tegwick
a9ca0adfcf
Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics written with per_entity_mean=3.9556. Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS redundancy_ratio 0.0061 (max 0.10) coverage_ratio 0.6190 (min 0.40) coherence_comps 0.0000 (max 3) consistency_cycles 0.0000 (max 0) granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0) per_entity_mean 3.9556 (min 3.5) Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities): definition_precision 3.62 source_grounding 4.36 domain_placement 4.56 vsm_relevance 3.31 explanatory_value 3.94 Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
66 lines
3.6 KiB
Markdown
66 lines
3.6 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
entity_slug: military_assistance
|
|
evaluator: null
|
|
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T05:52:16.275879'
|
|
overall_score: 3.6
|
|
scores:
|
|
- name: definition_precision
|
|
value: 4.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: The definition clearly distinguishes military assistance as organized
|
|
provision of armed forces by towns with specific command structures, differentiating
|
|
it from other forms of military service. It captures the reciprocal nature and
|
|
political leverage aspects that make this a distinct concept rather than generic
|
|
military obligation.
|
|
- name: source_grounding
|
|
value: 4.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: Smith does discuss how towns provided military assistance to their protectors
|
|
as part of reciprocal obligations in Book III, Chapter 3. The entity accurately
|
|
reflects Smith's analysis of how economic privileges were balanced against civic
|
|
duties in medieval political arrangements.
|
|
- name: domain_placement
|
|
value: 3.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: While "Regulation" captures the obligatory nature of military assistance,
|
|
this concept spans multiple domains including political economy and governance
|
|
structures. The regulatory aspect is present but may not be the primary conceptual
|
|
home for this entity.
|
|
- name: vsm_relevance
|
|
value: 3.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: Military assistance maps reasonably well to S1 (operational capability
|
|
that towns provided) and S3 (internal regulation of civic obligations), but the
|
|
mapping is not as natural as purely economic or organizational concepts. It's
|
|
more of a political-economic hybrid that doesn't have a clear VSM home.
|
|
- name: explanatory_value
|
|
value: 4.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: This entity illuminates an important structural mechanism in Smith's
|
|
analysis - how economic privileges were sustained through reciprocal military
|
|
obligations, revealing the political foundations of early commercial development.
|
|
It explains a key relationship rather than merely naming a surface phenomenon.
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Evaluation: Military Assistance
|
|
|
|
## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
The definition clearly distinguishes military assistance as organized provision of armed forces by towns with specific command structures, differentiating it from other forms of military service. It captures the reciprocal nature and political leverage aspects that make this a distinct concept rather than generic military obligation.
|
|
|
|
## source_grounding — 4.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
Smith does discuss how towns provided military assistance to their protectors as part of reciprocal obligations in Book III, Chapter 3. The entity accurately reflects Smith's analysis of how economic privileges were balanced against civic duties in medieval political arrangements.
|
|
|
|
## domain_placement — 3.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
While "Regulation" captures the obligatory nature of military assistance, this concept spans multiple domains including political economy and governance structures. The regulatory aspect is present but may not be the primary conceptual home for this entity.
|
|
|
|
## vsm_relevance — 3.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
Military assistance maps reasonably well to S1 (operational capability that towns provided) and S3 (internal regulation of civic obligations), but the mapping is not as natural as purely economic or organizational concepts. It's more of a political-economic hybrid that doesn't have a clear VSM home.
|
|
|
|
## explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
This entity illuminates an important structural mechanism in Smith's analysis - how economic privileges were sustained through reciprocal military obligations, revealing the political foundations of early commercial development. It explains a key relationship rather than merely naming a surface phenomenon.
|