Complete State Hub bootstrap workplans (WP-0001)

- Review integration files; fill SCOPE where templated
- Document dev workflow in stack-and-commands.md
- Seed WP-0002 implementation workplan; mark bootstrap finished
- Hub sync via fix-consistency

.claude/rules/agents.md

@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+## Kaizen Agents
+
+Specialized agent personas available on demand via the state-hub MCP.
+
+**Discover:** `list_kaizen_agents()` — returns all agents with name, description, category
+**Load:** `get_kaizen_agent("tdd-workflow")` — returns full instructions; read and follow them
+
+Common agents:
+
+| Agent | Category | When to use |
+|-------|----------|-------------|
+| `tdd-workflow` | testing | Step-by-step TDD8 workflow for any feature |
+| `code-refactoring` | quality | Code quality analysis and safe refactoring |
+| `test-maintenance` | testing | Diagnose and fix failing tests |
+| `requirements-engineering` | process | Prevent interface/mock mismatches upfront |
+| `keepaTodofile` | process | Maintain TODO.md during work |
+| `project-management` | process | Track status, determine next steps |
+| `datamodel-optimization` | quality | Optimize dataclasses and data structures |
+
+All 17 agents: call `list_kaizen_agents()` for the full list.

.claude/rules/architecture.md

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+## Architecture
+
+<!-- TODO: Describe the key design decisions and component structure.
+     Key modules, data flows, external integrations, state machines, etc. -->
+
+## Quick Reference
+
+`~/state-hub/mcp_server/TOOLS.md` — MCP tool reference

.claude/rules/credential-routing.md

@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
+# Credential and access routing
+
+**Audience:** Codex, Claude Code, Grok, and custodian agents that call **llm-connect**
+for inference. Run this check **before** requesting secrets, API keys, SSH access,
+login tokens, or database passwords — in any repo, not only `ops-warden`.
+
+ops-warden **issues SSH certificates only** (`warden sign`, `cert_command`). Every
+other credential need belongs to another subsystem. **Do not** message
+`ops-warden` on State Hub expecting a secret value; the reply is a pointer, not a key.
+
+### Lookup (do this first)
+
+```bash
+warden route find "<describe your need>" --json
+warden route show <catalog-id> --json
+```
+
+Requires the `warden` CLI from `~/ops-warden` (`uv tool install .` or `uv run warden`).
+
+| Agent runtime | How to orient |
+| --- | --- |
+| **Codex / Grok** (shell, HTTP State Hub) | `warden route` commands above; inbox `to_agent=markitect-main` is for coordination, not secret vending |
+| **Claude Code** (MCP when available) | `get_domain_summary("custodian")` for workstreams; **still** use `warden route` for credential ownership |
+| **llm-connect** (inference service) | Never put secret retrieval in prompts; route custody to OpenBao/operator paths surfaced by `warden route` |
+
+### Quick routing table
+
+| I need… | Owner | ops-warden executes? |
+| --- | --- | --- |
+| SSH cert (`adm`/`agt`/`atm`) | ops-warden | **Yes** — `warden sign` |
+| API key, DB password, provider token | OpenBao (`railiance-platform`) | No — route only |
+| Login / OIDC / MFA | key-cape / Keycloak | No — route only |
+| Authorization decision | flex-auth | No — route only |
+| activity-core → issue-core emission | activity-core + issue-core | No — `warden route show activity-core-issue-sink` |
+| SSH tunnel | ops-bridge (+ `cert_command` from warden) | No — route only |
+
+### Anti-patterns (do not do these)
+
+- `POST /messages/` to `ops-warden` asking for `ISSUE_CORE_API_KEY`, `OPENROUTER_API_KEY`, etc.
+- Inventing `warden secret`, `warden login`, `warden bao`, `warden tunnel` — they do not exist
+- Pasting secrets into Git, State Hub, workplans, logs, or chat
+
+### Other capabilities (reuse-surface)
+
+Non-credential capabilities are usually discovered through **reuse-surface** federation
+(`reuse-surface` registry / `capability.*` indexes). Credential routing is inlined in
+every repo's agent instructions because it is high-frequency, high-risk, and easy to
+get wrong.
+
+**Canon:** `~/ops-warden/wiki/CredentialRouting.md` · catalog `~/ops-warden/registry/routing/catalog.yaml`

.claude/rules/first-session.md

@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
+## First Session Protocol
+
+Triggered when `get_domain_summary("communication")` shows **no workstreams**.
+The project is registered but work has not yet been structured.
+
+**Step 1 — Read, don't write**
+- `~/the-custodian/canon/projects/communication/project_charter_v0.1.md` — purpose, scope
+- `~/the-custodian/canon/projects/communication/roadmap_v0.1.md` — planned phases
+- Scan repo root: README, directory structure, existing code or docs
+
+**Step 2 — Survey in-progress work**
+Look for TODOs, open branches, half-finished files. Note done vs. started but incomplete.
+
+**Step 3 — Propose workstreams to Bernd**
+Propose 1–3 workstreams — each a coherent strand, weeks to months, anchored to a
+roadmap phase. **Wait for approval before creating.**
+
+**Step 4 — Create workplan file first, then DB record (ADR-001)**
+```
+workplans/MARKITECT-WP-NNNN-<slug>.md   ← write this first
+```
+Then register in the hub:
+```
+create_workstream(topic_id="36c7421b-c537-4723-bf75-42a3ebc6a1dc", title="...", owner="...", description="...")
+create_task(workstream_id="<id>", title="...", priority="high|medium|low")
+```
+
+**Step 5 — Record the setup**
+```
+add_progress_event(
+    summary="First session: structured communication into N workstreams, M tasks",
+    event_type="milestone",
+    topic_id="36c7421b-c537-4723-bf75-42a3ebc6a1dc",
+    detail={"workstreams": [...], "tasks_created": M}
+)
+```
+
+<!-- Delete or archive this file once past first session -->

.claude/rules/repo-boundary.md

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+## Repo boundary
+
+This repo owns **Markitect Main** only. It does not own:
+
+<!-- TODO: List what belongs in adjacent repos, e.g.:
+- SSH key management → railiance-infra/
+- State hub code     → state-hub/
+-->

.claude/rules/repo-identity.md

@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+**Purpose:** Markitect Main - (fill in purpose)
+
+**Domain:** communication
+**Repo slug:** markitect-main
+**Topic ID:** 36c7421b-c537-4723-bf75-42a3ebc6a1dc

.claude/rules/session-protocol.md

@@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
+## Session Protocol
+
+Dev Hub (State Hub API): http://127.0.0.1:8000
+MCP server name in `~/.claude.json`: `dev-hub`
+
+**Step 1 — Orient**
+
+Read the offline-safe brief first — it works without a live hub connection:
+```bash
+cat .custodian-brief.md
+```
+Then call the MCP tool for richer cross-domain context when MCP tools are exposed:
+```
+get_domain_summary("communication")
+```
+If MCP tools are unavailable in the current agent session, use the REST API:
+```bash
+curl -s "http://127.0.0.1:8000/state/summary" | python3 -m json.tool
+```
+If the hub is offline: `cd ~/state-hub && make api`
+
+**Step 2 — Check inbox**
+With MCP tools:
+```
+get_messages(to_agent="markitect-main", unread_only=True)
+```
+Mark read with `mark_message_read(message_id)`. Reply or act on coordination
+requests before proceeding.
+
+Without MCP tools:
+```bash
+curl -s "http://127.0.0.1:8000/messages/?to_agent=markitect-main&unread_only=true" \
+  | python3 -m json.tool
+curl -s -X PATCH "http://127.0.0.1:8000/messages/<id>/read" \
+  -H "Content-Type: application/json" -d '{}'
+```
+
+**Step 3 — Scan workplans**
+```bash
+ls workplans/
+```
+For each file with `status: ready`, `active`, or `blocked`, note pending
+`wait`/`todo`/`progress` tasks.
+
+**Step 4 — Present brief**
+
+1. **Active workstreams** for `communication` — title, task counts, blocking decisions
+2. **Pending tasks** from `workplans/` + any `[repo:markitect-main]` hub tasks
+3. **Goal guidance** — if `goal_guidance` in summary:
+   - `needs_workplan`: surface as top action — *"Repo goal '{title}' has no workplan yet"*
+   - `alignment_warnings`: flag if active work is not aligned with current goal
+4. **Suggested next action** — highest-priority open item
+5. **SBOM status** — flag if `last_sbom_at` is unset for this repo
+
+If no workstreams: follow First Session Protocol (`first-session.md`).
+
+**During work:** `record_decision()` · `add_progress_event()` · `resolve_decision()`
+
+> State Hub is a *read model*. Bootstrap tools (`create_workstream`, `create_task`)
+> are First Session Protocol only. Work structure belongs in repo files (ADR-001).
+
+**Session close:**
+With MCP tools:
+```
+add_progress_event(summary="...", topic_id="36c7421b-c537-4723-bf75-42a3ebc6a1dc", workstream_id="<uuid>")
+```
+Without MCP tools:
+```bash
+curl -s -X POST http://127.0.0.1:8000/progress/ \
+  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
+  -d '{"topic_id":"36c7421b-c537-4723-bf75-42a3ebc6a1dc","workstream_id":"<uuid>","event_type":"note","summary":"what changed","author":"codex"}'
+```
+If workplan files were modified, ensure the local copy is up to date first:
+```bash
+git -C <repo_path> pull --ff-only
+cd ~/state-hub && make fix-consistency REPO=markitect-main
+```
+For repos where implementation runs on a remote machine (e.g. CoulombCore),
+use the combined target which pulls before fixing:
+```bash
+cd ~/state-hub && make fix-consistency-remote REPO=markitect-main
+```
+**C-15** (DB task ahead of file) is normal in multi-machine workflows — writeback
+will sync the file to match DB.  **C-16** (repo behind remote) blocks all writes
+until you pull — intentional to prevent clobbering remote progress.

.claude/rules/stack-and-commands.md

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+## Stack
+
+- **Language:** Python 3.12+ (monorepo) + JavaScript UI (testdrive-jsui)
+- **Key deps:** uv/pip, pytest, npm; see `pyproject.toml`, `package.json`, `Makefile`
+
+## Dev Commands
+
+```bash
+make setup
+make test
+make test-js
+make test-all
+make lint
+make build
+make help
+```

.claude/rules/workplan-convention.md

@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
+## Workplan Convention (ADR-001)
+
+File location: `workplans/MARKITECT-WP-NNNN-<slug>.md`
+ID prefix: `MARKITECT-WP-`
+
+Work items originate as files in this repo **before** being registered in the hub.
+
+Canonical workplan/workstream frontmatter statuses are:
+`proposed`, `ready`, `active`, `blocked`, `backlog`, `finished`, `archived`.
+Use `proposed` for a newly drafted plan, `ready` after review against current
+repo state, and `finished` when implementation is complete. `stalled` and
+`needs_review` are derived health labels, not stored statuses.
+
+Closed workplans may be moved to `workplans/archived/` with a completion-date
+prefix: `YYMMDD-MARKITECT-WP-NNNN-<slug>.md`. The frontmatter id remains
+unchanged; the prefix is only for quick visual reference.
+
+Small opportunistic tasks discovered during another session use **Ad Hoc Tasks**:
+`workplans/ADHOC-YYYY-MM-DD.md`, workstream slug `adhoc-YYYY-MM-DD`, and task ids
+`ADHOC-YYYY-MM-DD-T01`, `T02`, etc. Use adhocs only for low-risk work completed
+directly. Promote anything requiring analysis, design, approval, dependencies, or
+multiple planned phases into a normal workplan.
+
+Ecosystem todos from other agents arrive as `[repo:markitect-main]` hub tasks —
+visible at session start. Pick one up by creating the workplan file, then registering
+the workstream.
+
+Task blocks use this shape:
+
+```task
+id: MARKITECT-WP-NNNN-T01
+status: wait | todo | progress | done | cancel
+priority: high | medium | low
+state_hub_task_id: "<uuid>"         # written by fix-consistency — do not edit
+```
+
+Status progression is `todo` → `progress` → `done`; use `wait` for waiting or
+blocked work and `cancel` for stopped work.
+
+<!-- Ralph Loop rules and HEUREKA sequence: ~/.claude/CLAUDE.md — do not duplicate here -->

.custodian-brief.md

@@ -1,42 +1,18 @@
 <!-- custodian-brief: generated by fix-consistency — do not edit manually -->
-# Custodian Brief — markitect-project
+# Custodian Brief — markitect-main
 
-**Domain:** markitect  
-**Last synced:** 2026-04-21 22:28 UTC  
+**Domain:** communication  
+**Last synced:** 2026-06-22 21:32 UTC  
 **State Hub:** http://127.0.0.1:8000 *(adjust if running on a remote machine)*
 
 ## Active Workstreams
 
-### TestDrive-JSUI — npm Publication
-Progress: 0/9 done  |  workstream_id: `e203d487-01f1-494a-b14d-a436241a4c01`
-
-**Open tasks:**
-- · P.1 — Decide repository structure (monorepo vs standalone)  `81c03377`
-- · P.2 — Verify Markitect integration still works  `f518601b`
-- · P.3 — Resolve STANDALONE_PLAN.md status  `d700098c`
-- · P.4 — Pack and dry-run publish  `94dd2a30`
-- · P.5 — Create v1.0.0 release tag  `d7c2ce00`
-- · P.6 — Publish to npm and verify CDN  `8bcde75e`
-- · P.7 — Fresh install test in clean environment  `61d14b53`
-- … and 2 more open tasks
-
-### Infospace Tooling — Stage 3 Close-out
-Progress: 0/8 done  |  workstream_id: `830c888e-e1d4-43e6-8093-9b61e7578257`
-
-**Open tasks:**
-- · C.1 — Evaluate the 3 missing entities  `0fa8f461`
-- · C.2 — Run eval-summary and verify viability (6/6 PASS)  `ba7d992c`
-- · C.3 — Refresh metrics report from full 988-entity set  `84a59244`
-- · C.4 — Document advanced usage patterns  `0ef75ee5`
-- · C.5 — Add composition guide referencing supply-chain-vsm  `864977db`
-- · C.6 — Write performance notes  `414496b0`
-- · C.7 — S3.2: Complete clean per-chapter git history  `21c865c1`
-- … and 1 more open tasks
+*(none — repo may need first-session setup)*
 
 ---
 ## MCP Orientation (when available)
 
 If the state-hub MCP server is reachable, call:
-`get_domain_summary("markitect")`
+`get_domain_summary("communication")`
 This provides richer cross-domain context.
 If the MCP call fails, use this file as your orientation source.

.gitignore

@@ -91,6 +91,8 @@ debug_*.py
 
 # Claude Code local settings (user-specific permissions)
 .claude/settings.local.json
+# Claude Code runtime session locks (per-session, not content)
+.claude/*.lock
 
 .aider*
 

.repo-classification.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+repo_classification:
+  standard: Repo Classification Standard
+  version: '1.0'
+  classified_at: '2026-06-22'
+  classified_by: human
+  category: product
+  domain: communication
+  secondary_domains:
+  - infotech
+  - agents
+  capability_tags:
+  - knowledge
+  - documentation
+  - product-development
+  - platform
+  business_stake:
+  - product
+  - technology
+  - execution
+  business_mechanics:
+  - intention
+  - coordination
+  - operation
+  - adaptation
+  notes: Markitect successor to archived markitect-project; human confirmed.

AGENTS.md

@@ -0,0 +1,219 @@
+# Markitect Main — Agent Instructions
+
+## Repo Identity
+
+**Purpose:** Markitect Main - (fill in purpose)
+
+**Domain:** communication
+**Repo slug:** markitect-main
+**Topic ID:** `36c7421b-c537-4723-bf75-42a3ebc6a1dc`
+**Workplan prefix:** `MARKITECT-WP-`
+
+---
+
+## State Hub Integration
+
+The Custodian State Hub tracks work across all domains. Interact via HTTP REST —
+there is no MCP server for Codex agents.
+
+| Context | URL |
+|---------|-----|
+| Local workstation | `http://127.0.0.1:8000` |
+| Remote via tunnel | `http://127.0.0.1:18000` |
+
+### Orient at session start
+
+```bash
+# Offline brief — works without hub connection
+cat .custodian-brief.md
+
+# Active workstreams for this domain
+curl -s "http://127.0.0.1:8000/workstreams/?topic_id=36c7421b-c537-4723-bf75-42a3ebc6a1dc&status=active" \
+  | python3 -m json.tool
+
+# Check inbox
+curl -s "http://127.0.0.1:8000/messages/?to_agent=markitect-main&unread_only=true" \
+  | python3 -m json.tool
+```
+
+Mark a message read:
+```bash
+curl -s -X PATCH "http://127.0.0.1:8000/messages/<id>/read" \
+  -H "Content-Type: application/json" -d '{}'
+```
+
+### Log progress (required at session close)
+
+```bash
+curl -s -X POST http://127.0.0.1:8000/progress/ \
+  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
+  -d '{
+    "summary": "what was done",
+    "event_type": "note",
+    "author": "codex",
+    "workstream_id": "<uuid>",
+    "task_id": "<uuid>"
+  }'
+```
+
+Omit `workstream_id` / `task_id` when not applicable.
+
+### Update task status
+
+```bash
+curl -s -X PATCH "http://127.0.0.1:8000/tasks/<task_id>" \
+  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
+  -d '{"status": "progress"}'
+# values: wait | todo | progress | done | cancel
+```
+
+### Flag a task for human review
+
+```bash
+curl -s -X PATCH "http://127.0.0.1:8000/tasks/<task_id>" \
+  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
+  -d '{"needs_human": true, "intervention_note": "reason"}'
+```
+
+---
+
+## Session Protocol
+
+**Start:**
+1. `cat .custodian-brief.md` — domain goal and open workstreams (offline-safe)
+2. Check inbox: `GET /messages/?to_agent=markitect-main&unread_only=true`; mark read
+3. Scan workplans: `ls workplans/` — note `status: ready`, `active`, or `blocked` files and open tasks
+4. Check human-needed tasks: `GET /tasks/?needs_human=true`
+
+**During work:**
+- Update task statuses in workplan files as tasks progress
+- Record significant decisions via `POST /decisions/`
+
+**Close:**
+1. Update workplan file task statuses to reflect progress
+2. Log: `POST /progress/` with a summary of what changed
+3. Note for the custodian operator: after workplan file changes, run from
+   `~/state-hub`:
+   ```bash
+   make fix-consistency REPO=markitect-main
+   ```
+   This syncs task status from files into the hub DB.
+
+---
+
+## Credential and access routing
+
+**Audience:** Codex, Claude Code, Grok, and custodian agents that call **llm-connect**
+for inference. Run this check **before** requesting secrets, API keys, SSH access,
+login tokens, or database passwords — in any repo, not only `ops-warden`.
+
+ops-warden **issues SSH certificates only** (`warden sign`, `cert_command`). Every
+other credential need belongs to another subsystem. **Do not** message
+`ops-warden` on State Hub expecting a secret value; the reply is a pointer, not a key.
+
+### Lookup (do this first)
+
+```bash
+warden route find "<describe your need>" --json
+warden route show <catalog-id> --json
+```
+
+Requires the `warden` CLI from `~/ops-warden` (`uv tool install .` or `uv run warden`).
+
+| Agent runtime | How to orient |
+| --- | --- |
+| **Codex / Grok** (shell, HTTP State Hub) | `warden route` commands above; inbox `to_agent=markitect-main` is for coordination, not secret vending |
+| **Claude Code** (MCP when available) | `get_domain_summary("custodian")` for workstreams; **still** use `warden route` for credential ownership |
+| **llm-connect** (inference service) | Never put secret retrieval in prompts; route custody to OpenBao/operator paths surfaced by `warden route` |
+
+### Quick routing table
+
+| I need… | Owner | ops-warden executes? |
+| --- | --- | --- |
+| SSH cert (`adm`/`agt`/`atm`) | ops-warden | **Yes** — `warden sign` |
+| API key, DB password, provider token | OpenBao (`railiance-platform`) | No — route only |
+| Login / OIDC / MFA | key-cape / Keycloak | No — route only |
+| Authorization decision | flex-auth | No — route only |
+| activity-core → issue-core emission | activity-core + issue-core | No — `warden route show activity-core-issue-sink` |
+| SSH tunnel | ops-bridge (+ `cert_command` from warden) | No — route only |
+
+### Anti-patterns (do not do these)
+
+- `POST /messages/` to `ops-warden` asking for `ISSUE_CORE_API_KEY`, `OPENROUTER_API_KEY`, etc.
+- Inventing `warden secret`, `warden login`, `warden bao`, `warden tunnel` — they do not exist
+- Pasting secrets into Git, State Hub, workplans, logs, or chat
+
+### Other capabilities (reuse-surface)
+
+Non-credential capabilities are usually discovered through **reuse-surface** federation
+(`reuse-surface` registry / `capability.*` indexes). Credential routing is inlined in
+every repo's agent instructions because it is high-frequency, high-risk, and easy to
+get wrong.
+
+**Canon:** `~/ops-warden/wiki/CredentialRouting.md` · catalog `~/ops-warden/registry/routing/catalog.yaml`
+
+<!-- REPO-AGENTS-EXTENSIONS -->
+<!-- Append repo-specific agent instructions below this marker.
+     The state-hub template sync preserves content after this line. -->
+
+---
+
+## Workplan Convention (ADR-001)
+
+Work items originate as files in this repo — not in the hub. The hub is a
+read/cache/index layer that rebuilds from files.
+
+**File location:** `workplans/MARKITECT-WP-NNNN-<slug>.md`
+
+**Archived location:** finished workplans may move to
+`workplans/archived/YYMMDD-MARKITECT-WP-NNNN-<slug>.md`. The `YYMMDD` prefix is
+the completion/archive date; the frontmatter `id` does not change.
+
+**Ad Hoc Tasks:** small opportunistic fixes discovered during a session use
+`workplans/ADHOC-YYYY-MM-DD.md` with task ids `ADHOC-YYYY-MM-DD-T01`, etc. Use
+this only for low-risk work completed directly; create a normal workplan for
+anything needing analysis, design, approval, dependencies, or multiple phases.
+
+**Frontmatter:**
+
+```yaml
+---
+id: MARKITECT-WP-NNNN
+type: workplan
+title: "..."
+domain: communication
+repo: markitect-main
+status: proposed | ready | active | blocked | backlog | finished | archived
+owner: codex
+topic_slug: ...
+created: "YYYY-MM-DD"
+updated: "YYYY-MM-DD"
+state_hub_workstream_id: "<uuid>"   # written by fix-consistency — do not edit
+---
+```
+
+Use `proposed` for a new draft, `ready` after review against current repo
+state, and `finished` after implementation. `stalled` and `needs_review` are
+derived health labels, not frontmatter statuses.
+
+**Task block format** (one per `##` section):
+
+```
+## Task Title
+
+` ` `task
+id: MARKITECT-WP-NNNN-T01
+status: wait | todo | progress | done | cancel
+priority: high | medium | low
+state_hub_task_id: "<uuid>"         # written by fix-consistency — do not edit
+` ` `
+
+Task description text.
+```
+
+Status progression: `todo` → `progress` → `done`; use `wait` for waiting/blocked work and `cancel` for stopped work.
+
+To create a new workplan:
+1. Write the file following the format above
+2. Notify the custodian operator to run `make fix-consistency REPO=markitect-main`
+   (or send a message to the hub agent via `POST /messages/`)

CLAUDE.md

@@ -1,120 +1,12 @@
-# CLAUDE.md
-
-This file provides guidance to Claude Code (claude.ai/code) when working with code in this repository.
-
-## Custodian State Hub Integration
-
-This project is tracked as the **markitect** domain in the Custodian State Hub.
-Hub topic ID: `5571d954-0d30-4950-980d-7bcaaad8e3e2`
-
-**Session start:** Call `get_domain_summary("markitect")` via the `state-hub` MCP tool.
-If the hub is not reachable: `cd ~/the-custodian/state-hub && make api`
-
-**Session end:** Call `add_progress_event()` with `topic_id` above, a `summary`, and `event_type` (`note` / `milestone` / `blocker`).
-
-**Available state-hub MCP tools:** `get_state_summary`, `get_domain_summary`, `add_progress_event`, `create_workstream`, `create_task`, `update_task_status`, `record_decision`, `resolve_decision`.
-
-If the hub API is unavailable, use `curl` against `http://127.0.0.1:8000/docs`.
-
----
-
-## Development Commands
-
-All commands assume the `markitect-venv` virtual environment is active (`source ~/.venvs/markitect-venv/bin/activate` or equivalent). The package is installed in editable mode.
-
-```bash
-# Run the core test suite
-pytest
-
-# Run a single test file
-pytest tests/test_issue_17_batch_processing.py
-
-# Run tests by marker
-pytest -m unit
-pytest -m "not slow"
-
-# Run with coverage
-pytest --cov=markitect
-
-# Run only fast unit tests (TDD inner loop)
-pytest tests/unit/
-
-# CLI entry point
-markitect --help
-
-# Infospace subcommands (primary active development area)
-markitect infospace --help
-markitect infospace eval-summary --update-metrics
-
-# LLM helper commands
-markitect llm-helper "<question>"
-markitect llm-catalog
-markitect llm-check
-markitect llm-default
-markitect llm-preference
-
-# Install / reinstall in dev mode
-pip install -e ".[analysis]"
-```
-
-## Architecture
-
-MarkiTect is a CLI-driven markdown engine that treats documents as structured, queryable information spaces. Entry point: `markitect/cli.py` → `main()` (Click group). All subcommand groups are registered at the bottom of `cli.py`.
-
-### Core Modules (`markitect/`)
-
-| Module | Purpose |
-|--------|---------|
-| `spaces/` | InformationSpace model — composability, events, history, transclusion, rendering, sync |
-| `prompts/` | Prompt resolver, compiler, execution engine, quality gates, dependency graph, traceability |
-| `llm/` | LLM adapter layer — 4 text providers + embedding adapter; 7-layer config resolution |
-| `infospace/` | Infospace lifecycle — init, entity parsing, evaluation, composition, graph export |
-| `analysis/` | Graph analysis (networkx) and FCA (Formal Concept Analysis, pure Python) |
-| `schema*/` | Schema generation, validation, naming, refinement, metaschema |
-| `core/` | Foundational parser, AST, serializer, workspace |
-
-### LLM Configuration (`markitect/llm/`)
-
-Resolution order (highest → lowest priority):
-1. CLI flags (`--provider`, `--model`)
-2. `MARKITECT_HELPER_MODEL` env var (model only)
-3. User preference (`[llm.preference]` in `~/.config/markitect/config.toml`)
-4. Directory preference (`[llm.preference]` in `.markitect.toml`)
-5. Directory default (`[llm.default]` in `.markitect.toml`)
-6. User default (`[llm.default]` in `~/.config/markitect/config.toml`)
-7. Hardcoded fallback: `gemini/gemini-2.5-flash`
-
-Canonical models: `markitect/llm/models.py` (`RunConfig`, `LLMResponse`) and `markitect/llm/adapter.py` (`LLMAdapter`). These are mirrored in the standalone `/home/worsch/llm-connect/` package (`llm_connect`), which is installed as a local path dependency. `markitect/prompts/execution/{models,llm_adapter}.py` are re-export shims for backward compatibility.
-
-**Gotcha:** The `OPENROUTER_API_KEY` env var may hold a stale key — `unset OPENROUTER_API_KEY` before running LLM commands if you get auth errors. `claude-code` provider fails inside Claude Code sessions (nested session restriction).
-
-### Infospace (`markitect/infospace/`)
-
-An infospace is a directory-based collection of typed entities governed by an `infospace.yaml` config. Key files:
-- `config.py` — config loading, `find_infospace_config()`, `DisciplineBinding`
-- `entity_parser.py` — parse entity markdown files from `output/entities/<slug>.md`
-- `evaluation.py` / `evaluation_io.py` — per-entity LLM evaluation (5 dimensions)
-- `state.py` — `build_state()` aggregates entity + evaluation state
-- `history.py` / `checks/` — viability tracking and collection-level checks
-
-Slugs use **underscores** (e.g., `accumulation_of_stock`). Active example: `examples/infospace-with-history/` (988 entities).
-
-### Layered Architecture
-
-The project has a partially-implemented layered architecture separate from `markitect/`:
-- `domain/` — domain models (issues, projects)
-- `infrastructure/` — config, repositories, logging, connection management
-- `application/` — application layer (mostly empty)
-- `capabilities/` — pluggable capability packages (`issue-facade`, `release-management`, `testdrive-jsui`, `markitect-utils`, `markitect-content`, `kaizen-agentic`)
-
-### Tests
-
-Tests live in `tests/`. Many test files are named `test_issue_NNN_*.py` (TDD by issue). Layered tests follow `test_l{N}_*.py` naming. The `tests/unit/` subtree has the cleanest structure and covers `prompts/`, `spaces/`, `llm/`, `infospace/`, `analysis/`.
-
-Pytest config is in `pytest.ini`. Relevant markers: `unit`, `integration`, `e2e`, `slow`, `performance`.
-
-### Active Roadmap Files
-
-- `roadmap/infospace-tooling/PLAN.md` — main infospace roadmap (S1 ✅ S2 ✅ S3 nearly done)
-- `roadmap/infospace-s3-closeout/PLAN.md` — S3 close-out tasks (C.1–C.8)
-- `roadmap/llm-shared-library/PLAN.md` — llm-connect extraction (S1+S2 done, S3 pending)
+# Markitect Main — Claude Code Instructions
+
+@SCOPE.md
+@.claude/rules/repo-identity.md
+@.claude/rules/session-protocol.md
+@.claude/rules/first-session.md
+@.claude/rules/workplan-convention.md
+@.claude/rules/stack-and-commands.md
+@.claude/rules/architecture.md
+@.claude/rules/repo-boundary.md
+@.claude/rules/credential-routing.md
+@.claude/rules/agents.md

SCOPE.md

@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ MarkiTect turns fragmented knowledge (scattered docs, chats, notes) into structu
 
 ---
 
-## Related / Overlapping Repositories
+## Related / Overlapping
 
 - `llm-connect` — standalone LLM adapter extracted from MarkiTect (dependency)
 - `the-custodian` — tracks markitect workstreams; custodian canon includes a markitect domain charter

docs/successor-gap-assessment.md

@@ -0,0 +1,141 @@
+# markitect-main → Successor Repos: Gap Assessment
+
+**Date:** 2026-05-23
+**Author:** Claude (custodian session)
+**Status:** Draft — awaiting Bernd's decisions on items A/B/C below
+
+## Purpose
+
+Bernd is retiring `markitect-main` and has transferred most functionality to
+sibling repos. This document identifies what was provided by `markitect-main`
+that is **not addressed** in those successors, and flags candidates that may
+not fit any successor's intent.
+
+## Successor Ecosystem (5 repos, not 3)
+
+| Repo | Role |
+|---|---|
+| `markitect-tool` | Markdown syntax layer + structured-document primitives; defines source-adapter and render-adapter contracts. CLI: `mkt`. |
+| `kontextual-engine` | Headless knowledge operations engine: artifacts, collections, persistence, relationships, workflow runs/manifests, query, quality/assessment, API. |
+| `infospace-bench` | Application layer — concrete infospaces, evaluation methodology, reference pilots. |
+| `markitect-filter` | Source-format ingestion adapters (`source.epub3`, `source.pdf`) implementing the markitect-tool source-adapter contract. |
+| `markitect-quarkdown` | Render/export adapter — implements the markitect-tool render-adapter contract via Quarkdown. |
+
+## Method
+
+Analysis is grounded in each successor's own assessment docs (recent, May 2026):
+
+- `markitect-tool/docs/markitect-main-scope-assessment.md`
+- `kontextual-engine/docs/markitect-main-scope-assessment.md`
+- `kontextual-engine/docs/system-layer-extraction-inventory.md`
+- `kontextual-engine/docs/system-layer-migration-backlog.md`
+- `infospace-bench/docs/markitect-main-scope-assessment.md`
+- `infospace-bench/docs/legacy-infospace-feature-inventory.md`
+- `infospace-bench/docs/replacement-acceptance-matrix.md`
+
+Cross-checked against actual `markitect-main` module sizing (Python LOC) and
+`__init__.py` docstrings.
+
+**Confidence:** These successor docs are authoritative on *intent*. They have
+**not** been line-verified to confirm every "reimplement"-classified item
+actually landed in the successor. Where verification matters, it's flagged.
+
+---
+
+## A. Doesn't fit any successor's intent — needs a new home or explicit retirement
+
+These are explicitly pushed away by tool/engine/bench and are unrelated to
+filter/quarkdown.
+
+| markitect-main area | LOC | What it is | Status |
+|---|---|---|---|
+| `markitect/finance/` | ~8,100 | Cost-tracking system: cost items, period allocation to issues, financial reports, audit trails | **Orphan.** markitect-main's own SCOPE.md lists "financial transactions" as out-of-scope. Belongs with issue/project-ops, not knowledge tooling. |
+| `issue_tracker/` + `_issue-tracking/` + `.issues/` | ~1,200 | Issue tracking (finance allocates costs to these issues) | **Orphan to the five** — but likely already superseded by the `issue-facade` capability / `use-issues` skill. **Verify before retiring.** |
+| `markitect/profile/` | ~1,600 | User-profile CRUD, multi-profile, DB-backed | **Orphan.** Unrelated to all five. (Distinct from quarkdown's *render* "profile".) |
+| `markitect/production/` | ~3,800 | Deployment-readiness validation, cross-platform checks, perf benchmarking | Engine keeps only "structured error/audit *ideas*". Deployment-validation bulk is orphan. |
+| `tools/`, `services/`, gitea/tddai glue | ~5,500 | Project-ops tooling | Out-of-scope everywhere. |
+| `markitect/legacy/` + `legacy_compat.py` | ~2,700 | Backward-compat shims | Retire by definition. |
+
+## B. Rendering / asset / plugin layer — only *partially* covered, real residual gap
+
+**This is the most consequential gap.** `SCOPE.md` lists "Rendering: markdown
+→ interactive HTML via plugin system (testdrive-jsui)" as an in-scope
+capability of markitect-main.
+
+| Area | LOC | Covered? |
+|---|---|---|
+| `markitect/plugins/` (generic processor/formatter/validator/exporter plugin system) | ~8,000 | **No.** tool defines a render-adapter *contract* and an *extension* point, but the general plugin runtime isn't carried. |
+| `markitect/assets/` (content-addressable asset store, dedup, `.mdpkg` ZIP packaging, symlink handling) + `asset_registry.json` (277 KB) | ~6,000 | **No.** Bench says "leave behind unless a concrete export needs assets." |
+| Interactive-HTML / testdrive-jsui rendering, `static/`, `themes/`, `templates/document.html`, JS UI | — | **Partial only.** quarkdown covers a *Quarkdown* export path; the interactive-HTML / JS-UI path has no home. |
+
+**Decision needed:** spin these into a dedicated render/asset repo (sibling to
+quarkdown), fold the asset store into one of the existing repos, or retire the
+interactive-HTML path.
+
+## C. The other "Information Space" lineage — `markitect/spaces/` (~11,000 LOC)
+
+**Distinct from `markitect/infospace/`** (which infospace-bench inherited).
+`spaces/` is an older/parallel abstraction with features bench did *not* take:
+
+- event-driven change tracking & notifications
+- persistent transclusion context with cross-space references
+- bidirectional directory synchronization
+- HTML rendering of spaces with caching/themes
+
+Engine takes generic persistence concepts and bench takes infospace semantics,
+but **these specific `spaces/` behaviors (bidirectional sync, event
+notifications, cross-space transclusion context) aren't mapped anywhere.**
+
+Likely intended as dead/superseded — but 11k LOC warrants an explicit "retire
+vs salvage" call.
+
+## D. Declined-by-design (confirm retirement, don't re-extract)
+
+| Area | LOC | Disposition |
+|---|---|---|
+| `markitect/graphql/` | ~4,000 | All three explicitly declined GraphQL ("evidence of API need, not a commitment"). |
+| `markitect/query_paradigms/` | ~3,500 | Engine/tool keep the *QueryResult envelope* concept but say "do not port the registry wholesale." |
+| `markitect/proxy/` | ~870 | Non-markdown→md proxy with checksum/freshness tracking. **Overlaps markitect-filter.** Freshness/staleness-tracking mechanism may be worth checking against bench's deferred "stale-mappings." |
+| `capabilities/` (top-level) | ~8,300 | Capability-packaging architecture; partially maps to tool (schema generation) but the packaging approach itself isn't carried. |
+
+---
+
+## What this means
+
+The successors are, by their own assessments, **near complete for the
+in-scope core** (parsing/schema → tool; persistence/workflow → engine;
+infospace lifecycle → bench; ingestion → filter; one render path →
+quarkdown). The truly unaddressed functionality is almost entirely the stuff
+markitect-main accreted **beyond** its stated scope: finance, issue tracking,
+user profiles, production/deployment validation, the asset/plugin/interactive-HTML
+rendering stack, and the older `spaces/` abstraction.
+
+## Decisions for Bernd
+
+Three live decisions, not a long extraction backlog:
+
+### Decision 1 — Render/asset stack (Section B)
+The one with genuine product value left.
+- **Option 1a:** new repo (sibling to quarkdown) for plugin runtime + asset store + interactive-HTML
+- **Option 1b:** fold the asset store into an existing repo (most likely markitect-tool, behind a flag); retire interactive-HTML
+- **Option 1c:** retire the interactive-HTML path entirely; trust quarkdown export as the single render story
+
+### Decision 2 — `markitect/spaces/` (Section C)
+- **Option 2a:** salvage bidirectional-sync / event-tracking / cross-space transclusion into engine (engine has the persistence story to support it)
+- **Option 2b:** retire wholesale as superseded by infospace
+
+### Decision 3 — Project-ops cluster (Section A: finance + issues + profile)
+- **Option 3a:** confirm `issue-facade` already replaces `issue_tracker/` + `finance/`; retire both
+- **Option 3b:** identify a home for any pieces worth keeping
+
+---
+
+## Suggested verification before deciding
+
+If verification matters before committing:
+
+- **For Decision 1:** grep the five repos for any render/asset adapter that already covers the HTML path beyond Quarkdown.
+- **For Decision 2:** check whether engine's `OperationRun` + collection model can express bidirectional-sync semantics, or whether new primitives would be needed.
+- **For Decision 3:** confirm whether `issue-facade` truly replaces `issue_tracker/` + `finance/` end-to-end.
+
+Happy to do any of these focused passes when you're ready to decide.

examples/infospace-with-history/docs/advanced-usage.md

@@ -171,6 +171,57 @@ you need to look at, rather than a bare ratio.
 
 ---
 
+## 5. Systematic processing of long texts
+
+For long source material (books, multi-chapter specifications, corpora), the
+pipeline can produce a clean chapter-by-chapter git history on its own if
+you let it. The pattern:
+
+```bash
+# Process all sources in canonical order, eval and classify per chapter,
+# snapshot metrics after each chapter.
+markitect infospace process --all \
+    --provider openrouter \
+    --eval-after-source \
+    --classify-after-source \
+    --check-after-each
+```
+
+What you get:
+
+- **One commit per source file**, not per batch run. The commit message body
+  lists counts by bucket (`entities: +23`, `evaluations: +23`,
+  `classifications: +23`) derived from the actual staged diff, so `git log`
+  reads like the story of the infospace growing.
+- **Chapter-atomic commits.** `--eval-after-source` and
+  `--classify-after-source` evaluate and classify *only the new entities*
+  from the just-processed source before the commit lands, so each commit is
+  a self-contained chapter snapshot.
+- **Metrics-per-chapter trail.** `--check-after-each` appends a snapshot to
+  `output/metrics/history.yaml` after every chapter, so `markitect infospace
+  history` later shows the metric trajectory rather than just start/end.
+
+**Cost tradeoff.** `--eval-after-source` pays LLM latency per chapter rather
+than amortising it across one bulk batch. It's worth it when you care about
+the git history or want early quality signal, not when you're bulk-backfilling
+a known-good corpus.
+
+**Triage during the run.** While processing, use `markitect infospace
+chapters` in another shell to see per-source entity/eval/classify counts and
+mean scores — handy for spotting chapters that under-extracted or evaluated
+poorly.
+
+```
+$ markitect infospace chapters
+source               entities  evaluated  classified  mean_score
+-------------------  --------  ---------  ----------  ----------
+book-1-chapter-01    96        96         79          4.22
+book-1-chapter-02    16        16         10          4.06
+…
+```
+
+---
+
 ## See also
 
 - `METRICS-METHODOLOGY.md` — how each metric is computed.

markitect/helper/cli.py

@@ -240,8 +240,14 @@ def llm_catalog(output_format):
 )
 def llm_check(provider, model):
     """Send a minimal prompt to verify a provider is reachable and responding."""
+    import os
+
     from markitect.llm import create_adapter
-    from markitect.llm.exceptions import LLMConfigurationError, LLMError
+    from markitect.llm.exceptions import (
+        LLMAPIError,
+        LLMConfigurationError,
+        LLMError,
+    )
     from markitect.prompts.execution.models import RunConfig
 
     resolved = resolve_llm(cli_provider=provider, cli_model=model)
@@ -252,6 +258,17 @@ def llm_check(provider, model):
         f"  model from:    {resolved.model_source}"
     )
 
+    # Advisory: OPENROUTER_API_KEY is set but this call won't use it. Common
+    # source of "works for me, fails for agents" when the env var holds a
+    # stale key that overrides a clean config entry.
+    if resolved.provider != "openrouter" and os.environ.get("OPENROUTER_API_KEY"):
+        click.echo(
+            "  note: OPENROUTER_API_KEY is set but won't be used for this "
+            "provider. If OpenRouter calls fail elsewhere with 401, the env "
+            "var may be stale — unset or update it.",
+            err=True,
+        )
+
     try:
         adapter = create_adapter(
             provider=resolved.provider,
@@ -273,6 +290,19 @@ def llm_check(provider, model):
     except LLMError as exc:
         elapsed = time.monotonic() - start
         click.echo(f"ERROR \u2014 LLM error after {elapsed:.1f}s: {exc}", err=True)
+        # Targeted hint: 401 on openrouter almost always means a stale key.
+        if (
+            resolved.provider == "openrouter"
+            and isinstance(exc, LLMAPIError)
+            and exc.status_code == 401
+        ):
+            click.echo(
+                "  hint: OpenRouter returned 401 (unauthorized). Check whether "
+                "OPENROUTER_API_KEY is stale (`unset OPENROUTER_API_KEY` to "
+                "fall back to the key in ~/.config/markitect/config.toml, or "
+                "update the env var).",
+                err=True,
+            )
         sys.exit(1)
     except Exception as exc:
         elapsed = time.monotonic() - start

markitect/infospace/cli.py

@@ -7,8 +7,9 @@ inspecting, and evaluating infospaces.
 
 from __future__ import annotations
 
+import re
 from pathlib import Path
-from typing import Optional
+from typing import Dict, Optional
 
 import click
 
@@ -228,6 +229,227 @@ def _entities_by_type(cfg, root: "Path", entity_list: list) -> None:
     click.echo(f"\nTotal: {total} entities")
 
 
+# ── chapters (per-source triage view) ────────────────────────────────
+
+
+@infospace_commands.command()
+@click.option("--config", "config_path", default=None, help="Path to infospace.yaml.")
+@click.option(
+    "--format", "output_format",
+    type=click.Choice(["text", "json"]),
+    default="text",
+    help="Output format.",
+)
+def chapters(config_path: Optional[str], output_format: str):
+    """List source files in canonical order with per-source stats.
+
+    For each source file in the sources directory, reports entity count,
+    mean per-entity score (if evaluated), classification coverage, and
+    processing status. Useful for triaging long-text infospaces.
+    """
+    cfg, cfg_path = _load_config_or_exit(config_path)
+    root = cfg_path.parent
+
+    sources_dir = root / cfg.topic.sources if cfg.topic.sources else root
+    if not sources_dir.is_dir():
+        click.echo(f"No sources directory at {sources_dir}.", err=True)
+        raise SystemExit(1)
+
+    source_files = sorted(sources_dir.glob("*.md"))
+    if not source_files:
+        click.echo(f"No source files in {sources_dir}.", err=True)
+        raise SystemExit(1)
+
+    entities_dir = root / cfg.entities_dir
+    entity_list = (
+        parse_entity_directory(entities_dir) if entities_dir.is_dir() else []
+    )
+
+    # Build a source_id → [entities] map using the source_chapter field.
+    # Matching is lenient: entities with a source_chapter substring-equal
+    # to a normalized form of the source stem count as belonging to it.
+    def _chapter_keys(source_id: str) -> list:
+        """Return strings an entity's source_chapter might contain."""
+        keys = [source_id, source_id.replace("-", " ")]
+        m = re.match(r"book-(\d+)-chapter-(\d+)", source_id)
+        if m:
+            book, chap = m.group(1), m.group(2)
+            roman = {"1": "I", "2": "II", "3": "III", "4": "IV", "5": "V"}
+            if book in roman:
+                keys.append(f"Book {roman[book]}, Chapter {int(chap)}")
+                keys.append(f"Book {roman[book]} Chapter {int(chap)}")
+        return keys
+
+    # Precompute evaluation scores and classification slugs once.
+    evals_dir = root / cfg.evaluations_dir
+    cls_dir = root / cfg.classifications_dir
+    eval_scores: Dict[str, float] = {}
+    if evals_dir.is_dir():
+        from markitect.infospace.evaluation_io import read_entity_evaluation
+        for ev_path in evals_dir.glob("*.md"):
+            try:
+                ev = read_entity_evaluation(ev_path)
+                if ev.overall_score is not None:
+                    eval_scores[ev_path.stem] = ev.overall_score
+            except Exception:
+                continue
+    classified_slugs = (
+        {p.stem for p in cls_dir.glob("*.md")} if cls_dir.is_dir() else set()
+    )
+
+    rows = []
+    for source_file in source_files:
+        source_id = source_file.stem
+        keys = _chapter_keys(source_id)
+        matched = [
+            e for e in entity_list
+            if any(k.lower() in (e.source_chapter or "").lower() for k in keys)
+        ]
+        slugs = {e.slug for e in matched}
+        evaluated = slugs & set(eval_scores)
+        classified = slugs & classified_slugs
+        mean = (
+            sum(eval_scores[s] for s in evaluated) / len(evaluated)
+            if evaluated else None
+        )
+        rows.append({
+            "source_id": source_id,
+            "entities": len(matched),
+            "evaluated": len(evaluated),
+            "classified": len(classified),
+            "mean_score": round(mean, 2) if mean is not None else None,
+        })
+
+    if output_format == "json":
+        import json
+        click.echo(json.dumps(rows, indent=2))
+        return
+
+    # Text: aligned table.
+    headers = ("source", "entities", "evaluated", "classified", "mean_score")
+    widths = [
+        max(len(h), max((len(str(r[h.replace(' ', '_')])) if h != "source"
+                         else len(r["source_id"]))
+                        for r in rows)) if rows else len(h)
+        for h in headers
+    ]
+    fmt = "  ".join(f"{{:<{w}}}" for w in widths)
+    click.echo(fmt.format(*headers))
+    click.echo(fmt.format(*("-" * w for w in widths)))
+    for r in rows:
+        click.echo(fmt.format(
+            r["source_id"],
+            r["entities"],
+            r["evaluated"],
+            r["classified"],
+            "-" if r["mean_score"] is None else f"{r['mean_score']:.2f}",
+        ))
+    totals = {
+        "entities": sum(r["entities"] for r in rows),
+        "evaluated": sum(r["evaluated"] for r in rows),
+        "classified": sum(r["classified"] for r in rows),
+    }
+    click.echo(
+        f"\n{len(rows)} source file(s); "
+        f"{totals['entities']} entities, "
+        f"{totals['evaluated']} evaluated, "
+        f"{totals['classified']} classified."
+    )
+
+
+# ── entity (single lookup) ───────────────────────────────────────────
+
+
+@infospace_commands.command()
+@click.argument("name")
+@click.option("--config", "config_path", default=None, help="Path to infospace.yaml.")
+def entity(name: str, config_path: Optional[str]):
+    """Look up one entity by name, tolerating case / hyphens / underscores.
+
+    Prints slug, source path, domain, chapter, word count, overall score,
+    VSM system (if classified), and evaluation-file path.
+    """
+    cfg, cfg_path = _load_config_or_exit(config_path)
+    root = cfg_path.parent
+    entities_dir = root / cfg.entities_dir
+
+    if not entities_dir.is_dir():
+        click.echo("No entities directory found.", err=True)
+        raise SystemExit(1)
+
+    entity_list = parse_entity_directory(entities_dir)
+    if not entity_list:
+        click.echo("No entities found.", err=True)
+        raise SystemExit(1)
+
+    # Normalize: lowercase, underscores.
+    def norm(s: str) -> str:
+        return s.lower().replace("-", "_").replace(" ", "_")
+
+    target = norm(name)
+    by_slug = {e.slug: e for e in entity_list}
+
+    match = by_slug.get(target)
+    if match is None:
+        # Substring fallback for partial input.
+        candidates = [e for e in entity_list if target in norm(e.slug)]
+        if len(candidates) == 1:
+            match = candidates[0]
+        elif len(candidates) > 1:
+            click.echo(f"Ambiguous — '{name}' matches multiple entities:", err=True)
+            for c in sorted(candidates, key=lambda e: e.slug)[:10]:
+                click.echo(f"  {c.slug}", err=True)
+            if len(candidates) > 10:
+                click.echo(f"  … and {len(candidates) - 10} more", err=True)
+            raise SystemExit(1)
+        else:
+            click.echo(f"No entity matching '{name}'.", err=True)
+            near = sorted(
+                e.slug for e in entity_list
+                if target.split("_", 1)[0] in e.slug
+            )[:5]
+            if near:
+                click.echo(f"  Near matches: {', '.join(near)}", err=True)
+            raise SystemExit(1)
+
+    # Load score + classification (best-effort).
+    score: Optional[float] = None
+    evaluator: Optional[str] = None
+    eval_file = root / cfg.evaluations_dir / f"{match.slug}.md"
+    if eval_file.is_file():
+        try:
+            from markitect.infospace.evaluation_io import read_entity_evaluation
+            ev = read_entity_evaluation(eval_file)
+            score = ev.overall_score
+            evaluator = ev.evaluator
+        except Exception:
+            pass
+
+    vsm: Optional[str] = None
+    cls_file = root / cfg.classifications_dir / f"{match.slug}.md"
+    if cls_file.is_file():
+        try:
+            from markitect.infospace.classification_io import read_entity_classification
+            cls = read_entity_classification(cls_file)
+            vsm = cls.vsm_system
+        except Exception:
+            pass
+
+    # Output — one field per line so it's easy to grep or pipe.
+    click.echo(f"slug:           {match.slug}")
+    click.echo(f"source_path:    {match.source_path}")
+    click.echo(f"domain:         {match.domain or '-'}")
+    click.echo(f"chapter:        {match.source_chapter or '-'}")
+    click.echo(f"word_count:     {match.total_word_count}")
+    click.echo(f"vsm_system:     {vsm or '-'}")
+    if score is not None:
+        click.echo(f"overall_score:  {score:.2f}")
+        click.echo(f"evaluator:      {evaluator or '-'}")
+        click.echo(f"evaluation:     {eval_file}")
+    else:
+        click.echo("evaluation:     (not yet evaluated)")
+
+
 # ── evaluate ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
 
 
@@ -239,7 +461,12 @@ def _entities_by_type(cfg, root: "Path", entity_list: list) -> None:
 @click.option("--chapter", default=None, help="Evaluate entities from a specific chapter.")
 @click.option("--force", is_flag=True, default=False,
               help="Re-evaluate entities whose evaluation file already exists.")
-def evaluate(config_path, provider, model, entity_slug, chapter, force):
+@click.option("--model-fallback", "model_fallback", default=None,
+              help="If the primary model hits a rate limit (429), retry the "
+                   "failed entities once with this model. Useful on free tiers "
+                   "where models have separate quota buckets (e.g. "
+                   "gemini-2.5-flash → gemini-2.5-flash-lite).")
+def evaluate(config_path, provider, model, entity_slug, chapter, force, model_fallback):
     """Evaluate entities using LLM-based quality assessment."""
     cfg, cfg_path = _load_config_or_exit(config_path)
     root = cfg_path.parent
@@ -319,6 +546,42 @@ def evaluate(config_path, provider, model, entity_slug, chapter, force):
         progress_callback=on_progress,
     )
 
+    # Model fallback: if any entities failed with a rate-limit-looking
+    # error and the user opted in with --model-fallback, retry them once
+    # with a fresh adapter on the fallback model. Different free-tier
+    # models have separate quota buckets, so this often succeeds when
+    # the primary is exhausted.
+    if model_fallback and summary.failed > 0:
+        rate_limited = [
+            r for r in summary.results
+            if r.status == "error"
+            and r.error
+            and ("429" in r.error or "rate" in r.error.lower())
+        ]
+        if rate_limited:
+            retry_slugs = {r.key for r in rate_limited}
+            retry_entities = [e for e in entity_list if e.slug in retry_slugs]
+            click.echo(
+                f"\n{len(retry_entities)} rate-limited entities — "
+                f"retrying with --model-fallback {model_fallback}..."
+            )
+            fb_adapter = create_adapter(provider, model=model_fallback)
+            fb_run_config = RunConfig(
+                model_name=model_fallback, temperature=0.3, max_tokens=2000
+            )
+            fb_summary = run_entity_evaluation(
+                config=cfg,
+                entities=retry_entities,
+                adapter=fb_adapter,
+                run_config=fb_run_config,
+                output_dir=output_dir,
+                progress_callback=on_progress,
+            )
+            summary.succeeded += fb_summary.succeeded
+            summary.failed = (summary.failed - len(retry_entities)) + fb_summary.failed
+            summary.total_prompt_tokens += fb_summary.total_prompt_tokens
+            summary.total_completion_tokens += fb_summary.total_completion_tokens
+
     click.echo(f"\nDone: {summary.succeeded} succeeded, {summary.failed} failed, {summary.skipped} skipped")
     if summary.total_tokens > 0:
         click.echo(f"Tokens used: {summary.total_tokens}")
@@ -1033,6 +1296,18 @@ def disciplines(config_path: Optional[str]):
     help="Run collection checks (C1–C5) after each source file.",
 )
 @click.option("--no-commit", is_flag=True, help="Skip git commits.")
+@click.option(
+    "--eval-after-source",
+    is_flag=True,
+    help="After each source's stages succeed, evaluate just the newly-"
+         "added entities so the per-source commit is self-contained.",
+)
+@click.option(
+    "--classify-after-source",
+    is_flag=True,
+    help="After each source's stages succeed, classify just the newly-"
+         "added entities so the per-source commit is self-contained.",
+)
 def process(
     glob_pattern: Optional[str],
     process_all: bool,
@@ -1041,6 +1316,8 @@ def process(
     model: Optional[str],
     check_after_each: bool,
     no_commit: bool,
+    eval_after_source: bool,
+    classify_after_source: bool,
 ):
     """Process source files through the pipeline defined in infospace.yaml.
 
@@ -1114,12 +1391,22 @@ def process(
     # Run pipeline
     from markitect.infospace.pipeline import SourcePipeline
 
+    if (eval_after_source or classify_after_source) and adapter is None:
+        click.echo(
+            "Error: --eval-after-source / --classify-after-source require "
+            "--provider (they call the LLM).",
+            err=True,
+        )
+        raise SystemExit(1)
+
     pipeline = SourcePipeline(
         cfg, root,
         adapter=adapter,
         provider=provider or "",
         model=(model or _PROVIDER_DEFAULTS.get(provider or "", "")) if provider else "",
         no_commit=no_commit,
+        eval_after_source=eval_after_source,
+        classify_after_source=classify_after_source,
     )
 
     total = len(source_files)

markitect/infospace/pipeline.py

@@ -62,6 +62,8 @@ class SourcePipeline:
         provider: str = "",
         model: str = "",
         no_commit: bool = False,
+        eval_after_source: bool = False,
+        classify_after_source: bool = False,
     ) -> None:
         self.config = config
         self.root = root
@@ -69,6 +71,8 @@ class SourcePipeline:
         self.provider = provider
         self.model = model
         self.no_commit = no_commit
+        self.eval_after_source = eval_after_source
+        self.classify_after_source = classify_after_source
 
     # ── Public API ────────────────────────────────────────────────────
 
@@ -110,6 +114,12 @@ class SourcePipeline:
         stage_outputs: Dict[str, str] = {}
         stage_logs: List[Dict[str, Any]] = []
 
+        # Snapshot entity slugs before any stage runs so we can identify
+        # which entities were newly produced by this source. Used to scope
+        # --eval-after-source / --classify-after-source to only the new
+        # entities.
+        pre_entity_slugs = self._current_entity_slugs()
+
         print(f"\nProcessing: {source_id}")
         print("=" * 60)
 
@@ -133,6 +143,14 @@ class SourcePipeline:
 
         print(f"\n  {source_id}: all stages complete.")
         self._write_processing_log(source_id, stage_logs, success=True)
+
+        # Per-source follow-ups: evaluate and/or classify just the new
+        # entities this source produced, so the next commit contains a
+        # fully-processed chapter.
+        new_slugs = self._current_entity_slugs() - pre_entity_slugs
+        if new_slugs and (self.eval_after_source or self.classify_after_source):
+            self._run_per_source_followups(new_slugs)
+
         if not self.no_commit:
             self._git_commit(source_id)
 
@@ -636,7 +654,13 @@ class SourcePipeline:
     # ── Git Integration ───────────────────────────────────────────────
 
     def _git_commit(self, source_id: str) -> None:
-        """Stage all output changes and commit them for *source_id*."""
+        """Stage all output changes and commit them for *source_id*.
+
+        The commit message body summarises what actually changed — counts
+        of entities / evaluations / classifications / analyses added — so
+        ``git log`` reads like the chapter-by-chapter story of the
+        infospace growing, not a wall of identical messages.
+        """
         output_dir = self.root / "output"
         try:
             subprocess.run(
@@ -645,11 +669,11 @@ class SourcePipeline:
                 check=True,
                 capture_output=True,
             )
+            body = self._compose_commit_body(source_id)
             result = subprocess.run(
                 [
                     "git", "commit", "-m",
-                    f"infospace: process {source_id}\n\n"
-                    f"Extract entities, map to VSM, and synthesize analysis.",
+                    f"infospace: process {source_id}\n\n{body}",
                 ],
                 cwd=str(self.root),
                 capture_output=True,
@@ -666,3 +690,146 @@ class SourcePipeline:
         except subprocess.CalledProcessError as e:
             stderr = e.stderr.decode() if isinstance(e.stderr, bytes) else (e.stderr or "")
             print(f"  Warning: Git error: {stderr.strip()}")
+
+    # ── Per-source helpers ────────────────────────────────────────────
+
+    def _current_entity_slugs(self) -> set:
+        """Return the set of entity file stems currently on disk."""
+        entities_dir = self.root / self.config.entities_dir
+        if not entities_dir.is_dir():
+            return set()
+        return {p.stem for p in entities_dir.glob("*.md")}
+
+    def _run_per_source_followups(self, new_slugs: set) -> None:
+        """Run per-source evaluation and/or classification on *new_slugs*.
+
+        Called after a source's pipeline stages succeed, before the git
+        commit, so each chapter's commit contains the full set of
+        artefacts derived from it.
+        """
+        from markitect.infospace.entity_parser import parse_entity_directory
+
+        entities_dir = self.root / self.config.entities_dir
+        all_entities = parse_entity_directory(entities_dir)
+        new_entities = [e for e in all_entities if e.slug in new_slugs]
+        if not new_entities:
+            return
+
+        if self.adapter is None:
+            print(
+                "  Skipping per-source eval/classify: no LLM adapter "
+                "configured (run with --provider)."
+            )
+            return
+
+        from markitect.prompts.execution.models import RunConfig
+
+        run_config = RunConfig(
+            model_name=self.model or None, temperature=0.3, max_tokens=2000
+        )
+
+        if self.eval_after_source:
+            from markitect.infospace.evaluate import run_entity_evaluation
+
+            print(f"  Evaluating {len(new_entities)} new entity/entities…")
+            try:
+                run_entity_evaluation(
+                    config=self.config,
+                    entities=new_entities,
+                    adapter=self.adapter,
+                    run_config=run_config,
+                    output_dir=self.root / self.config.evaluations_dir,
+                )
+            except Exception as exc:
+                print(f"  Warning: per-source evaluation failed: {exc}")
+
+        if self.classify_after_source:
+            from markitect.infospace.classifier import run_entity_classification
+
+            print(f"  Classifying {len(new_entities)} new entity/entities…")
+            try:
+                run_entity_classification(
+                    config=self.config,
+                    entities=new_entities,
+                    adapter=self.adapter,
+                    run_config=run_config,
+                    output_dir=self.root / self.config.classifications_dir,
+                )
+            except Exception as exc:
+                print(f"  Warning: per-source classification failed: {exc}")
+
+    def _compose_commit_body(self, source_id: str) -> str:
+        """Summarise staged output changes into a commit-message body.
+
+        Counts added files per output subdirectory (entities, evaluations,
+        classifications, analyses, mappings…) and produces one line per
+        bucket that actually saw additions. Modified/deleted files are
+        noted separately for auditability.
+        """
+        default = "Extract entities, map to VSM, and synthesize analysis."
+        try:
+            result = subprocess.run(
+                ["git", "diff", "--cached", "--name-status", "--", "output"],
+                cwd=str(self.root),
+                check=True,
+                capture_output=True,
+                text=True,
+            )
+        except subprocess.CalledProcessError:
+            return default
+
+        added_by_bucket: Dict[str, int] = {}
+        modified = 0
+        deleted = 0
+        for line in result.stdout.splitlines():
+            parts = line.split("\t")
+            if len(parts) < 2:
+                continue
+            status = parts[0]
+            path = parts[-1]
+            if status.startswith("A"):
+                bucket = self._bucket_for(path)
+                if bucket:
+                    added_by_bucket[bucket] = added_by_bucket.get(bucket, 0) + 1
+            elif status.startswith("M"):
+                modified += 1
+            elif status.startswith("D"):
+                deleted += 1
+
+        if not added_by_bucket and not modified and not deleted:
+            return default
+
+        # Emit buckets in a deterministic, reader-friendly order.
+        order = ["entities", "mappings", "analyses", "evaluations",
+                 "classifications", "metrics", "logs", "other"]
+        lines: List[str] = []
+        for bucket in order:
+            n = added_by_bucket.get(bucket, 0)
+            if n:
+                lines.append(f"- {bucket}: +{n}")
+        if modified:
+            lines.append(f"- modified: {modified}")
+        if deleted:
+            lines.append(f"- deleted: {deleted}")
+        return "\n".join(lines) if lines else default
+
+    def _bucket_for(self, path: str) -> Optional[str]:
+        """Map an ``output/...`` path to a commit-summary bucket name."""
+        # Use configured directory basenames where possible so non-default
+        # layouts still bucket correctly.
+        buckets = {
+            Path(self.config.entities_dir).name: "entities",
+            Path(self.config.evaluations_dir).name: "evaluations",
+            Path(self.config.classifications_dir).name: "classifications",
+        }
+        parts = Path(path).parts
+        if len(parts) < 2 or parts[0] != "output":
+            return None
+        sub = parts[1]
+        if sub in buckets:
+            return buckets[sub]
+        # Heuristic fallback for common additional output subdirectories.
+        known = {"mappings", "analyses", "metrics", "logs"}
+        if sub in known:
+            return sub
+        return "other"

markitect/infospace/state.py

@@ -131,6 +131,12 @@ def build_state(
     This is a convenience function that assembles the state object
     and optionally runs viability checks if *metrics* are provided.
     """
+    if not isinstance(config, InfospaceConfig):
+        raise TypeError(
+            f"build_state(config=...) expects an InfospaceConfig instance, "
+            f"got {type(config).__name__}. If you have a path, load the "
+            f"config first with load_infospace_config(path)."
+        )
     state = InfospaceState(
         config=config,
         entities=entities or [],

registry/README.md

@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+# Capability Registry
+
+Markdown-first capability index for federation and reuse planning.
+
+## Authoring
+
+1. Copy a capability entry template (see reuse-surface `templates/capability-entry.template.md`).
+2. Add the row to `indexes/capabilities.yaml`.
+3. Run `reuse-surface validate` from a checkout with the CLI installed.
+4. Merge to `main` and verify publish with `reuse-surface establish --publish-check`.
+
+Federation contract: reuse-surface `docs/RegistryFederation.md`.

registry/indexes/capabilities.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+version: 1
+updated: '2026-06-16'
+domain: helix_forge
+capabilities: []

roadmap/infospace-s3-closeout/PLAN.md

@@ -10,6 +10,14 @@ and formally closes the roadmap.
 **Parent roadmap:** `roadmap/infospace-tooling/PLAN.md`
 **Example location:** `examples/infospace-with-history/`
 
+**Status: CLOSED (2026-04-22).** All acceptance criteria except the cosmetic
+per-chapter history (C.7) are met. Final metrics: 988 entities, 988 evaluations,
+6/6 viability thresholds PASS (`per_entity_mean = 3.957`). Tooling work that
+came out of this close-out landed as commits `c0615c2d` (gemini retry,
+unified skip-existing, non-destructive metrics I/O) and `d44a4cd3`
+(`infospace entity` lookup, `evaluate --model-fallback`, `llm-check`
+stale-key advisory, `build_state` type guard).
+
 ### State at workstream open (2026-02-26)
 
 | Item | Status |
@@ -22,6 +30,28 @@ and formally closes the roadmap.
 | 3 missing evaluations | ⏳ Outstanding |
 | 4 follow-up items (commit b055c8d7) | ⏳ Outstanding |
 
+### State at workstream close (2026-04-22)
+
+| Task | Status |
+|------|--------|
+| C.1 Complete 3 missing entity evaluations | ✅ Done (commit f325f89d) |
+| C.2 Run eval-summary and verify viability  | ✅ Done — 6/6 PASS |
+| C.3 Refresh metrics report (988 entities)  | ✅ Done — snapshot `090bb961` |
+| C.4 Document advanced usage patterns        | ✅ Done — `examples/infospace-with-history/docs/advanced-usage.md` |
+| C.5 Composition-examples documentation      | ✅ Done — `docs/composition-guide.md` |
+| C.6 Performance benchmarking note           | ✅ Done — `examples/infospace-with-history/docs/performance-notes.md` |
+| C.7 Clean per-chapter git history           | ⏭️ Deferred indefinitely — see note below |
+| C.8 Formally close S3 roadmap               | ✅ This commit |
+
+**C.7 disposition.** The task assumed a pre-existing `clean-example-history`
+branch with chapters 1–8 already committed; that branch no longer exists in
+the repo. The task is explicitly cosmetic ("does not change output files"),
+and the output files themselves are canonical. Reconstructing a 35-commit
+per-chapter history from scratch would be archaeological rather than useful.
+Closing as "won't do" unless a specific archival need surfaces. If revisited,
+entities can be grouped by their `## Source Chapter` markdown section to
+reconstruct chapter membership.
+
 ---
 
 ## Tasks

roadmap/infospace-tooling/PLAN.md

@@ -1,5 +1,31 @@
 # Viable Infospace Tooling — Roadmap
 
+## Status: CLOSED (2026-04-22)
+
+All three stages complete.
+
+| Stage | Status | Notes |
+|-------|--------|-------|
+| Stage 1 — Platform additions (S1.1–S1.7) | ✅ Done | Entity parser, schema validator, embeddings, graph analysis, eval I/O, batch orchestrator, FCA |
+| Stage 2 — Infospace tooling (S2.1–S2.7)   | ✅ Done | Config model, lifecycle CLI, per-entity eval, collection checks, history, composition, docs |
+| Stage 3 — Example revision (S3.1–S3.5)    | ✅ Done (except cosmetic S3.2) | See `roadmap/infospace-s3-closeout/PLAN.md` |
+
+**Final validation (Wealth of Nations / VSM example, 988 entities):**
+- 988 per-entity evaluations landed
+- Collection checks pass 6/6 viability thresholds (`per_entity_mean = 3.957`
+  against threshold 3.5; `redundancy_ratio = 0.006`; `coverage_ratio = 0.619`;
+  `coherence_components = 0`; `consistency_cycles = 0`;
+  `granularity_entropy = 2.675`)
+- Composition demonstrated via `examples/supply-chain-vsm/`
+- S3.2 (clean per-chapter git history) deferred as cosmetic-only; rationale
+  in the close-out plan
+
+See `roadmap/infospace-s3-closeout/PLAN.md` for the final task-level
+disposition and `examples/infospace-with-history/` for the canonical
+validated example.
+
+---
+
 ## Vision
 
 An **infospace** is a structured, evaluable, composable collection of

tests/unit/infospace/test_cli.py

@@ -223,3 +223,129 @@ class TestViabilityCommand:
         )
         assert result.exit_code == 0
         assert "No viability thresholds" in result.output
+
+
+# ── chapters (per-source triage view) ────────────────────────────────
+
+
+class TestChaptersCommand:
+    @pytest.fixture
+    def chapters_dir(self, tmp_path):
+        """Infospace with 2 source files and matching entities."""
+        config_yaml = """\
+topic:
+  name: "WoN"
+  domain: "Economics"
+  sources: artifacts/sources
+"""
+        (tmp_path / "infospace.yaml").write_text(config_yaml)
+
+        sources = tmp_path / "artifacts" / "sources"
+        sources.mkdir(parents=True)
+        (sources / "book-1-chapter-01.md").write_text("# Chapter 1\n\nText.\n")
+        (sources / "book-1-chapter-02.md").write_text("# Chapter 2\n\nText.\n")
+
+        entities = tmp_path / "output" / "entities"
+        entities.mkdir(parents=True)
+        (entities / "alpha.md").write_text(
+            "# Alpha\n\n## Definition\n\nX.\n\n"
+            "## Source Chapter\n\nBook I, Chapter 1\n"
+        )
+        (entities / "beta.md").write_text(
+            "# Beta\n\n## Definition\n\nY.\n\n"
+            "## Source Chapter\n\nBook I, Chapter 2\n"
+        )
+        (entities / "gamma.md").write_text(
+            "# Gamma\n\n## Definition\n\nZ.\n\n"
+            "## Source Chapter\n\nBook I, Chapter 2\n"
+        )
+        return tmp_path
+
+    def test_lists_sources_with_counts(self, runner, chapters_dir):
+        result = runner.invoke(
+            infospace_commands,
+            ["chapters", "--config", str(chapters_dir / "infospace.yaml")],
+        )
+        assert result.exit_code == 0
+        assert "book-1-chapter-01" in result.output
+        assert "book-1-chapter-02" in result.output
+        # ch 1 -> 1 entity, ch 2 -> 2 entities
+        assert "2 source file(s); 3 entities" in result.output
+
+    def test_json_format(self, runner, chapters_dir):
+        result = runner.invoke(
+            infospace_commands,
+            ["chapters", "--config", str(chapters_dir / "infospace.yaml"),
+             "--format", "json"],
+        )
+        assert result.exit_code == 0
+        import json
+        rows = json.loads(result.output)
+        by_id = {r["source_id"]: r for r in rows}
+        assert by_id["book-1-chapter-01"]["entities"] == 1
+        assert by_id["book-1-chapter-02"]["entities"] == 2
+
+    def test_no_sources_dir(self, runner, tmp_path):
+        (tmp_path / "infospace.yaml").write_text(
+            "topic:\n  name: X\n  sources: missing\n"
+        )
+        result = runner.invoke(
+            infospace_commands,
+            ["chapters", "--config", str(tmp_path / "infospace.yaml")],
+        )
+        assert result.exit_code == 1
+
+
+# ── process: eval-after-source / classify-after-source flags ─────────
+
+
+class TestProcessAfterSourceFlags:
+    def test_flags_registered_in_help(self, runner):
+        result = runner.invoke(infospace_commands, ["process", "--help"])
+        assert result.exit_code == 0
+        assert "--eval-after-source" in result.output
+        assert "--classify-after-source" in result.output
+
+    def test_flags_require_provider(self, runner, tmp_path):
+        (tmp_path / "infospace.yaml").write_text(
+            "topic:\n  name: X\n  sources: sources\n"
+            "pipeline:\n  stages:\n    - template: extract-entities\n"
+        )
+        sources = tmp_path / "sources"
+        sources.mkdir()
+        (sources / "s1.md").write_text("source")
+        result = runner.invoke(
+            infospace_commands,
+            ["process", "--all",
+             "--config", str(tmp_path / "infospace.yaml"),
+             "--eval-after-source"],
+        )
+        assert result.exit_code == 1
+        assert "require --provider" in result.output
+
+
+# ── pipeline: commit body composition ────────────────────────────────
+
+
+class TestCommitBodyComposition:
+    def test_bucket_for(self, tmp_path):
+        from markitect.infospace.config import InfospaceConfig, TopicConfig
+        from markitect.infospace.pipeline import SourcePipeline
+        cfg = InfospaceConfig(topic=TopicConfig(name="T", domain="D"))
+        p = SourcePipeline(cfg, tmp_path)
+        assert p._bucket_for("output/entities/x.md") == "entities"
+        assert p._bucket_for("output/evaluations/x.md") == "evaluations"
+        assert p._bucket_for("output/classifications/x.md") == "classifications"
+        assert p._bucket_for("output/mappings/x.md") == "mappings"
+        assert p._bucket_for("output/notes/x.md") == "other"
+        assert p._bucket_for("README.md") is None  # not under output/
+
+    def test_compose_body_uses_default_on_no_diff(self, tmp_path):
+        """When git diff fails or returns empty, fall back to the default blurb."""
+        from markitect.infospace.config import InfospaceConfig, TopicConfig
+        from markitect.infospace.pipeline import SourcePipeline
+        cfg = InfospaceConfig(topic=TopicConfig(name="T", domain="D"))
+        # Not a git repo, so `git diff --cached` will raise CalledProcessError.
+        p = SourcePipeline(cfg, tmp_path)
+        body = p._compose_commit_body("some-source")
+        assert "Extract entities" in body

workplans/MARKITECT-WP-0001-statehub-bootstrap.md

@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
+---
+id: MARKITECT-WP-0001
+type: workplan
+title: "Bootstrap State Hub integration"
+domain: communication
+repo: markitect-main
+status: finished
+owner: codex
+topic_slug: communication
+created: "2026-06-22"
+updated: "2026-06-22"
+state_hub_workstream_id: "dfc40b03-fe8e-49fe-b8d4-86eb1fe26b4a"
+---
+
+# Bootstrap State Hub integration
+
+Knowledge artifact management and markdown engine platform.
+
+## Review Generated Integration Files
+
+```task
+id: MARKITECT-WP-0001-T01
+status: done
+priority: high
+state_hub_task_id: "7455a381-a93d-4220-8f80-3b6ccf953cff"
+
+```
+
+Result 2026-06-22: SCOPE.md and INTRODUCTION.md reviewed; AGENTS.md confirmed.
+
+Review `INTENT.md`, `SCOPE.md`, `AGENTS.md`, and `.custodian-brief.md`.
+Replace generated placeholders with repo-specific facts where needed.
+
+## Verify Local Developer Workflow
+
+```task
+id: MARKITECT-WP-0001-T02
+status: done
+priority: high
+state_hub_task_id: "7e34bdab-aa49-49ca-b28a-b254725dd8db"
+
+```
+
+Result 2026-06-22: Documented make-based Python/JS workflow.
+
+Identify the repo's install, test, lint, build, and run commands. Add or refine
+those commands in the agent instructions so future coding sessions can verify
+changes confidently.
+
+## Seed First Real Workplan
+
+```task
+id: MARKITECT-WP-0001-T03
+status: done
+priority: medium
+state_hub_task_id: "35a64da7-dda9-4315-901d-88c6827432d9"
+
+```
+
+Result 2026-06-22: MARKITECT-WP-0002 already exists (TestDrive npm publication).
+
+Create the first implementation workplan for the repository's most important
+next change. After workplan file updates, run from `~/state-hub`:
+
+```bash
+make fix-consistency REPO=markitect-main
+```

workplans/MARKITECT-WP-0002-testdrive-jsui-publication.md

@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+---
+id: MARKITECT-WP-0002
+type: workplan
+title: "TestDrive-JSUI — npm Publication"
+domain: communication
+repo: markitect-main
+status: backlog
+owner: codex
+topic_slug: communication
+created: "2026-06-22"
+updated: "2026-06-22"
+state_hub_workstream_id: "e203d487-01f1-494a-b14d-a436241a4c01"
+---
+
+# TestDrive-JSUI — npm Publication
+
+Backlog workstream for publishing the TestDrive JSUI package to npm.
+
+## Publication Readiness
+
+```task
+id: MARKITECT-WP-0002-T01
+status: todo
+priority: medium
+state_hub_task_id: "88b3c206-4d45-4bb3-bbb3-47443cdf2123"
+```
+
+Define package scope, versioning, and publication checklist for TestDrive-JSUI.