Files
infospace-bench/workplans/IB-WP-0012-replacement-readiness-cli-parity.md

86 lines
2.2 KiB
Markdown

---
id: IB-WP-0012
type: workplan
title: "Replacement Readiness And CLI Parity Gate"
domain: markitect
repo: infospace-bench
status: planned
owner: markitect
topic_slug: markitect
created: "2026-05-14"
updated: "2026-05-14"
state_hub_workstream_slug: "ib-wp-0012-replacement-readiness-cli-parity"
state_hub_workstream_id: "72b6a923-cad5-450b-b658-b35a00cecd4d"
---
# IB-WP-0012 — Replacement Readiness And CLI Parity Gate
## Goal
Decide when `infospace-bench` can be treated as the replacement for the
in-scope infospace features from `markitect-project`.
## Tasks
### T01 — Legacy command parity table
```task
id: IB-WP-0012-T01
status: todo
priority: high
state_hub_task_id: "b48edb8e-b0af-4d46-9714-9830725d0773"
```
- Map legacy commands such as status, entities, chapters, evaluate,
eval-summary, relations, classify, viability, check, history, history-diff,
bind-discipline, process, stale-mappings, and graph
- Mark each as replaced, reframed, delegated, deferred, or retired
- Add replacement command/API examples
### T02 — End-to-end acceptance suite
```task
id: IB-WP-0012-T02
status: todo
priority: high
state_hub_task_id: "12eb0f88-4483-48ad-b156-79fa7c2171b7"
```
- Build tests around the bootstrap pilot and pruned legacy pilot
- Cover lifecycle, validation, entity/relation parsing, evaluation history,
metrics, viability, workflow run, and export
- Keep all tests deterministic by default
### T03 — Documentation and migration guide
```task
id: IB-WP-0012-T03
status: todo
priority: high
state_hub_task_id: "cd4ee529-1ca0-4214-80fc-000af5c16b11"
```
- Write a guide for moving legacy MarkiTect infospaces into `infospace-bench`
- Explain which functionality moved to `markitect-tool` and
`kontextual-engine`
- Include explicit non-goals
### T04 — Replacement decision record
```task
id: IB-WP-0012-T04
status: todo
priority: medium
state_hub_task_id: "ca88d1c5-b83f-47c9-90d0-58cedc7ca6f7"
```
- Record whether the old infospace feature set is replaced enough for new work
- List residual gaps and owning repos
- Update State Hub with the decision
## Acceptance
- Replacement readiness is evidence-based, not aspirational
- Users have a command/API migration path
- Remaining gaps are explicitly owned by the correct repo