This repository has been archived on 2026-07-08. You can view files and clone it. You cannot open issues or pull requests or push a commit.
Files
identity-canon/research/commercial-identity/beneficial-ownership-kyc-boi.md
tegwick 08361f6fb7 Settle commercial identity nuances with consolidated enums and linking rules
Add commercial-identity-nuance-settlement.md resolving control_basis,
binding_trigger, cross-registry Synonymity strengths, OPI branch modeling,
escrow commitment type, reputation portability, payment edge cases, CRM renewal
rules, Person Account adapters, and eIDAS wallet scope. Update canon, OpenQuestions,
and all commercial-identity source notes.
2026-06-21 23:21:21 +02:00

183 lines
9.4 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
# Beneficial Ownership — CDD, BOI, and KYC Modeling
## Source Type
Regulatory framework synthesis. FinCEN CDD Rule (31 CFR 1010.230), Corporate
Transparency Act / BOI reporting, FATF Recommendation 24, and KYC industry
practice.
## Domain
Beneficial ownership identification for legal entity customers — financial
institution due diligence, government transparency registries, and regulated
commercial onboarding.
## Why This Source Matters
Beneficial ownership is the regulatory answer to "who really controls this
legal entity customer?" It is **not** the same as corporate parent ownership
(LEI Level 2), operational resource ownership (Cerbos), or CRM account hierarchy.
Regulators impose **two independent prongs** (equity and control), trust
look-through rules, nominee prohibitions, and evidence retention — all scoped
to **counterparty risk**, not general graph semantics.
## Key Concepts
### FinCEN CDD Rule (customer due diligence)
- **Legal entity customer**: corporations, LLCs, general partnerships, and
similar entities opening accounts at covered financial institutions.
- **Beneficial owner — ownership prong**: each individual who directly or
indirectly owns **25% or more** of equity interests.
- **Beneficial owner — control prong**: a **single** individual with significant
responsibility to control, manage, or direct the legal entity (e.g., CEO,
CFO, managing member, general partner, president).
- **Collection at account opening**: identify and verify BO identities when a
new account opens (with 2026 exceptive relief allowing reuse after first
account unless risk triggers update).
- **Nominee prohibition**: legal entity must identify **ultimate** beneficial
owners, not nominees or straw men.
- **Trust look-through**: when a trust owns 25%+ equity, identify natural persons
behind the trust (settlor, trustees, beneficiaries as applicable); a legal
entity trustee does **not** satisfy the ownership prong — natural persons must
be identified.
- **Risk-based updates**: ongoing CDD may require BO refresh on triggering
events, not only at opening.
- **CIP alignment**: BO verification procedures must contain CIP-equivalent
elements for individuals but are not identical to the institution's CIP.
### BOI / Corporate Transparency Act (entity reporting)
- **Distinct from CDD**: BOI is a **filing obligation on reporting companies**
to FinCEN's BOI registry, not a financial-institution collection rule.
- **Reporting company beneficial owner**: similar dual-prong concept (substantial
ownership + substantial control) with FinCEN ID for individuals.
- **US regulatory volatility (20252026)**: interim final rules and litigation
have substantially narrowed or suspended BOI reporting for many US domestic
entities. **CDD beneficial ownership collection by financial institutions
remains in force** for covered institutions regardless of BOI reporting shifts.
- **Foreign entities**: BOI and transparency expectations remain more relevant
for non-US reporting companies and cross-border KYC.
### FATF Recommendation 24
- Requires countries to ensure adequate, accurate, and up-to-date **beneficial
ownership information** on legal persons, accessible to competent authorities.
- Supports **multi-prong** definitions (ownership threshold + control) and
look-through for complex structures (trusts, nominees, layered ownership).
- Drives national registries and financial-sector CDD alignment globally.
### KYC practice overlay
- Institutions may adopt **lower equity thresholds** for high-risk customers
(e.g., 10%) under AML program risk policies.
- **PEP screening** applies to beneficial owners, not only account signers.
- **Sanctions screening** (OFAC) must cover identified beneficial owners.
- BO evidence retained for years after relationship ends (BSA record retention).
## Relevant Terminology
| Term | Source meaning |
| --- | --- |
| Beneficial owner | Natural person owning 25%+ or exercising substantial control. |
| Ownership prong | Equity-interest threshold test. |
| Control prong | Significant management/control responsibility test. |
| Legal entity customer | Entity opening a financial account subject to CDD. |
| CDD Rule | FinCEN customer due diligence requirements (2016, amended). |
| BOI / CTA | Corporate Transparency Act beneficial ownership information reporting. |
| FinCEN ID | Individual identifier for BOI filers. |
| Nominee / straw man | Non-ultimate owner; prohibited as BO response under CDD. |
| Look-through | Identifying natural persons behind trusts or intermediary entities. |
## Modeling Assumptions
- **Beneficial ownership is relationship semantics**, not a new actor type.
The natural person remains **Natural Person**; the assertion is regulatory.
- **Ownership prong and control prong are orthogonal** — one person may satisfy
both, and multiple persons may satisfy ownership prong while exactly one
control-prong person is required under US CDD.
- **Beneficial ownership ≠ corporate parent ownership** (LEI Level 2 describes
corporate structure; BO describes natural persons behind a customer entity).
- **Beneficial ownership ≠ Representation** (authorized signers may represent
without being beneficial owners).
- **Lifecycle is risk-triggered**, not merely account-open/close.
- **Regulatory regime is a scope dimension** — US CDD, EU AMLD, FATF R24, and
BOI filing may differ; canon models the relationship, downstream applies law.
## Identity-Canon Implications
### Resolved: dedicated relationship type
**Beneficial Ownership Relationship** is a first-class relationship type — **not**
an Ownership subtype with `beneficial` metadata.
**Rationale:**
| Concern | Why not Ownership subtype |
| --- | --- |
| Semantic collision | Ownership in canon covers records, tenants, resources, corporate parents — not regulated natural-person BO. |
| Dual prongs | Ownership prong (%) and control prong (role) are regulatory-specific; corporate Ownership edges lack this structure. |
| Trust look-through | Requires intermediary entity traversal metadata absent from generic Ownership. |
| Evidence & scope | BO ties to CDD/AML Evidence Source, Commercial Relationship, and jurisdictional scope — distinct lifecycle from LEI parent edges. |
| Projection safety | Prevents Cerbos/Zanzibar "owner" tuples from silently implying KYC beneficial owner compliance. |
**Beneficial Owner** remains a glossary label for the **natural person** who is
the target of a Beneficial Ownership Relationship — not a participation root.
### Recommended relationship fields
- `relationship_type`: `beneficial_ownership`
- `source`: Natural Person
- `target`: Organization / Legal Entity (the legal entity **customer**)
- `scope`: jurisdiction + institution/program (e.g., US CDD, EU AMLD)
- `ownership_prong`: boolean
- `control_prong`: boolean
- `equity_percentage`: optional numeric (when ownership prong)
- `control_basis`: optional enum (e.g., `ceo`, `managing_member`, `general_partner`)
- `intermediary_chain`: optional ordered list for trust/entity look-through
- `evidence_reference`: CDD certification, BOI filing, registry extract
- `lifecycle_state`: proposed, active, superseded, revoked
- `regulatory_basis`: optional reference (CDD Rule, FATF R24, national statute)
### Mapping table
| Source concept | Canonical mapping |
| --- | --- |
| Beneficial owner (person) | Natural Person |
| BO linkage | Beneficial Ownership Relationship |
| CDD certification | Evidence Source |
| Legal entity customer | Organization / Legal Entity + Commercial Relationship |
| BOI filing record | Evidence Source (registry) on Legal Entity |
| FinCEN ID | Identifier (government registry) on Natural Person |
| PEP/sanctions hit on BO | Lifecycle State / Trust Relationship on BO relationship |
| LEI Level 2 parent | Ownership Relationship (corporate structure — separate) |
## Terminology Conflicts
- **Beneficial owner (CDD)** vs. **beneficial owner (BOI filing)** vs.
**beneficial owner (transparency registry)**: same conceptual person, different
regulatory scopes and evidence — use `scope` and `regulatory_basis` metadata.
- **Owner (Cerbos resource)** vs. **beneficial owner**: authorization attribute
vs. regulated natural-person linkage.
- **Shareholder** vs. **beneficial owner**: not all shareholders meet BO thresholds;
control prong may identify non-shareholders.
## Open Questions
*(none — settled in `commercial-identity-nuance-settlement.md`)*
## Settled
- `control_basis` enum — jurisdiction-neutral role codes + `regulatory_basis`.
- FinCEN ID → **Registry Identifier** on Natural Person.
- Exempt entities → **Beneficial Ownership Exemption** Evidence (not absence).
- BOI filing volatility separated from CDD Beneficial Ownership Relationships.
## References
- FinCEN, CDD Rule FAQs — https://www.fincen.gov/resources/statutes-and-regulations/cdd-rule-faqs
- FinCEN, CDD Final Rule — https://www.fincen.gov/resources/statutes-regulations/cdd-final-rule
- FinCEN, Account Opening Exceptive Relief Order (FIN-2026-R001) — https://www.fincen.gov/system/files/2026-02/FinCEN-Order-CCDExceptiveRelief.pdf
- FATF, Recommendation 24 — https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/topics/fatf-recommendations.html
- Open Ownership, reliable identifiers for corporate vehicles — https://www.openownership.org/en/publications/using-reliable-identifiers-for-corporate-vehicles-in-beneficial-ownership-data/
- Internal: `kyc-aml-commercial-identity-binding.md`, `lei-gleif-legal-entity-identifier.md`