generated from coulomb/repo-seed
Register the InfoTechCanon Repository Layout Standard as a domain standard (itc-repo-layout), processed from demand through the canon's Purpose/Demand intake without collapsing existing model concepts. - Register standard in artifacts/index.yaml, canon.yaml, infospace.yaml; regenerate indexes, views, briefs, tree, and validation (validate green). - T04: add reconciliation.yaml (partial/as-is dogfooding, declared core conformance, recorded tensions); resolve the demand by moving it out of demand/ to the evaluation pack as source-demand.md and removing demand/. - T05: add consumer-adoption-brief.md for downstream repos. - Update test artifact/standard counts (60->61, standards 2->3). - Mark T03/T04/T05 done; workplan and registry status -> finished. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
76 lines
1.5 KiB
Markdown
76 lines
1.5 KiB
Markdown
<!-- GENERATED by info_tech_canon; do not edit by hand. -->
|
|
|
|
# Kernel Overview
|
|
|
|
- Infospace: `canon`
|
|
- Artifacts: 61
|
|
|
|
## Artifact Kinds
|
|
|
|
- `access-descriptor-set`: 1
|
|
- `alignment-review-kit`: 1
|
|
- `alignment-review-schema`: 1
|
|
- `alignment-review-workflow`: 1
|
|
- `alignment-scorecard`: 1
|
|
- `benchmark-findings`: 1
|
|
- `benchmark-workspace`: 1
|
|
- `benefit-analysis`: 1
|
|
- `capture-criteria`: 1
|
|
- `caring-mapping`: 1
|
|
- `comparison-frame`: 1
|
|
- `comparison-report`: 1
|
|
- `concept-catalog`: 1
|
|
- `conformance-pack`: 1
|
|
- `consumer-workplan-brief`: 3
|
|
- `consumer-workplan-template`: 1
|
|
- `evaluation-pack`: 1
|
|
- `evaluation-question-set`: 1
|
|
- `example`: 1
|
|
- `extension-candidate-set`: 1
|
|
- `interface-card-expectation`: 1
|
|
- `kernel`: 2
|
|
- `mapping`: 1
|
|
- `mapping-expectation`: 1
|
|
- `model`: 11
|
|
- `model-extension`: 1
|
|
- `model-selection-guide`: 1
|
|
- `native-concept-map`: 1
|
|
- `pattern`: 1
|
|
- `profile`: 1
|
|
- `profile-alignment`: 1
|
|
- `profile-artifact`: 13
|
|
- `standard`: 3
|
|
- `visualization-example-set`: 1
|
|
|
|
## Relationship Types
|
|
|
|
- `access_evidenced_by`: 1
|
|
- `changes`: 1
|
|
- `compares`: 1
|
|
- `conforms_to`: 19
|
|
- `constrained_by`: 1
|
|
- `deploys`: 1
|
|
- `evaluates`: 2
|
|
- `evidenced_by`: 3
|
|
- `extends`: 1
|
|
- `governed_by`: 2
|
|
- `has_access_under`: 1
|
|
- `illustrates`: 4
|
|
- `implements`: 2
|
|
- `imports`: 14
|
|
- `instantiates`: 13
|
|
- `introduces`: 1
|
|
- `isolated_by`: 2
|
|
- `maps`: 36
|
|
- `member_of`: 1
|
|
- `owned_by`: 3
|
|
- `part_of`: 22
|
|
- `partitioned_for`: 2
|
|
- `proposes`: 7
|
|
- `represented_by`: 1
|
|
- `requires`: 13
|
|
- `separates`: 2
|
|
- `serves`: 2
|
|
- `stress_tests`: 6
|
|
- `uses`: 113
|