generated from coulomb/repo-seed
tegwick
c6dfc9b172
- workplans/MRKD-WP-0001-foundation-level1.md: 8-task workplan for Foundation & LEVEL1 Core (T01 scaffolding through T08 e2e harness) - CLAUDE.md: added Planned Architecture section (interface table, FR domain map, key concepts, round-trip data flow) and Development Commands stubs derived from FRS v0.2 - problems/next-steps-2026-03-14.md: implementation guide for next session — task order, dep list, state-hub task UUIDs, quality gates No code implemented yet; workstream registered in State Hub. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
392 lines
11 KiB
Markdown
392 lines
11 KiB
Markdown
Below is a **PRD for the markidocx product**, structured according to your **InfoTechPrimer PRD model** and respecting the principle of **implementation independence** (no CLI flags, API routes, or architecture details).
|
||
Implementation specifics such as CLI/REST/MCP interfaces belong in the **FRS**, which would normally follow this PRD.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
# PRD
|
||
|
||
*Product Requirement Document*
|
||
|
||
# Product Requirements Document: markidocx
|
||
|
||
## 1. Definition
|
||
|
||
**markidocx** is a product that enables **reliable round-trip editing between Markdown and Microsoft Word documents** while preserving document structure and semantic intent.
|
||
|
||
The product addresses a recurring coordination problem in technical documentation and knowledge workflows:
|
||
Markdown is widely used for structured authoring and version-controlled collaboration, while Word remains the dominant format for editorial review, stakeholder collaboration, and formal document exchange.
|
||
|
||
markidocx provides a controlled workflow in which:
|
||
|
||
* Markdown remains the **canonical structured source**
|
||
* Word serves as a **managed editorial interface**
|
||
* repeated conversion cycles preserve semantic structure
|
||
* template-driven styling separates presentation from content
|
||
* large multi-file documents remain manageable across the editing lifecycle
|
||
|
||
The product is intended for organizations that require **structured documentation workflows with Word-based collaboration**, including engineering teams, documentation teams, standards bodies, and regulated environments.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 2. Context
|
||
|
||
markidocx operates at the intersection of:
|
||
|
||
* **technical documentation systems**
|
||
* **collaborative editorial workflows**
|
||
* **requirements and specification authoring**
|
||
* **knowledge management infrastructures**
|
||
|
||
In many modern documentation environments:
|
||
|
||
* engineers and technical authors write in **Markdown**
|
||
* documents are stored in **version-controlled repositories**
|
||
* external stakeholders and reviewers operate primarily in **Word**
|
||
|
||
This mismatch creates friction:
|
||
|
||
* Word-based edits often break structured content
|
||
* Markdown workflows are inaccessible to non-technical reviewers
|
||
* conversion pipelines introduce structural drift
|
||
|
||
markidocx exists to bridge these environments by establishing a **controlled round-trip workflow** where:
|
||
|
||
* Markdown remains structurally authoritative
|
||
* Word editing is supported within a defined semantic envelope
|
||
* conversion processes are deterministic and inspectable
|
||
|
||
The product acts as a **boundary system between structured authoring and editorial collaboration**.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 3. Core Concepts
|
||
|
||
### Round-Trip Editing
|
||
|
||
Round-trip editing is the ability to export a document into another format for editing and later re-import the modified document while preserving structural meaning.
|
||
|
||
markidocx establishes a disciplined round-trip process between Markdown and Word.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### Canonical Source Model
|
||
|
||
The canonical source of truth is **Markdown structured documents**.
|
||
|
||
Word documents generated by the system are considered **editorial projections** of the canonical source rather than independent authoritative artifacts.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### Semantic Preservation
|
||
|
||
The product guarantees preservation of document semantics across editing cycles within defined feature levels.
|
||
|
||
Preserved semantics include structural constructs such as headings, lists, references, and citations.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### Template-Driven Presentation
|
||
|
||
Document presentation is controlled by **document templates and style definitions**.
|
||
|
||
This allows the same content to be exported in different presentation forms without modifying the source.
|
||
|
||
Built-in document families include:
|
||
|
||
* article
|
||
* book
|
||
* website
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### Multi-File Document Composition
|
||
|
||
Large documents are often structured across multiple files for maintainability.
|
||
|
||
markidocx supports multi-file composition and ensures that editing cycles do not collapse this structure unnecessarily.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### Feature Levels
|
||
|
||
markidocx distinguishes between two functional feature tiers:
|
||
|
||
**LEVEL1 – Core Document Structure**
|
||
|
||
* headings
|
||
* lists
|
||
* tables
|
||
* footnotes
|
||
* images
|
||
* links
|
||
|
||
**LEVEL3 – Advanced Scholarly / Technical Features**
|
||
|
||
* cross references
|
||
* numbered figures
|
||
* automatic diagrams
|
||
* bibliography
|
||
|
||
Feature levels define the guarantees the system provides during round-trip editing.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### Drift Detection
|
||
|
||
Structural drift may occur when editing documents in Word.
|
||
|
||
markidocx introduces mechanisms to detect and report semantic differences between:
|
||
|
||
* original Markdown sources
|
||
* re-imported Markdown versions
|
||
|
||
This allows users to understand and manage structural changes.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 4. Scope and Non-Scope
|
||
|
||
### In Scope
|
||
|
||
The product must support:
|
||
|
||
* Markdown ↔ Word round-trip editing
|
||
* multi-file document composition
|
||
* template-based document styling
|
||
* two defined feature levels (LEVEL1 and LEVEL3)
|
||
* preservation of document structure across editing cycles
|
||
* detection and reporting of semantic drift
|
||
* support for editorial collaboration workflows
|
||
* extensibility through additional document templates and styles
|
||
* automated testing of round-trip behavior using product documentation
|
||
|
||
The product must provide interfaces that enable:
|
||
|
||
* local document workflows
|
||
* automated integration into documentation pipelines
|
||
* programmatic interaction through service interfaces
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### Out of Scope
|
||
|
||
The product does not attempt to:
|
||
|
||
* replace word processors
|
||
* provide a graphical document editor
|
||
* support arbitrary Word document constructs
|
||
* act as a full document layout system
|
||
* enforce a specific documentation methodology
|
||
* replace existing publishing systems
|
||
|
||
markidocx focuses specifically on **structured round-trip workflows**, not full document production ecosystems.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 5. Practical Implications
|
||
|
||
Adopting markidocx introduces a structured approach to document collaboration.
|
||
|
||
Benefits include:
|
||
|
||
* improved collaboration between technical and non-technical stakeholders
|
||
* preservation of structured documentation in version-controlled environments
|
||
* reduced manual cleanup after Word-based reviews
|
||
* deterministic document generation workflows
|
||
* improved traceability between authored content and reviewed documents
|
||
|
||
Trade-offs include:
|
||
|
||
* the need to operate within supported feature boundaries
|
||
* the requirement to use defined templates and styles
|
||
* occasional limitations when importing highly customized Word content
|
||
|
||
The system is particularly valuable for organizations that:
|
||
|
||
* maintain long-lived technical documentation
|
||
* operate cross-disciplinary teams
|
||
* require traceable document evolution
|
||
* manage complex specifications or manuals
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 6. Product Use Cases
|
||
|
||
The product must support the following key use cases.
|
||
|
||
### Technical Review Workflow
|
||
|
||
A document written in Markdown is exported to Word for review by stakeholders and later re-imported with edits incorporated into the Markdown source.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### Multi-Chapter Document Editing
|
||
|
||
A large multi-file document is exported as a single Word document for external review and later re-imported without collapsing the source structure.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### Specification Publishing
|
||
|
||
A technical specification written in Markdown is exported using a formal template suitable for distribution and archival.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### Documentation Collaboration
|
||
|
||
Technical authors maintain Markdown sources while subject matter experts provide editorial feedback using Word.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### Knowledge System Integration
|
||
|
||
The product integrates with documentation pipelines, knowledge repositories, or automated publication workflows.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### Regression Testing of Documentation
|
||
|
||
The product documentation itself serves as a round-trip editing test corpus, validating product functionality across releases.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 7. Constraints and Assumptions
|
||
|
||
### Constraints
|
||
|
||
* Word document editing environments vary widely.
|
||
* Markdown dialects differ across ecosystems.
|
||
* Some Word features cannot be reliably mapped to Markdown.
|
||
* Diagram and bibliography rendering depend on external tools.
|
||
|
||
The product must therefore operate within defined semantic boundaries.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### Assumptions
|
||
|
||
* Markdown remains the authoritative authoring format.
|
||
* Word is used primarily for editing and review rather than canonical storage.
|
||
* document structure is maintained using supported constructs.
|
||
* editorial users operate within template-defined formatting environments.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 8. Success Criteria
|
||
|
||
markidocx is considered successful when it achieves the following outcomes.
|
||
|
||
### Structural Stability
|
||
|
||
Repeated Markdown → Word → Markdown cycles preserve document structure within supported feature levels.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### Editorial Accessibility
|
||
|
||
Non-technical stakeholders can review and edit documents without interacting directly with Markdown sources.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### Template Flexibility
|
||
|
||
Organizations can apply different document presentation styles without altering content.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### Multi-Document Scalability
|
||
|
||
Large documents composed from multiple files remain manageable across editing cycles.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### Detectable Drift
|
||
|
||
Structural changes introduced during editing are visible and analyzable.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### Pipeline Compatibility
|
||
|
||
The product integrates into automated documentation and publishing pipelines.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### Testable Documentation
|
||
|
||
The product documentation itself can be used as a stable end-to-end validation corpus.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 9. Dependencies
|
||
|
||
The product depends on:
|
||
|
||
* document conversion technologies capable of translating between Markdown and Word formats
|
||
* diagram rendering tools for automated diagrams
|
||
* citation and bibliography processing tools
|
||
* structured document templates
|
||
* consistent Markdown dialect support
|
||
|
||
External dependencies must be manageable without introducing excessive operational complexity.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 10. Risks
|
||
|
||
### Semantic Drift Risk
|
||
|
||
Editing in Word may unintentionally alter document structure.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### Template Misuse
|
||
|
||
Users may modify templates in ways that break round-trip guarantees.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### Over-complex Feature Expectations
|
||
|
||
Users may expect support for all Word features, which is not feasible.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### Workflow Discipline
|
||
|
||
Successful operation depends on maintaining structured authoring practices.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 11. Related Concepts
|
||
|
||
* Markdown Documentation Systems
|
||
* Structured Authoring
|
||
* Technical Writing Pipelines
|
||
* Documentation-as-Code
|
||
* Word Editorial Workflows
|
||
* Publishing Toolchains
|
||
* Knowledge Repositories
|
||
|
||
Adjacent artifacts include:
|
||
|
||
* Functional Requirements Specification (FRS)
|
||
* Architecture Documentation
|
||
* Technical Specifications
|
||
* Template and Style Definitions
|
||
* Round-Trip Validation Reports
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 12. Appendix: Product Positioning
|
||
|
||
markidocx belongs to a class of tools that bridge structured authoring and editorial collaboration.
|
||
|
||
Compared with typical Markdown toolchains, the product focuses specifically on **controlled editorial round-trip workflows** rather than pure publishing.
|
||
|
||
Compared with office-based authoring systems, the product preserves **version-controlled structured sources**.
|
||
|
||
Its value lies in enabling **structured documentation ecosystems that remain compatible with Word-centric collaboration environments**.
|
||
|
||
xxx
|