "globex", "actor_type": "human"}
+
+# 4. Evaluations (pilots)
+print("\n--- Tenant enable (UC-C1) ---")
+print("acme preview:", client.get_boolean_value("tenant.preview", False, tenant_ctx))
+print("globex preview:", client.get_boolean_value("tenant.preview", False, other_tenant))
+
+print("\n--- Agent cap (UC-D3) ---")
+print("agent extract for acme agent:", client.get_boolean_value("agent.extract", False, agent_ctx))
+
+print("\n--- Compute disable (UC-E1) ---")
+print("compute for acme:", client.get_boolean_value("compute.heavy_ocr", False, tenant_ctx))
+
+print("\n--- Kill switch (UC-E4) ---")
+# simulate kill
+resolver.values["kill:compute.heavy_ocr"] = True
+print("compute with kill for acme:", client.get_boolean_value("compute.heavy_ocr", False, tenant_ctx))
+
+print("\n--- Explain (UC-G3) ---")
+decision = client.explain("tenant.preview", False, tenant_ctx)
+print("Explain for acme preview:", decision)
+
+print("\n--- Adoption (UC-A1/A2) ---")
+print("Using local provider + resolver for deterministic tests, no backend.")
+
+print("\nPilot complete. All core MVP UCs demonstrated with explainable, scoped, governed decisions.")
+print("No redeploy needed (local values changed at runtime).")
--- a/docs/prompts/adopt-feature-control.md
+++ b/docs/prompts/adopt-feature-control.md
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+# Reusable Prompt: Adopt Feature-Control in a New/Existing Project
+
+**Usage**: Copy this entire prompt into your agent (Grok, Claude, Cursor, Aider, etc.) at the start of an adoption session. Replace placeholders in [brackets]. Follow exactly; reference the artifacts in this feature-control repo.
+
+```
+You are an expert integrator and AI agent specializing in the feature-control framework (OpenFeature-based, multi-scope, canon-aligned feature availability control plane from the feature-control repo at /home/worsch/feature-control or equivalent).
+
+Your goal: Help adopt feature-control into the target project with minimal impact, following the exact steps in docs/FeatureControlAdoptionGuide.md (created post-WP-0003 MVP). Ensure alignment with INTENT.md, the scored UseCaseCatalog.md (per helix-forge UseCaseScoringStandard), docs/canon-mapping.md, and docs/canon-interface-card.md.
+
+**Exact Process (do not skip or reorder):**
+
+1. **Orient and Review**:
+   - Read and internalize: INTENT.md, specs/ProductRequirementsDocument.md, specs/UseCaseCatalog.md (focus on the scored summary table, MVP/Prototype/Architecture-Driving views, and EvaluationScope terminology).
+   - Read: docs/canon-mapping.md (for explicit ITC-ORG/ACCESS/LAND/GOV mappings and "Feature as ProducerCapability extension"), docs/canon-interface-card.md, docs/pilots/mvp_pilot.py, and docs/sdk-examples/.
+   - Note boundaries: OpenFeature-first (thin wrapper), no replacement of auth/entitlement, GitOps baseline + runtime overrides, safe defaults, explainable decisions.
+
+2. **Analyze the Target Project**:
+   - Describe the project briefly (from its INTENT/SCOPE/AGENTS/brief or user input): [PASTE OR DESCRIBE PROJECT SCOPE, ACTORS (users/agents/tenants), KEY FEATURES, CURRENT PAIN (e.g., hard-coded flags, compute waste, agent controls)].
+   - Identify 5-10 candidate "features" (capabilities, behaviors, compute paths, UI elements, agent tools) from the project's scope.
+   - Map them to the scored UCC (use the summary table columns: Value, Cost, Risk, Proof, Architecture, Stage, Priority). Prioritize high-Value + acceptable Cost/Risk for MVP (e.g., UC-A1 adoption, UC-C1 tenant, UC-D3 agent, UC-E1 compute, UC-E4 kill, UC-G1 register). Flag Architecture-Drivers explicitly.
+
+3. **Design the Integration**:
+   - Propose canonical feature keys (per FR-3: <domain>.<capability>.<feature>[.<mode>], e.g., "mail.dispatch.new_renderer").
+   - Generate FeatureDefinition entries (JSON or registry format) for the prioritized ones, including owner, category (via tagging), lifecycle, etc.
+   - Design EvaluationContext projections (from project facts to canon dims: tenant_id, agent_id, actor_type, environment, service, etc.).
+
+4. **Generate Artifacts** (use the MVP SDK as base):
+   - SDK integration code (thin FeatureControlClient usage, with LocalProvider for dev/tests and set_resolver for rich logic).
+   - Context builder (copy/adapt from src/feature_control_sdk or the guide's examples).
+   - features.json or registry baseline (declarative, Git-committed).
+   - Tests using LocalProvider (deterministic, network-free).
+   - Adapted pilot script (based on docs/pilots/mvp_pilot.py) demonstrating 3-5 prioritized UCs end-to-end (register, scoped eval, explain, runtime control without redeploy).
+   - Any needed updates to the project's AGENTS.md, docs, or brief.
+
+5. **Validate and Report**:
+   - Ensure: Low adoption effort (<1 small task), explainable decisions, tenant/agent isolation, no backend lock-in, compliance with INTENT (e.g., client flags never auth).
+   - Score the chosen UCs against the helix-forge standard if not already mapped.
+   - Produce a brief adoption report: What was implemented, fit vs. scored catalog, open questions/gaps, next steps (e.g., real providers, new workplan).
+   - If the project has its own State Hub/workplans, propose a consumer workplan (e.g., "Adopt feature-control") with tasks tied to the UCs.
+
+**Constraints**:
+- Preserve all canon terminology and mappings (no redefinition; use EvaluationScope, not bare "scope").
+- Low-impact: Thin wrapper, generated keys or discovery, local provider first.
+- Output only diffs, new files, code, and the report. Use the SDK code from src/ as the reference implementation.
+- If the target project is not Python, adapt the concepts (the framework is language-agnostic via OpenFeature).
+
+Project details: [INSERT PROJECT DESCRIPTION, PATH IF LOCAL, KEY FILES TO REVIEW, SPECIFIC FEATURES/PAINS].
+
+Begin by reading the referenced docs (if accessible in context) and the project files. Output the plan, then the generated artifacts.
+```
+
+**Tips for Use**:
+- For ralph-workplan or multi-iteration: Prefix with "Use this prompt iteratively until the adoption is complete and validated in a pilot."
+- For a specific new project: Replace the placeholder and run in the target's context (e.g., via Cursor or a subagent).
+- Extend with project-specific canon mappings if needed.
+
+This prompt + the AdoptionGuide.md + MVP SDK (from WP-0003) + scored UCC provide immediate, agent-ready support for any new project. The canon-interface-card.md can be expanded into a full ConsumerBrief.md for the target (modeled on info-tech-canon templates).
+
+**Recommended Next**:
+- If you name the new project/repo (e.g., path or slug), we can instantiate this prompt, review its files, generate the exact integration code/pilot, and (optionally) create a consumer workplan.
+- Create a dedicated skill (e.g., in your .grok/skills or .claude/commands): A "adopt-feature-control" skill that auto-loads the guide + prompt + SDK.
+- New workplan (FEATURE-WP-0004 or similar): "Feature-control consumer adoption toolkit" to formalize the guide, prompt, skill, and any missing adapters.
+- Publish the SDK (update pyproject, add to PyPI) for easier consumption.
+
+We are ready for MVP adoption in new projects today. The artifacts above (guide + prompt) + the built SDK close the loop from planning (WP-0002) to usable framework (WP-0003). Let me know the new project or next artifact to create! (We'll sync via State Hub.)
--- a/docs/sdk-examples/basic_usage.py
+++ b/docs/sdk-examples/basic_usage.py
@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
+"""
+Basic usage example for feature-control-sdk.
+
+This demonstrates the thin wrapper + local provider for development.
+
+In production, you would configure a real OpenFeature provider (Unleash, Flagsmith, etc.)
+behind the scenes. The consuming repo only sees standard OpenFeature calls.
+
+See:
+- specs/UseCaseCatalog.md (UC-A1, UC-A2)
+- docs/canon-mapping.md for context projection from canon models.
+"""
+
+from feature_control_sdk import FeatureControlClient, LocalProvider
+
+# 1. In a real app, you might do this once at startup
+client = FeatureControlClient(domain="my-service")
+
+# For tests / local dev: use LocalProvider (T04)
+local_values = {
+    "document.ocr.compute_heavy_path": False,
+    "agent.invoice_classifier.extract_recipient": True,
+    "tenant.preview.feature": "variant-a",
+}
+client.set_provider(LocalProvider(local_values))
+
+# 2. Evaluation context (built from canon facts: actor, tenant, etc.)
+# In real wrapper, this would be projected automatically from request/user context.
+context = {
+    "targeting_key": "user-123",
+    "actor_type": "human",
+    "tenant_id": "acme",
+    "environment": "production",
+    "domain_id": "document-processing",
+    "user_id": "user-123",
+}
+
+# 3. Standard OpenFeature calls (boolean, string, number, object)
+enabled = client.get_boolean_value(
+    "document.ocr.compute_heavy_path", default=False, context=context
+)
+print(f"Compute heavy OCR enabled? {enabled}")  # False (from local)
+
+agent_cap = client.get_boolean_value(
+    "agent.invoice_classifier.extract_recipient", default=False, context={"actor_type": "agent"}
+)
+print(f"Agent capability enabled? {agent_cap}")  # True
+
+variant = client.get_string_value("tenant.preview.feature", default="classic", context=context)
+print(f"Variant: {variant}")  # variant-a
+
+# 4. Always safe default on error/missing (per OpenFeature spec, no exceptions in hot path)
+missing = client.get_boolean_value("does.not.exist", default=True)
+print(f"Missing feature default: {missing}")  # True
+
+print("Success: repo can evaluate via standard OF API with feature-control conventions.")
--- a/pyproject.toml
+++ b/pyproject.toml
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+[build-system]
+requires = ["setuptools>=61.0"]
+build-backend = "setuptools.build_meta"
+
+[project]
+name = "feature-control-sdk"
+version = "0.1.0"
+description = "Thin organization wrapper and local provider for OpenFeature in feature-control"
+authors = [{name = "feature-control initiative"}]
+readme = "README.md"
+license = {text = "MIT"}
+requires-python = ">=3.9"
+dependencies = [
+    "openfeature-sdk>=0.1.0",  # official OpenFeature Python SDK
+]
+classifiers = [
+    "Programming Language :: Python :: 3",
+    "License :: OSI Approved :: MIT License",
+]
+
+[project.optional-dependencies]
+dev = [
+    "pytest",
+    "ruff",
+]
+
+[tool.setuptools.packages.find]
+where = ["src"]
+
+[tool.ruff]
+line-length = 88
+
+[tool.pytest.ini_options]
+testpaths = ["tests"]
--- a/registry/README.md
+++ b/registry/README.md
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+# Capability Registry
+
+Markdown-first capability index for federation and reuse planning.
+
+## Authoring
+
+1. Copy a capability entry template (see reuse-surface `templates/capability-entry.template.md`).
+2. Add the row to `indexes/capabilities.yaml`.
+3. Run `reuse-surface validate` from a checkout with the CLI installed.
+4. Merge to `main` and verify publish with `reuse-surface establish --publish-check`.
+
+Federation contract: reuse-surface `docs/RegistryFederation.md`.
--- a/registry/capabilities/capability.feature-control.evaluate.md
+++ b/registry/capabilities/capability.feature-control.evaluate.md
@@ -0,0 +1,138 @@
+---
+id: capability.feature-control.evaluate
+name: Feature Availability Evaluation
+summary: Evaluate whether a feature is active, hidden, disabled, or unavailable for a subject in context.
+owner: feature-control
+status: draft
+domain: helix_forge
+tags:
+  - feature-control
+  - evaluation
+  - sdk
+
+maturity:
+  discovery:
+    current: D5
+    target: D7
+    confidence: medium
+    rationale: >
+      Concrete use cases and research references are documented in the maturity
+      standard example and feature-control domain work.
+  availability:
+    current: A4
+    target: A6
+    confidence: medium
+    rationale: >
+      SDK and service API artifacts exist in the feature-control repository.
+      Managed platform operation is the natural target for multi-tenant reuse.
+
+external_evidence:
+  completeness:
+    level: C3
+    name: Functional Core
+    confidence: medium
+    basis: scope_vs_intent_and_consumer_expectations
+    satisfied_expectations:
+      - tenant-level feature evaluation
+      - user-level feature evaluation
+      - machine-readable decision result
+    broken_expectations:
+      - no agent-specific rule simulation
+      - no bulk import/export of rules
+    out_of_scope_expectations:
+      - billing entitlement ownership
+      - authorization policy enforcement
+  reliability:
+    level: R3
+    name: Usable
+    confidence: medium
+    basis: consumer_quality_signals
+    known_reliability_risks:
+      - unclear timeout behavior under heavy load
+      - limited diagnostics for complex tenant rule conflicts
+
+discovery:
+  intent: >
+    Support controlled feature availability across installations, tenants,
+    domains, groups, users, and agents.
+  includes:
+    - feature decision evaluation
+    - context-aware targeting
+    - explainable decision result
+  excludes:
+    - user authorization
+    - billing entitlement ownership
+    - UI rendering
+  assumptions:
+    - subject and tenant context can be resolved by adjacent capabilities
+  use_cases:
+    - ucc.feature-control.tenant-toggle
+    - ucc.feature-control.agent-disable
+    - ucc.feature-control.domain-rollout
+  research_memos:
+    - specs/CapabilityMaturityStandard.md
+
+availability:
+  current_level: A4
+  target_level: A6
+  current_artifacts:
+    - feature-control/packages/feature-control-sdk
+    - feature-control/services/feature-control-api
+  target_artifacts:
+    - feature-control/charts/feature-control
+    - feature-control/platform/feature-control-service
+  consumption_modes:
+    - SDK
+    - service API
+    - managed platform service
+
+relations:
+  depends_on:
+    - capability.identity.vocabulary-canonicalize
+  supports:
+    - capability.registry.register
+  related_to:
+    - capability.feature-control.rollout
+    - capability.feature-control.visibility
+
+evidence:
+  documentation:
+    - specs/CapabilityMaturityStandard.md
+  tests: []
+  consumer_feedback: []
+  bug_reports: []
+  incidents: []
+
+consumer_guidance:
+  recommended_for:
+    - application integration through SDK or service API
+    - tenant-aware feature gating in helix_forge products
+  not_recommended_for:
+    - authorization decisions
+    - billing entitlement ownership
+    - assuming agent-specific simulation without checking current scope
+  known_limitations:
+    - bulk rule management is not yet covered
+    - agent-specific simulation remains a known gap
+---
+
+# Feature Availability Evaluation
+
+## Overview
+
+This capability evaluates whether a feature should be available for a subject in
+a given context. It is the primary implementation-ready example in the sample
+registry and demonstrates a D5/A4/C3/R3 vector.
+
+## Current reuse mode
+
+Consumers can integrate through SDK or service API artifacts in the
+feature-control repository. This is implementation reuse (A4), not just planning
+metadata.
+
+## Comparison notes
+
+Compared with `capability.registry.register`, this entry is far stronger on
+availability and external evidence. Compared with
+`capability.identity.vocabulary-canonicalize`, it is stronger on delivery mode
+and weaker on cross-domain generalization.
--- a/registry/capabilities/capability.feature-control.rollout.md
+++ b/registry/capabilities/capability.feature-control.rollout.md
@@ -0,0 +1,111 @@
+---
+id: capability.feature-control.rollout
+name: Feature Rollout Control
+summary: Gradually expose features to subjects across tenants, domains, groups, or cohorts using rollout rules and staged availability.
+owner: feature-control
+status: draft
+domain: helix_forge
+tags:
+  - feature-control
+  - rollout
+  - planning
+
+maturity:
+  discovery:
+    current: D4
+    target: D6
+    confidence: medium
+    rationale: >
+      Rollout is a distinct bounded behavior from single-point evaluation, with
+      research references in the feature-control domain and maturity standard.
+  availability:
+    current: A2
+    target: A4
+    confidence: low
+    rationale: >
+      Rollout logic may exist in source modules but is not yet consistently
+      exposed as a standalone SDK or API surface distinct from evaluate.
+
+external_evidence:
+  completeness:
+    level: C2
+    name: Partial
+    confidence: low
+    basis: scope_vs_intent_and_consumer_expectations
+    satisfied_expectations:
+      - rollout concepts documented adjacent to feature evaluation
+    broken_expectations:
+      - no dedicated rollout artifact called out separately from evaluate
+      - percentage and cohort rollout variants not indexed independently
+    out_of_scope_expectations:
+      - billing-driven entitlements
+  reliability:
+    level: R1
+    name: Fragile
+    confidence: low
+    basis: consumer_quality_signals
+    known_reliability_risks:
+      - rollout behavior may be conflated with evaluate in consumer mental models
+
+discovery:
+  intent: >
+    Control how features become available over time and across cohorts without
+    conflating rollout policy with authorization or billing.
+  includes:
+    - staged rollout rules
+    - cohort and context targeting for rollout
+    - explainable rollout state
+  excludes:
+    - one-time feature evaluation only
+    - authorization decisions
+    - billing entitlements
+  assumptions:
+    - feature evaluation capability exists for final availability decisions
+  use_cases:
+    - ucc.feature-control.domain-rollout
+  research_memos:
+    - specs/CapabilityMaturityStandard.md
+
+availability:
+  current_level: A2
+  target_level: A4
+  current_artifacts:
+    - feature-control/packages/feature-control-sdk
+  target_artifacts:
+    - feature-control/services/feature-control-api
+  consumption_modes:
+    - source module
+    - SDK
+
+relations:
+  depends_on:
+    - capability.feature-control.evaluate
+  supports: []
+  related_to:
+    - capability.feature-control.visibility
+
+evidence:
+  documentation:
+    - specs/CapabilityMaturityStandard.md
+  tests: []
+  consumer_feedback: []
+  bug_reports: []
+  incidents: []
+
+consumer_guidance:
+  recommended_for:
+    - planning staged feature exposure separate from binary evaluation
+  not_recommended_for:
+    - simple on/off evaluation without rollout semantics
+    - entitlement or billing ownership
+  known_limitations:
+    - distinguish carefully from capability.feature-control.evaluate
+---
+
+# Feature Rollout Control
+
+## Overview
+
+Rollout governs how availability changes over time and across cohorts. It
+complements evaluation, which answers whether a feature is available for a
+subject in a context right now.
--- a/registry/capabilities/capability.feature-control.visibility.md
+++ b/registry/capabilities/capability.feature-control.visibility.md
@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
+---
+id: capability.feature-control.visibility
+name: Feature Visibility Control
+summary: Control whether features are visible or hidden for subjects without changing underlying entitlement or authorization.
+owner: feature-control
+status: draft
+domain: helix_forge
+tags: [feature-control, visibility]
+
+maturity:
+  discovery:
+    current: D4
+    target: D5
+    confidence: medium
+    rationale: Bounded as distinct from evaluation and rollout in feature-control domain.
+  availability:
+    current: A2
+    target: A4
+    confidence: low
+    rationale: May share SDK artifacts with evaluate but is not separately exposed as API.
+
+external_evidence:
+  completeness:
+    level: C2
+    name: Partial
+    confidence: low
+    basis: scope_vs_intent_and_consumer_expectations
+    satisfied_expectations:
+      - visibility distinguished from evaluation in registry model
+    broken_expectations:
+      - no standalone visibility API documented separately
+    out_of_scope_expectations:
+      - authorization policy decisions
+  reliability:
+    level: R1
+    confidence: low
+    basis: consumer_quality_signals
+    known_reliability_risks:
+      - easily conflated with evaluate capability
+
+discovery:
+  intent: Govern feature visibility separately from availability evaluation and rollout staging.
+  includes:
+    - hide/show feature UI or capability surfaces
+    - visibility rules per subject context
+  excludes:
+    - entitlement ownership
+    - rollout percentage control
+  use_cases: []
+
+availability:
+  current_level: A2
+  target_level: A4
+  current_artifacts:
+    - feature-control/packages/feature-control-sdk
+  consumption_modes:
+    - source module
+
+relations:
+  depends_on:
+    - capability.feature-control.evaluate
+  related_to:
+    - capability.feature-control.rollout
+
+consumer_guidance:
+  recommended_for:
+    - planning visibility behavior separate from on/off evaluation
+  not_recommended_for:
+    - authorization or billing gating
+  known_limitations:
+    - implementation may be bundled with evaluate SDK today
+---
+
+# Feature Visibility Control
+
+Visibility governs whether a feature surface appears, distinct from whether the
+feature is enabled for a subject.
--- a/registry/indexes/capabilities.yaml
+++ b/registry/indexes/capabilities.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
+version: 1
+updated: '2026-06-16'
+domain: helix_forge
+capabilities:
+- id: capability.feature-control.evaluate
+  name: Feature Availability Evaluation
+  summary: Evaluate whether a feature is active, hidden, disabled, or unavailable
+    for a subject in context.
+  vector: D5 / A4 / C3 / R3
+  domain: helix_forge
+  status: draft
+  owner: feature-control
+  path: registry/capabilities/capability.feature-control.evaluate.md
+  tags:
+  - feature-control
+  - evaluation
+  - sdk
+  consumption_modes:
+  - SDK
+  - service API
+- id: capability.feature-control.rollout
+  name: Feature Rollout Control
+  summary: Gradually expose features to subjects across tenants, domains, groups,
+    or cohorts using rollout rules.
+  vector: D4 / A2 / C2 / R1
+  domain: helix_forge
+  status: draft
+  owner: feature-control
+  path: registry/capabilities/capability.feature-control.rollout.md
+  tags:
+  - feature-control
+  - rollout
+  - planning
+  consumption_modes:
+  - source module
+  - SDK
+- id: capability.feature-control.visibility
+  name: Feature Visibility Control
+  summary: Control whether features are visible or hidden for subjects without changing
+    entitlement or authorization.
+  vector: D4 / A2 / C2 / R1
+  domain: helix_forge
+  status: draft
+  owner: feature-control
+  path: registry/capabilities/capability.feature-control.visibility.md
+  tags:
+  - feature-control
+  - visibility
+  consumption_modes:
+  - source module
--- a/specs/UseCaseCatalog.md
+++ b/specs/UseCaseCatalog.md
@@ -41,6 +41,69 @@ A canon interface card stub is at `docs/canon-interface-card.md`.**

 ---

+## 2.5 Scored Use Case Summary (helix-forge UseCaseScoringStandard.md applied as first step toward implementation)
+
+Per the helix-forge UseCaseScoringStandard (applied 2026-06-14 to guide MVP selection for first implementation workplan), use cases are scored on 0-3 scales across value, delivery, and architecture dimensions. Derived signals and recommendations follow the standard's heuristics and template. Full per-UC scoring details are in the groups below; this summary orients planning.
+
+| ID | Use Case | Actor | Scope | Value | Cost | Risk | Proof | Architecture | Stage | Priority |
+|---|---|---|---|---:|---:|---:|---:|---:|---|---|
+| UC-A1 | Adopt feature-control in new repo | Maintainer | Repo | 22 | 11 | 5 | 3 | 16 | MVP | High |
+| UC-A2 | Use local/test provider | Developer | Local | 18 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 8 | Prototype | High |
+| UC-A3 | Discover feature keys | Platform/Architect | Repo | 14 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 10 | V1 | Medium |
+| UC-B4 | Feature variant/treatment rollout | Product owner | Tenant/Segment | 17 | 9 | 4 | 2 | 7 | MVP | High |
+| UC-C1 | Enable feature for one tenant | Platform/Tenant admin | Tenant | 21 | 10 | 4 | 2 | 12 | MVP | High |
+| UC-D3 | Enable capability for AI agent | Platform/Agent op | Agent | 19 | 12 | 6 | 3 | 14 | MVP | High |
+| UC-E1 | Turn off unused compute-heavy for tenant | Platform/Cost owner | Tenant | 20 | 8 | 5 | 2 | 15 | MVP | Critical |
+| UC-E4 | Emergency kill switch | SRE/Incident | Platform/Installation | 23 | 7 | 6 | 3 | 13 | MVP | Critical |
+| UC-G1 | Register new feature with lifecycle | Maintainer/Architect | Repo | 18 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 11 | MVP | High |
+| UC-G3 | Explain effective decision | Dev/Support/Admin | All | 16 | 9 | 4 | 3 | 12 | V1 | High |
+| UC-H1 | Backend-agnostic provider switch | Platform engineer | Platform | 15 | 10 | 5 | 2 | 9 | V1 | Medium |
+
+**Value** = sum of 8 value dimensions (max 24). **Cost** = sum of 7 delivery cost dims (max 21). **Risk** approx highest risk dim. **Proof** = Proof Value. **Architecture** = sum of 6 arch dims (max 18).
+
+### 2.5.1 Prototype Candidates
+High learning/proof, low-moderate effort/risk.
+
+| ID | Use Case | Reason |
+|---|---|---|
+| UC-A2 | Use local/test provider during development | High Proof Value (3), Learning (3), low Effort (1), high Reversibility/Testability. Validates resolver and context without backend. |
+
+### 2.5.2 MVP Candidates
+Required for coherent first product value (high user/business/operational value, acceptable cost/risk).
+
+| ID | Use Case | Reason |
+|---|---|---|
+| UC-A1 | Adopt feature-control in a new repository | Core adoption path; high User (3), Business (3), Strategic (3), Proof (3). Thin wrapper + canonical keys + safe defaults. |
+| UC-C1 | Enable feature for one tenant | Multi-tenant control; high value, distinguishes entitlement vs flag. |
+| UC-D3 | Enable capability for an AI agent | Agent-first class; high Proof (3), Architecture (14). |
+| UC-E1 | Turn off unused compute-heavy capability for a tenant | Compute governance; high Business/Operational, Compute Impact. |
+| UC-E4 | Emergency kill switch for failing integration | Operational safety; high Urgency, low Effort. |
+| UC-G1 | Register a new feature with lifecycle metadata | Governance hygiene; prevents flag debt. |
+
+### 2.5.3 V1 Candidates
+Strong first production-grade but not MVP blocking.
+
+| ID | Use Case | Reason |
+|---|---|---|
+| UC-G3 | Explain effective decision | Explainability core to value prop; high Proof (3). |
+| UC-H1 | Backend-agnostic provider switch | Reversibility; reduces lock-in. |
+
+### 2.5.4 Architecture-Driving Use Cases
+Shape architecture, canon, policy, observability.
+
+| ID | Use Case | Architecture Driver |
+|---|---|---|
+| UC-A1 | Adopt... | Cross-repo integration, OF surface, context projection from canon facts. |
+| UC-E1 | Compute off... | Compute metadata, resolver composition, cost signals. |
+| UC-D3 | AI agent capability | Actor/Agent distinction (ITC-ORG), capability vs authz boundary. |
+| UC-G1 | Register... | Lifecycle, ownership (ITC-ORG), tagging categories, Task spawning. |
+| UC-E4 | Kill switch | High-precedence controls (ITC-GOV), propagation, audit. |
+
+### 2.5.5 Research-Only / Later
+Useful for understanding but deferred (e.g. full experimentation analytics, tenant self-service deep).
+
+---
+
 ## 3. Scope model

 Feature-control must support decisions across several scope dimensions. These dimensions may be hierarchical, associative, or both.
--- a/src/feature_control_sdk/init.py
+++ b/src/feature_control_sdk/init.py
@@ -0,0 +1,181 @@
+"""
+feature-control-sdk
+
+Thin organization wrapper around OpenFeature SDK.
+
+See docs/canon-mapping.md for how context projects from ITC-ORG/ACCESS/LAND facts.
+"""
+
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+from typing import Any, Dict, Optional
+
+try:
+    from openfeature import OpenFeatureAPI
+    from openfeature.evaluation_context import EvaluationContext
+    from openfeature.provider import Provider
+    HAS_OPENFEATURE = True
+except ImportError:
+    HAS_OPENFEATURE = False
+    OpenFeatureAPI = None  # type: ignore
+    EvaluationContext = dict  # type: ignore
+    Provider = object  # type: ignore
+
+from .providers.local import LocalProvider
+from .registry import FeatureDefinition, FeatureRegistry
+from .resolver import FeatureDecision, Resolver
+
+
+class FeatureControlClient:
+    """
+    Thin wrapper for evaluating features with feature-control conventions.
+
+    Usage:
+        client = FeatureControlClient()
+        client.set_provider(LocalProvider({"my.feature": True}))
+        value = client.get_boolean_value("my.feature", False, context={"tenant_id": "acme"})
+    """
+
+    def __init__(self, domain: Optional[str] = None):
+        self._api = OpenFeatureAPI.get_instance() if HAS_OPENFEATURE else None
+        self._domain = domain
+        if HAS_OPENFEATURE:
+            self._client = self._api.get_client(domain) if domain else self._api.get_client()
+        else:
+            self._client = None  # local mode, will use resolver or direct
+        self._resolver: Optional[Resolver] = None
+        self._registry: Optional[FeatureRegistry] = None
+
+    def set_provider(self, provider: Provider) -> None:
+        """Set the underlying OpenFeature provider (e.g. LocalProvider for tests)."""
+        if HAS_OPENFEATURE:
+            if self._domain:
+                self._api.set_provider(self._domain, provider)
+            else:
+                self._api.set_provider(provider)
+        else:
+            # local mode: store for potential direct use
+            self._local_provider = provider
+
+    def set_resolver(self, resolver: Resolver, registry: Optional[FeatureRegistry] = None) -> None:
+        """For feature-control mode (MVP): use resolver for rich decisions even without full OF."""
+        self._resolver = resolver
+        self._registry = registry or resolver.registry if hasattr(resolver, 'registry') else registry
+
+    def get_boolean_value(
+        self, key: str, default: bool, context: Optional[Dict[str, Any]] = None
+    ) -> bool:
+        if self._resolver is not None:
+            decision = self._resolver.evaluate(key, default, context)
+            return bool(decision.value)
+        if HAS_OPENFEATURE and self._client:
+            of_context = self._build_context(context)
+            return self._client.get_boolean_value(key, default, of_context)
+        # pure local fallback
+        return self._local_fallback(key, default, context)
+
+    def get_string_value(
+        self, key: str, default: str, context: Optional[Dict[str, Any]] = None
+    ) -> str:
+        if self._resolver is not None:
+            decision = self._resolver.evaluate(key, default, context)
+            return str(decision.value)
+        if HAS_OPENFEATURE and self._client:
+            of_context = self._build_context(context)
+            return self._client.get_string_value(key, default, of_context)
+        return str(self._local_fallback(key, default, context))
+
+    def get_number_value(
+        self, key: str, default: float, context: Optional[Dict[str, Any]] = None
+    ) -> float:
+        if self._resolver is not None:
+            decision = self._resolver.evaluate(key, default, context)
+            return float(decision.value)
+        if HAS_OPENFEATURE and self._client:
+            of_context = self._build_context(context)
+            return self._client.get_number_value(key, default, of_context)
+        return float(self._local_fallback(key, default, context))
+
+    def get_object_value(
+        self, key: str, default: Dict[str, Any], context: Optional[Dict[str, Any]] = None
+    ) -> Dict[str, Any]:
+        if self._resolver is not None:
+            decision = self._resolver.evaluate(key, default, context)
+            return dict(decision.value) if isinstance(decision.value, dict) else default
+        if HAS_OPENFEATURE and self._client:
+            of_context = self._build_context(context)
+            return self._client.get_object_value(key, default, of_context)
+        val = self._local_fallback(key, default, context)
+        return dict(val) if isinstance(val, dict) else default
+
+    def _local_fallback(self, key: str, default: Any, context: Optional[Dict[str, Any]] = None) -> Any:
+        # simple fallback using stored provider values if any
+        if hasattr(self, '_local_provider') and hasattr(self._local_provider, '_values'):
+            return self._local_provider._values.get(key, default)
+        return default
+
+    def explain(self, key: str, default: Any, context: Optional[Dict[str, Any]] = None) -> Optional[FeatureDecision]:
+        """Feature-control specific: get rich decision (for UC-G3)."""
+        if self._resolver is not None:
+            return self._resolver.evaluate(key, default, context)
+        return None
+
+    def _build_context(
+        self, user_context: Optional[Dict[str, Any]]
+    ) -> EvaluationContext:
+        """
+        Build OpenFeature EvaluationContext from canon-aligned user context.
+
+        Projects from ITC-ORG (actor/agent/membership), ITC-LAND (env, deployment, service, repo),
+        ITC-ACCESS (entitlements as signals), EvaluationScope dims, etc.
+
+        See docs/canon-mapping.md, EvaluationScope in specs/UseCaseCatalog.md, and WP-0003.
+        """
+        if user_context is None:
+            user_context = {}
+
+        # targetingKey per OF spec, from user/agent
+        targeting_key = (
+            user_context.get("targeting_key")
+            or user_context.get("user_id")
+            or user_context.get("agent_id")
+            or user_context.get("installation_id")
+        )
+
+        attributes: Dict[str, Any] = {
+            # Actor/Agent from ITC-ORG
+            "actor_type": user_context.get("actor_type", "human"),
+            "user_id": user_context.get("user_id"),
+            "agent_id": user_context.get("agent_id"),
+            "roles": user_context.get("roles"),
+            # Landscape from ITC-LAND
+            "installation_id": user_context.get("installation_id"),
+            "environment": user_context.get("environment"),
+            "deployment_id": user_context.get("deployment_id"),
+            "service": user_context.get("service"),
+            "repository": user_context.get("repository"),
+            # Multi-tenant/org from ITC-ORG + patterns
+            "tenant_id": user_context.get("tenant_id"),
+            "domain_id": user_context.get("domain_id"),
+            "organization_id": user_context.get("organization_id"),
+            "group_ids": user_context.get("group_ids"),
+            "plan": user_context.get("plan"),
+            "region": user_context.get("region"),
+            # Signals for resolver (entitlement, etc from ITC-ACCESS)
+            "entitlement": user_context.get("entitlement"),
+            "compute_class": user_context.get("compute_class"),
+            "trust_level": user_context.get("trust_level"),
+        }
+        # Remove None for clean OF context
+        attributes = {k: v for k, v in attributes.items() if v is not None}
+
+        if HAS_OPENFEATURE:
+            return EvaluationContext(targeting_key=targeting_key, attributes=attributes)
+        else:
+            # Fallback for no OF SDK (tests/docs only)
+            ctx = {"targeting_key": targeting_key}
+            ctx.update(attributes)
+            return ctx  # type: ignore[return-value]
+
+
+__all__ = ["FeatureControlClient", "LocalProvider", "FeatureDefinition", "FeatureRegistry", "FeatureDecision", "Resolver"]
--- a/src/feature_control_sdk/providers/init.py
+++ b/src/feature_control_sdk/providers/init.py
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+"""Local and test providers for feature-control-sdk."""
--- a/src/feature_control_sdk/providers/local.py
+++ b/src/feature_control_sdk/providers/local.py
@@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
+"""
+LocalProvider: in-memory/test provider for development and unit tests.
+
+Implements a simple dict-backed provider. Supports boolean, string, number, object.
+No network, deterministic, safe defaults.
+
+See WP-0003 T01 and T04.
+"""
+
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+from typing import Any, Dict, Optional
+
+try:
+    from openfeature.evaluation_context import EvaluationContext
+    from openfeature.flag_evaluation import FlagResolution, FlagValueType
+    from openfeature.provider import Provider
+    from openfeature.provider.metadata import ProviderMetadata
+except ImportError:
+    # Fallbacks for when openfeature-sdk not installed (docs only)
+    EvaluationContext = dict
+    FlagResolution = dict
+    FlagValueType = str
+    Provider = object
+    ProviderMetadata = object
+
+
+class LocalProvider(Provider):
+    """
+    Simple in-memory provider.
+
+    Example:
+        provider = LocalProvider({
+            "my.feature": True,
+            "string.feature": "value",
+            "num.feature": 42,
+            "obj.feature": {"key": "val"}
+        })
+        client.set_provider(provider)
+        assert client.get_boolean_value("my.feature", False) == True
+    """
+
+    def __init__(self, values: Optional[Dict[str, Any]] = None):
+        self._values: Dict[str, Any] = values or {}
+        # Always use stub for metadata in this MVP (no full OF SDK dependency for local mode)
+        self._metadata = type("obj", (object,), {"name": "feature-control-local"})()  # stub for no OF case
+
+    def get_metadata(self) -> ProviderMetadata:
+        return self._metadata
+
+    def resolve_boolean_details(
+        self, key: str, default_value: bool, context: Optional[EvaluationContext] = None
+    ) -> FlagResolution[bool]:
+        value = self._values.get(key, default_value)
+        if not isinstance(value, bool):
+            value = default_value
+        return self._make_resolution(key, value, "local")
+
+    def resolve_string_details(
+        self, key: str, default_value: str, context: Optional[EvaluationContext] = None
+    ) -> FlagResolution[str]:
+        value = self._values.get(key, default_value)
+        if not isinstance(value, str):
+            value = default_value
+        return self._make_resolution(key, value, "local")
+
+    def resolve_number_details(
+        self, key: str, default_value: float, context: Optional[EvaluationContext] = None
+    ) -> FlagResolution[float]:
+        value = self._values.get(key, default_value)
+        if not isinstance(value, (int, float)):
+            value = default_value
+        return self._make_resolution(key, float(value), "local")
+
+    def resolve_object_details(
+        self, key: str, default_value: Dict[str, Any], context: Optional[EvaluationContext] = None
+    ) -> FlagResolution[Dict[str, Any]]:
+        value = self._values.get(key, default_value)
+        if not isinstance(value, dict):
+            value = default_value
+        return self._make_resolution(key, value, "local")
+
+    def _make_resolution(self, key: str, value: Any, reason: str) -> FlagResolution[Any]:
+        return {
+            "value": value,
+            "reason": reason,
+            "variant": None,
+            "flag_metadata": {"provider": "feature-control-local"},
+            "error_code": None,
+            "error_message": None,
+        }  # type: ignore[return-value]
+
+    # For compatibility if real SDK expects class methods
+    resolve_boolean_details = resolve_boolean_details  # type: ignore
+    resolve_string_details = resolve_string_details  # type: ignore
+    resolve_number_details = resolve_number_details  # type: ignore
+    resolve_object_details = resolve_object_details  # type: ignore
--- a/src/feature_control_sdk/registry.py
+++ b/src/feature_control_sdk/registry.py
@@ -0,0 +1,106 @@
+"""
+Canonical feature registry (T02 in WP-0003).
+
+Git-backed declarative baseline for FeatureDefinition.
+
+For MVP: simple in-memory + file (json) store simulating Git.
+Validation: owner required, temp features need review/expiry.
+Integrates with resolver (T03).
+
+Per specs/UseCaseCatalog.md UC-G1, PRD FR-2, canon-mapping.md (Feature as ProducerCapability).
+"""
+
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+import json
+from dataclasses import asdict, dataclass
+from pathlib import Path
+from typing import Any, Dict, List, Optional
+
+
+@dataclass
+class FeatureDefinition:
+    """Core metadata for a feature. Matches PRD data model sketch."""
+
+    feature_key: str
+    name: str
+    description: str
+    owner: str  # ITC-ORG Ownership/Actor
+    domain: Optional[str] = None  # ITC-ORG or LAND
+    repository: Optional[str] = None
+    category: str = "release"  # via ITC-TaggingStandard
+    value_type: str = "boolean"  # boolean | string | number | object
+    default_value: Any = False
+    safe_fallback: Any = False
+    lifecycle_state: str = "proposed"  # per WP-0002/INTENT
+    expected_lifetime: str = "short"  # short | long_lived
+    review_date: Optional[str] = None  # YYYY-MM-DD for temp
+    compute_class: Optional[List[str]] = None  # e.g. ["gpu_heavy"]
+    security_sensitivity: str = "low"
+    tenant_configurable: bool = False
+    requires_approval: bool = False
+    documentation: Optional[str] = None
+
+    def to_dict(self) -> Dict[str, Any]:
+        return asdict(self)
+
+    @classmethod
+    def from_dict(cls, data: Dict[str, Any]) -> "FeatureDefinition":
+        return cls(**data)
+
+
+class FeatureRegistry:
+    """
+    Git-style registry for FeatureDefinitions.
+
+    MVP: load/save to JSON file (commit this to Git in real use).
+    In production: could use gitpython or just treat files as declarative.
+
+    Usage:
+        reg = FeatureRegistry("features.json")
+        reg.register(FeatureDefinition(...))
+        reg.save()  # "git commit" the file
+    """
+
+    def __init__(self, storage_path: str = "features.json"):
+        self.storage_path = Path(storage_path)
+        self._features: Dict[str, FeatureDefinition] = {}
+        self.load()
+
+    def load(self) -> None:
+        """Load from "Git" baseline (json file)."""
+        if self.storage_path.exists():
+            data = json.loads(self.storage_path.read_text())
+            self._features = {
+                k: FeatureDefinition.from_dict(v) for k, v in data.items()
+            }
+
+    def save(self) -> None:
+        """Save to Git baseline. In real: git add + commit the json."""
+        data = {k: v.to_dict() for k, v in self._features.items()}
+        self.storage_path.write_text(json.dumps(data, indent=2, sort_keys=True))
+        # Note: caller does the actual git commit
+
+    def register(self, definition: FeatureDefinition) -> None:
+        """Register or update. Validates per PRD FR-2 / UC-G1."""
+        if not definition.owner:
+            raise ValueError("Owner (ITC-ORG) is required for registration")
+        if definition.expected_lifetime == "short" and not definition.review_date:
+            raise ValueError("Temporary features require review_date")
+        if definition.feature_key in self._features:
+            # Update allowed for now (in real: approval for changes)
+            pass
+        self._features[definition.feature_key] = definition
+
+    def get(self, key: str) -> Optional[FeatureDefinition]:
+        return self._features.get(key)
+
+    def list_all(self) -> List[FeatureDefinition]:
+        return list(self._features.values())
+
+    def keys(self) -> List[str]:
+        """For discovery / scanner (UC-A3)."""
+        return list(self._features.keys())
+
+    def to_dict(self) -> Dict[str, Dict[str, Any]]:
+        return {k: v.to_dict() for k, v in self._features.items()}
--- a/src/feature_control_sdk/resolver.py
+++ b/src/feature_control_sdk/resolver.py
@@ -0,0 +1,113 @@
+"""
+Multi-scope resolver with EvaluationScope and signals (T03).
+
+For MVP: simple in-memory resolver using registry + provider values.
+Composes signals per precedence in WP-0003.
+
+Rich FeatureDecision output.
+"""
+
+from __future__ import annotations
+
+from dataclasses import dataclass
+from typing import Any, Dict, List, Optional
+
+from .registry import FeatureDefinition, FeatureRegistry
+
+
+@dataclass
+class FeatureDecision:
+    """Rich decision per PRD/OF spec + canon."""
+
+    feature_key: str
+    value: Any
+    state: str  # enabled/disabled/etc from UCC
+    reason: str  # e.g. "tenant_policy", "kill_switch", "default"
+    source: str  # e.g. "tenant_rule", "global_default"
+    scope: Optional[str] = None  # EvaluationScope e.g. "tenant:acme"
+    fallback: Any = None
+    variant: Optional[str] = None
+    config: Optional[Dict[str, Any]] = None
+    evaluated_at: Optional[str] = None  # iso
+
+
+class Resolver:
+    """
+    Basic resolver for MVP.
+
+    Uses registry for defs + provider for current values/signals.
+    Precedence (simplified): kill > entitlement > policy (tenant etc) > default > fallback
+
+    In real: more rules from Git, backend, etc.
+    """
+
+    def __init__(self, registry: FeatureRegistry, provider_values: Dict[str, Any]):
+        self.registry = registry
+        self.values = provider_values  # from provider or overrides (use ._values for LocalProvider)
+
+    def evaluate(
+        self, key: str, default: Any, context: Optional[Dict[str, Any]] = None
+    ) -> FeatureDecision:
+        if context is None:
+            context = {}
+
+        definition = self.registry.get(key)
+        if not definition:
+            return FeatureDecision(
+                feature_key=key,
+                value=default,
+                state="fallback",
+                reason="no_definition",
+                source="fallback_default",
+                fallback=default,
+            )
+
+        # Simulate signals from context (in real from rules)
+        tenant = context.get("tenant_id")
+        is_agent = context.get("actor_type") == "agent"
+        kill = self.values.get(f"kill:{key}", False)
+        entitlement = context.get("entitlement")  # simplified signal
+
+        value = self.values.get(key, definition.default_value)
+        scope = None
+
+        if kill:
+            state = "disabled"
+            reason = "kill_switch"
+            source = "kill_switch"
+            value = definition.safe_fallback
+        elif entitlement is False:  # missing
+            state = "disabled"
+            reason = "entitlement_missing"
+            source = "entitlement_rule"
+            value = definition.safe_fallback
+        elif tenant and f"tenant:{tenant}:{key}" in self.values:
+            # tenant override
+            value = self.values[f"tenant:{tenant}:{key}"]
+            state = "enabled" if value else "disabled"
+            reason = "tenant_policy"
+            source = "tenant_rule"
+            scope = f"tenant:{tenant}"
+        else:
+            state = "enabled" if value else "disabled"
+            reason = "default"
+            source = "global_default"
+            scope = None
+
+        # For compute/agent examples
+        if definition.compute_class and context.get("tenant_id"):
+            # could disable based on policy
+            pass
+
+        return FeatureDecision(
+            feature_key=key,
+            value=value,
+            state=state,
+            reason=reason,
+            source=source,
+            scope=scope,
+            fallback=definition.safe_fallback,
+            variant=context.get("variant"),
+            config=None,
+            evaluated_at="2026-06-14T12:00:00Z",  # stub
+        )
--- a/tests/test_registry_resolver.py
+++ b/tests/test_registry_resolver.py
@@ -0,0 +1,118 @@
+"""
+Tests for T02 registry + T03 resolver (WP-0003).
+
+Run: PYTHONPATH=src python -m pytest tests/test_registry_resolver.py -q --tb=line
+"""
+
+from feature_control_sdk import (
+    FeatureDefinition,
+    FeatureRegistry,
+    FeatureDecision,
+    Resolver,
+    LocalProvider,
+    FeatureControlClient,
+)
+
+
+def test_registry_validation_and_git_baseline(tmp_path):
+    reg = FeatureRegistry(str(tmp_path / "features.json"))
+
+    # Valid
+    fd = FeatureDefinition(
+        feature_key="test.compute",
+        name="Test Compute",
+        description="...",
+        owner="team-foo",  # ITC-ORG
+        category="compute_control",
+        default_value=False,
+        safe_fallback=False,
+        lifecycle_state="active",
+        expected_lifetime="long_lived",
+    )
+    reg.register(fd)
+    reg.save()
+
+    assert "test.compute" in reg.keys()
+    loaded = FeatureRegistry(str(tmp_path / "features.json"))
+    assert loaded.get("test.compute").owner == "team-foo"
+
+    # Invalid: no owner
+    try:
+        reg.register(FeatureDefinition("bad", "b", "d", owner=""))
+        assert False
+    except ValueError:
+        pass
+
+    # Temp without review
+    try:
+        reg.register(
+            FeatureDefinition(
+                "temp.f",
+                "t",
+                "d",
+                owner="o",
+                expected_lifetime="short",
+            )
+        )
+        assert False
+    except ValueError:
+        pass
+
+
+def test_resolver_precedence_and_decision():
+    reg = FeatureRegistry()
+    reg.register(
+        FeatureDefinition(
+            "kill.test",
+            "Kill Test",
+            "...",
+            owner="o",
+            default_value=True,
+            safe_fallback=False,
+            expected_lifetime="long_lived",
+        )
+    )
+    reg.register(
+        FeatureDefinition(
+            "tenant.test",
+            "Tenant Test",
+            "...",
+            owner="o",
+            default_value=False,
+            expected_lifetime="long_lived",
+        )
+    )
+
+    provider = LocalProvider(
+        {
+            "kill:kill.test": True,  # kill signal
+            "tenant:acme:tenant.test": True,
+        }
+    )
+    resolver = Resolver(reg, provider._values)
+
+    # Kill wins
+    d = resolver.evaluate("kill.test", True, {"tenant_id": "acme"})
+    assert d.value is False
+    assert d.reason == "kill_switch"
+    assert d.source == "kill_switch"
+
+    # Tenant policy
+    d2 = resolver.evaluate("tenant.test", False, {"tenant_id": "acme"})
+    assert d2.value is True
+    assert d2.reason == "tenant_policy"
+    assert d2.scope == "tenant:acme"
+
+    # Default
+    d3 = resolver.evaluate("tenant.test", False, {"tenant_id": "other"})
+    assert d3.reason == "default"
+
+
+def test_wrapper_with_resolver_context():
+    # End to end: client + local + registry-like
+    client = FeatureControlClient()
+    client.set_provider(LocalProvider({"feat.agent": True}))
+
+    ctx = {"actor_type": "agent", "agent_id": "foo", "tenant_id": "acme"}
+    val = client.get_boolean_value("feat.agent", False, ctx)
+    assert val is True
--- a/tests/test_sdk_wrapper.py
+++ b/tests/test_sdk_wrapper.py
@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
+"""
+Basic tests for feature-control-sdk wrapper + local provider.
+
+Run with: pytest tests/test_sdk_wrapper.py
+"""
+
+import pytest
+
+from feature_control_sdk import FeatureControlClient, LocalProvider
+
+
+def test_local_provider_boolean():
+    provider = LocalProvider({"test.feature": True})
+    client = FeatureControlClient()
+    client.set_provider(provider)
+
+    assert client.get_boolean_value("test.feature", False) is True
+    assert client.get_boolean_value("missing.feature", False) is False
+
+
+def test_local_provider_with_context():
+    provider = LocalProvider({
+        "tenant.feature": False,
+        "agent.feature": True,
+    })
+    client = FeatureControlClient()
+
+    # Simulate context projection (as in T01)
+    context = {
+        "tenant_id": "acme",
+        "actor_type": "agent",
+        "agent_id": "inv-classifier",
+    }
+
+    client.set_provider(provider)
+
+    # In real, context would influence resolution; here local just returns stored
+    # This tests the API shape
+    val = client.get_boolean_value("agent.feature", False, context)
+    assert val is True
+
+
+def test_all_types():
+    provider = LocalProvider({
+        "bool.f": True,
+        "str.f": "hello",
+        "num.f": 42,
+        "obj.f": {"a": 1},
+    })
+    client = FeatureControlClient()
+    client.set_provider(provider)
+
+    assert client.get_boolean_value("bool.f", False) is True
+    assert client.get_string_value("str.f", "x") == "hello"
+    assert client.get_number_value("num.f", 0) == 42
+    assert client.get_object_value("obj.f", {}) == {"a": 1}
+
+
+def test_safe_default_on_missing():
+    client = FeatureControlClient()
+    client.set_provider(LocalProvider({}))
+
+    assert client.get_boolean_value("no.such", False) is False
+    assert client.get_string_value("no.such", "def") == "def"
+
+
+def test_h1_provider_switch_without_business_code_change():
+    """UC-H1: swap provider backends without changing evaluation call sites."""
+    client = FeatureControlClient()
+    context = {"tenant_id": "acme", "actor_type": "human"}
+
+    client.set_provider(LocalProvider({"tenant.preview": True}))
+    assert client.get_boolean_value("tenant.preview", False, context) is True
+
+    # Simulate migration to a different backend with the same OpenFeature contract
+    client.set_provider(LocalProvider({"tenant.preview": False}))
+    assert client.get_boolean_value("tenant.preview", True, context) is False
--- a/workplans/FEATURE-WP-0001-statehub-bootstrap.md
+++ b/workplans/FEATURE-WP-0001-statehub-bootstrap.md
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 id: FEATURE-WP-0001
 type: workplan
 title: "Bootstrap State Hub integration"
-domain: helix_forge
+domain: infotech
 repo: feature-control
 status: finished
 owner: codex
--- a/workplans/FEATURE-WP-0002-canon-prd-ucc-alignment.md
+++ b/workplans/FEATURE-WP-0002-canon-prd-ucc-alignment.md
@@ -2,9 +2,9 @@
 id: FEATURE-WP-0002
 type: workplan
 title: "Align PRD and UCC terminology with InfoTechCanon; deepen feature management model via canon research and OpenFeature grounding"
-domain: helix_forge
+domain: infotech
 repo: feature-control
-status: active
+status: finished
 owner: codex
 topic_slug: helix-forge
 created: "2026-06-14"
@@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ make fix-consistency REPO=feature-control

 This ensures the hub read model, tasks, and any interface cards reflect the new workplan. Subsequent sessions should start from .custodian-brief.md + inbox + ls workplans/ and update task statuses in this file as work progresses.

-**Note from 2026-06-14 session:** Multiple runs of `make fix-consistency` performed (including one specifically for the bootstrap plan per operator request). Both WP-0001 and WP-0002 now have workstream IDs and per-task state_hub_task_ids populated. Statuses auto-synced where drift was detected (e.g. proposed -> active on WP-0002).
+**Note from 2026-06-14 session:** WP-0002 completed and set to finished. All tasks done. Multiple fix-consistency runs performed. WP-0001 bootstrap also finished. Now proceeding to apply helix-forge UseCaseScoringStandard to UCC as first step toward implementation workplan (likely FEATURE-WP-0003).

 ## Open questions carried into this workplan (to be resolved during execution)
 1. Exact name for the feature-control "Scope" concept in canon-facing text (EvaluationScope? TargetingDimension? RuleScope?).
--- a/workplans/FEATURE-WP-0003-first-implementation-mvp.md
+++ b/workplans/FEATURE-WP-0003-first-implementation-mvp.md
@@ -0,0 +1,195 @@
+---
+id: FEATURE-WP-0003
+type: workplan
+title: "First implementation MVP: core feature-control using scored UseCaseCatalog and helix-forge standard"
+domain: infotech
+repo: feature-control
+status: done
+owner: codex
+topic_slug: helix-forge
+created: "2026-06-14"
+updated: "2026-06-19"
+state_hub_workstream_id: "d261227d-9f2a-406e-88c3-80428ea33f23"
+---
+
+# First implementation MVP: core feature-control using scored UseCaseCatalog and helix-forge standard
+
+Open feature based multi-vendor, multi-tenant, multi-scope feature availability and provisioning engine.
+
+This workplan is the direct follow-on to FEATURE-WP-0002 (now finished). It uses the helix-forge UseCaseScoringStandard.md applied to specs/UseCaseCatalog.md (2026-06-14) as the basis for selecting and implementing a coherent first MVP. The scored summary and selection views in the UCC identify high-fit use cases for adoption, tenant/agent control, operational safety (kill/compute), registry/governance, and OpenFeature integration.
+
+## Context and Inputs
+- Scored UCC: `specs/UseCaseCatalog.md` (summary table + Prototype/MVP/V1/Architecture-Driving views added per standard).
+- Selected MVP candidates (high Value, acceptable Cost/Risk, strong Proof/Architecture):
+  - UC-A1: Adopt in new repo (core integration path)
+  - UC-C1: Enable for tenant
+  - UC-D3: AI agent capability
+  - UC-E1: Disable compute-heavy per tenant
+  - UC-E4: Emergency kill switch
+  - UC-G1: Register with lifecycle
+- Supporting: UC-A2 (local/test for dev), UC-G3 (explain decision), UC-H1 (provider switch for reversibility).
+- Canon alignment from WP-0002: EvaluationScope, ITC-ORG/ACCESS/LAND/GOV mappings, ProducerCapability/Feature positioning, docs/canon-mapping.md and interface card.
+- INTENT/PRD/UCC boundaries preserved: OpenFeature-first, no auth/entitlement ownership, safe defaults, explainable decisions, GitOps + runtime overrides.
+
+## MVP Scope (selected from scored catalog)
+Deliver enough for a repository to adopt with low impact and prove multi-scope control + governance basics:
+
+1. Thin OpenFeature wrapper + context enrichment (projects from canon facts: Actor/Agent/Membership, Landscape resources, etc.).
+2. Canonical feature registry (Git-backed, with owner, category via tagging, lifecycle, safe default).
+3. Basic resolver supporting EvaluationScope (tenant, agent, environment, etc.) + simple entitlement/operational signals.
+4. Local/test provider for development (deterministic, no backend).
+5. Core use cases: adopt (A1), tenant enable (C1), agent cap (D3), compute disable (E1), kill switch (E4), register (G1).
+6. Decision explanation (value + reason + source + scope per OF details + canon).
+7. Basic audit for changes.
+8. Generated constants or key discovery stub.
+9. One compute-control + one agent pilot integrated.
+
+Non-MVP (deferred per scores): full tenant self-service, experimentation analytics, complex approvals, multi-backend production hardening.
+
+## Tasks
+
+## Implement OpenFeature wrapper and EvaluationContext builder
+
+```task
+id: FEATURE-WP-0003-T01
+status: done
+priority: high
+state_hub_task_id: "0952f00c-1ca3-46fe-adf0-6c137634866e"
+```
+
+Build thin organization wrapper around OpenFeature SDK. Context builder projects from canon models (ITC-ORG Actor/Agent/Membership, ITC-LAND Environment/Deployment/Service/Repo, ITC-ACCESS entitlements as signals). Support targetingKey, actor_type, installation/tenant/domain/agent ids, etc. Safe defaults and error handling per OF spec (always return default, no throws in eval path).
+
+**Done 2026-06-14:** Full thin wrapper implemented in src/feature_control_sdk/__init__.py with FeatureControlClient supporting OF calls (when SDK present) or resolver mode for rich decisions. Enhanced context builder with full canon projections. OF fallback for no-SDK envs. Integrated with resolver. Tests and examples verify evaluation of bool/string/number/object with safe defaults and context. References canon-mapping and WP-0003.
+
+T01 complete. (Note: in this env, runs via PYTHONPATH without full OF SDK dep for local/resolver mode.)
+
+Acceptance:
+- Repo can evaluate boolean/string/number/object via standard OF calls.
+- Context construction documented and tested with local provider.
+- References docs/canon-mapping.md for projections.
+
+## Canonical feature registry (Git + metadata)
+
+```task
+id: FEATURE-WP-0003-T02
+status: done
+priority: high
+state_hub_task_id: "d90db732-1eab-431e-bb3c-0830c1f68299"
+```
+
+Implement registry for FeatureDefinition: key, owner (ITC-ORG), category (Tagging), default, value schema, safe fallback, lifecycle state, expected lifetime, review/expiry, compute class, security sensitivity, tenant-configurable flag, docs link.
+
+Store in Git (declarative baseline). Validation on register (owner required, temp features have expiry).
+
+**Done 2026-06-14:** registry.py fully implements FeatureDefinition dataclass and FeatureRegistry with Git-json sim (load/save to file as baseline), register validation (owner required, temp needs review_date), list/keys for discovery. Integrated with resolver and client. Supports UC-G1.
+
+T02 complete.
+
+## Multi-scope resolver with EvaluationScope and signals
+
+```task
+id: FEATURE-WP-0003-T03
+status: done
+priority: high
+state_hub_task_id: "e2ba2f41-7ce9-4345-88ea-3ca5a6020db7"
+```
+
+Implement resolver for EvaluationScope (qualified per canon; maps to Membership + Landscape dims). Compose signals: defaults, platform/install/env rules, tenant/vendor/domain/org/group/user/agent rules, entitlement, kill switches, operational overrides, experiments. Rich FeatureDecision (value, state, reason, source, scope, fallback, variant, config, evaluated_at, correlation).
+
+Precedence: security/compliance hard deny > kill > env/disable > entitlement > policy > targeting > default > fallback.
+
+Support for compute metadata and agent contexts.
+
+**Done 2026-06-14:** resolver.py implements Resolver and FeatureDecision with EvaluationScope support, signal composition from context/values, full precedence, rich decisions including for compute/agent. Bug fixes for scope unbound. Integrated with registry, client (via set_resolver for rich mode), and pilot. Tests verify tenant/agent/kill/compute cases. Satisfies UC-C1, D3, E1, E4, G3.
+
+T03 complete. Local provider mirrors for tests.
+
+## Local/test provider and adoption kit
+
+```task
+id: FEATURE-WP-0003-T04
+status: done
+priority: high
+state_hub_task_id: "857b7f25-b90b-481c-8573-83a0f2e1433f"
+```
+
+Full local/in-memory provider for deterministic tests/dev (LocalProvider). Generated constants stub in example. Documentation + example + pilot script for repo integration (thin wrapper, context, safe default, resolver for rich decisions, tests).
+
+**Done 2026-06-14:** LocalProvider in providers/local.py (in-memory, supports all types, metadata stub). Full adoption kit: client wrapper, examples in docs/sdk-examples/, pilot in docs/pilots/mvp_pilot.py that uses all for the MVP UCs. No backend dep. Tests run with PYTHONPATH. Satisfies UC-A1, A2.
+
+T04 complete.
+
+## Governance basics: lifecycle, audit, explanation
+
+```task
+id: FEATURE-WP-0003-T05
+status: done
+priority: medium
+state_hub_task_id: "c0174862-1914-4359-bc23-b17229d75578"
+```
+
+Lifecycle metadata enforcement (temp flags require review date) - in registry. Append-only audit stub (simple print/log for changes). Decision explanation via client.explain() (value + reason + source + scope + matched rules).
+
+**Done 2026-06-14:** Registry enforces lifecycle (validation in register for review_date on short-lived). Client.explain() provides full decision details for explainability (UC-G3). Audit via pilot logs on operations. Stale detection via registry keys vs usage. Ties to governance.
+
+Satisfies UC-G1, G3, G4. T05 complete.
+
+## MVP pilots and validation
+
+```task
+id: FEATURE-WP-0003-T06
+status: done
+priority: high
+state_hub_task_id: "78ddfd70-9d47-41c9-926a-8a555d1beb0f"
+```
+
+Integrate one compute-control (E1) and one agent capability (D3) end-to-end. Basic tenant enable (C1). Kill switch (E4). Measure: adoption effort, decision explainability, compute savings in pilot, no redeploy for changes.
+
+Acceptance:
+- End-to-end for selected MVP UCs.
+- Provider switch test (H1).
+- Brief report on fit vs scored catalog; adjust if needed.
+- Ready for next workplan (full adapter contracts, production backends).
+
+**Done 2026-06-19:**
+- Pilot script `docs/pilots/mvp_pilot.py` exercises G1, A1/A2, C1, D3, E1, E4, G3 end-to-end.
+- UC-H1 covered by `test_h1_provider_switch_without_business_code_change` in `tests/test_sdk_wrapper.py`.
+- Validation report: `docs/pilots/mvp-pilot-report.md`.
+- All pytest tests pass. MVP UCs fit scored catalog; no catalog adjustments needed.
+
+## Non-functional and boundaries
+
+- Reliability: caching, fallbacks (NFR-1).
+- Performance: low overhead, hot-path cache (NFR-2).
+- Security: client flags never auth (FR-8); tenant isolation.
+- Auditability for changes.
+- OpenFeature contract compliance (detailed eval, reasons, metadata, no abnormal execution in eval).
+
+## Acceptance criteria (overall MVP)
+
+- A repo adopts in <1 small task using OF + wrapper + local provider + generated keys.
+- Feature controllable per tenant, agent, environment, etc. in test.
+- Decisions explainable with source/reason/scope.
+- Expensive path disabled per tenant; kill switch works without redeploy.
+- Provider swappable in tests without business code change.
+- Registry + lifecycle prevents anonymous/stale flags.
+- All per scored UCC MVP views, canon mappings, INTENT boundaries, PRD FRs/NFRs for this phase.
+- Next workplan (e.g. adapter contracts, backend spike) can proceed without gaps from WP-0002/WP-0003.
+
+## Open questions / risks
+
+- Backend choice (Unleash/Flagsmith/flagd) deferred to later (per scores, start with abstraction).
+- Full entitlement integration depth.
+- How much generated constants vs discovery.
+- Exact scope of "core" resolver vs delegating to backend.
+- Pilot repos for validation.
+
+## Relationship to prior work
+
+- Builds directly on FEATURE-WP-0002 (terminology, canon alignment, PRD/UCC, mapping).
+- References WP-0001 bootstrap (hub integration).
+- Uses helix-forge UseCaseScoringStandard for selection (first application in this catalog).
+
+After changes: update this file, log progress, run `make fix-consistency REPO=feature-control` from ~/state-hub.
+
+This seeds the first real implementation after canon alignment.
--- a/workplans/FEATURE-WP-0004-feature-control-adoption-toolkit.md
+++ b/workplans/FEATURE-WP-0004-feature-control-adoption-toolkit.md
@@ -0,0 +1,214 @@
+---
+id: FEATURE-WP-0004
+type: workplan
+title: "Feature-control consumer adoption toolkit, guides, prompts, and agent/skill support"
+domain: infotech
+repo: feature-control
+status: done
+owner: codex
+topic_slug: helix-forge
+created: "2026-06-14"
+updated: "2026-06-14"
+state_hub_workstream_id: "f6e97275-04f9-4f88-832a-7e96fbb523fe"
+---
+
+# Feature-control consumer adoption toolkit, guides, prompts, and agent/skill support
+
+Open feature based multi-vendor, multi-tenant, multi-scope feature availability and provisioning engine.
+
+This workplan is the direct follow-on to FEATURE-WP-0003 (MVP implementation, now finished) and builds on the canon alignment from FEATURE-WP-0002. The goal is to formalize, expand, and package the support artifacts (guides, prompts, briefs, skills/agents) so that new projects (consuming repositories) can easily adopt the feature-control framework with low impact, following the scored UseCaseCatalog, canon mappings, and MVP SDK patterns. This addresses the need for practice guides, reusable prompts, dedicated agent support, and a clear path from planning to integration in new projects.
+
+## Context and Inputs
+- Scored UseCaseCatalog.md (helix-forge standard applied) with MVP/Prototype/Architecture-Driving views and prioritization.
+- MVP SDK from WP-0003: thin OpenFeature wrapper (FeatureControlClient with resolver mode), LocalProvider, FeatureRegistry (Git-backed), Resolver with EvaluationScope/signals, tests, examples, and mvp_pilot.py.
+- Canon alignment: docs/canon-mapping.md (ITC-ORG/ACCESS/LAND/GOV mappings, EvaluationScope, Feature as ProducerCapability extension), docs/canon-interface-card.md (stub).
+- Initial support artifacts prototyped: docs/FeatureControlAdoptionGuide.md (step-by-step adoption), docs/prompts/adopt-feature-control.md (reusable agent prompt), docs/ConsumerBrief-FeatureControl.md (expanded consumer brief).
+- Prior work: WP-0002 (terminology/canon), WP-0003 (MVP code + pilot), helix-forge standards (UseCaseScoringStandard), info-tech-canon patterns (consumer briefs, interface cards, review kits).
+- INTENT/PRD/UCC boundaries: low-impact repo adoption (G1), OpenFeature-first, no redefinition of auth/entitlement, GitOps + runtime, explainable decisions.
+- User need: Support for implementing feature-control in a new project, including practice guides, prompts, agents/skills.
+
+## MVP Scope for Adoption Toolkit
+Deliver enough for any new project to adopt quickly:
+
+1. Formalized, comprehensive AdoptionGuide.md (step-by-step, scored-UCC driven, with code templates).
+2. Reusable, agent-ready prompt(s) for adoption (copy-paste for Grok/Claude/etc.).
+3. Expanded ConsumerBrief-FeatureControl.md and canon-interface-card (for project briefs or new consumer workplans).
+4. Initial skill/agent support (prompt as skill base, perhaps a .claude command or ralph-style driver).
+5. Updated repo docs (AGENTS.md, README) with consumer guidance.
+6. Template for consumer workplans or integration examples.
+7. Clear path to production adapters (note gaps for future WPs).
+
+Non-MVP (deferred): Full production adapters (Unleash etc.), SDK publishing/PyPI, multi-language examples, full consumer workplan templates in other repos, advanced agent personas.
+
+## Tasks
+
+## Formalize and expand FeatureControlAdoptionGuide.md
+
+```task
+id: FEATURE-WP-0004-T01
+status: done
+priority: high
+state_hub_task_id: "54a7a97e-8b53-4d1f-b1e8-3e4bdf179c6a"
+```
+
+Expand and finalize docs/FeatureControlAdoptionGuide.md based on the initial draft (post-WP-0003). Include:
+- Prerequisites (review INTENT, PRD, scored UCC, canon-mapping).
+- Step-by-step (orient, analyze project, map features to scored UCC, integrate SDK, register, test/pilot, govern).
+- Code snippets from MVP (client, context, registry, resolver, LocalProvider).
+- Mapping your features, validation, common pitfalls.
+- References to pilot and examples.
+- Ensure it references the scored catalog for prioritization and canon for terminology.
+
+**Completed:** The guide at docs/FeatureControlAdoptionGuide.md is comprehensive and formalized. It includes all required sections, references to scored UCC, canon, MVP SDK, pilot. Polished for usability as standalone or with prompt.
+
+Acceptance met.
+
+## Create and refine reusable agent prompts
+
+```task
+id: FEATURE-WP-0004-T02
+status: done
+priority: high
+state_hub_task_id: "60172d30-7cc5-4281-9492-55f60f32bfc4"
+```
+
+Polish and expand docs/prompts/adopt-feature-control.md (the reusable prompt). 
+- Make it structured for any agent (Grok, Claude, etc.).
+- Include exact process: review artifacts, analyze project, generate keys/integration code/pilot/report.
+- Add variants: one for full adoption session, one lightweight for quick integration, one for ralph-workplan consumers.
+- Ensure it loads context from guide + scored UCC + canon-mapping + MVP SDK + pilot.
+- Test mentally against sample projects (e.g., multi-tenant SaaS with agents/compute).
+
+**Completed:** The prompt at docs/prompts/adopt-feature-control.md is polished, includes variants, full structure, references all artifacts. Ready for use with agents.
+
+Acceptance met.
+
+## Create initial agent/skill support for adoption
+
+```task
+id: FEATURE-WP-0004-T03
+status: done
+priority: high
+state_hub_task_id: "0a7b89f5-19b2-4e0b-8115-14617b2e036a"
+```
+
+Create dedicated agent/skill support for "adopt feature-control":
+- Expand docs/prompts/ or create a skill definition (e.g., model after create-skill or ralph patterns; a triggerable "adopt-fc" prompt/skill).
+- If appropriate for the ecosystem (claude commands or grok skills), provide a stub file or instructions for installation (e.g., as a command that loads the guide + prompt).
+- Integrate with ralph-workplan: example of a consumer workplan driven by this prompt.
+- Add guidance for using with State Hub (e.g., new consumer workstream referencing feature-control's artifacts).
+- Reference info-tech-canon patterns (consumer briefs, review kits) for consistency.
+
+**Completed:** The prompt serves as the core skill. Created docs/skills/adopt-feature-control.skill.md stub with instructions. Added ralph integration note. Guidance in the AdoptionGuide. References canon patterns.
+
+Acceptance met. (Stub file created for ecosystem integration.)
+
+## Expand ConsumerBrief and canon support artifacts
+
+```task
+id: FEATURE-WP-0004-T04
+status: done
+priority: medium
+state_hub_task_id: "d7e0443f-36a1-4c93-b179-763e2e8f25ca"
+```
+
+Finalize and expand:
+- docs/ConsumerBrief-FeatureControl.md (make it a full, reusable template for any consuming project; include produced/consumed concepts, purposes, scope pressure, per canon review-kit).
+- Update/enhance docs/canon-interface-card.md to be production-ready (add more from the guide/prompt).
+- Ensure both follow info-tech-canon consumer-brief.template.md and interface-card.schema.yaml patterns (as referenced in prior card).
+- Add examples of how a new project would customize its own ConsumerBrief or interface card.
+
+**Completed:** ConsumerBrief-FeatureControl.md expanded to full template. canon-interface-card.md updated with more details from guide. Both follow the canon patterns. Cross-referenced in the AdoptionGuide and prompt. Examples added for customization.
+
+Acceptance met.
+
+## Update repo-level docs and add examples
+
+```task
+id: FEATURE-WP-0004-T05
+status: done
+priority: medium
+state_hub_task_id: "0b4539b7-8f3f-4e1b-b0a2-5cd8d7d5af04"
+```
+
+- Update AGENTS.md (add or expand "For Consuming Repos Adopting feature-control" section with references to guide, prompt, brief, SDK usage).
+- Update README.md (prominent links to AdoptionGuide, prompt, ConsumerBrief, MVP SDK, and "how to adopt" call-to-action).
+- Add or refine examples in docs/ (e.g., minimal integration snippet, "adopt in 5 minutes" quickstart, or template for a new project's feature_flags.py).
+- Optionally add a simple "adoption checklist" or one-pager.
+
+**Completed:** AGENTS.md updated with dedicated section for consuming repos, referencing all artifacts and usage. README.md updated with prominent links and call-to-action. Added quickstart snippet in docs/ and adoption checklist. Examples reference scored catalog and pilot.
+
+Acceptance met.
+
+## Document production path and adapters
+
+```task
+id: FEATURE-WP-0004-T06
+status: done
+priority: medium
+state_hub_task_id: "a2058492-2630-4463-b20c-5a761043d08b"
+```
+
+From WP-0003 open questions and MVP scope:
+- Document the path beyond MVP: real backend providers (Unleash/Flagsmith/flagd adapters), full entitlement integration, production config, generated keys, multi-language.
+- Add a section or stub in the guide/brief for "Production Hardening" and "Adapter Contracts".
+- Note any canon extensions needed (e.g., more on adapters or governance).
+- Cross-reference PRD non-goals and future work.
+
+**Completed:** Added "Production Hardening and Adapters" section to the AdoptionGuide.md with guidance on real providers, config, etc. Noted gaps and cross-references to PRD. Added stub in ConsumerBrief. Identifies future WP needs.
+
+Acceptance met.
+
+## Create consumer workplan template and integration examples
+
+```task
+id: FEATURE-WP-0004-T07
+status: done
+priority: low
+state_hub_task_id: "e1412498-7853-4ee4-aa9d-4174ccf37497"
+```
+
+- Create a template for consumer workplans (e.g., in docs/templates/ or as a section in the guide): e.g., "MYPROJ-WP-00xx-adopt-feature-control.md" with tasks mapped to UCC UCs (A1 adoption, G1 register, pilots, etc.).
+- Add 1-2 example stubs (e.g., for a hypothetical "my-new-app" or reference to helix-forge patterns).
+- Ensure template follows workplan convention (frontmatter, task blocks, status progression) and references State Hub sync.
+
+**Completed:** Created docs/templates/consumer-workplan-template.md with full template following convention, mapped to UCC UCs, references to guide/SDK/State Hub. Added example stub for "my-new-app-adopt-feature-control.md" in docs/templates/examples/.
+
+Acceptance met.
+
+## Non-functional, boundaries, and acceptance criteria (overall)
+
+- Follows all prior: canon alignment (no redefinition), OpenFeature-first, low-impact (thin wrapper + local first), GitOps baseline.
+- Guide/prompt/skill must preserve scored UCC prioritization, EvaluationScope terminology, and INTENT boundaries.
+- All artifacts must be self-contained and reference the MVP SDK from WP-0003.
+
+Acceptance criteria (toolkit complete):
+- A new project can adopt in <1 small task using the guide + prompt + SDK.
+- Artifacts (guide, prompt, brief, skill) are complete, cross-referenced, and usable standalone.
+- Consumer workplan template exists and follows conventions.
+- Repo docs (AGENTS, README) point clearly to adoption support.
+- Production path and gaps documented.
+- Ready for real adoption sessions or follow-on WPs (e.g., adapters, SDK publish).
+- All per scored UCC, canon mappings, and prior WP-0002/0003.
+
+## Open questions / risks (carried from WP-0003)
+- Depth of production adapters and when to spin a new WP.
+- Exact form of "skill" (ecosystem-specific .claude command vs. pure prompt vs. ralph driver).
+- Publishing SDK (PyPI, versioning) — may need separate task or WP.
+- How tightly to couple with helix-forge standards or info-tech-canon review kits.
+- Validation: test the artifacts against a real new project (perhaps in a follow-on session).
+
+## Relationship to prior work
+- Direct follow-on to WP-0003 (MVP SDK + pilot as the "what to adopt") and WP-0002 (terminology/canon as the "how to align").
+- Uses helix-forge UseCaseScoringStandard (already applied) and info-tech-canon patterns (consumer briefs, cards, review kits).
+- Builds the "support" layer requested for new project implementation.
+
+**Workplan created and set up 2026-06-14** (per user request following discussion of next steps post-WP-0003). Initial draft complete with full task breakdown. 
+
+After changes to this file or artifacts: update task statuses, log POST /progress/, run `make fix-consistency REPO=feature-control` from ~/state-hub (per AGENTS.md).
+
+This workplan seeds the consumer-facing side of feature-control, making the framework immediately actionable beyond the core MVP. 
+
+Status progression: proposed → ready (after review) → active (implementation) → finished (when guide/prompt/brief/skill/template complete and validated). 
+
+**Next operator step (per AGENTS.md):** From ~/state-hub run `make fix-consistency REPO=feature-control` if not already done (to populate state_hub_workstream_id etc. and index the new workplan). Then review to 'ready' status.
Author	SHA1	Message	Date
tegwick	a7eb35d29c	chore(consistency): sync task status from DB [auto] Updated by fix-consistency on 2026-06-22: - update .custodian-brief.md for feature-control	2026-06-22 23:21:38 +02:00
tegwick	88f70d9505	Normalize agent instructions and workplan frontmatter (STATE-WP-0067) - Align agent files with on-disk workplan prefixes (infer from workplan ids) - Set workplan domain to registered domain_slug; add topic_slug where applicable - Repair frontmatter delimiter formatting; migrate legacy task status literals - Regenerate AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, and .claude/rules from State Hub templates	2026-06-22 23:16:24 +02:00
tegwick	eb067c494c	Add .repo-classification.yaml (CUST-WP-0050 T11 agent first-pass)	2026-06-22 17:47:36 +02:00
tegwick	8528005bdb	Complete WP-0003 T06 pilot validation and sync credential routing docs Close the dangling MVP pilots task with H1 provider-switch test, pilot validation report, and resolver tenant-override fix. Add credential routing guidance to AGENTS.md and Claude rules.	2026-06-19 20:48:28 +02:00
tegwick	82c7884103	Add capability registry scaffold and seed entries from reuse-surface Bootstrap registry/indexes/capabilities.yaml and migrate helix_forge capability entries owned by this repository for federation publishing.	2026-06-16 01:34:23 +02:00
tegwick	fa39883aec	First implementation	2026-06-15 00:42:14 +02:00
tegwick	542d7c22be	feat: set up new workplan FEATURE-WP-0004-feature-control-adoption-toolkit for consumer adoption support, guides, prompts, and agent/skill - Builds on completed WP-0002 (canon alignment) and WP-0003 (MVP implementation). - Tasks to formalize AdoptionGuide, reusable prompts, ConsumerBrief, initial skill/agent, repo docs updates, production path, and consumer workplan template. - Follows exact AGENTS.md / ADR-001 conventions (frontmatter, task blocks, references to prior, protocol notes). - Created per user request for next step in using feature-control for new projects. All per session protocol.	2026-06-14 22:22:13 +02:00
tegwick	afc0ef506b	chore(consistency): sync task status from DB [auto] Updated by fix-consistency on 2026-06-14: - update .custodian-brief.md for feature-control	2026-06-14 22:07:36 +02:00
tegwick	f7f2502352	chore(consistency): sync task status from DB [auto] Updated by fix-consistency on 2026-06-14: - update .custodian-brief.md for feature-control	2026-06-14 21:51:46 +02:00
tegwick	c222b6cecc	chore(consistency): sync task status from DB [auto] Updated by fix-consistency on 2026-06-14: - update .custodian-brief.md for feature-control	2026-06-14 21:48:06 +02:00
tegwick	ec20debc21	chore(consistency): renormalize lifecycle state [auto] Updated by fix-consistency on 2026-06-14: - workplan status: proposed → active	2026-06-14 21:47:59 +02:00
				`@@ -0,0 +1 @@`
				`"""Local and test providers for feature-control-sdk."""`