generated from coulomb/repo-seed
Crossexamination of utility based on the content management interoperability standard
This commit is contained in:
99
docs/cmis-compliance-assessment.md
Normal file
99
docs/cmis-compliance-assessment.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
|
||||
# CMIS Compliance Assessment
|
||||
|
||||
Date: 2026-05-06
|
||||
|
||||
Status: planning baseline for CMIS compliance and access-point implementation.
|
||||
|
||||
## Reference Standard
|
||||
|
||||
Target CMIS version: OASIS Content Management Interoperability Services
|
||||
Version 1.1, OASIS Standard, approved 23 May 2013, including approved errata
|
||||
where applicable.
|
||||
|
||||
CMIS defines a domain model plus Web Services, AtomPub, and Browser JSON
|
||||
bindings for one or more content repositories. The standard explicitly allows a
|
||||
CMIS endpoint to expose more than one repository and does not require every
|
||||
underlying content-management feature to be represented through CMIS.
|
||||
|
||||
## Reusable Validation Foundation
|
||||
|
||||
Primary reusable validation candidate: Apache Chemistry OpenCMIS TCK and CMIS
|
||||
Workbench.
|
||||
|
||||
OpenCMIS provides client libraries, server frameworks, development tools,
|
||||
InMemory/FileShare reference repositories, and TCK artifacts. The project pages
|
||||
now indicate the project is retired, so we should treat OpenCMIS as a legacy
|
||||
compatibility validation tool rather than a moving dependency. The Maven
|
||||
artifact `org.apache.chemistry.opencmis:chemistry-opencmis-test-tck:1.1.0`
|
||||
remains available and should be used as the first external conformance harness.
|
||||
|
||||
Practical strategy:
|
||||
|
||||
- Build local, deterministic example fixtures grouped by CMIS service
|
||||
capability.
|
||||
- Build internal contract tests that validate our mapper and profile behavior
|
||||
without Java tooling.
|
||||
- Add an optional external TCK harness that can run OpenCMIS TCK against a
|
||||
running CMIS access point when Java/Maven are available.
|
||||
- Keep TCK execution optional in the default Python suite to avoid turning the
|
||||
engine into a Java project.
|
||||
|
||||
## Capability Assessment
|
||||
|
||||
| CMIS capability | Current engine availability | Gap | Demand |
|
||||
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|
||||
| Repository service | Service health/version, runtime repository state, capability catalogs. | Need CMIS repository info, repository IDs, root folder IDs, capability flags, type summaries. | Low |
|
||||
| Type definitions | Asset classifications, metadata schemas, relationship target kinds. | Need CMIS base types, property definitions, type mutability flags, secondary type projection. | Medium |
|
||||
| Navigation service | Relationships and context graph exist, but no folder tree model. | Need root folder, folder children, descendants/tree, parent relationships, path semantics. | High |
|
||||
| Object service read | Assets, metadata, representations, content refs, audit, versions exist. | Need CMIS object envelopes, allowable actions, path/object-id lookup, property filters, rendition/content stream response shape. | Medium |
|
||||
| Object service write | Asset create, metadata add, lifecycle transition, relationship create, ingestion. | Need createDocument/createFolder/updateProperties/deleteObject/moveObject mapping and CMIS change tokens. | High |
|
||||
| Content streams | Source, normalized, derived representations store content hashes and storage refs. | Need getContentStream/setContentStream/deleteContentStream/appendContentStream semantics and streaming endpoints. | Medium-High |
|
||||
| Versioning | Asset versions and transformation/workflow lineage exist. | Need CMIS checkout, PWC, checkin, cancelCheckout, version series semantics, latest/major flags. | High |
|
||||
| Discovery/query | Governed retrieval, lexical search, filters, relationships. | Need CMIS SQL-like query grammar or supported subset, query result shape, joins/capability flags. | High |
|
||||
| Relationships | Core relationships exist. | Need CMIS relationship object mapping and relationship type capability exposure. | Medium |
|
||||
| ACL service | Policy gateway and authorization decisions exist. | Need CMIS ACL model, principals, direct/inherited ACEs, applyACL, exact capability flags. | High |
|
||||
| Policy service | Policy decisions and governance reports exist. | Need CMIS policy objects/applyPolicy/removePolicy/getAppliedPolicies mapping or explicit unsupported profile. | Medium |
|
||||
| Change log | Audit events and correlation IDs exist. | Need CMIS change events, change tokens, object change entries, paging. | Medium |
|
||||
| Multi-filing/unfiling | Not modeled directly. | Need folder membership model or profile-level unsupported flags. | High if full support, Low if unsupported |
|
||||
| Renditions | Representations exist, no rendition taxonomy. | Need rendition metadata and stream mapping for thumbnails/previews. | Medium |
|
||||
| Retention and hold | Metadata/governance hooks exist, no first-class legal hold model. | Need retention/hold capabilities, apply/remove hold, retention date semantics. | High for full support |
|
||||
| Bulk update | Metadata update pathways exist. | Need bulkUpdateProperties semantics, partial failure reporting, change tokens. | Medium |
|
||||
| Browser JSON binding | FastAPI JSON service already exists. | Need CMIS Browser Binding routes, selectors/actions, multipart/content stream behavior. | High |
|
||||
| AtomPub binding | No AtomPub/XML binding. | Need XML/Atom feed generation and protocol semantics. | Very High |
|
||||
| Web Services binding | No SOAP stack. | Need WSDL/SOAP implementation. | Very High |
|
||||
|
||||
## Recommended Compliance Profile Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
Start with a constrained CMIS 1.1 Browser Binding profile:
|
||||
|
||||
- Repository, type, object read, content stream read, query subset,
|
||||
relationships, change log, and navigation over a synthetic root/folder
|
||||
projection.
|
||||
- Explicitly unsupported or read-only: AtomPub, Web Services, full ACL mutation,
|
||||
retention/hold, multifiling/unfiling, and full CMIS SQL joins.
|
||||
|
||||
Then expand by profile:
|
||||
|
||||
- `readonly-browser`: safe read-only repository and content access.
|
||||
- `governed-authoring`: selected object creation/update/content stream changes
|
||||
through engine policy and audit.
|
||||
- `admin-export`: broad export and governance inspection, restricted to
|
||||
service accounts.
|
||||
- `compat-tck`: profile tuned to pass a selected OpenCMIS TCK capability subset.
|
||||
|
||||
## Risk Summary
|
||||
|
||||
The engine already has strong foundations for asset identity, metadata,
|
||||
representations, relationships, versions, audit, policy, retrieval, and
|
||||
service APIs. The hard parts are not storage; they are CMIS protocol semantics:
|
||||
folder/path behavior, versioning/PWC semantics, CMIS query grammar, ACL shape,
|
||||
content stream actions, and binding-specific compatibility.
|
||||
|
||||
Best estimate:
|
||||
|
||||
- Internal mapper and examples: moderate.
|
||||
- Browser Binding MVP profile: medium-high.
|
||||
- TCK subset harness: medium.
|
||||
- Broad CMIS 1.1 Browser compliance: high.
|
||||
- AtomPub and Web Services compliance: very high and probably not justified
|
||||
until a real client demands those bindings.
|
||||
190
docs/cmis-compliance-test-foundation.md
Normal file
190
docs/cmis-compliance-test-foundation.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,190 @@
|
||||
# CMIS Compliance Test Foundation
|
||||
|
||||
Date: 2026-05-06
|
||||
|
||||
Status: planned test foundation for CMIS access-point work.
|
||||
|
||||
## Purpose
|
||||
|
||||
Set up CMIS examples and compliance tests before implementation so the engine
|
||||
can compare required CMIS behavior with current capabilities and planned
|
||||
profiles.
|
||||
|
||||
## External Harness
|
||||
|
||||
Use Apache Chemistry OpenCMIS TCK 1.1.0 as an optional external conformance
|
||||
harness.
|
||||
|
||||
Planned harness shape:
|
||||
|
||||
- `tests/cmis/examples/` contains deterministic fixture descriptions grouped by
|
||||
CMIS service capability.
|
||||
- `tests/cmis/test_cmis_contract_examples.py` validates mapper and profile
|
||||
behavior without external Java dependencies.
|
||||
- `tests/cmis/opencmis-tck/` contains optional harness config, Maven
|
||||
invocation notes, and selected TCK group mapping.
|
||||
- Default `pytest` skips external OpenCMIS TCK unless explicitly enabled.
|
||||
|
||||
## Example Groups
|
||||
|
||||
### Repository And Type Service
|
||||
|
||||
Fixtures:
|
||||
|
||||
- one repository profile with CMIS 1.1 Browser Binding,
|
||||
- one read-only profile,
|
||||
- one authoring profile,
|
||||
- base types for document, folder, relationship, policy, item, and secondary.
|
||||
|
||||
Validates:
|
||||
|
||||
- repository info,
|
||||
- capability flags,
|
||||
- type definitions,
|
||||
- property definitions,
|
||||
- unsupported capability flags are explicit.
|
||||
|
||||
### Navigation Service
|
||||
|
||||
Fixtures:
|
||||
|
||||
- synthetic root folder,
|
||||
- folder projection by collection/topic/source system,
|
||||
- documents filed under one folder,
|
||||
- unfiled asset projection when profile allows it.
|
||||
|
||||
Validates:
|
||||
|
||||
- root folder children,
|
||||
- folder path lookup,
|
||||
- getChildren/getDescendants/getFolderTree,
|
||||
- profile restrictions on folder visibility.
|
||||
|
||||
### Object And Content Stream Service
|
||||
|
||||
Fixtures:
|
||||
|
||||
- source document with content stream,
|
||||
- normalized representation,
|
||||
- derived representation,
|
||||
- metadata-rich document,
|
||||
- document with no stream.
|
||||
|
||||
Validates:
|
||||
|
||||
- getObject/getObjectByPath,
|
||||
- getProperties,
|
||||
- getContentStream,
|
||||
- create/update/delete behavior by profile,
|
||||
- content stream hash and media type mapping.
|
||||
|
||||
### Versioning Service
|
||||
|
||||
Fixtures:
|
||||
|
||||
- single-version document,
|
||||
- multi-version document,
|
||||
- derived output linked to source version,
|
||||
- attempted checkout in read-only profile.
|
||||
|
||||
Validates:
|
||||
|
||||
- version series projection,
|
||||
- latest version flags,
|
||||
- checkout/checkin unsupported or supported per profile,
|
||||
- version history listing.
|
||||
|
||||
### Discovery Query Service
|
||||
|
||||
Fixtures:
|
||||
|
||||
- lexical query examples,
|
||||
- metadata filter examples,
|
||||
- relationship-scoped query examples,
|
||||
- unsupported CMIS SQL features.
|
||||
|
||||
Validates:
|
||||
|
||||
- query capability flags,
|
||||
- supported subset behavior,
|
||||
- paging,
|
||||
- error diagnostics for unsupported grammar.
|
||||
|
||||
### Relationship Service
|
||||
|
||||
Fixtures:
|
||||
|
||||
- asset-to-asset relationship,
|
||||
- asset-to-context-entity projection,
|
||||
- derived lineage relation.
|
||||
|
||||
Validates:
|
||||
|
||||
- relationship object projection,
|
||||
- source/target filters,
|
||||
- profile-level relationship visibility.
|
||||
|
||||
### ACL And Policy Services
|
||||
|
||||
Fixtures:
|
||||
|
||||
- public asset,
|
||||
- internal asset,
|
||||
- confidential asset,
|
||||
- denied actor,
|
||||
- service-account actor.
|
||||
|
||||
Validates:
|
||||
|
||||
- allowable actions,
|
||||
- ACL projection,
|
||||
- applyACL/applyPolicy supported or unsupported by profile,
|
||||
- no protected metadata leakage on denial.
|
||||
|
||||
### Change Log Events
|
||||
|
||||
Fixtures:
|
||||
|
||||
- asset create,
|
||||
- metadata update,
|
||||
- content update,
|
||||
- transformation output,
|
||||
- workflow run,
|
||||
- policy denial.
|
||||
|
||||
Validates:
|
||||
|
||||
- change tokens,
|
||||
- change event ordering,
|
||||
- correlation with audit records,
|
||||
- paging.
|
||||
|
||||
### Retention Hold Renditions And Bulk Operations
|
||||
|
||||
Fixtures:
|
||||
|
||||
- retention metadata,
|
||||
- legal hold metadata,
|
||||
- preview/thumbnail representation,
|
||||
- bulk metadata update request.
|
||||
|
||||
Validates:
|
||||
|
||||
- explicit capability flags,
|
||||
- supported subset behavior,
|
||||
- structured unsupported-operation diagnostics.
|
||||
|
||||
## Capability Profile Test Matrix
|
||||
|
||||
| Profile | Expected external TCK posture |
|
||||
| --- | --- |
|
||||
| `readonly-browser` | Pass repository/type/read/navigation/query/content-read groups where supported; skip mutation groups. |
|
||||
| `governed-authoring` | Add selected create/update/delete/content stream checks with engine policy and audit. |
|
||||
| `admin-export` | Not intended as general CMIS client profile; focus internal contract tests. |
|
||||
| `compat-tck` | Tuned profile for OpenCMIS TCK subset and compatibility client smoke tests. |
|
||||
|
||||
## Certification Note
|
||||
|
||||
No current OASIS certification service was identified during planning. The
|
||||
practical reusable foundation is OpenCMIS TCK/Workbench, plus our own
|
||||
capability-profile contract tests.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,138 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
id: KONT-WP-0011
|
||||
type: workplan
|
||||
title: "CMIS Compliance Assessment And Test Foundation"
|
||||
domain: markitect
|
||||
repo: kontextual-engine
|
||||
status: active
|
||||
owner: codex
|
||||
topic_slug: markitect
|
||||
planning_priority: high
|
||||
planning_order: 11
|
||||
created: "2026-05-06"
|
||||
updated: "2026-05-06"
|
||||
state_hub_workstream_id: "c14d232c-cf80-443b-b5e0-76b51baf6676"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# KONT-WP-0011: CMIS Compliance Assessment And Test Foundation
|
||||
|
||||
## Purpose
|
||||
|
||||
Establish the CMIS compliance baseline before implementation. This workplan
|
||||
maps OASIS CMIS 1.1 capabilities to current engine functionality, organizes
|
||||
example fixtures by capability, and prepares internal and optional external
|
||||
compliance tests.
|
||||
|
||||
## References
|
||||
|
||||
- `docs/cmis-compliance-assessment.md`
|
||||
- `docs/cmis-compliance-test-foundation.md`
|
||||
- OASIS CMIS 1.1 standard and errata.
|
||||
- Apache Chemistry OpenCMIS TCK 1.1.0 and CMIS Workbench as optional external
|
||||
validation tools.
|
||||
|
||||
## Boundary
|
||||
|
||||
This workplan does not implement CMIS access points. It creates the assessment,
|
||||
fixtures, profile matrix, and test harness that will govern implementation in
|
||||
`KONT-WP-0012`.
|
||||
|
||||
## C11.1 - Freeze CMIS target version and reusable validation strategy
|
||||
|
||||
```task
|
||||
id: KONT-WP-0011-T001
|
||||
status: todo
|
||||
priority: high
|
||||
state_hub_task_id: "1f4ed133-74f7-46df-9266-277813b5399a"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Acceptance:
|
||||
|
||||
- CMIS target version, bindings, and errata posture are documented.
|
||||
- OpenCMIS TCK/Workbench reuse strategy is documented.
|
||||
- External harness is optional and does not block default Python tests.
|
||||
|
||||
## C11.2 - Build capability assessment and demand estimate
|
||||
|
||||
```task
|
||||
id: KONT-WP-0011-T002
|
||||
status: todo
|
||||
priority: high
|
||||
state_hub_task_id: "02651630-16e6-4c5f-879d-988a55fb7227"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Acceptance:
|
||||
|
||||
- Capability-by-capability availability is documented.
|
||||
- Each CMIS area has a gap statement and implementation demand estimate.
|
||||
- High-risk areas are called out before implementation begins.
|
||||
|
||||
## C11.3 - Create CMIS example fixture catalog grouped by capability
|
||||
|
||||
```task
|
||||
id: KONT-WP-0011-T003
|
||||
status: todo
|
||||
priority: high
|
||||
state_hub_task_id: "a895218c-61b1-4944-8774-fd21c5416580"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Acceptance:
|
||||
|
||||
- Example fixture groups cover repository/type, navigation, object/content,
|
||||
versioning, discovery, relationships, ACL/policy, change log, renditions,
|
||||
retention/hold, and bulk operations.
|
||||
- Fixtures declare expected behavior per profile.
|
||||
- Fixtures can seed both internal tests and external TCK preparations.
|
||||
|
||||
## C11.4 - Add internal CMIS contract test skeleton
|
||||
|
||||
```task
|
||||
id: KONT-WP-0011-T004
|
||||
status: todo
|
||||
priority: high
|
||||
state_hub_task_id: "710da9b6-2034-4948-8bc7-16230cc839cf"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Acceptance:
|
||||
|
||||
- Internal tests validate CMIS mapper outputs independent of OpenCMIS.
|
||||
- Tests are organized by capability.
|
||||
- Unsupported capabilities assert explicit CMIS capability flags and structured
|
||||
diagnostics.
|
||||
|
||||
## C11.5 - Add optional OpenCMIS TCK harness plan
|
||||
|
||||
```task
|
||||
id: KONT-WP-0011-T005
|
||||
status: todo
|
||||
priority: medium
|
||||
state_hub_task_id: "85b321a1-b9b5-469e-bc45-b207dc39ad7a"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Acceptance:
|
||||
|
||||
- Optional Java/Maven harness configuration is documented.
|
||||
- TCK group selection is mapped to access-point profiles.
|
||||
- CI/default test suite skips TCK unless explicitly enabled.
|
||||
|
||||
## C11.6 - Produce readiness gate for implementation
|
||||
|
||||
```task
|
||||
id: KONT-WP-0011-T006
|
||||
status: todo
|
||||
priority: medium
|
||||
state_hub_task_id: "604e2f06-fde5-4d88-a13e-f3b725177696"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Acceptance:
|
||||
|
||||
- A readiness checklist determines when `KONT-WP-0012` can start.
|
||||
- The checklist includes capability profile scope, fixture coverage, TCK
|
||||
strategy, and known unsupported features.
|
||||
|
||||
## Definition Of Done
|
||||
|
||||
- CMIS capability assessment exists and is reviewed.
|
||||
- Example fixtures and internal test skeleton are organized by capability.
|
||||
- Optional OpenCMIS TCK strategy is ready.
|
||||
- Implementation proceeds only through the profile plan in `KONT-WP-0012`.
|
||||
169
workplans/KONT-WP-0012-cmis-profiled-access-points.md
Normal file
169
workplans/KONT-WP-0012-cmis-profiled-access-points.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,169 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
id: KONT-WP-0012
|
||||
type: workplan
|
||||
title: "CMIS Profiled Access Points Implementation"
|
||||
domain: markitect
|
||||
repo: kontextual-engine
|
||||
status: active
|
||||
owner: codex
|
||||
topic_slug: markitect
|
||||
planning_priority: high
|
||||
planning_order: 12
|
||||
created: "2026-05-06"
|
||||
updated: "2026-05-06"
|
||||
state_hub_workstream_id: "d538d68f-17a8-401f-9cdc-d526dd734ddc"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# KONT-WP-0012: CMIS Profiled Access Points Implementation
|
||||
|
||||
## Purpose
|
||||
|
||||
Implement a CMIS API extension for `kontextual-engine` that can expose multiple
|
||||
CMIS access points. Each access point has a profile that regulates which CMIS
|
||||
capabilities are available, which data is visible, which mutations are allowed,
|
||||
and which data must never be exposed.
|
||||
|
||||
## Requirement
|
||||
|
||||
It must be possible to allow and expose multiple CMIS access points with
|
||||
different profiles that regulate:
|
||||
|
||||
- which subset of CMIS capabilities are provided on the access point,
|
||||
- which engine data is accessible using the access point,
|
||||
- which data must not be exposed through the access point.
|
||||
|
||||
## Dependency
|
||||
|
||||
Implementation must begin after the assessment, examples, and test foundation
|
||||
from `KONT-WP-0011` are sufficient to define the first profile and regression
|
||||
suite.
|
||||
|
||||
## Architecture Constraint
|
||||
|
||||
CMIS routes are adapters over engine services and policy gates. They must not
|
||||
become a second domain model. Every CMIS access point resolves an
|
||||
`OperationContext`, applies profile rules, authorizes exposure/mutation, and
|
||||
emits audit events.
|
||||
|
||||
## D12.1 - Define CMIS profile and access-point model
|
||||
|
||||
```task
|
||||
id: KONT-WP-0012-T001
|
||||
status: todo
|
||||
priority: high
|
||||
state_hub_task_id: "031c3ce5-bb56-41fb-a014-6a496c280d20"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Acceptance:
|
||||
|
||||
- Access-point config includes ID, repository ID, profile name, binding,
|
||||
capability flags, visibility scope, deny rules, mutation policy, and actor
|
||||
context requirements.
|
||||
- Profiles support read-only, governed authoring, admin/export, and TCK
|
||||
compatibility variants.
|
||||
- Profile matching is deterministic and auditable.
|
||||
|
||||
## D12.2 - Implement CMIS domain mapper
|
||||
|
||||
```task
|
||||
id: KONT-WP-0012-T002
|
||||
status: todo
|
||||
priority: high
|
||||
state_hub_task_id: "a4c44471-22a9-40d9-9821-4b78e5ba9360"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Acceptance:
|
||||
|
||||
- Engine assets map to CMIS documents/items.
|
||||
- Synthetic folders, paths, object IDs, properties, content streams,
|
||||
relationships, versions, allowable actions, and change tokens are mapped.
|
||||
- Unsupported CMIS features are represented by correct capability flags and
|
||||
structured errors.
|
||||
|
||||
## D12.3 - Implement Browser Binding MVP access point
|
||||
|
||||
```task
|
||||
id: KONT-WP-0012-T003
|
||||
status: todo
|
||||
priority: high
|
||||
state_hub_task_id: "b9f5d790-f291-4613-89da-5d47e7887a9e"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Acceptance:
|
||||
|
||||
- Browser Binding routes expose repository info, types, navigation, object read,
|
||||
content stream read, query subset, relationships, and change log.
|
||||
- Route behavior is profile-scoped.
|
||||
- Responses match CMIS Browser Binding expectations for the supported subset.
|
||||
|
||||
## D12.4 - Implement governed authoring operations
|
||||
|
||||
```task
|
||||
id: KONT-WP-0012-T004
|
||||
status: todo
|
||||
priority: high
|
||||
state_hub_task_id: "49716ca7-6a10-43ac-8ac5-ffa1c15b048e"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Acceptance:
|
||||
|
||||
- Supported create/update/delete/content stream operations delegate through
|
||||
engine services.
|
||||
- Mutations enforce policy, profile rules, version expectations, and audit.
|
||||
- Read-only profiles reject mutations with CMIS-compatible diagnostics.
|
||||
|
||||
## D12.5 - Implement profile-scoped ACL policy and redaction
|
||||
|
||||
```task
|
||||
id: KONT-WP-0012-T005
|
||||
status: todo
|
||||
priority: high
|
||||
state_hub_task_id: "64289d84-d7a2-4c03-8fa6-5f439bc233fe"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Acceptance:
|
||||
|
||||
- Access points can hide assets by classification, owner, topic, lifecycle,
|
||||
source system, metadata, actor, or policy decision.
|
||||
- Denied data is omitted rather than partially leaked.
|
||||
- ACL/allowable action projections reflect engine policy and profile rules.
|
||||
|
||||
## D12.6 - Integrate CMIS compliance fixtures and optional OpenCMIS TCK
|
||||
|
||||
```task
|
||||
id: KONT-WP-0012-T006
|
||||
status: todo
|
||||
priority: medium
|
||||
state_hub_task_id: "2f1e9075-395e-4ed0-9abd-ed7c4ecd774d"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Acceptance:
|
||||
|
||||
- Internal CMIS tests run for every profile.
|
||||
- Optional OpenCMIS TCK can target a running CMIS access point.
|
||||
- TCK subset results are captured and mapped back to capability gaps.
|
||||
|
||||
## D12.7 - Document deployment and compatibility posture
|
||||
|
||||
```task
|
||||
id: KONT-WP-0012-T007
|
||||
status: todo
|
||||
priority: medium
|
||||
state_hub_task_id: "a1d28453-2ab7-4d18-8757-6f9ece1674b3"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Acceptance:
|
||||
|
||||
- CMIS endpoint setup is documented.
|
||||
- Supported/unsupported CMIS capabilities are documented per profile.
|
||||
- Browser Binding MVP, AtomPub/Web Services deferral, OpenCMIS TCK posture, and
|
||||
known client compatibility notes are explicit.
|
||||
|
||||
## Definition Of Done
|
||||
|
||||
- Multiple CMIS access points can be configured and exposed.
|
||||
- Each access point enforces profile-specific capability and data-visibility
|
||||
rules.
|
||||
- Supported CMIS Browser Binding subset passes internal compliance tests.
|
||||
- Optional OpenCMIS TCK harness can be run against a compatibility profile.
|
||||
- `python3 -m pytest` passes.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user