generated from coulomb/repo-seed
Add capability registry scaffold and seed entries from reuse-surface
Bootstrap registry/indexes/capabilities.yaml and migrate helix_forge capability entries owned by this repository for federation publishing.
This commit is contained in:
12
registry/README.md
Normal file
12
registry/README.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
|
||||
# Capability Registry
|
||||
|
||||
Markdown-first capability index for federation and reuse planning.
|
||||
|
||||
## Authoring
|
||||
|
||||
1. Copy a capability entry template (see reuse-surface `templates/capability-entry.template.md`).
|
||||
2. Add the row to `indexes/capabilities.yaml`.
|
||||
3. Run `reuse-surface validate` from a checkout with the CLI installed.
|
||||
4. Merge to `main` and verify publish with `reuse-surface establish --publish-check`.
|
||||
|
||||
Federation contract: reuse-surface `docs/RegistryFederation.md`.
|
||||
115
registry/capabilities/capability.identity.subject-resolution.md
Normal file
115
registry/capabilities/capability.identity.subject-resolution.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,115 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
id: capability.identity.subject-resolution
|
||||
name: Identity Subject Resolution
|
||||
summary: Resolve who or what is acting in a context by mapping principals, accounts, actors, and identifiers to a stable subject model.
|
||||
owner: identity-canon
|
||||
status: draft
|
||||
domain: helix_forge
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- identity
|
||||
- subject
|
||||
- architecture
|
||||
|
||||
maturity:
|
||||
discovery:
|
||||
current: D3
|
||||
target: D5
|
||||
confidence: medium
|
||||
rationale: >
|
||||
Subject/principal terminology is explored in identity-canon conflict maps
|
||||
and conceptual model, but dedicated use-case grounding is incomplete.
|
||||
availability:
|
||||
current: A0
|
||||
target: A4
|
||||
confidence: low
|
||||
rationale: >
|
||||
Canon and research artifacts exist; no standalone resolver service or SDK
|
||||
is registered yet.
|
||||
|
||||
external_evidence:
|
||||
completeness:
|
||||
level: C1
|
||||
name: Fragmentary
|
||||
confidence: low
|
||||
basis: scope_vs_intent_and_consumer_expectations
|
||||
satisfied_expectations:
|
||||
- overloaded subject and principal terms are mapped as candidates
|
||||
broken_expectations:
|
||||
- no runtime resolver artifact
|
||||
- canonical subject model not finalized across all actor types
|
||||
out_of_scope_expectations:
|
||||
- authentication protocol implementation
|
||||
- credential storage
|
||||
reliability:
|
||||
level: R0
|
||||
confidence: low
|
||||
basis: consumer_quality_signals
|
||||
known_reliability_risks:
|
||||
- draft terminology may change during source-note backfill
|
||||
|
||||
discovery:
|
||||
intent: >
|
||||
Give planners and implementers a consistent subject concept for authorization,
|
||||
feature control, tenancy, and agent workflows without collapsing product-specific
|
||||
identity models.
|
||||
includes:
|
||||
- subject vs principal vs account distinctions
|
||||
- actor type modeling
|
||||
- identifier resolution concepts
|
||||
excludes:
|
||||
- authentication execution
|
||||
- credential issuance
|
||||
- directory provisioning
|
||||
assumptions:
|
||||
- vocabulary canonicalization supports but does not replace subject resolution
|
||||
use_cases:
|
||||
- UC-RS-004
|
||||
research_memos:
|
||||
- identity-canon/terminology/TerminologyConflictMap.md
|
||||
- identity-canon/model/ConceptualModel.md
|
||||
|
||||
availability:
|
||||
current_level: A0
|
||||
target_level: A4
|
||||
current_artifacts:
|
||||
- identity-canon/model/ConceptualModel.md
|
||||
- identity-canon/canon/CanonicalGlossary.md
|
||||
target_artifacts:
|
||||
- identity-canon/packages/subject-resolution-sdk
|
||||
consumption_modes:
|
||||
- informational
|
||||
|
||||
relations:
|
||||
depends_on:
|
||||
- capability.identity.vocabulary-canonicalize
|
||||
supports:
|
||||
- capability.feature-control.evaluate
|
||||
- capability.statehub.workstream-coordinate
|
||||
related_to: []
|
||||
|
||||
evidence:
|
||||
documentation:
|
||||
- identity-canon/canon/CanonicalGlossary.md
|
||||
- identity-canon/scenarios/ScenarioTests.md
|
||||
tests: []
|
||||
consumer_feedback: []
|
||||
bug_reports: []
|
||||
incidents: []
|
||||
|
||||
consumer_guidance:
|
||||
recommended_for:
|
||||
- architecture planning where subject/principal/account terms overlap
|
||||
not_recommended_for:
|
||||
- runtime authentication or token validation
|
||||
- treating draft canon as finalized resolver behavior
|
||||
known_limitations:
|
||||
- resolver artifacts are not yet available
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Identity Subject Resolution
|
||||
|
||||
## Overview
|
||||
|
||||
Subject resolution defines how actors and identifiers map to a stable subject
|
||||
concept for downstream capabilities such as feature evaluation and coordination.
|
||||
Today this capability is planning-heavy (D3/A0).
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,136 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
id: capability.identity.vocabulary-canonicalize
|
||||
name: Identity Vocabulary Canonicalization
|
||||
summary: Define and maintain an implementation-neutral vocabulary for identity-related concepts across overlapping domains.
|
||||
owner: identity-canon
|
||||
status: draft
|
||||
domain: helix_forge
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- identity
|
||||
- terminology
|
||||
- research
|
||||
|
||||
maturity:
|
||||
discovery:
|
||||
current: D4
|
||||
target: D6
|
||||
confidence: medium
|
||||
rationale: >
|
||||
identity-canon has researched overlapping terminology across IAM,
|
||||
directory, federation, and authorization domains, but use-case saturation
|
||||
is not yet demonstrated.
|
||||
availability:
|
||||
current: A0
|
||||
target: A2
|
||||
confidence: medium
|
||||
rationale: >
|
||||
The capability is available as research and canon documentation only.
|
||||
Future source modules or libraries could raise availability to A2.
|
||||
|
||||
external_evidence:
|
||||
completeness:
|
||||
level: C2
|
||||
name: Partial
|
||||
confidence: low
|
||||
basis: scope_vs_intent_and_consumer_expectations
|
||||
satisfied_expectations:
|
||||
- draft canonical glossary exists
|
||||
- terminology conflict map exists
|
||||
- conceptual model and scenario tests exist
|
||||
broken_expectations:
|
||||
- individual source notes are not fully backfilled
|
||||
- many mappings remain candidate rather than finalized
|
||||
out_of_scope_expectations:
|
||||
- operating identity providers
|
||||
- provisioning or authorization engines
|
||||
reliability:
|
||||
level: R0
|
||||
confidence: low
|
||||
basis: consumer_quality_signals
|
||||
known_reliability_risks:
|
||||
- draft canon terms may change as source evidence is backfilled
|
||||
|
||||
discovery:
|
||||
intent: >
|
||||
Provide a reusable planning primitive for identity vocabulary so architects
|
||||
and agents can compare overlapping terms consistently without collapsing
|
||||
product-specific meanings into one ambiguous label.
|
||||
includes:
|
||||
- canonical glossary maintenance
|
||||
- terminology conflict mapping
|
||||
- conceptual model and scenario tests
|
||||
- research corpus indexing
|
||||
excludes:
|
||||
- identity provider implementation
|
||||
- account lifecycle services
|
||||
- authorization policy enforcement
|
||||
assumptions:
|
||||
- external product mappings remain separate from canonical definitions
|
||||
use_cases:
|
||||
- UC-RS-004
|
||||
- UC-RS-006
|
||||
research_memos:
|
||||
- identity-canon/ResearchProposal.md
|
||||
- identity-canon/canon/CanonicalGlossary.md
|
||||
|
||||
availability:
|
||||
current_level: A0
|
||||
target_level: A2
|
||||
current_artifacts:
|
||||
- identity-canon/canon/CanonicalGlossary.md
|
||||
- identity-canon/terminology/TerminologyConflictMap.md
|
||||
- identity-canon/model/ConceptualModel.md
|
||||
target_artifacts:
|
||||
- identity-canon/packages/identity-vocabulary
|
||||
consumption_modes:
|
||||
- informational
|
||||
- markdown research artifacts
|
||||
|
||||
relations:
|
||||
depends_on: []
|
||||
supports:
|
||||
- capability.feature-control.evaluate
|
||||
- capability.registry.register
|
||||
related_to:
|
||||
- capability.identity.subject-resolution
|
||||
|
||||
evidence:
|
||||
documentation:
|
||||
- identity-canon/INTENT.md
|
||||
- identity-canon/canon/CanonicalGlossary.md
|
||||
tests: []
|
||||
consumer_feedback: []
|
||||
bug_reports: []
|
||||
incidents: []
|
||||
|
||||
consumer_guidance:
|
||||
recommended_for:
|
||||
- architecture and planning conversations involving overloaded identity terms
|
||||
- comparing IAM, directory, and authorization vocabulary without forcing one product model
|
||||
not_recommended_for:
|
||||
- runtime identity resolution
|
||||
- assuming draft canon entries are finalized standards
|
||||
known_limitations:
|
||||
- source-note backfill is incomplete
|
||||
- mappings may remain candidate until evidence review completes
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Identity Vocabulary Canonicalization
|
||||
|
||||
## Overview
|
||||
|
||||
This capability makes identity vocabulary reusable for planning across adjacent
|
||||
domains. It is intentionally research-heavy and informational, illustrating a
|
||||
D4/A0/C2/R0 vector that contrasts with implementation-ready entries.
|
||||
|
||||
## Current reuse mode
|
||||
|
||||
Consumers read canon, terminology, and model artifacts in the identity-canon
|
||||
repository. The value is planning reuse through shared vocabulary, not runtime
|
||||
integration.
|
||||
|
||||
## Relation to adjacent capabilities
|
||||
|
||||
Feature-control evaluation depends on consistent subject and tenant concepts.
|
||||
This capability supports that planning layer without providing runtime identity
|
||||
services itself.
|
||||
34
registry/indexes/capabilities.yaml
Normal file
34
registry/indexes/capabilities.yaml
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
|
||||
version: 1
|
||||
updated: '2026-06-16'
|
||||
domain: helix_forge
|
||||
capabilities:
|
||||
- id: capability.identity.subject-resolution
|
||||
name: Identity Subject Resolution
|
||||
summary: Resolve who or what is acting by mapping principals, accounts, actors,
|
||||
and identifiers to a stable subject model.
|
||||
vector: D3 / A0 / C1 / R0
|
||||
domain: helix_forge
|
||||
status: draft
|
||||
owner: identity-canon
|
||||
path: registry/capabilities/capability.identity.subject-resolution.md
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- identity
|
||||
- subject
|
||||
- architecture
|
||||
consumption_modes:
|
||||
- informational
|
||||
- id: capability.identity.vocabulary-canonicalize
|
||||
name: Identity Vocabulary Canonicalization
|
||||
summary: Define an implementation-neutral vocabulary for identity-related concepts
|
||||
across overlapping domains.
|
||||
vector: D4 / A0 / C2 / R0
|
||||
domain: helix_forge
|
||||
status: draft
|
||||
owner: identity-canon
|
||||
path: registry/capabilities/capability.identity.vocabulary-canonicalize.md
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- identity
|
||||
- terminology
|
||||
- research
|
||||
consumption_modes:
|
||||
- informational
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user