tegwick
a9ca0adfcf
Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics written with per_entity_mean=3.9556. Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS redundancy_ratio 0.0061 (max 0.10) coverage_ratio 0.6190 (min 0.40) coherence_comps 0.0000 (max 3) consistency_cycles 0.0000 (max 0) granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0) per_entity_mean 3.9556 (min 3.5) Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities): definition_precision 3.62 source_grounding 4.36 domain_placement 4.56 vsm_relevance 3.31 explanatory_value 3.94 Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
62 lines
3.1 KiB
Markdown
62 lines
3.1 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
entity_slug: principal_employments
|
|
evaluator: null
|
|
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T06:08:56.143097'
|
|
overall_score: 1.2
|
|
scores:
|
|
- name: definition_precision
|
|
value: 1.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: There is no definition provided whatsoever, making this entity completely
|
|
imprecise. Without any definitional content, it's impossible to assess whether
|
|
this captures a distinct concept or represents a vague umbrella term.
|
|
- name: source_grounding
|
|
value: 1.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: With no source chapter specified and no definition or context provided,
|
|
there's no evidence this entity is grounded in Smith's actual text. The term "principal
|
|
employments" could refer to various concepts in The Wealth of Nations, but without
|
|
specificity, it appears to be a floating abstraction.
|
|
- name: domain_placement
|
|
value: 1.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: The domain is listed as "unspecified," indicating no clear economic or
|
|
thematic categorization has been established. Without knowing what specific employments
|
|
or economic activities this refers to, proper domain placement is impossible.
|
|
- name: vsm_relevance
|
|
value: 2.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: While "principal employments" could potentially map to S1 (primary operations)
|
|
if it refers to core economic activities, the complete lack of definition makes
|
|
any VSM placement speculative. The term is too undefined to establish clear VSM
|
|
relevance.
|
|
- name: explanatory_value
|
|
value: 1.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: This entity provides zero explanatory value in its current form, as it
|
|
offers no definition, context, or mechanism to illuminate any aspect of Smith's
|
|
economic theory. It's merely an empty label without analytical content.
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Evaluation: Principal Employments
|
|
|
|
## definition_precision — 1.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
There is no definition provided whatsoever, making this entity completely imprecise. Without any definitional content, it's impossible to assess whether this captures a distinct concept or represents a vague umbrella term.
|
|
|
|
## source_grounding — 1.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
With no source chapter specified and no definition or context provided, there's no evidence this entity is grounded in Smith's actual text. The term "principal employments" could refer to various concepts in The Wealth of Nations, but without specificity, it appears to be a floating abstraction.
|
|
|
|
## domain_placement — 1.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
The domain is listed as "unspecified," indicating no clear economic or thematic categorization has been established. Without knowing what specific employments or economic activities this refers to, proper domain placement is impossible.
|
|
|
|
## vsm_relevance — 2.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
While "principal employments" could potentially map to S1 (primary operations) if it refers to core economic activities, the complete lack of definition makes any VSM placement speculative. The term is too undefined to establish clear VSM relevance.
|
|
|
|
## explanatory_value — 1.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
This entity provides zero explanatory value in its current form, as it offers no definition, context, or mechanism to illuminate any aspect of Smith's economic theory. It's merely an empty label without analytical content.
|