708 lines
22 KiB
Markdown
708 lines
22 KiB
Markdown
# Map Economic Entities to VSM Concepts
|
|
|
|
You are a systems theorist specializing in Stafford Beer's Viable System Model.
|
|
Your task is to map extracted economic entities to VSM concepts.
|
|
|
|
## Extracted Entities
|
|
|
|
--- ENTITY: productive and unproductive labour ---
|
|
|
|
# Productive and Unproductive Labour
|
|
|
|
## Definition
|
|
|
|
A fundamental classification of economic activity distinguishing labour that
|
|
adds value to materials through transformation into vendible commodities from
|
|
labour that provides services without creating lasting value. Productive labour
|
|
fixes and realizes itself in particular subjects or commodities that endure
|
|
after the labour is past and can be stored, exchanged, or employed again,
|
|
while unproductive labour perishes in the very instant of performance without
|
|
leaving any vendible commodity or value that can be stored or exchanged.
|
|
|
|
## Source Chapter
|
|
|
|
Book II, Chapter 3
|
|
|
|
## Context
|
|
|
|
The central analytical framework of this chapter, introduced to explain how
|
|
different types of labour affect capital accumulation and economic growth.
|
|
Smith uses this distinction to show why manufacturers grow rich while those
|
|
maintaining unproductive servants grow poor, and how this affects the overall
|
|
productive capacity of a nation.
|
|
|
|
## Economic Domain
|
|
|
|
Production
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
--- ENTITY: capital accumulation ---
|
|
|
|
# Capital Accumulation
|
|
|
|
## Definition
|
|
|
|
The process by which savings from revenue are added to capital stock, enabling
|
|
the employment of additional productive labour. Capital grows through
|
|
parsimony when individuals save part of their revenue and either employ it
|
|
themselves in maintaining productive hands or lend it to others, creating a
|
|
perpetual fund for maintaining productive labour across time.
|
|
|
|
## Source Chapter
|
|
|
|
Book II, Chapter 3
|
|
|
|
## Context
|
|
|
|
The chapter's primary focus, explaining how individual saving behavior
|
|
accumulates into national capital growth. Smith argues that parsimony, not
|
|
industry, is the immediate cause of capital increase, and that this process
|
|
determines whether a nation tends toward industry or idleness.
|
|
|
|
## Economic Domain
|
|
|
|
Accumulation
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
--- ENTITY: revenue destined for capital replacement ---
|
|
|
|
# Revenue Destined for Capital Replacement
|
|
|
|
## Definition
|
|
|
|
That portion of annual produce which immediately replaces capital by renewing
|
|
provisions, materials, and finished work withdrawn from capital. This revenue
|
|
maintains only productive hands and pays wages of productive labour, forming
|
|
the foundation for continued production and economic growth.
|
|
|
|
## Source Chapter
|
|
|
|
Book II, Chapter 3
|
|
|
|
## Context
|
|
|
|
Smith divides annual produce into two parts: one replacing capital and one
|
|
constituting revenue. This portion is crucial because it determines the
|
|
proportion between productive and unproductive hands in society and thus the
|
|
general character of inhabitants as to industry or idleness.
|
|
|
|
## Economic Domain
|
|
|
|
Accumulation
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
--- ENTITY: revenue constituting profit and rent ---
|
|
|
|
# Revenue Constituting Profit and Rent
|
|
|
|
## Definition
|
|
|
|
That portion of annual produce which forms revenue either as profit of stock
|
|
or rent of land. This revenue may maintain either productive or unproductive
|
|
hands indifferently, unlike capital replacement revenue which maintains only
|
|
productive labour. It represents the surplus after capital renewal.
|
|
|
|
## Source Chapter
|
|
|
|
Book II, Chapter 3
|
|
|
|
## Context
|
|
|
|
The second major division of annual produce, distinguished from capital
|
|
replacement revenue. Smith notes that owners of this revenue often show
|
|
predilection for maintaining unproductive hands, affecting the overall
|
|
productive capacity of society.
|
|
|
|
## Economic Domain
|
|
|
|
Distribution
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
--- ENTITY: spare revenue ---
|
|
|
|
# Spare Revenue
|
|
|
|
## Definition
|
|
|
|
That portion of revenue which remains after necessary subsistence is met and
|
|
which may be employed in maintaining either productive or unproductive hands.
|
|
Productive labourers have little spare revenue, while landlords and merchants
|
|
have most to spare, giving them greater influence over the proportion of
|
|
productive versus unproductive labour in society.
|
|
|
|
## Source Chapter
|
|
|
|
Book II, Chapter 3
|
|
|
|
## Context
|
|
|
|
Smith explains how different social classes use their revenue, noting that
|
|
spare revenue is the key determinant of whether additional labour will be
|
|
productive or unproductive, thus affecting capital accumulation and economic
|
|
growth.
|
|
|
|
## Economic Domain
|
|
|
|
Distribution
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
--- ENTITY: funds for maintaining productive labour ---
|
|
|
|
# Funds for Maintaining Productive Labour
|
|
|
|
## Definition
|
|
|
|
The capital and revenue sources that employ productive hands whose labour
|
|
adds value to materials. These funds are much greater in rich countries and
|
|
bear a much greater proportion to those likely to be employed in maintaining
|
|
idleness, determining the general character of inhabitants as industrious or
|
|
idle.
|
|
|
|
## Source Chapter
|
|
|
|
Book II, Chapter 3
|
|
|
|
## Context
|
|
|
|
Smith argues that the proportion between these funds and those for maintaining
|
|
unproductive hands determines whether a country tends toward industry or
|
|
idleness, with rich countries having larger proportions of productive labour.
|
|
|
|
## Economic Domain
|
|
|
|
Production
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
--- ENTITY: funds for maintaining unproductive hands ---
|
|
|
|
# Funds for Maintaining Unproductive Hands
|
|
|
|
## Definition
|
|
|
|
Capital and revenue sources that employ unproductive labourers and those who
|
|
do not labour at all, including servants, soldiers, churchmen, lawyers,
|
|
physicians, and entertainers. These funds tend to have predilection for
|
|
unproductive labour, especially among the wealthy, affecting the overall
|
|
productive capacity of society.
|
|
|
|
## Source Chapter
|
|
|
|
Book II, Chapter 3
|
|
|
|
## Context
|
|
|
|
Smith contrasts these funds with those for productive labour, noting that
|
|
their proportion determines whether a society tends toward industry or
|
|
idleness, and that rich countries often maintain larger proportions of
|
|
unproductive hands.
|
|
|
|
## Economic Domain
|
|
|
|
Production
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
--- ENTITY: proportion between productive and unproductive hands ---
|
|
|
|
# Proportion Between Productive and Unproductive Hands
|
|
|
|
## Definition
|
|
|
|
The ratio determining the relative numbers of productive labourers who add
|
|
value to materials versus unproductive labourers who provide services without
|
|
creating vendible commodities. This proportion depends on the relative size
|
|
of funds for maintaining productive versus unproductive hands, and determines
|
|
whether a country tends toward industry or idleness.
|
|
|
|
## Source Chapter
|
|
|
|
Book II, Chapter 3
|
|
|
|
## Context
|
|
|
|
The central analytical relationship in the chapter, showing how the division
|
|
of annual produce between capital replacement and revenue affects the overall
|
|
productive capacity and economic character of a nation.
|
|
|
|
## Economic Domain
|
|
|
|
General Theory
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
--- ENTITY: frugality versus prodigality ---
|
|
|
|
# Frugality Versus Prodigality
|
|
|
|
# Frugality Versus Prodigality
|
|
|
|
## Definition
|
|
|
|
The contrasting principles governing individual and public expenditure that
|
|
determine capital accumulation. Frugality increases public capital by saving
|
|
revenue for productive employment, while prodigality diminishes it by
|
|
consuming capital through excessive expenditure on unproductive labour and
|
|
consumption.
|
|
|
|
## Source Chapter
|
|
|
|
Book II, Chapter 3
|
|
|
|
## Context
|
|
|
|
Smith presents this as the fundamental economic choice affecting national
|
|
wealth, arguing that individual frugality accumulates capital while
|
|
prodigality destroys it, with public prodigality being particularly harmful
|
|
when it employs revenue in maintaining unproductive hands.
|
|
|
|
## Economic Domain
|
|
|
|
Accumulation
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
--- ENTITY: perpetual fund for maintenance of labour ---
|
|
|
|
# Perpetual Fund for Maintenance of Labour
|
|
|
|
# Perpetual Fund for Maintenance of Labour
|
|
|
|
## Definition
|
|
|
|
The accumulated capital created through individual saving that provides
|
|
continuous employment for productive labour across all future time periods.
|
|
Like a founder of a public work-house, a frugal person establishes a fund
|
|
that, though not legally protected, is guarded by the evident interest of all
|
|
who may ever possess any share of it.
|
|
|
|
## Source Chapter
|
|
|
|
Book II, Chapter 3
|
|
|
|
## Context
|
|
|
|
Smith uses this concept to show how individual saving creates lasting economic
|
|
benefits beyond the immediate year, establishing a permanent capacity for
|
|
productive employment that characterizes wealthy nations.
|
|
|
|
## Economic Domain
|
|
|
|
Accumulation
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
--- ENTITY: encroachment upon capital ---
|
|
|
|
# Encroachment Upon Capital
|
|
|
|
## Definition
|
|
|
|
The process by which individuals who spend beyond their income consume their
|
|
capital stock, perverting funds consecrated to productive employment for
|
|
maintaining unproductive labour. This diminishes the quantity of labour that
|
|
adds value to subjects and consequently reduces the real wealth and revenue
|
|
of the country's inhabitants.
|
|
|
|
## Source Chapter
|
|
|
|
Book II, Chapter 3
|
|
|
|
## Context
|
|
|
|
Smith describes how prodigality leads to capital consumption, comparing it to
|
|
perverting revenues of pious foundations to profane purposes, and showing how
|
|
this behavior impoverishes both the individual and the country.
|
|
|
|
## Economic Domain
|
|
|
|
Accumulation
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
--- ENTITY: exportation of gold and silver as effect of declension ---
|
|
|
|
# Exportation of Gold and Silver as Effect of Declension
|
|
|
|
## Definition
|
|
|
|
The consequence rather than cause of economic decline, where diminishing
|
|
annual produce leads to reduced domestic circulation of money, forcing its
|
|
exportation to purchase consumable goods abroad. This exportation continues
|
|
for some time to support consumption beyond the value of domestic produce.
|
|
|
|
## Source Chapter
|
|
|
|
Book II, Chapter 3
|
|
|
|
## Context
|
|
|
|
Smith refutes the mercantilist view that gold and silver export causes
|
|
economic decline, arguing instead that it is the effect of declining
|
|
production and can even temporarily alleviate the misery of declension.
|
|
|
|
## Economic Domain
|
|
|
|
Exchange
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
--- ENTITY: increase of money as effect of prosperity ---
|
|
|
|
# Increase of Money as Effect of Prosperity
|
|
|
|
## Definition
|
|
|
|
The natural consequence of economic growth where increased annual produce
|
|
requires greater money circulation. The increased produce naturally employs
|
|
itself in purchasing additional gold and silver necessary for circulating the
|
|
rest, making monetary increase the effect rather than cause of public
|
|
prosperity.
|
|
|
|
## Source Chapter
|
|
|
|
Book II, Chapter 3
|
|
|
|
## Context
|
|
|
|
Smith's complementary argument to the previous entity, showing that monetary
|
|
growth follows rather than leads economic development, refuting mercantilist
|
|
concerns about money scarcity.
|
|
|
|
## Economic Domain
|
|
|
|
Exchange
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
--- ENTITY: private misconduct versus public prodigality ---
|
|
|
|
# Private Misconduct Versus Public Prodigality
|
|
|
|
# Private Misconduct Versus Public Prodigality
|
|
|
|
## Definition
|
|
|
|
The distinction between individual economic errors and government
|
|
extravagance as causes of reduced productive funds. While private misconduct
|
|
rarely affects great nations due to compensation by others' good conduct,
|
|
public prodigality employing revenue in maintaining unproductive hands can
|
|
significantly diminish funds for productive labour.
|
|
|
|
## Source Chapter
|
|
|
|
Book II, Chapter 3
|
|
|
|
## Context
|
|
|
|
Smith argues that public prodigality is more dangerous than private misconduct
|
|
because it operates at scale and is not compensated by others' frugality,
|
|
potentially leading to national impoverishment.
|
|
|
|
## Economic Domain
|
|
|
|
Regulation
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
--- ENTITY: natural progress of improvement ---
|
|
|
|
# Natural Progress of Improvement
|
|
|
|
## Definition
|
|
|
|
The inherent tendency of societies to accumulate capital and improve through
|
|
individual efforts to better their condition, protected by law and allowed by
|
|
liberty. This principle frequently restores health to the economic
|
|
constitution despite government extravagance and administrative errors.
|
|
|
|
## Source Chapter
|
|
|
|
Book II, Chapter 3
|
|
|
|
## Context
|
|
|
|
Smith's optimistic conclusion that individual self-interest and frugality
|
|
generally overcome government interference, allowing England's progress toward
|
|
opulence despite public prodigality.
|
|
|
|
## Economic Domain
|
|
|
|
General Theory
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
--- ENTITY: modes of expense affecting public opulence ---
|
|
|
|
# Modes of Expense Affecting Public Opulence
|
|
|
|
## Definition
|
|
|
|
The distinction between spending revenue on immediately consumable items
|
|
versus durable commodities, where the latter contributes more to public
|
|
opulence by providing useful goods to inferior ranks, encouraging frugality,
|
|
and maintaining more productive hands than extravagant hospitality.
|
|
|
|
## Source Chapter
|
|
|
|
Book II, Chapter 3
|
|
|
|
## Context
|
|
|
|
Smith's final analysis showing how different spending patterns affect
|
|
national wealth, arguing that investment in durable goods creates more
|
|
lasting economic benefits than consumption of perishable items.
|
|
|
|
## Economic Domain
|
|
|
|
Consumption
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## VSM Framework Reference
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
id: vsm-framework
|
|
name: vsm_framework
|
|
artifact_type: content
|
|
description: Stafford Beer's Viable System Model reference for economic analysis
|
|
version: 1.0.0
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Stafford Beer's Viable System Model (VSM)
|
|
|
|
The Viable System Model (VSM) is a model of the organisational structure of any
|
|
autonomous system capable of producing itself. It was created by management
|
|
cybernetician Stafford Beer in his books *Brain of the Firm* (1972) and
|
|
*The Heart of Enterprise* (1979).
|
|
|
|
## Core Principle: Viability
|
|
|
|
A viable system is any system organised in such a way as to meet the demands
|
|
of surviving in a changing environment. One of the prime features of systems
|
|
that survive is that they are adaptable. The VSM expresses a model for a
|
|
viable system, which is an abstracted cybernetic description applicable to
|
|
any organisation that is a going concern.
|
|
|
|
## The Five Systems
|
|
|
|
### System 1 (S1) — Operations
|
|
|
|
The primary activities that produce the organisation's purpose. These are the
|
|
operational units that directly create value. Each operational element is itself
|
|
a viable system (the principle of recursion).
|
|
|
|
**In economic terms:** Productive enterprises, factories, farms, workshops,
|
|
individual labourers performing specialised tasks, merchant operations.
|
|
|
|
**Key properties:** Autonomy within constraints, self-organisation,
|
|
direct engagement with the environment.
|
|
|
|
### System 2 (S2) — Coordination
|
|
|
|
The information channels and bodies that allow the primary activities in
|
|
System 1 to communicate with each other and that allow System 3 to monitor
|
|
and coordinate activities. System 2 dampens oscillations and resolves
|
|
conflicts between operational units.
|
|
|
|
**In economic terms:** Market price mechanisms, trade customs, standard
|
|
weights and measures, commercial law, banking clearinghouses, trade guilds.
|
|
|
|
**Key properties:** Anti-oscillatory, dampening, scheduling, conflict
|
|
resolution, standardisation.
|
|
|
|
### System 3 (S3) — Control / Operational Management
|
|
|
|
The structures and controls that establish the rules, resources, rights,
|
|
and responsibilities of System 1 and provide an interface between Systems 1
|
|
and Systems 4/5. System 3 represents the day-to-day control of the
|
|
organisation. It optimises the internal environment.
|
|
|
|
**In economic terms:** Government regulation of trade, taxation policy, labour
|
|
laws, enforcement of contracts, the "invisible hand" as emergent internal
|
|
regulation, guilds and corporations governing members.
|
|
|
|
**Key properties:** Internal regulation, resource allocation, accountability,
|
|
synergy extraction, performance management.
|
|
|
|
### System 3* (S3*) — Audit / Monitoring
|
|
|
|
The audit and monitoring channel that allows System 3 to verify information
|
|
coming from System 1 through channels other than those provided by System 2.
|
|
System 3* provides sporadic, direct access to operational reality.
|
|
|
|
**In economic terms:** Market inspections, quality checks, auditing of accounts,
|
|
surprise investigations into trade practices, verification of weights and measures.
|
|
|
|
**Key properties:** Sporadic direct investigation, reality checking, bypassing
|
|
normal reporting channels.
|
|
|
|
### System 4 (S4) — Intelligence / Adaptation
|
|
|
|
The bodies and processes that look outward to the environment to monitor
|
|
how the organisation needs to adapt to remain viable. System 4 captures
|
|
all relevant information about the outside-and-then environment. It is
|
|
responsible for strategic responses.
|
|
|
|
**In economic terms:** Foreign intelligence about trade opportunities,
|
|
market research, new technology adoption, colonial exploration and trade
|
|
route development, understanding of foreign economic systems.
|
|
|
|
**Key properties:** Environmental scanning, future orientation, strategic
|
|
planning, modelling, research and development.
|
|
|
|
### System 5 (S5) — Policy / Identity
|
|
|
|
The policy-making body that balances demands from Systems 3 and 4 and defines
|
|
the identity, values, and purpose of the organisation. System 5 provides
|
|
closure to the whole system and represents its supreme authority.
|
|
|
|
**In economic terms:** Sovereign authority, constitutional principles governing
|
|
economic policy, national economic identity, the philosophical foundations
|
|
of economic systems (mercantilism vs. free trade), the overarching purpose
|
|
of the commonwealth.
|
|
|
|
**Key properties:** Identity, ethos, supreme command, policy closure,
|
|
balancing internal and external perspectives.
|
|
|
|
## Key Concepts
|
|
|
|
### Recursion
|
|
|
|
Every viable system contains and is contained in a viable system. The same
|
|
five-system structure recurs at every level of organisation. A workshop is
|
|
a viable system within a factory, which is a viable system within an
|
|
industry, which is a viable system within a national economy.
|
|
|
|
### Variety
|
|
|
|
A measure of the number of possible states of a system. The Law of Requisite
|
|
Variety (Ashby's Law) states that only variety can absorb variety. A
|
|
controller must have at least as much variety as the system it controls.
|
|
|
|
### Requisite Variety
|
|
|
|
The principle that for effective regulation, the variety of the regulator
|
|
must match the variety of the system being regulated. This is achieved
|
|
through variety attenuation (reducing the variety coming up from operations)
|
|
and variety amplification (increasing the variety of management's responses).
|
|
|
|
### Attenuation and Amplification
|
|
|
|
Variety engineering mechanisms. Attenuation reduces variety (e.g., reporting
|
|
summaries, statistical aggregation, standardisation). Amplification increases
|
|
variety (e.g., delegation, empowerment, decentralisation).
|
|
|
|
### Algedonic Signals
|
|
|
|
Emergency signals that bypass the normal management hierarchy to alert
|
|
higher systems of critical situations requiring immediate attention. Named
|
|
from the Greek words for pain (algos) and pleasure (hedone).
|
|
|
|
**In economic terms:** Market panics, famine signals, sudden price collapses,
|
|
trade embargoes, economic crises that demand immediate sovereign intervention.
|
|
|
|
### Autonomy
|
|
|
|
The degree of freedom granted to operational units (System 1) to self-organise
|
|
within constraints set by System 3. Beer argued that maximum autonomy
|
|
consistent with systemic cohesion yields maximum viability.
|
|
|
|
### Viability
|
|
|
|
The capacity of a system to maintain a separate existence and survive in a
|
|
changing environment. A viable system continuously adapts while maintaining
|
|
its identity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Mapping Guidelines
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
id: mapping-rules
|
|
name: mapping_rules
|
|
artifact_type: content
|
|
description: Guidelines for mapping economic entities to VSM concepts
|
|
version: 1.0.0
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# VSM Mapping Rules
|
|
|
|
## Mapping Principles
|
|
|
|
1. **Ground in Beer's definitions.** Every mapping rationale must reference
|
|
the specific VSM system function, not just a superficial resemblance.
|
|
|
|
2. **Prefer structural over metaphorical mappings.** A mapping is strong
|
|
when the economic entity performs the same *functional role* in Smith's
|
|
economic system as the VSM component performs in an organisation.
|
|
|
|
3. **Allow multiple mappings.** A single economic entity may map to
|
|
multiple VSM systems. For example, "the sovereign" may map to both
|
|
S3 (regulation) and S5 (policy). Create separate mapping documents
|
|
for each relationship.
|
|
|
|
4. **Respect recursion.** Consider at which level of recursion the mapping
|
|
applies. The division of labour within a single workshop (S1-level)
|
|
differs from the division of labour across an entire national economy
|
|
(higher recursion level).
|
|
|
|
## Mapping Strength Criteria
|
|
|
|
### Strong
|
|
- The entity directly performs the function of the VSM system.
|
|
- The mapping would be recognisable to a VSM practitioner without explanation.
|
|
- Example: "market price mechanism" → S2 (Coordination) — prices coordinate
|
|
supply and demand between producers.
|
|
|
|
### Moderate
|
|
- The entity partially performs the function or performs it in a limited context.
|
|
- The mapping requires some argument but is defensible.
|
|
- Example: "merchant" → S4 (Intelligence) — merchants gather information
|
|
about foreign markets, but this is not their primary function.
|
|
|
|
### Weak
|
|
- The mapping is speculative or metaphorical rather than structural.
|
|
- The connection exists but requires significant interpretive work.
|
|
- Example: "moral sentiments" → S5 (Policy) — broad ethical framework
|
|
shapes economic behaviour, but the connection is indirect.
|
|
|
|
## What NOT to Map
|
|
|
|
- Do not force mappings where none exist. It is valid for an entity to have
|
|
no clear VSM mapping — flag it with "Mapping Strength: Weak" and explain
|
|
the difficulty.
|
|
- Do not map purely descriptive/historical content that lacks functional
|
|
significance.
|
|
|
|
## VSM System Checklist
|
|
|
|
When mapping, consider each system:
|
|
|
|
| System | Question to Ask |
|
|
|--------|----------------|
|
|
| S1 | Does this entity directly produce value or output? |
|
|
| S2 | Does this entity coordinate between operational units? |
|
|
| S3 | Does this entity regulate internal operations? |
|
|
| S3* | Does this entity provide audit or verification? |
|
|
| S4 | Does this entity scan the environment or plan for the future? |
|
|
| S5 | Does this entity define identity, policy, or purpose? |
|
|
|
|
Also consider the key concepts:
|
|
- **Recursion**: At what level does this entity operate?
|
|
- **Variety**: Does this entity manage variety (attenuate or amplify)?
|
|
- **Algedonic signals**: Does this entity serve as an emergency signal?
|
|
- **Autonomy**: Does this entity relate to operational autonomy?
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Instructions
|
|
|
|
1. Review each extracted economic entity carefully.
|
|
2. For each entity, determine which VSM system(s) it most closely relates to.
|
|
3. Produce a mapping document for each entity-VSM relationship following
|
|
the VSM Mapping Schema v1.0.
|
|
4. Each mapping document must include:
|
|
- An H1 heading in the format "Entity Name -> VSM Concept Name"
|
|
- An Economic Entity Reference section
|
|
- A VSM Concept Reference section
|
|
- A Mapping Rationale section (minimum 30 words) grounded in Beer's definitions
|
|
- A Mapping Strength section rated as Strong, Moderate, or Weak
|
|
5. Where an entity maps to multiple VSM systems (recursion), create
|
|
separate mapping documents for each relationship.
|
|
6. Flag entities that don't clearly map to any VSM concept with a
|
|
"Mapping Strength: Weak" and note the difficulty in the rationale.
|
|
|
|
## Output Format
|
|
|
|
Output each mapping as a separate markdown document, delimited by
|
|
`--- MAPPING: <entity-name>-to-<vsm-concept> ---` markers.
|