generated from coulomb/repo-seed
96 lines
3.1 KiB
Markdown
96 lines
3.1 KiB
Markdown
# INTENT
|
|
|
|
## Purpose
|
|
|
|
This repository exists to provide a **provider-neutral interface for interacting with large language models (LLMs)** in Python.
|
|
|
|
It ensures that applications can use LLM capabilities without being tightly coupled to any specific provider, API, or execution environment.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Primary Utility
|
|
|
|
The repository provides a **unified adapter layer** that:
|
|
|
|
* Abstracts over multiple LLM providers and execution modes
|
|
* Standardizes request, response, and configuration handling
|
|
* Enables interchangeable use of hosted APIs and local tooling (e.g. CLI-based models)
|
|
* Supports embeddings, token estimation, and related primitives
|
|
* Enables dynamic utility by cost optimizations
|
|
|
|
It transforms heterogeneous LLM ecosystems into a **consistent, composable programming interface**.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Intended Users
|
|
|
|
* Application developers integrating LLM capabilities into their systems
|
|
* Library and framework authors requiring provider-agnostic LLM primitives
|
|
* Automation systems (`atm`) orchestrating LLM-assisted workflows
|
|
* LLM agents (`agt`) operating across different model providers
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Strategic Role in the System
|
|
|
|
This repository acts as the **LLM abstraction layer** within the broader system:
|
|
|
|
* It decouples **application logic from provider-specific implementations**
|
|
* It enables **runtime flexibility and provider switching without code changes**
|
|
* It supports architectures where LLM usage is **optional, replaceable, and testable**
|
|
|
|
It allows higher-level systems to treat LLMs as **pluggable capabilities rather than fixed dependencies**.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Strategic Boundaries
|
|
|
|
This repository is **not** intended to:
|
|
|
|
* Provide application-level agent frameworks or workflows
|
|
* Define prompting strategies, routing policies, or domain-specific logic
|
|
* Manage secrets, credentials, or organizational access policies
|
|
* Own or implement LLM providers themselves
|
|
|
|
Its responsibility is limited to **clean abstraction and integration of LLM capabilities**.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Design Principles
|
|
|
|
* **Abstraction over providers**
|
|
Consumers depend on a stable adapter interface, not on vendor APIs
|
|
|
|
* **Composability**
|
|
LLM functionality should be usable as a building block in larger systems
|
|
|
|
* **Replaceability**
|
|
Providers and execution modes must be interchangeable without affecting consumers
|
|
|
|
* **Deterministic integration boundaries**
|
|
Non-LLM logic must remain testable and independent of LLM variability
|
|
|
|
* **Minimal opinionation**
|
|
The library provides primitives, not policies
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Maturity Target
|
|
|
|
A mature version of this repository should:
|
|
|
|
* Provide a **stable, versioned core adapter contract** for LLM interaction
|
|
* Support a broad range of providers and execution environments
|
|
* Enable **seamless switching and fallback between providers**
|
|
* Offer consistent handling of **responses, errors, and usage metrics**
|
|
* Serve as the **default integration layer for LLM capabilities** across dependent systems
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Stability Note
|
|
|
|
Changes to this file represent a **deliberate shift in the abstraction boundaries or role** of this repository.
|
|
|
|
Such changes should be rare, as they affect all downstream systems relying on provider-neutral LLM integration.
|
|
|