tegwick
a9ca0adfcf
Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics written with per_entity_mean=3.9556. Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS redundancy_ratio 0.0061 (max 0.10) coverage_ratio 0.6190 (min 0.40) coherence_comps 0.0000 (max 3) consistency_cycles 0.0000 (max 0) granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0) per_entity_mean 3.9556 (min 3.5) Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities): definition_precision 3.62 source_grounding 4.36 domain_placement 4.56 vsm_relevance 3.31 explanatory_value 3.94 Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
65 lines
3.6 KiB
Markdown
65 lines
3.6 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
entity_slug: mint
|
|
evaluator: null
|
|
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T05:53:36.199736'
|
|
overall_score: 4.8
|
|
scores:
|
|
- name: definition_precision
|
|
value: 5.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: The definition is highly precise and non-circular, clearly distinguishing
|
|
a mint as a specific public institution with defined functions (stamping, certifying
|
|
metal weight and fineness) and clear purpose (establishing currency trust). It
|
|
captures a distinct institutional concept rather than a vague category.
|
|
- name: source_grounding
|
|
value: 5.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: This entity is directly grounded in Smith's text from Book I, Chapter
|
|
4, where he explicitly discusses mints as institutions that certify metal currency
|
|
to prevent fraud and facilitate exchange. The definition accurately reflects Smith's
|
|
analysis of how mints solve practical problems in monetary systems.
|
|
- name: domain_placement
|
|
value: 5.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: The "Regulation" domain assignment is perfectly appropriate, as mints
|
|
represent a regulatory institution that standardizes and certifies currency quality
|
|
through official government authority. This clearly fits within the broader category
|
|
of regulatory mechanisms that govern economic activity.
|
|
- name: vsm_relevance
|
|
value: 4.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: The mint maps well to VSM System 3 (internal regulation/audit) as it
|
|
provides standardization and quality control functions within the monetary system.
|
|
It could also relate to S2 (coordination) by reducing transaction friction through
|
|
standardized currency certification.
|
|
- name: explanatory_value
|
|
value: 5.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: This entity provides excellent explanatory power by illuminating the
|
|
institutional mechanism that solves the fundamental problem of currency trust
|
|
and verification in metal-based monetary systems. It reveals how public institutions
|
|
emerge to address specific coordination problems in exchange relationships.
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Evaluation: Mint
|
|
|
|
## definition_precision — 5.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
The definition is highly precise and non-circular, clearly distinguishing a mint as a specific public institution with defined functions (stamping, certifying metal weight and fineness) and clear purpose (establishing currency trust). It captures a distinct institutional concept rather than a vague category.
|
|
|
|
## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
This entity is directly grounded in Smith's text from Book I, Chapter 4, where he explicitly discusses mints as institutions that certify metal currency to prevent fraud and facilitate exchange. The definition accurately reflects Smith's analysis of how mints solve practical problems in monetary systems.
|
|
|
|
## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
The "Regulation" domain assignment is perfectly appropriate, as mints represent a regulatory institution that standardizes and certifies currency quality through official government authority. This clearly fits within the broader category of regulatory mechanisms that govern economic activity.
|
|
|
|
## vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
The mint maps well to VSM System 3 (internal regulation/audit) as it provides standardization and quality control functions within the monetary system. It could also relate to S2 (coordination) by reducing transaction friction through standardized currency certification.
|
|
|
|
## explanatory_value — 5.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
This entity provides excellent explanatory power by illuminating the institutional mechanism that solves the fundamental problem of currency trust and verification in metal-based monetary systems. It reveals how public institutions emerge to address specific coordination problems in exchange relationships.
|