tegwick
a9ca0adfcf
Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics written with per_entity_mean=3.9556. Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS redundancy_ratio 0.0061 (max 0.10) coverage_ratio 0.6190 (min 0.40) coherence_comps 0.0000 (max 3) consistency_cycles 0.0000 (max 0) granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0) per_entity_mean 3.9556 (min 3.5) Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities): definition_precision 3.62 source_grounding 4.36 domain_placement 4.56 vsm_relevance 3.31 explanatory_value 3.94 Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
64 lines
3.3 KiB
Markdown
64 lines
3.3 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
entity_slug: paper_money
|
|
evaluator: null
|
|
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T06:04:27.539678'
|
|
overall_score: 4.2
|
|
scores:
|
|
- name: definition_precision
|
|
value: 4.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: The definition is precise and non-circular, clearly distinguishing paper
|
|
money as bank-issued promissory notes that substitute for metal currency based
|
|
on convertibility confidence. It captures a distinct monetary instrument rather
|
|
than being vague or overly broad.
|
|
- name: source_grounding
|
|
value: 5.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: This entity is directly grounded in Smith's actual discussion in Book
|
|
II, Chapter 2, where he extensively analyzes paper money as a banking innovation.
|
|
The definition accurately reflects Smith's treatment of paper money's role and
|
|
mechanism.
|
|
- name: domain_placement
|
|
value: 5.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: The "Exchange" domain placement is correct, as paper money is fundamentally
|
|
a medium of exchange that facilitates commerce. This aligns perfectly with Smith's
|
|
analysis of how paper money serves the same exchange functions as metallic currency.
|
|
- name: vsm_relevance
|
|
value: 3.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: Paper money maps reasonably well to S1 (primary operations) as a basic
|
|
operational tool of commerce, but could also relate to S2 (coordination) in facilitating
|
|
economic coordination. However, it's more of an operational instrument than a
|
|
clear VSM system component.
|
|
- name: explanatory_value
|
|
value: 4.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: This entity provides substantial explanatory value by illuminating the
|
|
mechanism of how confidence-based substitutes can replace costly metallic currency
|
|
while maintaining exchange functionality. It reveals an important structural innovation
|
|
in monetary systems rather than merely naming a surface phenomenon.
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Evaluation: Paper Money
|
|
|
|
## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
The definition is precise and non-circular, clearly distinguishing paper money as bank-issued promissory notes that substitute for metal currency based on convertibility confidence. It captures a distinct monetary instrument rather than being vague or overly broad.
|
|
|
|
## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
This entity is directly grounded in Smith's actual discussion in Book II, Chapter 2, where he extensively analyzes paper money as a banking innovation. The definition accurately reflects Smith's treatment of paper money's role and mechanism.
|
|
|
|
## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
The "Exchange" domain placement is correct, as paper money is fundamentally a medium of exchange that facilitates commerce. This aligns perfectly with Smith's analysis of how paper money serves the same exchange functions as metallic currency.
|
|
|
|
## vsm_relevance — 3.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
Paper money maps reasonably well to S1 (primary operations) as a basic operational tool of commerce, but could also relate to S2 (coordination) in facilitating economic coordination. However, it's more of an operational instrument than a clear VSM system component.
|
|
|
|
## explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
This entity provides substantial explanatory value by illuminating the mechanism of how confidence-based substitutes can replace costly metallic currency while maintaining exchange functionality. It reveals an important structural innovation in monetary systems rather than merely naming a surface phenomenon.
|