tegwick
a9ca0adfcf
Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics written with per_entity_mean=3.9556. Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS redundancy_ratio 0.0061 (max 0.10) coverage_ratio 0.6190 (min 0.40) coherence_comps 0.0000 (max 3) consistency_cycles 0.0000 (max 0) granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0) per_entity_mean 3.9556 (min 3.5) Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities): definition_precision 3.62 source_grounding 4.36 domain_placement 4.56 vsm_relevance 3.31 explanatory_value 3.94 Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
65 lines
3.6 KiB
Markdown
65 lines
3.6 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
entity_slug: kitchen_garden
|
|
evaluator: null
|
|
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T05:39:20.428965'
|
|
overall_score: 4.2
|
|
scores:
|
|
- name: definition_precision
|
|
value: 4.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: The definition clearly distinguishes kitchen gardens from other agricultural
|
|
land uses by their specific purpose (household consumption), cultivation intensity,
|
|
and economic characteristics (higher rents per unit area). It avoids circularity
|
|
and captures a distinct economic concept with measurable attributes.
|
|
- name: source_grounding
|
|
value: 5.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: This entity is well-grounded in Smith's actual discussion in Book I,
|
|
Chapter 11, where he uses kitchen gardens as a specific example to illustrate
|
|
principles of rent, intensive cultivation, and the relationship between land value
|
|
and proximity to markets. The context accurately reflects Smith's economic analysis.
|
|
- name: domain_placement
|
|
value: 5.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: The "Production" domain assignment is correct, as kitchen gardens represent
|
|
a specific mode of agricultural production with distinct economic characteristics.
|
|
This placement appropriately categorizes it within the broader framework of productive
|
|
economic activities.
|
|
- name: vsm_relevance
|
|
value: 3.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: Kitchen gardens map most naturally to S1 (primary operations) as a specific
|
|
production activity, but the entity lacks clear connections to coordination, regulation,
|
|
or intelligence functions. While it represents an operational unit, it doesn't
|
|
illuminate broader systemic relationships within the VSM framework.
|
|
- name: explanatory_value
|
|
value: 4.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: This entity provides genuine explanatory power by illustrating the economic
|
|
mechanism linking land use intensity, proximity to markets, and rental values.
|
|
It demonstrates how specific production choices respond to market conditions and
|
|
spatial economics, making abstract principles concrete.
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Evaluation: Kitchen Garden
|
|
|
|
## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
The definition clearly distinguishes kitchen gardens from other agricultural land uses by their specific purpose (household consumption), cultivation intensity, and economic characteristics (higher rents per unit area). It avoids circularity and captures a distinct economic concept with measurable attributes.
|
|
|
|
## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
This entity is well-grounded in Smith's actual discussion in Book I, Chapter 11, where he uses kitchen gardens as a specific example to illustrate principles of rent, intensive cultivation, and the relationship between land value and proximity to markets. The context accurately reflects Smith's economic analysis.
|
|
|
|
## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
The "Production" domain assignment is correct, as kitchen gardens represent a specific mode of agricultural production with distinct economic characteristics. This placement appropriately categorizes it within the broader framework of productive economic activities.
|
|
|
|
## vsm_relevance — 3.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
Kitchen gardens map most naturally to S1 (primary operations) as a specific production activity, but the entity lacks clear connections to coordination, regulation, or intelligence functions. While it represents an operational unit, it doesn't illuminate broader systemic relationships within the VSM framework.
|
|
|
|
## explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
This entity provides genuine explanatory power by illustrating the economic mechanism linking land use intensity, proximity to markets, and rental values. It demonstrates how specific production choices respond to market conditions and spatial economics, making abstract principles concrete.
|