generated from coulomb/repo-seed
35 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown
35 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown
# Evaluate Trading-Literature Entity
|
|
|
|
Profile: {{ macros.profile }}
|
|
|
|
Evaluate the generated entity as Markdown with YAML frontmatter. Include
|
|
`artifact_id`, `evaluator`, `evaluated_at`, and a `scores` list. Score
|
|
each criterion on a 0 to 5 scale where 5 is best.
|
|
|
|
Required score names:
|
|
|
|
- `groundedness` — does the entity stay anchored to the source chunk,
|
|
with no invented dates, dollar figures, or quotes?
|
|
- `lesson_clarity` — for `strategy`, `error`, `psychological_pattern`,
|
|
and `evidence_bearing_claim` entities, is the operator-level lesson
|
|
stated crisply enough to be reused in later chapters? For purely
|
|
factual entities (trader, market, institution, instrument), score
|
|
this on the clarity of the definition.
|
|
- `historical_context` — is the entity placed correctly in the era and
|
|
venue of the source (e.g. early-1900s American equities) without
|
|
importing modern terminology or instruments?
|
|
- `overgeneralization_risk` — is the entity scoped narrowly enough to
|
|
resist becoming a vague universal claim? Higher score means lower
|
|
risk. Flag entities that quietly claim to apply to all markets or
|
|
all operators when the source restricts the claim.
|
|
|
|
Add a short `## Review Notes` section listing any specific lines from
|
|
the entity body that drove a low score on any criterion.
|
|
|
|
Entity artifact: {{ input.artifact_id }}
|
|
Entity title: {{ input.title }}
|
|
|
|
## Entity
|
|
|
|
{{ input.content }}
|