generated from coulomb/repo-seed
Add workflow entries for INTENT assessment and automation-roadmap phases, workflows.yaml index, assessment-loop stages, and capability.hr.workflow-catalog for reuse-surface federation. Completes HUMAN-WP-0002.
111 lines
3.8 KiB
Markdown
111 lines
3.8 KiB
Markdown
---
|
||
id: workflow.hr.automation-roadmap
|
||
name: HR Automation Roadmap
|
||
summary: Prioritize high-impact repetitive HR tasks for intelligent automation while preserving human-led strategic and relational work.
|
||
owner: human-resources
|
||
status: draft
|
||
domain: consumer
|
||
intent_phase: automation-roadmap
|
||
tags:
|
||
- automation
|
||
- roadmap
|
||
- prioritization
|
||
- planning
|
||
|
||
assessment:
|
||
stage: inventory
|
||
last_reviewed: "2026-06-24"
|
||
blockers:
|
||
- Depends on workflow.hr.current-state-assessment reaching automation_potential stage
|
||
notes:
|
||
- Initial scaffold entry; candidate list seeded from INTENT automation guidance.
|
||
|
||
lifecycle:
|
||
depends_on:
|
||
- workflow.hr.current-state-assessment
|
||
precedes: []
|
||
supports: []
|
||
|
||
scope:
|
||
includes:
|
||
- prioritizing automation candidates by impact, effort, and risk
|
||
- defining human-in-the-loop boundaries per candidate
|
||
- sequencing rollout (start small, expand with feedback)
|
||
excludes:
|
||
- building or deploying HRIS/payroll products
|
||
- replacing coaching, complex dispute resolution, or culture-building
|
||
|
||
actors:
|
||
- HR operators and people-ops leads
|
||
- engineering/automation agents (future implementation)
|
||
- custodian agents (workplan and registry coordination)
|
||
|
||
inputs:
|
||
- current-state assessment outputs (process maps, pain points)
|
||
- INTENT automation best practices (high-impact repetitive tasks first)
|
||
- compliance and data-security constraints
|
||
|
||
outputs:
|
||
- ranked automation backlog with rationale
|
||
- per-candidate human-touch boundaries
|
||
- phased rollout plan with feedback/ROI review hooks
|
||
|
||
metrics_hooks:
|
||
- manual-touch reduction target per candidate (TBD)
|
||
- cycle-time reduction target per candidate (TBD)
|
||
- employee self-service adoption (TBD)
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
# HR Automation Roadmap
|
||
|
||
## Overview
|
||
|
||
Second INTENT phase: turn assessment findings into a sequenced automation plan.
|
||
Automation amplifies efficiency; strategic and relational HR work stays
|
||
human-led per INTENT.
|
||
|
||
## Candidate seed list
|
||
|
||
From INTENT automation guidance—validate against current-state inventory:
|
||
|
||
| Candidate | Typical impact | Human touch retained |
|
||
|-----------|----------------|----------------------|
|
||
| Onboarding paperwork & checklist routing | High volume, repetitive | Culture immersion, manager intro |
|
||
| Leave and absence requests | Self-service friendly | Complex cases, accommodations |
|
||
| Benefits enrollment reminders | Seasonal, rule-based | Plan design, exceptions |
|
||
| Compliance tracking & audit prep | Error reduction | Investigations, judgment calls |
|
||
| Basic HR reporting | Time savings | Interpretation, strategy |
|
||
| Payroll-adjacent data validation | Accuracy | Compensation design (out of scope for product build) |
|
||
|
||
## Prioritization rubric
|
||
|
||
Score each candidate (1–5) on:
|
||
|
||
1. **Volume** — how often the task runs
|
||
2. **Repetition** — rule-bound vs judgment-heavy
|
||
3. **Pain** — current friction from assessment
|
||
4. **Risk** — compliance/privacy exposure if automated poorly
|
||
5. **Readiness** — data, tools, and policy clarity available
|
||
|
||
Prefer high `(volume + repetition + pain) / risk` with readiness ≥ 3.
|
||
|
||
## Assessment loop position
|
||
|
||
Blocked at **`inventory`** until current-state assessment advances to
|
||
`automation_potential`. See `registry/assessment-loop.md`.
|
||
|
||
### Next steps
|
||
|
||
1. Import validated candidates from current-state assessment.
|
||
2. Apply prioritization rubric; produce ranked backlog.
|
||
3. Define phase-1 pilot (single candidate, clear ROI metric).
|
||
4. Advance to `automation_potential` when backlog is ranked and bounded.
|
||
|
||
## INTENT linkage
|
||
|
||
> *"…current-state assessment, **automation roadmap**, metrics framework,
|
||
> specific workflows…"* — `INTENT.md`
|
||
|
||
> *"Automation excels at admin (payroll, benefits enrollment, compliance
|
||
> tracking, basic reporting) but strategic/relational elements remain
|
||
> human-led."* — `INTENT.md` background |