Files
infospace-bench/wiki/ProductRequirementsDocument.md

227 lines
6.0 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
# Infospace Bench Product Requirements Document V0.1
## infospace-bench
---
## 1. Product Overview
### 1.1 Product Name
**infospace-bench**
---
### 1.2 Product Definition
infospace-bench is a **workspace and service for creating, developing, evaluating, and inspecting structured knowledge spaces (“infospaces”)**.
It provides an environment for applying structured knowledge methods to real-world domains such as books, research corpora, projects, and organizational knowledge systems.
---
## 2. Product Intent
### 2.1 Problem Statement
While tools and systems for structured knowledge exist:
* There is no consistent way to **develop and evaluate knowledge spaces in practice**
* Knowledge engineering approaches remain abstract and hard to validate
* Real-world knowledge artifacts lack **structured inspection and quality evaluation**
* Iterative refinement of knowledge systems is often ad-hoc and untraceable
This results in a gap between **knowledge theory and applied knowledge systems**.
---
### 2.2 Intended Outcomes
infospace-bench enables:
* Creation of **explicit, structured knowledge spaces** as first-class artifacts
* Iterative **development, evaluation, and refinement** of knowledge collections
* Inspection of **structure, quality, and relationships** within knowledge
* Application of AI-assisted workflows to real-world knowledge problems
* Generation of reusable patterns and insights for knowledge engineering
---
### 2.3 Success Criteria
The product is successful when:
* Infospaces can be **created, evolved, and inspected systematically**
* Knowledge quality can be **evaluated and improved over time**
* Real-world use cases (books, domains, projects) can be modeled effectively
* AI agents can contribute meaningfully to **knowledge development workflows**
* Insights from infospaces inform improvements in lower-layer systems
---
## 3. Scope Definition
### 3.1 In Scope
* Definition and management of infospaces as structured knowledge collections
* Lifecycle management: creation, population, evaluation, refinement, export
* Inspection tools for structure, relationships, and quality
* Application of workflows (generation, transformation, analysis) to infospaces
* AI-assisted development and evaluation of knowledge artifacts
* Use-case-specific configurations and project setups
---
### 3.2 Out of Scope
* Low-level markdown processing or transformation primitives
* Persistent system infrastructure or orchestration engines
* Generic multi-format content management systems
* Reusable tooling libraries or platform-level abstractions
* Final production publishing platforms (outside knowledge development context)
---
### 3.3 Boundary Clarification
infospace-bench provides **application-level usage**, not infrastructure:
* Tooling primitives → `markitect-tool`
* System/runtime orchestration → `kontextual-engine`
---
## 4. Functional Expectations
### 4.1 Core Capabilities
The product must support:
* **Infospace Definition**
Create structured knowledge collections with clear boundaries
* **Population & Development**
Add, modify, and organize knowledge artifacts
* **Evaluation & Quality Assessment**
Measure structure, consistency, and completeness
* **Inspection & Visualization**
Explore relationships, dependencies, and structure
* **Transformation & Generation**
Apply workflows to evolve knowledge artifacts
* **Export & Representation**
Produce outputs (documents, reports, derived artifacts)
---
### 4.2 Interaction Modes
* Project/workspace-based interaction
* CLI and/or service interfaces
* Agent-assisted workflows
---
## 5. Non-Functional Expectations
### 5.1 Performance
* Efficient handling of medium-to-large knowledge collections
* Reasonable responsiveness for interactive inspection and iteration
---
### 5.2 Reliability
* Consistent behavior in evaluation and transformation workflows
* Traceable changes and reproducible results
---
### 5.3 Extensibility
* Ability to incorporate new workflows and evaluation methods
* Flexible configuration for different domains and use cases
---
### 5.4 Usability
* Clear structure for organizing knowledge projects
* Intuitive workflows for iteration and refinement
* Transparency of system behavior and results
---
## 6. Assumptions and Dependencies
### 6.1 Assumptions
* Knowledge engineering benefits from iterative, project-based development
* AI agents can assist in generating and refining knowledge
* Structured knowledge systems require evaluation and inspection
---
### 6.2 Dependencies
* kontextual-engine for persistence and orchestration
* markitect-tool for markdown-based structuring and transformation
* llm-connect (or equivalent) for AI-assisted workflows
---
## 7. Constraints
* Must remain focused on **concrete infospaces**, not abstract infrastructure
* Must avoid duplication of tooling or system-level responsibilities
* Must support both human and AI-driven workflows
* Must maintain clear traceability of knowledge evolution
---
## 8. Risks
* Drifting into general-purpose platform or CMS functionality
* Over-complex evaluation frameworks reducing usability
* Tight coupling to specific tools or formats
* Loss of clarity between experimentation and production usage
---
## 9. Related Systems
* **markitect-tool** syntax layer (markdown primitives)
* **kontextual-engine** system layer (persistence and orchestration)
* **llm-connect** LLM abstraction layer
---
## 10. Ecosystem Context
This product is part of a layered knowledge system:
```text id="k2pz7m"
markitect-tool → makes markdown structured and manipulable
kontextual-engine → makes knowledge persistent and operable
infospace-bench → makes knowledge concrete and meaningful
```
Layers:
* **Syntax layer** → markitect-tool
* **System layer** → kontextual-engine
* **Application layer** → infospace-bench
---
## 11. PRD Type
**Hybrid / Boundary PRD**
This PRD defines application-level intent and usage boundaries while allowing flexibility for experimentation and iterative development.