tegwick
a9ca0adfcf
Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics written with per_entity_mean=3.9556. Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS redundancy_ratio 0.0061 (max 0.10) coverage_ratio 0.6190 (min 0.40) coherence_comps 0.0000 (max 3) consistency_cycles 0.0000 (max 0) granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0) per_entity_mean 3.9556 (min 3.5) Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities): definition_precision 3.62 source_grounding 4.36 domain_placement 4.56 vsm_relevance 3.31 explanatory_value 3.94 Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
65 lines
3.5 KiB
Markdown
65 lines
3.5 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
entity_slug: ejectment_action
|
|
evaluator: null
|
|
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T05:22:50.401351'
|
|
overall_score: 4.6
|
|
scores:
|
|
- name: definition_precision
|
|
value: 4.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: The definition clearly distinguishes ejectment action from ordinary damages
|
|
by specifying it allows recovery of actual possession, not just compensation.
|
|
It precisely identifies the key feature that made this legal remedy distinctive
|
|
and economically significant.
|
|
- name: source_grounding
|
|
value: 5.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: This entity is directly grounded in Smith's analysis in Book III, Chapter
|
|
2, where he explicitly discusses how English legal protections for tenants, including
|
|
remedies against wrongful ouster, contributed to agricultural improvement. The
|
|
contrast with continental practices is also textually supported.
|
|
- name: domain_placement
|
|
value: 5.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: '"Regulation" is the correct domain placement, as this represents a specific
|
|
legal-institutional mechanism that shapes economic behavior. It''s neither a pure
|
|
market phenomenon nor a broad policy concept, but rather a concrete regulatory
|
|
tool.'
|
|
- name: vsm_relevance
|
|
value: 4.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: This maps well to S3 (internal regulation) as it represents an institutional
|
|
mechanism that maintains system stability by protecting property rights and encouraging
|
|
investment. It could also relate to S2 as it prevents oscillations between investment
|
|
and disinvestment caused by tenure insecurity.
|
|
- name: explanatory_value
|
|
value: 5.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: This entity illuminates a specific causal mechanism in Smith's argument
|
|
about why English agriculture outperformed continental systems - the legal security
|
|
that encouraged tenant investment in improvements. It explains how institutional
|
|
design translates into economic outcomes rather than merely naming a surface phenomenon.
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Evaluation: Ejectment Action
|
|
|
|
## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
The definition clearly distinguishes ejectment action from ordinary damages by specifying it allows recovery of actual possession, not just compensation. It precisely identifies the key feature that made this legal remedy distinctive and economically significant.
|
|
|
|
## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
This entity is directly grounded in Smith's analysis in Book III, Chapter 2, where he explicitly discusses how English legal protections for tenants, including remedies against wrongful ouster, contributed to agricultural improvement. The contrast with continental practices is also textually supported.
|
|
|
|
## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
"Regulation" is the correct domain placement, as this represents a specific legal-institutional mechanism that shapes economic behavior. It's neither a pure market phenomenon nor a broad policy concept, but rather a concrete regulatory tool.
|
|
|
|
## vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
This maps well to S3 (internal regulation) as it represents an institutional mechanism that maintains system stability by protecting property rights and encouraging investment. It could also relate to S2 as it prevents oscillations between investment and disinvestment caused by tenure insecurity.
|
|
|
|
## explanatory_value — 5.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
This entity illuminates a specific causal mechanism in Smith's argument about why English agriculture outperformed continental systems - the legal security that encouraged tenant investment in improvements. It explains how institutional design translates into economic outcomes rather than merely naming a surface phenomenon.
|