1258 lines
53 KiB
Markdown
1258 lines
53 KiB
Markdown
# Extract Economic Entities
|
||
|
||
You are an analytical economist specializing in classical economic theory.
|
||
Your task is to extract distinct economic entities from a chapter of
|
||
Adam Smith's *The Wealth of Nations*.
|
||
|
||
## Source Chapter
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
id: book-3-chapter-03
|
||
title: "OF THE RISE AND PROGRESS OF CITIES AND TOWNS, AFTER THE FALL OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE."
|
||
book: "3"
|
||
chapter: 3
|
||
artifact_type: content
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
CHAPTER III.
|
||
OF THE RISE AND PROGRESS OF CITIES
|
||
AND TOWNS, AFTER THE FALL OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE.
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
The inhabitants of cities and towns were, after the fall of the Roman
|
||
empire, not more favoured than those of the country. They consisted,
|
||
indeed, of a very different order of people from the first inhabitants of
|
||
the ancient republics of Greece and Italy. These last were composed
|
||
chiefly of the proprietors of lands, among whom the public territory was
|
||
originally divided, and who found it convenient to build their houses in
|
||
the neighbourhood of one another, and to surround them with a wall, for
|
||
the sake of common defence. After the fall of the Roman empire, on the
|
||
contrary, the proprietors of land seem generally to have lived in
|
||
fortified castles on their own estates, and in the midst of their own
|
||
tenants and dependants. The towns were chiefly inhabited by tradesmen and
|
||
mechanics, who seem, in those days, to have been of servile, or very
|
||
nearly of servile condition. The privileges which we find granted by
|
||
ancient charters to the inhabitants of some of the principal towns in
|
||
Europe, sufficiently show what they were before those grants. The people
|
||
to whom it is granted as a privilege, that they might give away their own
|
||
daughters in marriage without the consent of their lord, that upon their
|
||
death their own children, and not their lord, should succeed to their
|
||
goods, and that they might dispose of their own effects by will, must,
|
||
before those grants, have been either altogether, or very nearly, in the
|
||
same state of villanage with the occupiers of land in the country.
|
||
|
||
They seem, indeed, to have been a very poor, mean set of people, who
|
||
seemed to travel about with their goods from place to place, and from fair
|
||
to fair, like the hawkers and pedlars of the present times. In all the
|
||
different countries of Europe then, in the same manner as in several of
|
||
the Tartar governments of Asia at present, taxes used to be levied upon
|
||
the persons and goods of travellers, when they passed through certain
|
||
manors, when they went over certain bridges, when they carried about their
|
||
goods from place to place in a fair, when they erected in it a booth or
|
||
stall to sell them in. These different taxes were known in England by the
|
||
names of passage, pontage, lastage, and stallage. Sometimes the king,
|
||
sometimes a great lord, who had, it seems, upon some occasions, authority
|
||
to do this, would grant to particular traders, to such particularly as
|
||
lived in their own demesnes, a general exemption from such taxes. Such
|
||
traders, though in other respects of servile, or very nearly of servile
|
||
condition, were upon this account called free traders. They, in return,
|
||
usually paid to their protector a sort of annual poll-tax. In those days
|
||
protection was seldom granted without a valuable consideration, and this
|
||
tax might perhaps be considered as compensation for what their patrons
|
||
might lose by their exemption from other taxes. At first, both those
|
||
poll-taxes and those exemptions seem to have been altogether personal, and
|
||
to have affected only particular individuals, during either their lives,
|
||
or the pleasure of their protectors. In the very imperfect accounts which
|
||
have been published from Doomsday-book, of several of the towns of
|
||
England, mention is frequently made, sometimes of the tax which particular
|
||
burghers paid, each of them, either to the king, or to some other great
|
||
lord, for this sort of protection, and sometimes of the general amount
|
||
only of all those taxes. {see Brady’s Historical Treatise of Cities and
|
||
Boroughs, p. 3. etc.}
|
||
|
||
But how servile soever may have been originally the condition of the
|
||
inhabitants of the towns, it appears evidently, that they arrived at
|
||
liberty and independency much earlier than the occupiers of land in the
|
||
country. That part of the king’s revenue which arose from such poll-taxes
|
||
in any particular town, used commonly to be let in farm, during a term of
|
||
years, for a rent certain, sometimes to the sheriff of the county, and
|
||
sometimes to other persons. The burghers themselves frequently got credit
|
||
enough to be admitted to farm the revenues of this sort which arose out of
|
||
their own town, they becoming jointly and severally answerable for the
|
||
whole rent. {See Madox, Firma Burgi, p. 18; also History of the Exchequer,
|
||
chap. 10, sect. v, p. 223, first edition.} To let a farm in this manner,
|
||
was quite agreeable to the usual economy of, I believe, the sovereigns of
|
||
all the different countries of Europe, who used frequently to let whole
|
||
manors to all the tenants of those manors, they becoming jointly and
|
||
severally answerable for the whole rent; but in return being allowed to
|
||
collect it in their own way, and to pay it into the king’s exchequer by
|
||
the hands of their own bailiff, and being thus altogether freed from the
|
||
insolence of the king’s officers; a circumstance in those days regarded as
|
||
of the greatest importance.
|
||
|
||
At first, the farm of the town was probably let to the burghers, in the
|
||
same manner as it had been to other farmers, for a term of years only. In
|
||
process of time, however, it seems to have become the general practice to
|
||
grant it to them in fee, that is for ever, reserving a rent certain, never
|
||
afterwards to be augmented. The payment having thus become perpetual, the
|
||
exemptions, in return, for which it was made, naturally became perpetual
|
||
too. Those exemptions, therefore, ceased to be personal, and could not
|
||
afterwards be considered as belonging to individuals, as individuals, but
|
||
as burghers of a particular burgh, which, upon this account, was called a
|
||
free burgh, for the same reason that they had been called free burghers or
|
||
free traders.
|
||
|
||
Along with this grant, the important privileges, above mentioned, that
|
||
they might give away their own daughters in marriage, that their children
|
||
should succeed to them, and that they might dispose of their own effects
|
||
by will, were generally bestowed upon the burghers of the town to whom it
|
||
was given. Whether such privileges had before been usually granted, along
|
||
with the freedom of trade, to particular burghers, as individuals, I know
|
||
not. I reckon it not improbable that they were, though I cannot produce
|
||
any direct evidence of it. But however this may have been, the principal
|
||
attributes of villanage and slavery being thus taken away from them, they
|
||
now at least became really free, in our present sense of the word freedom.
|
||
|
||
Nor was this all. They were generally at the same time erected into a
|
||
commonalty or corporation, with the privilege of having magistrates and a
|
||
town-council of their own, of making bye-laws for their own government, of
|
||
building walls for their own defence, and of reducing all their
|
||
inhabitants under a sort of military discipline, by obliging them to watch
|
||
and ward; that is, as anciently understood, to guard and defend those
|
||
walls against all attacks and surprises, by night as well as by day. In
|
||
England they were generally exempted from suit to the hundred and county
|
||
courts: and all such pleas as should arise among them, the pleas of the
|
||
crown excepted, were left to the decision of their own magistrates. In
|
||
other countries, much greater and more extensive jurisdictions were
|
||
frequently granted to them. {See Madox, Firma Burgi. See also Pfeffel in
|
||
the Remarkable events under Frederick II. and his Successors of the House
|
||
of Suabia.}
|
||
|
||
It might, probably, be necessary to grant to such towns as were admitted
|
||
to farm their own revenues, some sort of compulsive jurisdiction to oblige
|
||
their own citizens to make payment. In those disorderly times, it might
|
||
have been extremely inconvenient to have left them to seek this sort of
|
||
justice from any other tribunal. But it must seem extraordinary, that the
|
||
sovereigns of all the different countries of Europe should have exchanged
|
||
in this manner for a rent certain, never more to be augmented, that branch
|
||
of their revenue, which was, perhaps, of all others, the most likely to be
|
||
improved by the natural course of things, without either expense or
|
||
attention of their own; and that they should, besides, have in this manner
|
||
voluntarily erected a sort of independent republics in the heart of their
|
||
own dominions.
|
||
|
||
In order to understand this, it must be remembered, that, in those days,
|
||
the sovereign of perhaps no country in Europe was able to protect, through
|
||
the whole extent of his dominions, the weaker part of his subjects from
|
||
the oppression of the great lords. Those whom the law could not protect,
|
||
and who were not strong enough to defend themselves, were obliged either
|
||
to have recourse to the protection of some great lord, and in order to
|
||
obtain it, to become either his slaves or vassals; or to enter into a
|
||
league of mutual defence for the common protection of one another. The
|
||
inhabitants of cities and burghs, considered as single individuals, had no
|
||
power to defend themselves; but by entering into a league of mutual
|
||
defence with their neighbours, they were capable of making no contemptible
|
||
resistance. The lords despised the burghers, whom they considered not only
|
||
as a different order, but as a parcel of emancipated slaves, almost of a
|
||
different species from themselves. The wealth of the burghers never failed
|
||
to provoke their envy and indignation, and they plundered them upon every
|
||
occasion without mercy or remorse. The burghers naturally hated and feared
|
||
the lords. The king hated and feared them too; but though, perhaps, he
|
||
might despise, he had no reason either to hate or fear the burghers.
|
||
Mutual interest, therefore, disposed them to support the king, and the
|
||
king to support them against the lords. They were the enemies of his
|
||
enemies, and it was his interest to render them as secure and independent
|
||
of those enemies as he could. By granting them magistrates of their own,
|
||
the privilege of making bye-laws for their own government, that of
|
||
building walls for their own defence, and that of reducing all their
|
||
inhabitants under a sort of military discipline, he gave them all the
|
||
means of security and independency of the barons which it was in his power
|
||
to bestow. Without the establishment of some regular government of this
|
||
kind, without some authority to compel their inhabitants to act according
|
||
to some certain plan or system, no voluntary league of mutual defence
|
||
could either have afforded them any permanent security, or have enabled
|
||
them to give the king any considerable support. By granting them the farm
|
||
of their own town in fee, he took away from those whom he wished to have
|
||
for his friends, and, if one may say so, for his allies, all ground of
|
||
jealousy and suspicion, that he was ever afterwards to oppress them,
|
||
either by raising the farm-rent of their town, or by granting it to some
|
||
other farmer.
|
||
|
||
The princes who lived upon the worst terms with their barons, seem
|
||
accordingly to have been the most liberal in grants of this kind to their
|
||
burghs. King John of England, for example, appears to have been a most
|
||
munificent benefactor to his towns. {See Madox.} Philip I. of France lost
|
||
all authority over his barons. Towards the end of his reign, his son
|
||
Lewis, known afterwards by the name of Lewis the Fat, consulted, according
|
||
to Father Daniel, with the bishops of the royal demesnes, concerning the
|
||
most proper means of restraining the violence of the great lords. Their
|
||
advice consisted of two different proposals. One was to erect a new order
|
||
of jurisdiction, by establishing magistrates and a town-council in every
|
||
considerable town of his demesnes. The other was to form a new militia, by
|
||
making the inhabitants of those towns, under the command of their own
|
||
magistrates, march out upon proper occasions to the assistance of the
|
||
king. It is from this period, according to the French antiquarians, that
|
||
we are to date the institution of the magistrates and councils of cities
|
||
in France. It was during the unprosperous reigns of the princes of the
|
||
house of Suabia, that the greater part of the free towns of Germany
|
||
received the first grants of their privileges, and that the famous
|
||
Hanseatic league first became formidable. {See Pfeffel.}
|
||
|
||
The militia of the cities seems, in those times, not to have been inferior
|
||
to that of the country; and as they could be more readily assembled upon
|
||
any sudden occasion, they frequently had the advantage in their disputes
|
||
with the neighbouring lords. In countries such as Italy or Switzerland, in
|
||
which, on account either of their distance from the principal seat of
|
||
government, of the natural strength of the country itself, or of some
|
||
other reason, the sovereign came to lose the whole of his authority; the
|
||
cities generally became independent republics, and conquered all the
|
||
nobility in their neighbourhood; obliging them to pull down their castles
|
||
in the country, and to live, like other peaceable inhabitants, in the
|
||
city. This is the short history of the republic of Berne, as well as of
|
||
several other cities in Switzerland. If you except Venice, for of that
|
||
city the history is somewhat different, it is the history of all the
|
||
considerable Italian republics, of which so great a number arose and
|
||
perished between the end of the twelfth and the beginning of the sixteenth
|
||
century.
|
||
|
||
In countries such as France and England, where the authority of the
|
||
sovereign, though frequently very low, never was destroyed altogether, the
|
||
cities had no opportunity of becoming entirely independent. They became,
|
||
however, so considerable, that the sovereign could impose no tax upon
|
||
them, besides the stated farm-rent of the town, without their own consent.
|
||
They were, therefore, called upon to send deputies to the general assembly
|
||
of the states of the kingdom, where they might join with the clergy and
|
||
the barons in granting, upon urgent occasions, some extraordinary aid to
|
||
the king. Being generally, too, more favourable to his power, their
|
||
deputies seem sometimes to have been employed by him as a counterbalance
|
||
in those assemblies to the authority of the great lords. Hence the origin
|
||
of the representation of burghs in the states-general of all great
|
||
monarchies in Europe.
|
||
|
||
Order and good government, and along with them the liberty and security of
|
||
individuals, were in this manner established in cities, at a time when the
|
||
occupiers of land in the country, were exposed to every sort of violence.
|
||
But men in this defenceless state naturally content themselves with their
|
||
necessary subsistence; because, to acquire more, might only tempt the
|
||
injustice of their oppressors. On the contrary, when they are secure of
|
||
enjoying the fruits of their industry, they naturally exert it to better
|
||
their condition, and to acquire not only the necessaries, but the
|
||
conveniencies and elegancies of life. That industry, therefore, which aims
|
||
at something more than necessary subsistence, was established in cities
|
||
long before it was commonly practised by the occupiers of land in the
|
||
country. If, in the hands of a poor cultivator, oppressed with the
|
||
servitude of villanage, some little stock should accumulate, he would
|
||
naturally conceal it with great care from his master, to whom it would
|
||
otherwise have belonged, and take the first opportunity of running away to
|
||
a town. The law was at that time so indulgent to the inhabitants of towns,
|
||
and so desirous of diminishing the authority of the lords over those of
|
||
the country, that if he could conceal himself there from the pursuit of
|
||
his lord for a year, he was free for ever. Whatever stock, therefore,
|
||
accumulated in the hands of the industrious part of the inhabitants of the
|
||
country, naturally took refuge in cities, as the only sanctuaries in which
|
||
it could be secure to the person that acquired it.
|
||
|
||
The inhabitants of a city, it is true, must always ultimately derive their
|
||
subsistence, and the whole materials and means of their industry, from the
|
||
country. But those of a city, situated near either the sea-coast or the
|
||
banks of a navigable river, are not necessarily confined to derive them
|
||
from the country in their neighbourhood. They have a much wider range, and
|
||
may draw them from the most remote corners of the world, either in
|
||
exchange for the manufactured produce of their own industry, or by
|
||
performing the office of carriers between distant countries, and
|
||
exchanging the produce of one for that of another. A city might, in this
|
||
manner, grow up to great wealth and splendour, while not only the country
|
||
in its neighbourhood, but all those to which it traded, were in poverty
|
||
and wretchedness. Each of those countries, perhaps, taken singly, could
|
||
afford it but a small part, either of its subsistence or of its
|
||
employment; but all of them taken together, could afford it both a great
|
||
subsistence and a great employment. There were, however, within the narrow
|
||
circle of the commerce of those times, some countries that were opulent
|
||
and industrious. Such was the Greek empire as long as it subsisted, and
|
||
that of the Saracens during the reigns of the Abassides. Such, too, was
|
||
Egypt till it was conquered by the Turks, some part of the coast of
|
||
Barbary, and all those provinces of Spain which were under the government
|
||
of the Moors.
|
||
|
||
The cities of Italy seem to have been the first in Europe which were
|
||
raised by commerce to any considerable degree of opulence. Italy lay in
|
||
the centre of what was at that time the improved and civilized part of the
|
||
world. The crusades, too, though, by the great waste of stock and
|
||
destruction of inhabitants which they occasioned, they must necessarily
|
||
have retarded the progress of the greater part of Europe, were extremely
|
||
favourable to that of some Italian cities. The great armies which marched
|
||
from all parts to the conquest of the Holy Land, gave extraordinary
|
||
encouragement to the shipping of Venice, Genoa, and Pisa, sometimes in
|
||
transporting them thither, and always in supplying them with provisions.
|
||
They were the commissaries, if one may say so, of those armies; and the
|
||
most destructive frenzy that ever befel the European nations, was a source
|
||
of opulence to those republics.
|
||
|
||
The inhabitants of trading cities, by importing the improved manufactures
|
||
and expensive luxuries of richer countries, afforded some food to the
|
||
vanity of the great proprietors, who eagerly purchased them with great
|
||
quantities of the rude produce of their own lands. The commerce of a great
|
||
part of Europe in those times, accordingly, consisted chiefly in the
|
||
exchange of their own rude, for the manufactured produce of more civilized
|
||
nations. Thus the wool of England used to be exchanged for the wines of
|
||
France, and the fine cloths of Flanders, in the same manner as the corn in
|
||
Poland is at this day, exchanged for the wines and brandies of France, and
|
||
for the silks and velvets of France and Italy.
|
||
|
||
A taste for the finer and more improved manufactures was, in this manner,
|
||
introduced by foreign commerce into countries where no such works were
|
||
carried on. But when this taste became so general as to occasion a
|
||
considerable demand, the merchants, in order to save the expense of
|
||
carriage, naturally endeavoured to establish some manufactures of the same
|
||
kind in their own country. Hence the origin of the first manufactures for
|
||
distant sale, that seem to have been established in the western provinces
|
||
of Europe, after the fall of the Roman empire.
|
||
|
||
No large country, it must be observed, ever did or could subsist without
|
||
some sort of manufactures being carried on in it; and when it is said of
|
||
any such country that it has no manufactures, it must always be understood
|
||
of the finer and more improved, or of such as are fit for distant sale. In
|
||
every large country both the clothing and household furniture or the far
|
||
greater part of the people, are the produce of their own industry. This is
|
||
even more universally the case in those poor countries which are commonly
|
||
said to have no manufactures, than in those rich ones that are said to
|
||
abound in them. In the latter you will generally find, both in the clothes
|
||
and household furniture of the lowest rank of people, a much greater
|
||
proportion of foreign productions than in the former.
|
||
|
||
Those manufactures which are fit for distant sale, seem to have been
|
||
introduced into different countries in two different ways.
|
||
|
||
Sometimes they have been introduced in the manner above mentioned, by the
|
||
violent operation, if one may say so, of the stocks of particular
|
||
merchants and undertakers, who established them in imitation of some
|
||
foreign manufactures of the same kind. Such manufactures, therefore, are
|
||
the offspring of foreign commerce; and such seem to have been the ancient
|
||
manufactures of silks, velvets, and brocades, which flourished in Lucca
|
||
during the thirteenth century. They were banished from thence by the
|
||
tyranny of one of Machiavel’s heroes, Castruccio Castracani. In 1310, nine
|
||
hundred families were driven out of Lucca, of whom thirty-one retired to
|
||
Venice, and offered to introduce there the silk manufacture. {See Sandi
|
||
Istoria civile de Vinezia, part 2 vol. i, page 247 and 256.} Their offer
|
||
was accepted, many privileges were conferred upon them, and they began the
|
||
manufacture with three hundred workmen. Such, too, seem to have been the
|
||
manufactures of fine cloths that anciently flourished in Flanders, and
|
||
which were introduced into England in the beginning of the reign of
|
||
Elizabeth, and such are the present silk manufactures of Lyons and
|
||
Spitalfields. Manufactures introduced in this manner are generally
|
||
employed upon foreign materials, being imitations of foreign manufactures.
|
||
When the Venetian manufacture was first established, the materials were
|
||
all brought from Sicily and the Levant. The more ancient manufacture of
|
||
Lucca was likewise carried on with foreign materials. The cultivation of
|
||
mulberry trees, and the breeding of silk-worms, seem not to have been
|
||
common in the northern parts of Italy before the sixteenth century. Those
|
||
arts were not introduced into France till the reign of Charles IX. The
|
||
manufactures of Flanders were carried on chiefly with Spanish and English
|
||
wool. Spanish wool was the material, not of the first woollen manufacture
|
||
of England, but of the first that was fit for distant sale. More than one
|
||
half the materials of the Lyons manufacture is at this day foreign silk;
|
||
when it was first established, the whole, or very nearly the whole, was
|
||
so. No part of the materials of the Spitalfields manufacture is ever
|
||
likely to be the produce of England. The seat of such manufactures, as
|
||
they are generally introduced by the scheme and project of a few
|
||
individuals, is sometimes established in a maritime city, and sometimes in
|
||
an inland town, according as their interest, judgment, or caprice, happen
|
||
to determine.
|
||
|
||
At other times, manufactures for distant sale grow up naturally, and as it
|
||
were of their own accord, by the gradual refinement of those household and
|
||
coarser manufactures which must at all times be carried on even in the
|
||
poorest and rudest countries. Such manufactures are generally employed
|
||
upon the materials which the country produces, and they seem frequently to
|
||
have been first refined and improved in such inland countries as were not,
|
||
indeed, at a very great, but at a considerable distance from the
|
||
sea-coast, and sometimes even from all water carriage. An inland country,
|
||
naturally fertile and easily cultivated, produces a great surplus of
|
||
provisions beyond what is necessary for maintaining the cultivators; and
|
||
on account of the expense of land carriage, and inconveniency of river
|
||
navigation, it may frequently be difficult to send this surplus abroad.
|
||
Abundance, therefore, renders provisions cheap, and encourages a great
|
||
number of workmen to settle in the neighbourhood, who find that their
|
||
industry can there procure them more of the necessaries and conveniencies
|
||
of life than in other places. They work up the materials of manufacture
|
||
which the land produces, and exchange their finished work, or, what is the
|
||
same thing, the price of it, for more materials and provisions. They give
|
||
a new value to the surplus part of the rude produce, by saving the expense
|
||
of carrying it to the water-side, or to some distant market; and they
|
||
furnish the cultivators with something in exchange for it that is either
|
||
useful or agreeable to them, upon easier terms than they could have
|
||
obtained it before. The cultivators get a better price for their surplus
|
||
produce, and can purchase cheaper other conveniencies which they have
|
||
occasion for. They are thus both encouraged and enabled to increase this
|
||
surplus produce by a further improvement and better cultivation of the
|
||
land; and as the fertility of the land had given birth to the manufacture,
|
||
so the progress of the manufacture re-acts upon the land, and increases
|
||
still further its fertility. The manufacturers first supply the
|
||
neighbourhood, and afterwards, as their work improves and refines, more
|
||
distant markets. For though neither the rude produce, nor even the coarse
|
||
manufacture, could, without the greatest difficulty, support the expense
|
||
of a considerable land-carriage, the refined and improved manufacture
|
||
easily may. In a small bulk it frequently contains the price of a great
|
||
quantity of rude produce. A piece of fine cloth, for example which weighs
|
||
only eighty pounds, contains in it the price, not only of eighty pounds
|
||
weight of wool, but sometimes of several thousand weight of corn, the
|
||
maintenance of the different working people, and of their immediate
|
||
employers. The corn which could with difficulty have been carried abroad
|
||
in its own shape, is in this manner virtually exported in that of the
|
||
complete manufacture, and may easily be sent to the remotest corners of
|
||
the world. In this manner have grown up naturally, and, as it were, of
|
||
their own accord, the manufactures of Leeds, Halifax, Sheffield,
|
||
Birmingham, and Wolverhampton. Such manufactures are the offspring of
|
||
agriculture. In the modern history of Europe, their extension and
|
||
improvement have generally been posterior to those which were the
|
||
offspring of foreign commerce. England was noted for the manufacture of
|
||
fine cloths made of Spanish wool, more than a century before any of those
|
||
which now flourish in the places above mentioned were fit for foreign
|
||
sale. The extension and improvement of these last could not take place but
|
||
in consequence of the extension and improvement of agriculture, the last
|
||
and greatest effect of foreign commerce, and of the manufactures
|
||
immediately introduced by it, and which I shall now proceed to explain.
|
||
|
||
|
||
## Extraction Guidelines
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
id: extraction-rules
|
||
name: extraction_rules
|
||
artifact_type: content
|
||
description: Guidelines for extracting economic entities from source text
|
||
version: 1.0.0
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
# Entity Extraction Rules
|
||
|
||
## What Constitutes an Entity
|
||
|
||
An economic entity is a distinct concept, actor, mechanism, or institution
|
||
that plays a functional role in Adam Smith's economic analysis. Extract
|
||
entities at the level of specificity where they carry independent meaning.
|
||
|
||
## Extraction Criteria
|
||
|
||
1. **Concepts**: Abstract economic ideas (e.g., "division of labour",
|
||
"effectual demand", "natural price"). Extract when Smith defines,
|
||
explains, or argues about the concept.
|
||
|
||
2. **Actors**: Economic agents with defined roles (e.g., "the labourer",
|
||
"the merchant", "the sovereign"). Extract when the actor performs
|
||
a distinct economic function.
|
||
|
||
3. **Mechanisms**: Processes or dynamics that produce economic effects
|
||
(e.g., "accumulation of stock", "market price adjustment",
|
||
"foreign trade"). Extract when the mechanism is described as
|
||
producing specific outcomes.
|
||
|
||
4. **Institutions**: Organised structures that shape economic behaviour
|
||
(e.g., "the corporation", "the guild", "the joint-stock company").
|
||
Extract when the institution's economic function is described.
|
||
|
||
## Granularity Rules
|
||
|
||
- Extract at the level of a single coherent concept.
|
||
- Do NOT extract synonyms as separate entities — choose the primary term
|
||
Smith uses and note variations.
|
||
- DO extract distinct aspects of a broad concept as separate entities when
|
||
Smith treats them independently (e.g., "wages of labour" and "profits
|
||
of stock" are separate from "price of commodities" even though they
|
||
compose it).
|
||
- If an entity appears across multiple chapters, extract it on first
|
||
significant appearance and note cross-references in later chapters.
|
||
|
||
## Naming Conventions
|
||
|
||
- Use Smith's own terminology where possible.
|
||
- Normalise to lowercase except for proper nouns.
|
||
- Use the most common form Smith uses (e.g., "division of labour" not
|
||
"divided labour").
|
||
|
||
## Quality Checks
|
||
|
||
- Each entity must have a definition that would be comprehensible without
|
||
reading the source chapter.
|
||
- Each entity must cite the specific book and chapter of first appearance.
|
||
- **Economic Domain** must be EXACTLY ONE of: Production, Distribution,
|
||
Exchange, Consumption, Accumulation, Regulation, or General Theory.
|
||
Do not combine multiple domains. Do not use any other value.
|
||
- **Source Chapter format**: Use `Book [Roman numeral], Chapter [number]`
|
||
— for example `Book I, Chapter 3`. Do not include the chapter title,
|
||
quotation marks, markdown formatting, or asterisks. Use Roman numerals
|
||
for the book (I, II, III, IV, V).
|
||
|
||
|
||
## VSM Framework Context
|
||
|
||
Use the following VSM framework as context to guide your extraction.
|
||
Prioritize entities that are likely to have clear mappings to VSM concepts,
|
||
but do not exclude entities simply because they lack an obvious mapping.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
id: vsm-framework
|
||
name: vsm_framework
|
||
artifact_type: content
|
||
description: Stafford Beer's Viable System Model reference for economic analysis
|
||
version: 1.0.0
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
# Stafford Beer's Viable System Model (VSM)
|
||
|
||
The Viable System Model (VSM) is a model of the organisational structure of any
|
||
autonomous system capable of producing itself. It was created by management
|
||
cybernetician Stafford Beer in his books *Brain of the Firm* (1972) and
|
||
*The Heart of Enterprise* (1979).
|
||
|
||
## Core Principle: Viability
|
||
|
||
A viable system is any system organised in such a way as to meet the demands
|
||
of surviving in a changing environment. One of the prime features of systems
|
||
that survive is that they are adaptable. The VSM expresses a model for a
|
||
viable system, which is an abstracted cybernetic description applicable to
|
||
any organisation that is a going concern.
|
||
|
||
## The Five Systems
|
||
|
||
### System 1 (S1) — Operations
|
||
|
||
The primary activities that produce the organisation's purpose. These are the
|
||
operational units that directly create value. Each operational element is itself
|
||
a viable system (the principle of recursion).
|
||
|
||
**In economic terms:** Productive enterprises, factories, farms, workshops,
|
||
individual labourers performing specialised tasks, merchant operations.
|
||
|
||
**Key properties:** Autonomy within constraints, self-organisation,
|
||
direct engagement with the environment.
|
||
|
||
### System 2 (S2) — Coordination
|
||
|
||
The information channels and bodies that allow the primary activities in
|
||
System 1 to communicate with each other and that allow System 3 to monitor
|
||
and coordinate activities. System 2 dampens oscillations and resolves
|
||
conflicts between operational units.
|
||
|
||
**In economic terms:** Market price mechanisms, trade customs, standard
|
||
weights and measures, commercial law, banking clearinghouses, trade guilds.
|
||
|
||
**Key properties:** Anti-oscillatory, dampening, scheduling, conflict
|
||
resolution, standardisation.
|
||
|
||
### System 3 (S3) — Control / Operational Management
|
||
|
||
The structures and controls that establish the rules, resources, rights,
|
||
and responsibilities of System 1 and provide an interface between Systems 1
|
||
and Systems 4/5. System 3 represents the day-to-day control of the
|
||
organisation. It optimises the internal environment.
|
||
|
||
**In economic terms:** Government regulation of trade, taxation policy, labour
|
||
laws, enforcement of contracts, the "invisible hand" as emergent internal
|
||
regulation, guilds and corporations governing members.
|
||
|
||
**Key properties:** Internal regulation, resource allocation, accountability,
|
||
synergy extraction, performance management.
|
||
|
||
### System 3* (S3*) — Audit / Monitoring
|
||
|
||
The audit and monitoring channel that allows System 3 to verify information
|
||
coming from System 1 through channels other than those provided by System 2.
|
||
System 3* provides sporadic, direct access to operational reality.
|
||
|
||
**In economic terms:** Market inspections, quality checks, auditing of accounts,
|
||
surprise investigations into trade practices, verification of weights and measures.
|
||
|
||
**Key properties:** Sporadic direct investigation, reality checking, bypassing
|
||
normal reporting channels.
|
||
|
||
### System 4 (S4) — Intelligence / Adaptation
|
||
|
||
The bodies and processes that look outward to the environment to monitor
|
||
how the organisation needs to adapt to remain viable. System 4 captures
|
||
all relevant information about the outside-and-then environment. It is
|
||
responsible for strategic responses.
|
||
|
||
**In economic terms:** Foreign intelligence about trade opportunities,
|
||
market research, new technology adoption, colonial exploration and trade
|
||
route development, understanding of foreign economic systems.
|
||
|
||
**Key properties:** Environmental scanning, future orientation, strategic
|
||
planning, modelling, research and development.
|
||
|
||
### System 5 (S5) — Policy / Identity
|
||
|
||
The policy-making body that balances demands from Systems 3 and 4 and defines
|
||
the identity, values, and purpose of the organisation. System 5 provides
|
||
closure to the whole system and represents its supreme authority.
|
||
|
||
**In economic terms:** Sovereign authority, constitutional principles governing
|
||
economic policy, national economic identity, the philosophical foundations
|
||
of economic systems (mercantilism vs. free trade), the overarching purpose
|
||
of the commonwealth.
|
||
|
||
**Key properties:** Identity, ethos, supreme command, policy closure,
|
||
balancing internal and external perspectives.
|
||
|
||
## Key Concepts
|
||
|
||
### Recursion
|
||
|
||
Every viable system contains and is contained in a viable system. The same
|
||
five-system structure recurs at every level of organisation. A workshop is
|
||
a viable system within a factory, which is a viable system within an
|
||
industry, which is a viable system within a national economy.
|
||
|
||
### Variety
|
||
|
||
A measure of the number of possible states of a system. The Law of Requisite
|
||
Variety (Ashby's Law) states that only variety can absorb variety. A
|
||
controller must have at least as much variety as the system it controls.
|
||
|
||
### Requisite Variety
|
||
|
||
The principle that for effective regulation, the variety of the regulator
|
||
must match the variety of the system being regulated. This is achieved
|
||
through variety attenuation (reducing the variety coming up from operations)
|
||
and variety amplification (increasing the variety of management's responses).
|
||
|
||
### Attenuation and Amplification
|
||
|
||
Variety engineering mechanisms. Attenuation reduces variety (e.g., reporting
|
||
summaries, statistical aggregation, standardisation). Amplification increases
|
||
variety (e.g., delegation, empowerment, decentralisation).
|
||
|
||
### Algedonic Signals
|
||
|
||
Emergency signals that bypass the normal management hierarchy to alert
|
||
higher systems of critical situations requiring immediate attention. Named
|
||
from the Greek words for pain (algos) and pleasure (hedone).
|
||
|
||
**In economic terms:** Market panics, famine signals, sudden price collapses,
|
||
trade embargoes, economic crises that demand immediate sovereign intervention.
|
||
|
||
### Autonomy
|
||
|
||
The degree of freedom granted to operational units (System 1) to self-organise
|
||
within constraints set by System 3. Beer argued that maximum autonomy
|
||
consistent with systemic cohesion yields maximum viability.
|
||
|
||
### Viability
|
||
|
||
The capacity of a system to maintain a separate existence and survive in a
|
||
changing environment. A viable system continuously adapts while maintaining
|
||
its identity.
|
||
|
||
|
||
## Existing Entities
|
||
|
||
The following entities have already been extracted from previous chapters
|
||
of this work. Do NOT re-extract any of these. If one of these entities
|
||
appears in the current chapter, you may omit it entirely — the infospace
|
||
already contains it. Only extract entities that are genuinely new.
|
||
|
||
- accumulation-of-stock
|
||
- active-and-productive-stock
|
||
- adulteration-of-metals
|
||
- adulterine-guilds
|
||
- advanced-state-of-society
|
||
- advancing-state-of-manufacture
|
||
- agricultural-capital
|
||
- agricultural-capital-structure
|
||
- agricultural-comparative-advantage
|
||
- agricultural-cultivation
|
||
- agricultural-cultivation-at-farmer-expense
|
||
- agricultural-cultivation-at-proprietor-expense
|
||
- agricultural-demand
|
||
- agricultural-development-constraints
|
||
- agricultural-development-sequence
|
||
- agricultural-economic-potential
|
||
- agricultural-efficiency
|
||
- agricultural-improvement
|
||
- agricultural-improvement-discouragement
|
||
- agricultural-improvement-foundation
|
||
- agricultural-labour
|
||
- agricultural-market-access-cost-structure
|
||
- agricultural-market-access-development-prerequisites
|
||
- agricultural-market-access-development-sequence
|
||
- agricultural-market-access-gradient
|
||
- agricultural-market-access-inequality
|
||
- agricultural-market-access-opportunity-cost
|
||
- agricultural-market-communication-channels
|
||
- agricultural-market-integration
|
||
- agricultural-market-size-threshold
|
||
- agricultural-opportunity-cost
|
||
- agricultural-price-ceilings
|
||
- agricultural-price-differential
|
||
- agricultural-price-discovery
|
||
- agricultural-price-discrimination
|
||
- agricultural-price-elasticity
|
||
- agricultural-price-equalization
|
||
- agricultural-price-floors
|
||
- agricultural-price-mechanism
|
||
- agricultural-price-regulation
|
||
- agricultural-price-stability
|
||
- agricultural-price-transmission
|
||
- agricultural-price-volatility
|
||
- agricultural-productivity
|
||
- agricultural-productivity-limits
|
||
- agricultural-security-gradient
|
||
- agricultural-spatial-inequality
|
||
- agricultural-specialization
|
||
- agricultural-stock
|
||
- agricultural-supply
|
||
- agricultural-surplus
|
||
- agricultural-surplus-determination
|
||
- agricultural-technology
|
||
- agricultural-technology-adoption
|
||
- agricultural-trade
|
||
- annual-consumption-of-metals
|
||
- annual-industry-employed-in-production
|
||
- annual-produce-of-land-and-labour
|
||
- apprenticeships
|
||
- artificer-neighbourhood-settlement
|
||
- artificer-planter-independence
|
||
- artificer-planter-transition
|
||
- artificer-servant-status
|
||
- artificers-and-retailers
|
||
- artificial-grasses
|
||
- artificial-market-creation
|
||
- artisan-specialisation
|
||
- assaying
|
||
- assize-of-bread
|
||
- assize-of-bread-and-ale
|
||
- aulnagers
|
||
- average-price-of-corn
|
||
- bank-capital-adequacy
|
||
- bank-capital-structure
|
||
- bank-circulation-limits
|
||
- bank-competition-effects
|
||
- bank-credit-allocation
|
||
- bank-credit-cycles
|
||
- bank-credit-extension
|
||
- bank-credit-quality
|
||
- bank-economic-contribution
|
||
- bank-economic-contribution-metrics
|
||
- bank-economic-cycles
|
||
- bank-economic-development
|
||
- bank-economic-development-metrics
|
||
- bank-economic-efficiency
|
||
- bank-economic-efficiency-factors
|
||
- bank-economic-efficiency-metrics
|
||
- bank-economic-growth
|
||
- bank-economic-resilience
|
||
- bank-economic-resilience-factors
|
||
- bank-economic-resilience-metrics
|
||
- bank-economic-stability
|
||
- bank-failure-mechanisms
|
||
- bank-financial-development
|
||
- bank-financial-innovation
|
||
- bank-financial-innovation-adoption
|
||
- bank-financial-innovation-diffusion
|
||
- bank-financial-innovation-factors
|
||
- bank-financial-innovation-impact
|
||
- bank-financial-innovation-metrics
|
||
- bank-financial-intermediation
|
||
- bank-financial-intermediation-efficiency
|
||
- bank-financial-stability
|
||
- bank-financial-stability-factors
|
||
- bank-financial-stability-metrics
|
||
- bank-financial-system-integration
|
||
- bank-financial-system-stability
|
||
- bank-information-asymmetry
|
||
- bank-interest-rate-determination
|
||
- bank-liquidity-management
|
||
- bank-market-discipline
|
||
- bank-market-structure
|
||
- bank-monetary-policy
|
||
- bank-monetary-stability
|
||
- bank-notes
|
||
- bank-operational-efficiency
|
||
- bank-operational-risk
|
||
- bank-public-utility
|
||
- bank-regulatory-compliance
|
||
- bank-regulatory-effectiveness
|
||
- bank-regulatory-evolution
|
||
- bank-regulatory-framework
|
||
- bank-regulatory-framework-evolution
|
||
- bank-reserves
|
||
- bank-risk-management
|
||
- bank-systemic-risk
|
||
- bank-systemic-risk-management
|
||
- bank-systemic-stability
|
||
- bank-transaction-costs
|
||
- barbarous-nations-barrier
|
||
- barter-and-exchange
|
||
- benevolence
|
||
- bills-of-exchange
|
||
- bleacher
|
||
- butcher-trade
|
||
- canal-communication
|
||
- capital
|
||
- capital-accumulation
|
||
- capital-employed
|
||
- capital-employment-advantages
|
||
- capital-employment-effects
|
||
- capital-employment-security-gradient
|
||
- capital-replacement
|
||
- capital-security-preference
|
||
- capital-security-visibility
|
||
- carriage-value-savings
|
||
- carrying-trade
|
||
- cash-accounts
|
||
- certificates
|
||
- cheap-years
|
||
- circulating-capital
|
||
- circulating-capital-components
|
||
- circulation-of-money
|
||
- coal-heaver
|
||
- coal-price
|
||
- coarser-and-finer-materials
|
||
- coined-money
|
||
- collier
|
||
- colony-prosperity
|
||
- combination-of-masters
|
||
- combination-of-workmen
|
||
- command-over-labour
|
||
- commerce-between-town-and-country
|
||
- commercial-interactions
|
||
- commercial-society
|
||
- commercial-transactions
|
||
- common-annual-profits-of-manufacturing-stock
|
||
- common-labour-wages
|
||
- common-returns-of-stock
|
||
- competition-among-buyers
|
||
- competition-among-dealers
|
||
- competition-among-sellers
|
||
- complete-manufacture
|
||
- component-parts-of-price
|
||
- contract
|
||
- conversion-price
|
||
- copper-money
|
||
- corn-exportation-prohibition
|
||
- corn-land
|
||
- corn-rent
|
||
- corporation-laws
|
||
- corporation-privileges-and-market-prices
|
||
- country-gentlemen
|
||
- country-life-charms
|
||
- cultivation-improvement-priority
|
||
- dead-stock
|
||
- dear-years
|
||
- debasement-of-currency
|
||
- declining-manufacture
|
||
- degradation-of-coin
|
||
- demand-for-labour
|
||
- discount-of-bills
|
||
- distant-country-subsistence
|
||
- distant-market-manufacturing
|
||
- distant-sale-manufacturing
|
||
- division-of-labour
|
||
- division-of-labour-advantage
|
||
- double-coincidence-of-wants
|
||
- drawing-and-redrawing
|
||
- dwelling-house-distinction
|
||
- early-and-rude-state-of-society
|
||
- early-navigation-advantages
|
||
- economic-accessibility-determinants
|
||
- economic-accessibility-gradient
|
||
- economic-backwardness
|
||
- economic-connectivity-importance
|
||
- economic-development-constraints
|
||
- economic-development-geography
|
||
- economic-development-geography-theory
|
||
- economic-development-sequence
|
||
- economic-development-spatial-patterns
|
||
- economic-geography
|
||
- economic-geography-determinism
|
||
- economic-geography-impact
|
||
- economic-isolation-effects
|
||
- economic-opportunity-cost
|
||
- economic-opportunity-geography
|
||
- economic-prosperity-symptoms
|
||
- economic-spatial-inequality
|
||
- economic-spatial-organisation
|
||
- economic-stagnation-symptoms
|
||
- effectual-demand
|
||
- ejectment-action
|
||
- encroachment-upon-capital
|
||
- engrossers-and-forestallers
|
||
- entail
|
||
- equal-profit-employment-choice
|
||
- exchange
|
||
- exchangeable-value
|
||
- exchequer
|
||
- exclusive-corporation
|
||
- exportation-bounty
|
||
- exportation-of-gold-and-silver-as-effect-of-declension
|
||
- extraordinary-profits
|
||
- fairs-and-markets
|
||
- farmer
|
||
- farmers-capital
|
||
- farmers-profit
|
||
- favour
|
||
- feudal-anarchy
|
||
- feudal-government-effects
|
||
- fixed-capital
|
||
- flax-grower
|
||
- fluctuations-in-value-of-gold-and-silver
|
||
- foreign-capital-exportation
|
||
- foreign-commerce-manufactures-birth
|
||
- foreign-trade
|
||
- foreign-trade-of-consumption
|
||
- four-methods-of-employing-capital
|
||
- freeholder-yeomanry
|
||
- frozen-ocean-barrier
|
||
- frugal-and-industrious-borrowers
|
||
- frugality-versus-prodigality
|
||
- fruit-garden
|
||
- fruit-wall
|
||
- funds-for-maintaining-labour
|
||
- funds-for-maintaining-productive-labour
|
||
- funds-for-maintaining-unproductive-hands
|
||
- gold-money
|
||
- gold-price-variation
|
||
- gross-revenue
|
||
- higgling-and-bargaining-of-the-market
|
||
- home-trade
|
||
- hop-garden
|
||
- human-folly-injustice-exposure
|
||
- human-nature
|
||
- idle-consumers
|
||
- immediate-consumption
|
||
- improved-farm-advantages
|
||
- improved-land
|
||
- inclosure
|
||
- increase-of-money-as-effect-of-prosperity
|
||
- inland-market-limitation
|
||
- inland-navigation-extent
|
||
- inland-parts-of-the-country
|
||
- inland-trade
|
||
- inn-or-tavern-keeper
|
||
- instruments-of-husbandry
|
||
- interest
|
||
- interest-of-money
|
||
- interest-or-use-of-money
|
||
- journeymen
|
||
- judgment-in-labour-application
|
||
- kelp
|
||
- kitchen-garden
|
||
- labour-of-inspection-and-direction
|
||
- labouring-cattle
|
||
- labouring-poor
|
||
- land-carriage
|
||
- land-mines-and-fisheries
|
||
- landlord
|
||
- landlords-share
|
||
- law-of-primogeniture
|
||
- legal-rate-of-interest
|
||
- legal-tender
|
||
- licence-to-gather-natural-produce
|
||
- lowest-rate-of-wages
|
||
- machinery-invention
|
||
- manufactured-produce
|
||
- manufacturer
|
||
- manufacturing-capital
|
||
- manufacturing-process-subdivision
|
||
- manufacturing-subdivision
|
||
- maritime-commerce-development
|
||
- maritime-employment
|
||
- market-access-cost-structure
|
||
- market-access-development-sequence
|
||
- market-access-economic-potential
|
||
- market-access-gradient
|
||
- market-access-inequality
|
||
- market-access-opportunity-cost
|
||
- market-based-economic-geography
|
||
- market-based-economic-identity
|
||
- market-based-economic-structure
|
||
- market-based-productivity-limits
|
||
- market-based-specialisation
|
||
- market-communication-channels
|
||
- market-demand-regulation
|
||
- market-development-prerequisites
|
||
- market-driven-division
|
||
- market-extent
|
||
- market-extent-advantageousness
|
||
- market-extent-economic-impact
|
||
- market-extent-measurement
|
||
- market-for-surplus-produce
|
||
- market-integration-barriers
|
||
- market-integration-potential
|
||
- market-integration-timeline
|
||
- market-obstruction
|
||
- market-price-adjustment
|
||
- market-price-of-bullion
|
||
- market-price-of-commodities
|
||
- market-price-of-things
|
||
- market-price-regulation-mechanism
|
||
- market-proximity-advantage
|
||
- market-rate-of-interest
|
||
- market-regulation-of-prices
|
||
- market-separation
|
||
- market-size-economies
|
||
- market-size-specialisation-threshold
|
||
- market-size-specialization
|
||
- market-size-threshold
|
||
- market-town-economy
|
||
- market-town-formation
|
||
- masquerade-dress-trade
|
||
- master-artificer
|
||
- master-manufacturer
|
||
- materials-and-subsistence
|
||
- measure-of-exchangeable-value
|
||
- mediterranean-civilisation-pattern
|
||
- menial-servants
|
||
- merchant
|
||
- metal-currency
|
||
- metayer
|
||
- military-employment
|
||
- mine-fertility
|
||
- mine-situation
|
||
- mint
|
||
- mint-price
|
||
- modern-states-inversion
|
||
- modes-of-expense-affecting-public-opulence
|
||
- money
|
||
- money-rent
|
||
- moneys-worth
|
||
- monied-interest
|
||
- monopoly-effects-on-market-price
|
||
- monopoly-price-of-land
|
||
- mutual-gain-reciprocity
|
||
- mutual-good-offices
|
||
- mutual-servitude
|
||
- natural-complement-of-riches
|
||
- natural-course-of-things
|
||
- natural-development-sequence
|
||
- natural-inclinations-thwarting
|
||
- natural-liberty-in-banking
|
||
- natural-market-advantages
|
||
- natural-order-inversion
|
||
- natural-order-of-economic-development
|
||
- natural-preference-cultivation
|
||
- natural-price-as-central-price
|
||
- natural-price-of-commodities
|
||
- natural-produce-of-land
|
||
- natural-progress-of-improvement
|
||
- natural-rates-of-wages-profit-and-rent
|
||
- natural-rent-of-land
|
||
- natural-state-of-employments
|
||
- navigable-rivers
|
||
- neat-revenue
|
||
- necessity
|
||
- nominal-measure-of-value
|
||
- nominal-price-of-commodities
|
||
- non-standard-metal
|
||
- occasional-and-temporary-market-fluctuations
|
||
- ordinary-market-price-of-land
|
||
- ordinary-rates-of-wages-profit-and-rent
|
||
- ordinary-state-of-employments
|
||
- original-destination-of-man
|
||
- original-government-manners
|
||
- overstocked-market-conditions
|
||
- paper-money
|
||
- pasture-land
|
||
- payment-in-kind
|
||
- perfect-liberty-in-trade
|
||
- permanent-market-price-enhancements
|
||
- perpetual-fund-for-maintenance-of-labour
|
||
- piece-work-wages
|
||
- pin-maker-trade
|
||
- planter-independence
|
||
- poacher
|
||
- potato-cultivation
|
||
- precious-metals-consumption
|
||
- price-in-labour
|
||
- price-in-money
|
||
- price-of-commodities
|
||
- prime-cost-of-commodities
|
||
- principal-clerk
|
||
- principal-employments
|
||
- private-misconduct-versus-public-prodigality
|
||
- prodigals
|
||
- prodigals-and-projectors
|
||
- productive-abilities
|
||
- productive-and-unproductive-labour
|
||
- productive-labourers
|
||
- productive-powers-of-labour
|
||
- profits-of-stock
|
||
- progressive-state-of-society
|
||
- progressive-wealth-consequentiality
|
||
- promissory-notes
|
||
- proportion-between-metals
|
||
- proportion-between-productive-and-unproductive-hands
|
||
- public-education-of-professionals
|
||
- public-executioner
|
||
- public-fiars
|
||
- public-law-on-coinage
|
||
- public-lottery
|
||
- public-mourning-effects
|
||
- public-registers-of-manufactures
|
||
- purveyance
|
||
- quantity-of-labour
|
||
- rate-of-interest
|
||
- rate-of-profit
|
||
- real-measure-of-value
|
||
- real-price-of-commodities
|
||
- real-value-of-corn-rent
|
||
- regulated-proportion
|
||
- religious-occupational-restrictions
|
||
- rent-of-land
|
||
- requisite-variety-in-banking
|
||
- retail-trade
|
||
- retailers
|
||
- revenue
|
||
- revenue-constituting-profit-and-rent
|
||
- revenue-destined-for-capital-replacement
|
||
- rice-countries
|
||
- river-navigation-infrastructure
|
||
- rude-produce
|
||
- rural-urban-reciprocity
|
||
- scarcity-of-hands
|
||
- sea-coast-development
|
||
- security-preference-capital
|
||
- seed-as-fixed-capital
|
||
- seignorage
|
||
- self-love
|
||
- settlement-laws
|
||
- silver-money
|
||
- silver-price-variation
|
||
- skill-and-dexterity
|
||
- smuggling-trade
|
||
- sober-people
|
||
- societys-general-stock
|
||
- spare-revenue
|
||
- species-of-industry-with-consistent-output
|
||
- species-of-industry-with-variable-output
|
||
- speculative-trade
|
||
- stamp-masters
|
||
- standard-metal
|
||
- standard-weight-of-coin
|
||
- stationary-country
|
||
- statute-of-labourers
|
||
- statutes-of-apprenticeship-effects
|
||
- sterling-mark
|
||
- stock
|
||
- stock-lent-at-interest
|
||
- stock-of-the-country
|
||
- stock-of-the-farmer
|
||
- subsistence
|
||
- subsistence-agriculture
|
||
- subsistence-industry-priority
|
||
- subsistence-necessity-priority
|
||
- subsistence-of-the-dealer
|
||
- subsistence-prioritization
|
||
- sugar-colonies
|
||
- superfluity
|
||
- superior-hardship-and-superior-skill
|
||
- surplus-produce
|
||
- taille
|
||
- tale
|
||
- temporary-price-of-corn
|
||
- territorial-cultivation-completeness
|
||
- territorial-cultivation-limit
|
||
- territorial-improvement-support
|
||
- territorial-support-limitation
|
||
- three-original-sources-of-revenue
|
||
- three-way-employment-of-stock
|
||
- thriving-country
|
||
- tobacco-colonies
|
||
- toil-and-trouble-of-acquiring
|
||
- town-country-dependency
|
||
- town-market-function
|
||
- town-reproduction-impossibility
|
||
- trade-capital
|
||
- trade-encouragement
|
||
- trade-route-dependency
|
||
- transportation-cost-differential
|
||
- transportation-infrastructure-importance
|
||
- transportation-mode-economic-effects
|
||
- treasure-trove
|
||
- treaty
|
||
- truck
|
||
- two-branches-of-circulation
|
||
- uncultivated-land-availability
|
||
- unimproved-land
|
||
- university-of-trades
|
||
- unproductive-labourers
|
||
- unstamped-bars
|
||
- usury
|
||
- value-in-exchange
|
||
- value-in-use
|
||
- value-of-gold
|
||
- value-of-silver
|
||
- variety-of-talents
|
||
- venison
|
||
- victuals
|
||
- villeinage
|
||
- vineyard
|
||
- wages-of-a-journeyman
|
||
- wages-of-labour
|
||
- waggon-way-through-the-air-metaphor
|
||
- water-carriage
|
||
- water-pond-metaphor
|
||
- weighing
|
||
- whole-produce-of-labour
|
||
- wholesale-merchants
|
||
- wholesale-trade
|
||
- wood-price
|
||
- wool-grower
|
||
|
||
## Instructions
|
||
|
||
1. Read the source chapter carefully.
|
||
2. Review the list of existing entities above and do not duplicate them.
|
||
3. Identify all distinct economic concepts, actors, mechanisms, and institutions
|
||
that are NOT already in the existing entities list.
|
||
4. For each new entity, produce a separate markdown document following the
|
||
Economic Entity Schema v1.0.
|
||
5. Each entity document must include:
|
||
- An H1 heading with the entity name
|
||
- A Definition section (20-150 words)
|
||
- A Source Chapter section citing the specific chapter
|
||
- A Context section describing where in the argument the entity appears
|
||
- An Economic Domain section classifying the entity
|
||
6. Optionally include Smith's Original Wording (direct quote) and
|
||
Modern Interpretation sections.
|
||
7. Use neutral, analytical language throughout.
|
||
8. Ensure each entity is distinct and self-contained.
|
||
|
||
## Output Format
|
||
|
||
Output each entity as a separate markdown document, delimited by
|
||
`--- ENTITY: <entity-name> ---` markers.
|
||
|
||
Use **H2 headings** (`##`) for each section inside the entity document.
|
||
Do NOT use inline `Section:` format or H3 headings.
|
||
|
||
Example of a correctly formatted entity:
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
--- ENTITY: division of labour ---
|
||
|
||
# Division of Labour
|
||
|
||
## Definition
|
||
|
||
The separation of a work process into distinct tasks performed by specialised
|
||
workers, increasing productivity through greater dexterity, saved time, and
|
||
the invention of labour-saving machinery.
|
||
|
||
## Source Chapter
|
||
|
||
Book I, Chapter 1
|
||
|
||
## Context
|
||
|
||
The opening chapter's central argument, illustrated by Smith's pin factory
|
||
example showing how dividing 18 operations dramatically increases output.
|
||
|
||
## Economic Domain
|
||
|
||
Production
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
```
|