Previously, coverage analysis was incorrectly using keywords from all existing tests, causing false positives where untested issues showed coverage percentages instead of 0%. Changes: - Only count tests specifically related to the analyzed issue - Return 0% coverage when no issue-specific tests exist - Maintain accurate coverage calculation for tested issues This ensures that Issue #3 correctly shows 0.0% coverage instead of 33.3%, while Issue #11 still correctly shows 100.0% coverage. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
16 KiB
16 KiB