tegwick
a9ca0adfcf
Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics written with per_entity_mean=3.9556. Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS redundancy_ratio 0.0061 (max 0.10) coverage_ratio 0.6190 (min 0.40) coherence_comps 0.0000 (max 3) consistency_cycles 0.0000 (max 0) granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0) per_entity_mean 3.9556 (min 3.5) Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities): definition_precision 3.62 source_grounding 4.36 domain_placement 4.56 vsm_relevance 3.31 explanatory_value 3.94 Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
65 lines
3.3 KiB
Markdown
65 lines
3.3 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
entity_slug: military_discipline
|
|
evaluator: null
|
|
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T05:52:34.855446'
|
|
overall_score: 4.0
|
|
scores:
|
|
- name: definition_precision
|
|
value: 4.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: The definition clearly distinguishes military discipline as an organized
|
|
system of civic defense obligations, specifically detailing night watch and wall
|
|
defense duties. It avoids circularity and captures a distinct concept rather than
|
|
being a vague umbrella term.
|
|
- name: source_grounding
|
|
value: 5.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: This entity is well-grounded in Smith's actual discussion of the obligations
|
|
that accompanied the privileges granted to free burghs in Book III, Chapter 3.
|
|
The concept directly reflects Smith's analysis of how urban autonomy came with
|
|
defensive responsibilities.
|
|
- name: domain_placement
|
|
value: 4.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: The "Regulation" domain is appropriate since military discipline represents
|
|
a formal system of civic obligations and organized duties. While it has military
|
|
aspects, it functions primarily as a regulatory mechanism governing citizen behavior
|
|
and urban governance.
|
|
- name: vsm_relevance
|
|
value: 3.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: This entity maps reasonably well to S3 (internal regulation) as it represents
|
|
internal control mechanisms for urban communities, though it also has elements
|
|
of S1 (operational defense activities). The VSM mapping is present but not exceptionally
|
|
strong.
|
|
- name: explanatory_value
|
|
value: 4.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: The entity illuminates an important structural mechanism in Smith's analysis
|
|
- how urban freedoms were balanced by civic obligations, creating a reciprocal
|
|
relationship between liberty and duty. This adds genuine insight into the institutional
|
|
arrangements of medieval urban governance.
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Evaluation: Military Discipline
|
|
|
|
## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
The definition clearly distinguishes military discipline as an organized system of civic defense obligations, specifically detailing night watch and wall defense duties. It avoids circularity and captures a distinct concept rather than being a vague umbrella term.
|
|
|
|
## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
This entity is well-grounded in Smith's actual discussion of the obligations that accompanied the privileges granted to free burghs in Book III, Chapter 3. The concept directly reflects Smith's analysis of how urban autonomy came with defensive responsibilities.
|
|
|
|
## domain_placement — 4.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
The "Regulation" domain is appropriate since military discipline represents a formal system of civic obligations and organized duties. While it has military aspects, it functions primarily as a regulatory mechanism governing citizen behavior and urban governance.
|
|
|
|
## vsm_relevance — 3.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
This entity maps reasonably well to S3 (internal regulation) as it represents internal control mechanisms for urban communities, though it also has elements of S1 (operational defense activities). The VSM mapping is present but not exceptionally strong.
|
|
|
|
## explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
The entity illuminates an important structural mechanism in Smith's analysis - how urban freedoms were balanced by civic obligations, creating a reciprocal relationship between liberty and duty. This adds genuine insight into the institutional arrangements of medieval urban governance.
|