generated from coulomb/repo-seed
1.4 KiB
1.4 KiB
Evaluate Trading-Literature Entity
Profile: {{ macros.profile }}
Evaluate the generated entity as Markdown with YAML frontmatter. Include
artifact_id, evaluator, evaluated_at, and a scores list. Score
each criterion on a 0 to 5 scale where 5 is best.
Required score names:
groundedness— does the entity stay anchored to the source chunk, with no invented dates, dollar figures, or quotes?lesson_clarity— forstrategy,error,psychological_pattern, andevidence_bearing_claimentities, is the operator-level lesson stated crisply enough to be reused in later chapters? For purely factual entities (trader, market, institution, instrument), score this on the clarity of the definition.historical_context— is the entity placed correctly in the era and venue of the source (e.g. early-1900s American equities) without importing modern terminology or instruments?overgeneralization_risk— is the entity scoped narrowly enough to resist becoming a vague universal claim? Higher score means lower risk. Flag entities that quietly claim to apply to all markets or all operators when the source restricts the claim.
Add a short ## Review Notes section listing any specific lines from
the entity body that drove a low score on any criterion.
Entity artifact: {{ input.artifact_id }} Entity title: {{ input.title }}
Entity
{{ input.content }}