tegwick
a9ca0adfcf
Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics written with per_entity_mean=3.9556. Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS redundancy_ratio 0.0061 (max 0.10) coverage_ratio 0.6190 (min 0.40) coherence_comps 0.0000 (max 3) consistency_cycles 0.0000 (max 0) granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0) per_entity_mean 3.9556 (min 3.5) Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities): definition_precision 3.62 source_grounding 4.36 domain_placement 4.56 vsm_relevance 3.31 explanatory_value 3.94 Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
64 lines
3.4 KiB
Markdown
64 lines
3.4 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
entity_slug: feudal_anarchy
|
|
evaluator: null
|
|
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T05:28:07.442163'
|
|
overall_score: 4.0
|
|
scores:
|
|
- name: definition_precision
|
|
value: 4.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: The definition clearly identifies feudal anarchy as a specific historical
|
|
period with distinct characteristics (absence of centralized authority, local
|
|
lords exercising multiple powers). It avoids circularity and captures a concrete
|
|
political-economic arrangement rather than a vague concept.
|
|
- name: source_grounding
|
|
value: 5.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: This entity is directly grounded in Smith's historical analysis in Book
|
|
III, Chapter 2, where he explicitly discusses the post-Roman period and its impact
|
|
on property arrangements. The connection to primogeniture and entails as defensive
|
|
necessities is faithful to Smith's argument.
|
|
- name: domain_placement
|
|
value: 4.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: '"General Theory" is appropriate as this represents Smith''s broader
|
|
theoretical framework about institutional evolution and property systems. It could
|
|
potentially fit in a more specific historical or institutional domain, but General
|
|
Theory captures its role in Smith''s overarching analysis.'
|
|
- name: vsm_relevance
|
|
value: 2.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: This historical condition is largely VSM-neutral, describing a breakdown
|
|
of systemic organization rather than mapping to specific VSM functions. It represents
|
|
the absence or failure of viable system structures rather than their operation.
|
|
- name: explanatory_value
|
|
value: 5.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: This entity provides crucial explanatory power for understanding why
|
|
certain property institutions (primogeniture, entails) emerged and persisted.
|
|
It illuminates the structural relationship between political disorder and economic
|
|
arrangements in Smith's historical analysis.
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Evaluation: Feudal Anarchy
|
|
|
|
## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
The definition clearly identifies feudal anarchy as a specific historical period with distinct characteristics (absence of centralized authority, local lords exercising multiple powers). It avoids circularity and captures a concrete political-economic arrangement rather than a vague concept.
|
|
|
|
## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
This entity is directly grounded in Smith's historical analysis in Book III, Chapter 2, where he explicitly discusses the post-Roman period and its impact on property arrangements. The connection to primogeniture and entails as defensive necessities is faithful to Smith's argument.
|
|
|
|
## domain_placement — 4.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
"General Theory" is appropriate as this represents Smith's broader theoretical framework about institutional evolution and property systems. It could potentially fit in a more specific historical or institutional domain, but General Theory captures its role in Smith's overarching analysis.
|
|
|
|
## vsm_relevance — 2.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
This historical condition is largely VSM-neutral, describing a breakdown of systemic organization rather than mapping to specific VSM functions. It represents the absence or failure of viable system structures rather than their operation.
|
|
|
|
## explanatory_value — 5.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
This entity provides crucial explanatory power for understanding why certain property institutions (primogeniture, entails) emerged and persisted. It illuminates the structural relationship between political disorder and economic arrangements in Smith's historical analysis.
|