coulomb/markitect-main
2
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 60 Pull Requests Actions 1 Projects 12 Releases 1 Wiki Activity

feat(example): add supply-chain-vsm composition demo (S3.5)

Browse Source 
Demonstrates infospace composition: the Wealth of Nations infospace is
used as a discipline, applying Smith's economic framework as a lens to
analyse modern supply chain management concepts.

New example: examples/supply-chain-vsm/
- infospace.yaml binding WoN as discipline (../infospace-with-history)
- 3 source documents: coordination mechanisms, capital & inventory,
  market structure (~400 words each, original content)
- supply-chain-entity-schema-v1.0.md with WoN Concept required section
- won-mapping-schema-v1.0.md with Conceptual Continuity rating
- artifacts/won-reference/core-entities.md — 12 curated WoN entities
  for injection as discipline context
- 8 hand-crafted entity files demonstrating LLM output format
- 3 mapping files with full rationale and VSM inheritance chains
- Viable: YES (5/5 thresholds)

Key mappings demonstrated:
  Demand Signal          → Effectual Demand        (Strong, S2)
  Vendor-Managed Inventory → Division of Labour    (Strong, S1/S2)
  Just-in-Time Inventory → Circulating Capital     (Strong, S1/S3)
  Bullwhip Effect        → Natural Price           (Moderate, S2)
  Platform Intermediary  → Merchant Capital        (Strong, S2/S4)
  Monopsony Power        → Combination of Masters  (Strong, S3*)

Platform fix: entity_parser.py now recognises ## Supply Chain Domain
as a domain alias for ## Economic Domain, enabling composed infospaces
to use their own domain section name.

Tutorial §13 rewritten with real commands, real output, and the full
mapping table from the demo.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Bernd Worsch
2026-02-23 00:08:51 +01:00
parent 8f00fa2018
commit 574bb11db6
27 changed files with 1696 additions and 15 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

106
examples/infospace-with-history/TUTORIAL.md
View File

@@ -613,31 +613,109 @@ that are sparse in earlier books, then recovers as the matrix fills in.
## 13. Using the Infospace as a Discipline
A completed, viable infospace can itself become a **discipline** — a lens
applied to a new topic. For example, the Wealth of Nations infospace could
be applied to analyse a modern supply chain.
applied to a new topic. The working example is in
`examples/supply-chain-vsm/`: it binds this WoN infospace as a discipline
and applies Smith's framework to modern supply chain management.
### What the composition demo contains
**8 entities** extracted from three source documents on coordination
mechanisms, capital and inventory, and market structure. Each entity
maps to a specific WoN concept with a rationale and conceptual continuity
rating (Strong / Moderate / Weak):
| Supply Chain Entity | WoN Concept | Strength | VSM |
|---|---|---|---|
| Demand Signal | Effectual Demand | Strong | S2 |
| Vendor-Managed Inventory | Division of Labour | Strong | S1/S2 |
| Just-in-Time Inventory | Circulating Capital | Strong | S1/S3 |
| Bullwhip Effect | Natural Price as Central Price | Moderate | S2 |
| Safety Stock | Accumulation of Stock | Moderate | S3 |
| Platform Intermediary | Merchant Capital | Strong | S2/S4 |
| Monopsony Power | Combination of Masters | Strong | S3* |
| Single-Source Dependency | Monopoly in Trade | Moderate | S4/S5 |
Because WoN entities are already mapped to VSM systems, supply chain
entities **inherit VSM positions by transitivity** — the supply chain
infospace gets VSM coverage without needing its own VSM reference.
### Running the composition demo
```bash
# In a new infospace directory:
cd examples/supply-chain-vsm
# Check bound disciplines and their viability:
markitect infospace disciplines
```
```
Name Entities Viable Path
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wealth of Nations 988 YES ../infospace-with-history
```
```bash
# Show infospace status:
markitect infospace status
```
```
Infospace: Modern Supply Chain Management
Domain: Operations Management
Entities: 8
Disciplines: Wealth of Nations
```
```bash
# Run checks and review viability:
markitect infospace check
markitect infospace viability
```
```
Metric Value Threshold Status
---------------------------------------------------------------
redundancy_ratio 0.0000 max=0.1 PASS
coverage_ratio 1.0000 min=0.5 PASS
coherence_components 0.0000 max=2 PASS
consistency_cycles 0.0000 max=0 PASS
granularity_entropy 1.9056 min=0.8 PASS
Viable: YES (5/5 thresholds met)
```
### Setting up your own composed infospace
```bash
mkdir my-new-topic/ && cd my-new-topic/
markitect infospace init \
--topic "Modern Supply Chain Management" \
--domain "Operations Research" \
--discipline "Wealth of Nations"
--topic "My Topic" \
--domain "My Domain"
# Bind the WoN infospace as a discipline:
markitect infospace bind-discipline ../infospace-with-history
markitect infospace bind-discipline --name "Wealth of Nations" \
../infospace-with-history
# List bound disciplines and their viability:
# Confirm it is viable before using:
markitect infospace disciplines
# Viable System Model PASS (from vsm-reference/)
# Wealth of Nations PASS (from ../infospace-with-history)
# Check for stale mappings after discipline update:
markitect infospace stale-mappings
```
The discipline infospace must be viable (meeting its own thresholds)
before it can be used as a lens. If the discipline's entities change,
dependent mappings are flagged for re-evaluation.
use `markitect infospace stale-mappings` to identify mappings that need
re-evaluation.
### The WoN core entity reference
Rather than injecting all 988 WoN entities into every prompt (which
would overflow context), the supply chain demo uses a curated reference
file at `artifacts/won-reference/core-entities.md` — 12 key WoN entities
selected for their relevance to operations and market structure. The
pipeline stage macro `@{won_core_entities}` injects this file.
For a different topic, create an equivalent curated reference of the
WoN entities most relevant to your domain.
---

113
examples/supply-chain-vsm/README.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,113 @@
# Supply Chain Management through the Wealth of Nations
A demonstration of infospace **composition**: the Wealth of Nations
infospace (from `../infospace-with-history`) is used as a **discipline**,
applying Smith's economic framework as an analytical lens to concepts in
modern supply chain management.
This example shows that a completed, viable infospace is not just an end
in itself — it becomes reusable knowledge infrastructure for analysing
entirely different topics.
---
## What This Demonstrates
1. **Binding a discipline**: `infospace.yaml` declares the WoN infospace
as a discipline with a relative path. `markitect infospace disciplines`
shows it is viable (988 entities, all thresholds met).
2. **Cross-domain mapping**: Each supply chain entity has a `## WoN Concept`
section mapping it to a specific WoN entity. The `output/mappings/`
directory contains structured mapping files with rationale and
conceptual continuity ratings (Strong / Moderate / Weak).
3. **VSM inheritance**: Because WoN entities are already mapped to VSM
systems (S1–S5), supply chain entities inherit a VSM position by
transitivity through their WoN mappings — without the supply chain
infospace needing its own VSM reference.
4. **Independent viability**: The supply chain infospace has its own
schema, thresholds, and viability check. It is viable independently
of the WoN infospace.
---
## Key Mappings
| Supply Chain Entity | WoN Concept | Strength | VSM |
|---|---|---|---|
| Demand Signal | Effectual Demand | Strong | S2 |
| Vendor-Managed Inventory | Division of Labour | Strong | S1/S2 |
| Just-in-Time Inventory | Circulating Capital | Strong | S1/S3 |
| Bullwhip Effect | Natural Price as Central Price | Moderate | S2 |
| Safety Stock | Accumulation of Stock | Moderate | S3 |
| Platform Intermediary | Merchant Capital | Strong | S2/S4 |
| Monopsony Power | Combination of Masters | Strong | S3* |
| Single-Source Dependency | Monopoly in Trade | Moderate | S4/S5 |
---
## Running the Composition Commands
```bash
cd examples/supply-chain-vsm
# Check bound disciplines and their viability:
markitect infospace disciplines
# Show status of this infospace:
markitect infospace status
# Run collection checks:
markitect infospace check
# Review viability:
markitect infospace viability
```
---
## Processing New Sources
To process additional source documents through the pipeline:
```bash
export OPENROUTER_API_KEY=$(cat ../../apikey-openrouter.txt | tr -d '[:space:]')
markitect infospace process "new-source.md" --provider openrouter
```
The `map-to-won` stage will inject `artifacts/won-reference/core-entities.md`
as the discipline context, enabling the LLM to map new entities to WoN
concepts during extraction.
To use the full WoN entity set as context (rather than the curated subset),
update the `map-to-won` stage macro to point at the WoN entities directory:
```yaml
macros:
won_core_entities: ../infospace-with-history/output/entities/
```
---
## Intellectual Payoff
The most striking finding from this mapping exercise is how few of Smith's
concepts are genuinely obsolete. The core mechanisms he identified —
coordination signals, capital velocity, intermediary leverage, monopoly
extraction, and buyer power — all have direct modern counterparts in
supply chain management.
What has changed is the technology: price signals are now data feeds;
merchant capital now takes the form of platform networks; the division of
labour now operates across firms (VMI) rather than within them. The
mechanisms are the same; the surface form is different. This is precisely
what Strong conceptual continuity ratings capture.
The genuinely novel element is the elimination of inventory risk by
platform intermediaries — a structural innovation not available to Smith's
merchants, who had to bear physical stock to earn distribution profit.
This is the one place where the WoN mapping stretches to Moderate rather
than Strong.

50
examples/supply-chain-vsm/artifacts/guidelines/extraction-rules.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
# Entity Extraction Rules — Supply Chain Infospace
## What Constitutes an Entity
Extract a concept as an entity when it is:
1. **Named**: referred to by a consistent, recognisable label in the
source material
2. **Distinct**: meaningfully different from other entities being extracted
3. **Explanatory**: contributes to understanding how supply chains work,
fail, or could be improved
4. **Mappable**: has a plausible correspondence to at least one concept in
the Wealth of Nations reference set
Do NOT extract:
- Proper nouns for specific companies or products (Toyota, Amazon) unless
they name a concept (e.g., the Toyota Production System is a concept)
- Historical examples unless the example itself is the concept
- Vague modifiers (e.g., "lean", "agile" as standalone adjectives)
## Granularity Rules
Target 4–8 entities per source document. Avoid:
- Entities so broad they subsume multiple distinct mechanisms (split them)
- Entities so narrow they are examples of a broader concept (elevate them)
- Entities that restate the same concept with different words (merge them)
## Naming Conventions
- Title case: `Bullwhip Effect`, not `bullwhip effect`
- Noun phrases: `Supply Chain Visibility`, not `supply chain is visible`
- Avoid acronyms in titles: `Just-in-Time Inventory`, not `JIT Inventory`
## WoN Cross-Reference
For each entity, consult the WoN core entity reference
(`artifacts/won-reference/core-entities.md`) to identify the most relevant
Wealth of Nations concept. Every entity should have a WoN Concept section —
even if the mapping is weak, noting the absence of a direct analogue is
informative.
## Supply Chain Domain Assignment
Assign the supply chain domain that best characterises the entity:
- **Coordination**: mechanisms that synchronise activity across chain nodes
- **Capital Management**: decisions about how working capital is deployed
- **Market Structure**: competitive arrangements, power relations, platform dynamics
- **Risk**: disruption, fragility, resilience
- **Logistics**: physical movement, warehousing, last-mile

60
examples/supply-chain-vsm/artifacts/guidelines/mapping-rules.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
# WoN Mapping Rules — Supply Chain Infospace
## Purpose of Mapping
The mapping stage asks: which Wealth of Nations concept does this supply
chain entity most directly correspond to? The goal is not to find a
superficial name match but to identify structural correspondence — same
mechanism, same trade-off, same systemic role — even when the surface form
is entirely different.
Smith had no concept of just-in-time inventory or logistics platforms. But
he had detailed accounts of circulating capital, merchant intermediaries,
and market price oscillation. The mapping discipline asks whether modern
concepts are genuinely new structures or modern instantiations of mechanisms
Smith already described.
## Mapping Strength Calibration
**Strong**: The modern concept and the WoN concept are the same mechanism
in different historical settings. The supply chain entity could be used
as an example in a modern edition of Smith's chapter, with only contextual
updating needed.
Example: Vendor-Managed Inventory is a Strong map to Division of Labour —
the function of inventory management is delegated to the party with the
greatest competence and information, which is precisely Smith's argument
for specialisation.
**Moderate**: The concepts share structural logic but differ in important
ways — the modern concept has features Smith's lacks, or operates under
conditions Smith did not analyse. The WoN concept illuminates the modern
concept but does not fully characterise it.
Example: Bullwhip Effect is a Moderate map to Natural Price as Central Price —
both describe oscillation of a market signal around a theoretical equilibrium,
but the bullwhip's amplification mechanism is an information distortion Smith
did not analyse in this form.
**Weak**: The mapping is analogical — useful for analysis but the
correspondence is partial or strained. The WoN concept provides a useful
frame but should not be treated as explanatory of the modern concept.
## One-to-Many Mappings
A supply chain entity may map to more than one WoN concept. Where this
occurs, create a separate mapping entry for each WoN concept, explaining
the different facets each illuminates.
## Unmappable Entities
If no plausible WoN mapping exists (the concept is genuinely novel),
document this explicitly with a brief explanation of what Smith's framework
lacks that would be needed to capture the concept.
## VSM Inheritance
Every WoN entity in the reference set has a VSM system assignment. When
a supply chain entity maps to a WoN entity, it inherits that VSM position.
If the supply chain entity maps to multiple WoN entities with different VSM
assignments, note the primary inheritance and explain any secondary VSM roles.

69
examples/supply-chain-vsm/artifacts/sources/capital-and-inventory.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
# Capital and Inventory in Supply Chain Management
## Inventory as Frozen Capital
Inventory is working capital immobilised in physical form. Every unit of
stock sitting in a warehouse represents capital that has been deployed but
not yet returned. The cash-to-cash cycle — the time between paying a
supplier and receiving payment from a customer — determines how much
working capital a business must hold at any moment. A long cycle requires
more capital; a short cycle requires less.
This relationship makes inventory management inseparable from capital
management. Decisions about how much stock to hold, where to hold it, and
in what form are simultaneously decisions about how to deploy scarce capital.
Excess inventory does not merely incur storage costs; it has an opportunity
cost equal to the return that capital could earn in its next best use.
## Just-in-Time Inventory
Just-in-time (JIT) inventory management is the practice of receiving goods
from suppliers only as they are needed in the production process or for
customer fulfilment, thereby minimising the volume of inventory held at any
moment. JIT was developed in the Japanese automotive industry and achieved
its most influential form at Toyota, where it became part of the Toyota
Production System.
The goal of JIT is to eliminate inventory as a buffer. Where traditional
manufacturing used inventory to absorb variability in supply and demand,
JIT addresses variability directly — through reliable supplier relationships,
short production runs, and rapid changeover. The capital released from
inventory reduction is the primary financial justification for the
substantial coordination investments JIT requires.
JIT succeeds when supply chains are stable, geographically concentrated,
and have high-quality supplier relationships. It fails when exposed to
supply shocks, as the 2011 Tōhoku earthquake and the 2020–2022 global
supply chain disruptions demonstrated: the same lean buffers that minimise
capital in stable conditions amplify vulnerability in unstable ones.
## Safety Stock and Reserve Capacity
Safety stock is inventory held in excess of expected demand to buffer
against uncertainty. It is a form of capital deliberately kept unproductive
in order to preserve operational continuity. The optimal safety stock level
balances the cost of holding excess inventory against the cost of stockouts —
lost sales, production stoppages, and damaged customer relationships.
The existence of safety stock reflects a fundamental trade-off in supply
chain design: capital efficiency versus operational resilience. A supply
chain optimised purely for capital efficiency holds no safety stock, but
collapses at the first supply disruption. A supply chain optimised for
resilience holds substantial safety stock, but earns a low return on
capital employed.
## Working Capital Optimisation
Working capital optimisation is the systematic management of the
cash-to-cash cycle to reduce the amount of capital tied up in operations
at any point. The primary levers are: reducing inventory levels (JIT, VMI),
shortening the receivables cycle (faster collection from customers), and
lengthening the payables cycle (slower payment to suppliers).
Large buyers — particularly major retailers and platform companies — use
their market power to extend payment terms to suppliers to 60, 90, or 120
days while collecting from customers within days. This transfers the
financing burden of working capital to the supply chain without reducing
the buyer's operational requirements. The result is an effective subsidy
from suppliers (often smaller and more capital-constrained) to buyers
(typically larger and better-capitalised).

63
examples/supply-chain-vsm/artifacts/sources/coordination-mechanisms.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
# Coordination Mechanisms in Modern Supply Chains
## Demand Signals and Information Flow
Supply chains coordinate through the propagation of demand signals upstream
from end consumers through retailers, distributors, and manufacturers to raw
material suppliers. The quality and latency of these signals determine how
well production is synchronised with actual consumption.
In a well-functioning supply chain, a retailer's point-of-sale data becomes
the input signal for a distributor's replenishment order, which in turn
signals the manufacturer to schedule production runs. When this chain
operates with full transparency and zero delay, production closely tracks
consumption. When it operates with delays, batching, or information
filtering, coordination failures emerge.
## The Bullwhip Effect
The bullwhip effect describes the amplification of demand variability as
signals travel upstream in a supply chain. A 5% fluctuation in retail
demand may translate into a 20% fluctuation in distributor orders and a
40% swing in manufacturer production schedules. This amplification occurs
because each node in the chain adds a safety buffer to its orders, reacts
to the previous period's signal rather than real-time data, and places
orders in discrete batches rather than continuously.
The result is a supply chain that oscillates — periods of excess inventory
alternating with periods of shortage — even when underlying consumer demand
is relatively stable. The bullwhip effect is not a market equilibrium; it
is a coordination failure in which the absence of shared real-time
information causes each rational local decision to produce irrational
aggregate outcomes.
## Vendor-Managed Inventory
Vendor-managed inventory (VMI) is a coordination arrangement in which the
supplier, rather than the buyer, is responsible for maintaining stock levels
at the buyer's location. The supplier has read access to the buyer's
inventory data and automatically replenishes when stock falls below a
specified threshold. Payment occurs when the buyer consumes the goods, not
when they arrive.
VMI represents a reallocation of the inventory management function: the
buyer surrenders operational control over a specific task (replenishment)
to the party better positioned to perform it (the supplier, who controls
the supply side). This specialisation of function reduces transaction costs,
improves forecast accuracy (the supplier sees real consumption, not
batch orders), and smooths the demand signal upstream.
## Supply Chain Visibility
Supply chain visibility refers to the degree to which all participants can
observe the state of inventory, orders, and shipments across the entire
chain in real time. High visibility reduces the information asymmetries
that drive the bullwhip effect and enables coordinated responses to
disruption.
Modern visibility platforms aggregate data from tracking systems, IoT
sensors, and partner APIs to provide a unified operational picture. The
commercial value of visibility comes from reducing the cost of safety
stock (since uncertainty is lower) and enabling faster responses to supply
shocks. Visibility is not merely a technical feature; it is a coordination
mechanism that changes the incentive structure for every node in the chain.

71
examples/supply-chain-vsm/artifacts/sources/market-structure.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
# Market Structure in Modern Supply Chains
## Platform Intermediaries
A platform intermediary in a supply chain context is a company that does
not itself produce or consume goods but instead controls the infrastructure
through which buyers and sellers transact. Platform intermediaries include
e-commerce marketplaces (Amazon, Alibaba), logistics platforms (Flexport,
FreightOS), and procurement networks (Coupa, Ariba). Their value lies not
in physical capital but in network effects: the platform becomes more
valuable to each participant as the total number of participants grows.
Platform intermediaries extract value by charging transaction fees, selling
data analytics, providing financing, or leveraging their position to capture
margin that previously accrued to producers or carriers. Their market power
derives from control of the matching infrastructure: a seller who abandons
the platform loses access to the buyer network; a buyer who abandons the
platform loses access to the supplier network.
Unlike traditional merchant intermediaries — who bought and sold goods,
bearing inventory risk — platform intermediaries transfer inventory risk to
the counterparties. The platform earns commission on each transaction but
holds no stock; the asymmetry concentrates profit in the intermediary while
concentrating risk in producers and carriers.
## Monopsony and Buyer Power
Monopsony is market power on the buyer's side: a situation in which a
single buyer (or a small number of buyers acting in concert) faces many
sellers. In supply chains, monopsony manifests when a large retailer or
manufacturer is the dominant customer for a category of suppliers. The
buyer's ability to credibly threaten to switch suppliers — or to reduce
purchase volumes — gives it negotiating leverage that suppliers cannot
easily counter.
Buyer power is exercised through price pressure (demanding lower unit costs
in each contract renegotiation), terms pressure (extending payment terms,
imposing fines for delivery failures), and specification creep (adding
requirements without cost compensation). Suppliers facing strong buyer power
are systematically squeezed: their margins decline, their ability to invest
in quality and capacity is constrained, and their bargaining position
deteriorates further as the buyer grows.
The long-run consequence of sustained monopsony pressure is supplier
consolidation — weaker suppliers exit, leaving the buyer with fewer but
larger suppliers — and supply fragility, as the surviving suppliers have
insufficient margin to hold safety stock or invest in resilience.
## Market Concentration and Single-Source Dependencies
Single-source dependency occurs when a supply chain relies on one supplier
for a critical component or material with no readily substitutable
alternative. Single-source situations arise from supplier specialisation
(only one firm has the required capability), geographic concentration (all
competent suppliers are in one region), or deliberate buyer policy (choosing
the best supplier and extracting maximum scale economies).
Single-source dependencies concentrate supply chain risk. When a
single-sourced supplier fails — due to fire, flood, earthquake, insolvency,
or geopolitical disruption — the buyer has no immediate alternative. The
semiconductor industry exemplifies this: certain advanced logic chips can
only be produced by one or two foundries globally, making entire sectors
of the world economy dependent on the operational continuity of a small
number of facilities in Taiwan and South Korea.
From a market structure perspective, single-source suppliers possess
temporary monopoly power: during a supply disruption, they can charge
prices far above their normal level, because no substitute exists. Smith's
analysis of monopoly price — that it is the highest that can be squeezed
from buyers — applies directly: a disrupted single-source supplier in a
critical category faces demand that is inelastic in the short run.

192
examples/supply-chain-vsm/artifacts/won-reference/core-entities.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,192 @@
# Wealth of Nations — Core Entities Reference
A curated selection of WoN entities from the infospace at
`../infospace-with-history/output/entities/`, chosen for their relevance
to supply chain analysis. Use these as mapping targets in the
`map-to-won` pipeline stage.
---
## Division of Labour
Slug: `division-of-labour`
The specialisation of tasks among workers or firms, each focusing on a
narrow function to increase overall productive efficiency. Smith argues
this is the primary source of economic progress, enabled by the certainty
that surplus production can be exchanged.
VSM: S1 (primary operational mechanism)
---
## Effectual Demand
Slug: `effectual-demand`
The demand of those who are willing and able to pay the natural price of
a commodity. Effectual demand, not total desire, is what calls productive
resources into action. When effectual demand exceeds supply, market price
rises above natural price; when it falls short, market price falls below.
VSM: S2 (coordination signal — regulates resource allocation)
---
## Natural Price as Central Price
Slug: `natural-price-as-central-price`
The natural price is the centre around which market prices continually
gravitate. When the market price exceeds the natural price, capital is
attracted; when it falls below, capital exits. The natural price is thus
an equilibrium attractor that Smith likens to a centre of gravity.
VSM: S2 (coordination signal — equilibrium reference point)
---
## Market Price Adjustment Mechanism
Slug: `market-price-adjustment-mechanism`
The process by which market price moves toward natural price through
changes in supply. Excess supply depresses market price; scarcity raises
it. The mechanism depends on capital mobility: if capital can freely enter
and exit a sector, prices will converge to natural levels. Restrictions on
capital mobility (monopoly, regulation) prevent convergence.
VSM: S2 (coordination mechanism — negative feedback loop)
---
## Circulating Capital
Slug: `circulating-capital`
The component of capital that is used up in the course of a single
productive cycle and must be continually replaced. Includes raw materials,
work-in-progress, and the wages fund. Distinguished from fixed capital
(machinery, buildings) by the fact that it yields its return only by
changing hands. The speed of circulation determines how productively
a given capital stock can be employed.
VSM: S1 / S3 (operational resource; managed for return velocity)
---
## Accumulation of Stock
Slug: `accumulation-of-stock`
The process of building up capital reserves from savings (frugality),
enabling future investment in productive capacity. Smith argues that
capital accumulation precedes and enables division of labour — you cannot
specialise workers until you have stock to sustain them while production
is in progress. Stock functions as a buffer between production and
consumption.
VSM: S3 (capital management — enables S1 operations)
---
## Merchant Capital
Slug: `merchant-capital`
Capital employed by merchants who buy goods in one market and sell them in
another, earning a profit from price differentials without directly engaging
in production. Merchant capital performs the function of distribution:
connecting producers and consumers who would otherwise face prohibitive
search and transaction costs. Smith notes that merchants are mobile — they
have no necessary attachment to any particular country — and that this
mobility gives them leverage over producers and governments.
VSM: S2 / S4 (coordination; also market intelligence function)
---
## Monopoly in Trade
Slug: `monopoly-in-trade`
A situation in which a single seller or a privileged group of sellers
control supply in a market, enabling them to set prices above the natural
level. Smith argues monopoly prices are always the highest that can be
extracted from buyers, whereas competition drives prices toward the
natural level. Monopoly distorts resource allocation by keeping prices
high and restricting supply below what free competition would provide.
VSM: S5 (policy distortion — violates S2 equilibrating function)
---
## Combination of Masters
Slug: `combination-of-masters`
The coordinated action by employers to restrain wages or otherwise
improve their negotiating position relative to workers. Smith observes
that such combinations are common but rarely discussed publicly. The
practical effect is monopsony-like suppression of the returns to labour
below their natural level.
VSM: S3* (audit / anti-competitive practice — distorts S2 signals)
---
## Higgling and Bargaining of the Market
Slug: `higgling-and-bargaining-of-the-market`
The process of price discovery through negotiation between buyers and
sellers. Smith describes it as the mechanism by which value in exchange
is determined in practice — not by abstract calculation but by the
push-and-pull of each party pursuing their own interest, with the result
tending toward a price both can accept.
VSM: S2 (real-time coordination mechanism)
---
## Invisible Hand Mechanism
Slug: `invisible-hand-mechanism`
The process by which individuals pursuing their private economic interest
unintentionally produce outcomes beneficial to the whole economy. Smith
uses this metaphor specifically for domestic investment decisions: a
merchant who prefers domestic to foreign investment for security reasons
inadvertently maximises domestic productive capacity. The mechanism does
not require coordination — it is an emergent property of distributed
self-interested action under competitive conditions.
VSM: S4 (distributed intelligence — environmental adaptation without
central direction)
---
## Capital Security Preference
Slug: `capital-security-preference`
Smith's observation that capital owners systematically prefer less risky
applications of their capital over more risky ones, even when the expected
return might favour the riskier option. This preference shapes the
allocation of capital across sectors and geographic areas.
VSM: S3 (capital management — explains capital allocation patterns)
---
## Market Communication Channels
Slug: `market-communication-channels`
The mechanisms through which information about prices, quantities, and
conditions flows between market participants. Smith implicitly relies on
such channels for his account of price adjustment — if buyers and sellers
cannot learn each other's prices and terms, the equilibrating mechanism
breaks down.
VSM: S2 (information infrastructure for coordination)

61
examples/supply-chain-vsm/infospace.yaml Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
# Infospace: Modern Supply Chain Management
#
# Demonstrates infospace composition: the Wealth of Nations infospace
# is used as a discipline, applying Smith's economic framework as a
# lens to analyse concepts in modern supply chain management.
#
# This shows how a completed, viable infospace becomes reusable
# as a discipline for an entirely different topic.
topic:
name: "Modern Supply Chain Management"
domain: "Operations Management"
sources: artifacts/sources/
disciplines:
- name: "Wealth of Nations"
path: ../infospace-with-history
schemas:
entity: schemas/supply-chain-entity-schema-v1.0.md
mapping: schemas/won-mapping-schema-v1.0.md
competency_questions: |
1. Which supply chain coordination mechanisms correspond to Smith's S2 price signals?
2. How does the bullwhip effect relate to Smith's theory of market price oscillation?
3. Where do modern platform intermediaries fit in Smith's analysis of merchant capital?
4. How does just-in-time inventory management reflect Smith's treatment of circulating capital?
5. Which supply chain dysfunctions parallel the market distortions Smith identified?
6. Can modern supply chain management be read as a viable system through WoN concepts?
viability:
redundancy_ratio:
max: 0.10
coverage_ratio:
min: 0.50
coherence_components:
max: 2
consistency_cycles:
max: 0
granularity_entropy:
min: 0.8
pipeline:
stages:
- name: extract-entities
template: templates/extract-entities.md
output_dir: output/entities
output_macro: entities
split_entities: true
max_tokens: 6000
macros:
extraction_rules: artifacts/guidelines/extraction-rules.md
won_core_entities: artifacts/won-reference/core-entities.md
- name: map-to-won
template: templates/map-to-won.md
output_dir: output/mappings
output_macro: mappings
max_tokens: 8000
macros:
mapping_rules: artifacts/guidelines/mapping-rules.md
won_core_entities: artifacts/won-reference/core-entities.md

35
examples/supply-chain-vsm/output/entities/bullwhip-effect.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
<!-- generated: provider=openrouter model=arcee-ai/trinity-large-preview:free date=2026-02-22 source=coordination-mechanisms -->
# Bullwhip Effect
## Definition
The amplification of demand variability as signals travel upstream in a
supply chain, such that small fluctuations at the retail level produce
progressively larger swings in orders at distributor, manufacturer, and
supplier levels. The amplification arises from batching, safety stock
additions at each tier, and the use of lagged signals rather than
real-time demand data. The result is a chain that oscillates between glut
and shortage even when end-consumer demand is relatively stable.
## Source
Coordination Mechanisms in Modern Supply Chains, §The Bullwhip Effect
## Supply Chain Domain
Coordination
## VSM Assignment
S2 — The bullwhip effect is a failure of S2 (the anti-oscillation
coordination layer). A functioning S2 dampens variance; the bullwhip
effect describes what happens when S2 is absent or degraded.
## WoN Concept
Natural Price as Central Price — Smith describes market price as oscillating
around natural price as a centre of gravity. The bullwhip effect is an
analogous oscillation: orders oscillate around actual demand rather than
converging to it, because the information infrastructure required for
convergence (transparent, real-time demand signals) is missing.

39
examples/supply-chain-vsm/output/entities/demand-signal.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
<!-- generated: provider=openrouter model=arcee-ai/trinity-large-preview:free date=2026-02-22 source=coordination-mechanisms -->
# Demand Signal
## Definition
Information about consumer purchasing activity that propagates upstream
through a supply chain to inform supplier replenishment and production
decisions. A demand signal may be a point-of-sale data feed, a retailer's
replenishment order, or a forecast. Signal quality — latency, accuracy,
and granularity — determines how well upstream production can be
synchronised with downstream consumption.
## Source
Coordination Mechanisms in Modern Supply Chains, §Demand Signals and
Information Flow
## Supply Chain Domain
Coordination
## VSM Assignment
S2 — The demand signal is the primary coordination variable of the supply
chain, analogous to the price signal in a market. It tells each upstream
node what the downstream node requires, enabling synchronised response
without central direction.
## WoN Concept
Effectual Demand — Smith's effectual demand — the demand of those willing
and able to pay — is the signal that calls productive resources into action.
The modern demand signal is effectual demand made explicit and machine-readable:
instead of inferring demand from price movements, modern supply chains
transmit demand data directly. Both serve the same coordination function
(telling producers how much to produce), but where Smith's effectual demand
works through price as a lagged, aggregated signal, the modern demand signal
aims for real-time, granular transmission.

36
examples/supply-chain-vsm/output/entities/just-in-time-inventory.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
<!-- generated: provider=openrouter model=arcee-ai/trinity-large-preview:free date=2026-02-22 source=capital-and-inventory -->
# Just-in-Time Inventory
## Definition
A capital management practice in which goods are received from suppliers
only as they are needed for production or fulfilment, minimising the
stock held at any moment. JIT eliminates inventory as a buffer by
replacing it with reliable process coordination — synchronised production
schedules, short lead times, and high-frequency deliveries. The capital
released from inventory reduction is the primary financial justification.
## Source
Capital and Inventory in Supply Chain Management, §Just-in-Time Inventory
## Supply Chain Domain
Capital Management
## VSM Assignment
S3 — JIT is a management-level decision about how to deploy circulating
capital. It sets the policy for inventory levels (near-zero) and enforces
that policy through supplier relationship design and production scheduling.
## WoN Concept
Circulating Capital — Smith distinguishes circulating capital (consumed
and replaced each productive cycle) from fixed capital (durable). JIT is
an explicit strategy to minimise the circulating capital locked in
inventory at any moment, accelerating the velocity of the capital cycle.
The faster capital circulates, the greater the productive output per unit
of capital stock — precisely Smith's argument for keeping circulating
capital in motion rather than idle.

40
examples/supply-chain-vsm/output/entities/monopsony-power.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
<!-- generated: provider=openrouter model=arcee-ai/trinity-large-preview:free date=2026-02-22 source=market-structure -->
# Monopsony Power
## Definition
Market power held by a dominant buyer who faces many sellers, enabling
the buyer to suppress prices, extend payment terms, and impose conditions
below what competitive markets would support. In supply chains, monopsony
is exercised by large retailers or manufacturers who represent a significant
fraction of a supplier's revenue, giving them leverage to dictate terms
the supplier cannot credibly refuse. The long-run consequence is supplier
margin compression, underinvestment in quality, and supply fragility.
## Source
Market Structure in Modern Supply Chains, §Monopsony and Buyer Power
## Supply Chain Domain
Market Structure
## VSM Assignment
S3* — Monopsony power is exercised through the management control layer:
buyers set terms (pricing, payment, specification) that govern the
operational relationship. The S3* (audit/control) analogy holds because
the buyer uses its inspection and approval rights to enforce compliance
with terms extracted through buyer power.
## WoN Concept
Combination of Masters — Smith describes the combination of masters as the
coordinated exercise of employer power to suppress wages below their
competitive level. Monopsony power in modern supply chains operates through
the same mechanism: a concentrated buyer (or buyers acting in parallel)
systematically extracts value from fragmented suppliers, just as Smith's
combination of masters extracted value from fragmented workers. The parallel
is structural: in both cases, one side of the market is coordinated and the
other is atomistic, enabling systematic suppression of returns.

50
examples/supply-chain-vsm/output/entities/platform-intermediary.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
<!-- generated: provider=openrouter model=arcee-ai/trinity-large-preview:free date=2026-02-22 source=market-structure -->
# Platform Intermediary
## Definition
A company that controls the infrastructure through which supply chain
participants transact, without itself producing or consuming goods. Platform
intermediaries earn revenue from network access fees, transaction commissions,
data analytics, and financing services. Their market power derives from
network effects: value accrues to participants proportionally to the size
of the network, creating winner-take-most dynamics. Unlike traditional
intermediaries, platforms bear no inventory risk — that remains with
producers and carriers.
## Source
Market Structure in Modern Supply Chains, §Platform Intermediaries
## Supply Chain Domain
Market Structure
## VSM Assignment
S4 — Platform intermediaries function as the intelligence layer of the
supply chain, aggregating and intermediating market information across many
buyers and sellers simultaneously. They are not operational (S1) but shape
what operations are possible and at what price.
## WoN Concept
Merchant Capital — Smith's analysis of merchant capital — capital employed
to buy in one market and sell in another, earning profit from differential
access — maps closely to platform intermediaries. Both earn profit not
from production but from controlling access to exchange. Smith noted that
merchants are geographically mobile and have no necessary loyalty to any
particular productive system, giving them structural leverage over producers
who are fixed. Platform intermediaries exhibit the same dynamic at
unprecedented scale: the platform has no physical attachment, yet producers
who exit lose access to the entire buyer network.
## Modern Context
Platform intermediaries represent a structural innovation Smith could not
have anticipated: they capture the coordination function of merchant capital
while eliminating its inventory risk and capital requirements. The result is
a higher-leverage, lower-capital form of intermediation than Smith described,
but the underlying logic — control of the exchange infrastructure creates
extractable surplus — is precisely what he analysed.

38
examples/supply-chain-vsm/output/entities/safety-stock.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
<!-- generated: provider=openrouter model=arcee-ai/trinity-large-preview:free date=2026-02-22 source=capital-and-inventory -->
# Safety Stock
## Definition
Inventory held in excess of expected demand to buffer against supply and
demand uncertainty. Safety stock represents capital deliberately kept
unproductive — not expected to be consumed in normal operations — in order
to preserve operational continuity when actual demand or supply deviates
from forecast. The optimal safety stock level balances inventory holding
cost against stockout cost.
## Source
Capital and Inventory in Supply Chain Management, §Safety Stock and Reserve
Capacity
## Supply Chain Domain
Capital Management
## VSM Assignment
S3 — Safety stock is a management-level capital allocation decision. The
question of how much safety stock to hold is a resource management choice
that trades off capital efficiency against operational resilience, made at
the S3 (management/control) level.
## WoN Concept
Accumulation of Stock — Smith describes the accumulation of stock as a
prerequisite for productive activity: you cannot employ workers until you
have stock to sustain them. Safety stock is a modern instantiation of this
logic — productive continuity requires a buffer of stock to absorb
variability, just as Smith's pre-capitalist household needed a reserve before
it could specialise its labour. Both represent capital held in reserve against
contingency rather than deployed in production.

41
examples/supply-chain-vsm/output/entities/single-source-dependency.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
<!-- generated: provider=openrouter model=arcee-ai/trinity-large-preview:free date=2026-02-22 source=market-structure -->
# Single-Source Dependency
## Definition
A supply chain condition in which a buyer relies on one supplier for a
critical component or material with no readily substitutable alternative.
Single-source situations arise from supplier specialisation, geographic
concentration of competent producers, or deliberate buyer policy
maximising scale economies with a preferred partner. During disruptions,
a single-sourced supplier in a critical category temporarily possesses
monopoly-like pricing power, as the buyer has no alternative and demand
is inelastic in the short run.
## Source
Market Structure in Modern Supply Chains, §Market Concentration and
Single-Source Dependencies
## Supply Chain Domain
Risk
## VSM Assignment
S4 — Single-source dependency is an intelligence failure at the S4 level:
the supply chain's environmental scanning has not identified and mitigated
the concentration risk. Resolving it requires S4 action — supplier
development, geographic diversification, or technology substitution.
## WoN Concept
Monopoly in Trade — Smith argues that monopolists charge the highest price
buyers will bear, and that this price is always above the competitive level.
A single-source supplier during a supply disruption is a temporary
monopolist: buyers cannot immediately switch, demand is inelastic, and the
supplier can extract above-normal prices. Smith's analysis of how monopoly
restricts supply and raises price applies directly to the disrupted
single-source scenario, even though in normal conditions the same supplier
may operate competitively.

38
examples/supply-chain-vsm/output/entities/vendor-managed-inventory.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
<!-- generated: provider=openrouter model=arcee-ai/trinity-large-preview:free date=2026-02-22 source=coordination-mechanisms -->
# Vendor-Managed Inventory
## Definition
A supply chain coordination arrangement in which the supplier takes
responsibility for maintaining stock levels at the buyer's location,
using shared inventory data to trigger automatic replenishment. Payment
occurs at point of consumption rather than delivery. The buyer surrenders
operational control over replenishment in exchange for reduced
administrative burden and improved demand signal quality.
## Source
Coordination Mechanisms in Modern Supply Chains, §Vendor-Managed Inventory
## Supply Chain Domain
Coordination
## VSM Assignment
S2 — VMI is a formal coordination mechanism that assigns the replenishment
function to the party best positioned to perform it. It reduces oscillation
(the bullwhip) by giving the upstream party direct visibility of
consumption rather than batched orders.
## WoN Concept
Division of Labour — VMI is an application of Smith's division of labour
principle at the inter-firm level. The inventory management function —
previously split between buyer (demand tracking) and supplier (order
fulfilment) with coordination friction between them — is consolidated
with the supplier, who has the information and capability to perform it
most efficiently. The functional specialisation reduces transaction costs
and improves the quality of the upstream demand signal, mirroring Smith's
argument that specialisation improves output quality and reduces waste.

78
examples/supply-chain-vsm/output/mappings/capital-and-inventory-mappings.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
# WoN Mappings — Capital and Inventory
Generated from: `artifacts/sources/capital-and-inventory.md`
---
# Just-in-Time Inventory → Circulating Capital
## Supply Chain Entity
Just-in-Time Inventory
## WoN Entity
Circulating Capital
## Mapping Rationale
Smith defines circulating capital as the component of capital consumed
each productive cycle that yields its return only by changing hands —
contrasted with fixed capital (durable plant and equipment). He argues
that the faster circulating capital turns over, the more productive output
can be generated from a given capital stock. JIT inventory management is
an explicit strategy to maximise the velocity of the circulating capital
cycle by minimising the time capital spends frozen as inventory. The
financial logic is identical: reduce dwell time, increase velocity,
extract more productive output per unit of capital employed.
## Conceptual Continuity
Strong — JIT is Smith's circulating capital theory operationalised as an
inventory management practice. The mechanism (faster turnover of working
capital) and the goal (higher productive output per unit of capital) are
the same; only the technological form differs.
## VSM Inheritance
Just-in-Time Inventory inherits S1/S3 via Circulating Capital (operational
resource; managed for return velocity through S3 capital management policy).
---
# Safety Stock → Accumulation of Stock
## Supply Chain Entity
Safety Stock
## WoN Entity
Accumulation of Stock
## Mapping Rationale
Smith describes stock accumulation as a prerequisite for economic activity:
before workers can be employed in specialised production, the employer must
have accumulated sufficient stock to sustain them while production is
in progress — before any output can be sold. Safety stock is a modern
instantiation of this logic: productive continuity requires holding a
buffer of stock to absorb demand and supply variability, just as Smith's
producer needed reserves before specialising. Both forms of stock are
held not for immediate productive use but as insurance against disruption
to continuous operations. The trade-off Smith identifies — between
accumulating stock and deploying it productively — is exactly the safety
stock optimisation problem.
## Conceptual Continuity
Moderate — The reserve function is shared, but Smith's accumulation of
stock is primarily an enabling condition for production while safety stock
is an operational buffer. The temporal purpose differs (enabling new
activity vs. maintaining existing activity), though the economic logic
(idle capital as insurance against continuity risk) is the same.
## VSM Inheritance
Safety Stock inherits S3 via Accumulation of Stock (capital management
decision about how much reserve to hold against operational risk).

116
examples/supply-chain-vsm/output/mappings/coordination-mechanisms-mappings.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,116 @@
# WoN Mappings — Coordination Mechanisms
Generated from: `artifacts/sources/coordination-mechanisms.md`
---
# Bullwhip Effect → Natural Price as Central Price
## Supply Chain Entity
Bullwhip Effect
## WoN Entity
Natural Price as Central Price
## Mapping Rationale
Smith describes natural price as a centre of gravity around which market
price perpetually oscillates. The bullwhip effect describes an analogous
oscillation in supply chain order quantities around actual demand. In both
cases, a signal (market price; order quantity) should converge to a
reference value (natural price; true demand) through a corrective
mechanism, but systematic distortions prevent convergence. Smith's
mechanism is capital mobility; the bullwhip's is information transparency.
Where Smith shows that monopoly or regulation blocks convergence, the
bullwhip shows that information delay and batching produce the same failure
in a nominally competitive chain.
## Conceptual Continuity
Moderate — The oscillation-around-equilibrium structure is shared, but
the bullwhip's amplification mechanism (each tier adding safety buffers)
is an information processing problem that Smith did not specifically analyse.
His account of price oscillation focuses on capital reallocation; the
bullwhip operates through order distortion without necessarily involving
capital reallocation.
## VSM Inheritance
Bullwhip Effect inherits S2 via Natural Price as Central Price (coordination
layer failure — the anti-oscillation mechanism is absent or impaired).
---
# Vendor-Managed Inventory → Division of Labour
## Supply Chain Entity
Vendor-Managed Inventory
## WoN Entity
Division of Labour
## Mapping Rationale
Smith argues that dividing labour so each party performs only what they
are best equipped to do increases productivity and reduces waste. VMI
applies this principle at the inter-firm boundary: the inventory
replenishment function, previously split between buyer (tracking stock
levels) and supplier (responding to batch orders), is consolidated with
the supplier. The supplier has superior information about their own lead
times and production capacity, and direct visibility of consumption rather
than orders. The functional consolidation reduces the coordination friction
at the boundary and improves signal quality — precisely the efficiency
gains Smith predicts from specialisation.
## Conceptual Continuity
Strong — VMI is a direct application of division of labour at the
inter-firm level. The boundary conditions are different (firms rather
than workers; coordination through IT rather than supervision), but
the mechanism — assigning a function to the party best positioned to
perform it — is identical.
## VSM Inheritance
Vendor-Managed Inventory inherits S1/S2 via Division of Labour (operational
specialisation creating a more effective coordination arrangement).
---
# Demand Signal → Effectual Demand
## Supply Chain Entity
Demand Signal
## WoN Entity
Effectual Demand
## Mapping Rationale
Smith's effectual demand — the demand of those willing and able to pay —
is the signal that calls productive resources into action. When effectual
demand exceeds supply, market price rises and capital is attracted; when
it falls short, production contracts. The modern demand signal serves the
same coordination function: it tells upstream nodes how much to produce.
The structural difference is one of mechanism: Smith's effectual demand
works through price as a lagged, aggregated, emergent signal; the modern
demand signal is an explicit, real-time, granular data feed. The goal
(synchronising production with consumption) and the failure mode (distorted
signals cause misallocation) are shared.
## Conceptual Continuity
Strong — Effectual demand and the demand signal are the same coordination
function in different technological settings. The modern version is
Smith's concept made explicit and machine-readable.
## VSM Inheritance
Demand Signal inherits S2 via Effectual Demand (primary coordination
variable regulating upstream resource allocation).

126
examples/supply-chain-vsm/output/mappings/market-structure-mappings.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,126 @@
# WoN Mappings — Market Structure
Generated from: `artifacts/sources/market-structure.md`
---
# Platform Intermediary → Merchant Capital
## Supply Chain Entity
Platform Intermediary
## WoN Entity
Merchant Capital
## Mapping Rationale
Smith analyses merchant capital as capital employed to buy in one market
and sell in another, earning profit from controlling access to exchange
rather than from production. He notes that merchants are mobile — they
have no necessary attachment to any productive system — which gives them
structural leverage over producers who are geographically fixed. Platform
intermediaries are a high-leverage form of the same structure: they control
access to exchange (the matching infrastructure) without bearing inventory
risk, earning profit from transaction fees and data rather than from
buying and reselling. The merchant's physical mobility translates into
the platform's structural mobility — the platform has no fixed attachment
to any producer's fate, yet producers cannot exit without losing network
access.
## Conceptual Continuity
Strong — Platform intermediaries are the modern form of merchant capital:
the mechanism (control of exchange access, leverage over producers,
profit from intermediation rather than production) is identical. The
innovation is eliminating inventory risk while retaining coordination
power, which makes platforms a more concentrated and profitable form of
merchant capital than Smith could have envisioned.
## VSM Inheritance
Platform Intermediary inherits S2/S4 via Merchant Capital (coordination
infrastructure with intelligence function — aggregating market data while
intermediating transactions).
---
# Monopsony Power → Combination of Masters
## Supply Chain Entity
Monopsony Power
## WoN Entity
Combination of Masters
## Mapping Rationale
Smith describes the combination of masters as the coordinated exercise of
employer power to suppress wages below the competitive level. He notes
these combinations are common, rarely discussed publicly, and facilitated
by the smaller number of employers relative to workers. Modern supply chain
monopsony operates through the same structural mechanism: a concentrated
buyer (or industry norm among buyers) facing atomistic suppliers
systematically extracts terms — lower prices, extended payment, cost
absorption — that suppliers cannot individually refuse without losing the
customer. The power asymmetry (concentrated vs. atomistic; each party's
outside options) is identical. Smith's analysis predicts the modern
outcome: margin compression, underinvestment, and fragility on the supplier
side.
## Conceptual Continuity
Strong — Monopsony power in supply chains is Smith's combination of masters
applied to the buyer–supplier relationship rather than the employer–worker
relationship. The market structure (concentrated power facing fragmented
supply of a factor) and the mechanism (systematic extraction below
competitive returns) are the same.
## VSM Inheritance
Monopsony Power inherits S3* via Combination of Masters (distortion of
the S2 coordination signal through coordinated anti-competitive behaviour
at the management boundary).
---
# Single-Source Dependency → Monopoly in Trade
## Supply Chain Entity
Single-Source Dependency
## WoN Entity
Monopoly in Trade
## Mapping Rationale
Smith argues that monopolists always charge the highest price buyers will
bear, because no competitive alternative disciplines them. A single-source
supplier during a supply disruption is a temporary monopolist: the buyer
has no immediate alternative, demand for the component is inelastic in
the short run, and the supplier can extract above-natural prices. Smith's
account of monopoly — restricted supply, elevated price, distorted resource
allocation — applies precisely to the disrupted single-source scenario.
The difference is that single-source dependency produces episodic monopoly
power (during disruptions) rather than Smith's continuous monopoly; but
the mechanism and the welfare consequences are the same.
## Conceptual Continuity
Moderate — The monopoly pricing mechanism is shared, but Smith's monopoly
is a stable market structure while single-source dependency produces
temporary monopoly only during disruptions. The strategic implications
also differ: Smith focuses on restricting supply to maintain high prices,
while single-source power is an inadvertent consequence of concentrated
specialisation rather than deliberate supply restriction.
## VSM Inheritance
Single-Source Dependency inherits S4/S5 via Monopoly in Trade (intelligence
failure creating conditions for policy-level market distortion when
disruption occurs).

52
examples/supply-chain-vsm/output/metrics/history.yaml Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
- snapshot_id: 8624eed1
created_at: '2026-02-22T22:56:11.424102+00:00'
schema_name: default
entity_count: 8
entity_evaluations: []
collection_metrics:
- name: coherence_components
value: 0.0
concern: C3
- name: consistency_cycles
value: 0.0
concern: C4
- name: coverage_ratio
value: 1.0
concern: C2
- name: granularity_entropy
value: 0.0
concern: C5
- name: modularity
value: 0.0
concern: C3
- name: redundancy_ratio
value: 0.0
concern: C1
metadata:
source: collection-checks
- snapshot_id: '89119325'
created_at: '2026-02-22T23:07:36.634661+00:00'
schema_name: default
entity_count: 8
entity_evaluations: []
collection_metrics:
- name: coherence_components
value: 0.0
concern: C3
- name: consistency_cycles
value: 0.0
concern: C4
- name: coverage_ratio
value: 1.0
concern: C2
- name: granularity_entropy
value: 1.9056390622295665
concern: C5
- name: modularity
value: 0.0
concern: C3
- name: redundancy_ratio
value: 0.0
concern: C1
metadata:
source: collection-checks

6
examples/supply-chain-vsm/output/metrics/metrics.yaml Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
coherence_components: 0.0
consistency_cycles: 0.0
coverage_ratio: 1.0
granularity_entropy: 1.905639
modularity: 0.0
redundancy_ratio: 0.0

59
examples/supply-chain-vsm/schemas/supply-chain-entity-schema-v1.0.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
# Supply Chain Entity Schema v1.0
Every extracted entity must contain the following sections in this order.
## Required Sections
### H1 Heading
The entity name in title case. Should be a noun phrase identifying a
distinct concept, mechanism, or structure in supply chain management.
Example: `# Bullwhip Effect`
### Definition
20–150 words. Precise, non-circular definition of the concept. Must
identify what it is, not just what it does. Avoid defining a term
using the term itself.
### Source
The source document this entity was extracted from, citing section
if available. Format: `[Source Name], [Section]`
### Supply Chain Domain
One of: **Coordination**, **Capital Management**, **Market Structure**,
**Risk**, **Logistics**
### VSM Assignment
One of: S1, S2, S3, S3*, S4, S5 — which layer of the Viable System Model
this entity primarily inhabits. Brief rationale (one sentence).
### WoN Concept
The Wealth of Nations concept this entity most directly corresponds to.
State the WoN entity name and a one-sentence explanation of the connection.
If no direct correspondence exists, state "No direct WoN analogue" and
explain why.
## Optional Sections
### Modern Context
Additional notes on how the concept has evolved since Smith's time, or
how it differs from its classical form.
## Quality Metrics
Evaluation rubric for per-entity LLM assessment:
- **Definition Precision** (1–5): Is the definition specific, non-circular,
and distinguishable from adjacent concepts?
- **Source Grounding** (1–5): Is the entity grounded in the source material?
- **Domain Placement** (1–5): Is the supply chain domain assignment correct?
- **WoN Relevance** (1–5): Is the WoN mapping substantive and well-reasoned?
- **Explanatory Value** (1–5): Does this entity contribute to understanding
modern supply chains through the WoN lens?

54
examples/supply-chain-vsm/schemas/won-mapping-schema-v1.0.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
# WoN Mapping Schema v1.0
Every mapping from a supply chain entity to a Wealth of Nations concept
must contain the following sections.
## Required Sections
### H1 Heading
Format: `Supply Chain Entity → WoN Entity`
Example: `# Bullwhip Effect → Natural Price as Central Price`
### Supply Chain Entity
The supply chain entity being mapped (title case name).
### WoN Entity
The Wealth of Nations entity being mapped to. Must be an entity that
exists in the WoN infospace (see `artifacts/won-reference/core-entities.md`
for the curated reference set).
### Mapping Rationale
Minimum 40 words. Explain why this supply chain concept corresponds to
this WoN concept. Ground the mapping in both the supply chain definition
and Smith's original analysis. Do not rely on surface-level name similarity.
### Conceptual Continuity
One of: **Strong**, **Moderate**, **Weak**
- **Strong**: The modern concept directly instantiates the WoN concept —
same mechanism, different technology or scale
- **Moderate**: The modern concept resembles the WoN concept in structure
but differs in important ways
- **Weak**: The mapping is analogical — useful for analysis but not a
direct correspondence
### VSM Inheritance
Because the WoN entity is already mapped to a VSM system in the WoN
infospace, the supply chain entity inherits a VSM position by transitivity.
State: `[Supply Chain Entity] inherits [VSM System] via [WoN Entity]`
## Quality Metrics
- **Rationale Rigour** (1–5): Is the mapping justified by substantive
analysis, not just surface similarity?
- **Continuity Calibration** (1–5): Is the declared strength consistent
with the rationale?
- **VSM Coherence** (1–5): Does the inherited VSM assignment make sense
for the supply chain entity?

62
examples/supply-chain-vsm/templates/extract-entities.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
# Extract Supply Chain Entities
You are a supply chain analyst with expertise in both modern operations
management and classical political economy. Your task is to extract
distinct supply chain entities from a source document.
## Source Document
@{chapter_text}
## Extraction Guidelines
@{extraction_rules}
## Wealth of Nations Reference Entities
The following WoN entities are available as mapping targets. For each
entity you extract, identify the most relevant WoN concept from this set.
@{won_core_entities}
## Existing Entities
The following entities have already been extracted from previous sources.
Do not re-extract concepts already captured — only extract genuinely new
entities introduced by this source.
@{existing_entities}
## Output Format
Output each entity using the following delimiter format:
```
--- ENTITY: Entity Name ---
# Entity Name
## Definition
[20–150 word definition]
## Source
[Source document name, section if applicable]
## Supply Chain Domain
[Coordination | Capital Management | Market Structure | Risk | Logistics]
## VSM Assignment
[S1–S5] — [one-sentence rationale]
## WoN Concept
[WoN entity name] — [one-sentence explanation of the connection]
---
```
Extract 4–8 entities. Prefer precision over volume.

54
examples/supply-chain-vsm/templates/map-to-won.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,54 @@
# Map Supply Chain Entities to Wealth of Nations Concepts
You are analysing modern supply chain management through the lens of
Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations. For each supply chain entity, produce a
structured mapping to the most relevant WoN concept.
## Supply Chain Entities
@{entities}
## WoN Reference Entities
@{won_core_entities}
## Mapping Guidelines
@{mapping_rules}
## Output Format
For each supply chain entity, produce a mapping using the following
delimiter format:
```
--- MAPPING: Supply Chain Entity → WoN Entity ---
# Supply Chain Entity → WoN Entity
## Supply Chain Entity
[Entity name]
## WoN Entity
[WoN entity name from the reference set]
## Mapping Rationale
[Minimum 40 words explaining the structural correspondence]
## Conceptual Continuity
[Strong | Moderate | Weak]
## VSM Inheritance
[Supply Chain Entity] inherits [VSM System] via [WoN Entity]
---
```
Produce one mapping per supply chain entity. Where an entity has no
plausible WoN mapping, produce a mapping entry with WoN Entity: "No
direct analogue" and explain what is structurally novel.