tegwick
a9ca0adfcf
Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics written with per_entity_mean=3.9556. Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS redundancy_ratio 0.0061 (max 0.10) coverage_ratio 0.6190 (min 0.40) coherence_comps 0.0000 (max 3) consistency_cycles 0.0000 (max 0) granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0) per_entity_mean 3.9556 (min 3.5) Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities): definition_precision 3.62 source_grounding 4.36 domain_placement 4.56 vsm_relevance 3.31 explanatory_value 3.94 Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
60 lines
2.8 KiB
Markdown
60 lines
2.8 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
entity_slug: aulnagers
|
|
evaluator: null
|
|
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T00:36:23.671148'
|
|
overall_score: 4.4
|
|
scores:
|
|
- name: definition_precision
|
|
value: 4.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: The definition is precise and captures a distinct historical role - public
|
|
officials who certified woollen cloth quality and dimensions. The analogy to mint
|
|
officials effectively clarifies their function without circularity.
|
|
- name: source_grounding
|
|
value: 5.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: This entity is directly grounded in Smith's text from Book I, Chapter
|
|
4, where he explicitly draws the parallel between aulnagers and mint officials
|
|
as examples of public quality certification systems.
|
|
- name: domain_placement
|
|
value: 5.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: The "Regulation" domain assignment is perfectly appropriate, as aulnagers
|
|
represent a clear example of government regulatory oversight in commercial markets
|
|
through quality standardization.
|
|
- name: vsm_relevance
|
|
value: 4.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: Aulnagers map naturally to S3 (internal regulation/audit) as they perform
|
|
quality control and standardization functions within the broader economic system.
|
|
They could also relate to S2 (coordination) through their standardization role.
|
|
- name: explanatory_value
|
|
value: 4.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: This entity illuminates an important mechanism - how public institutions
|
|
create trust and reduce transaction costs through quality certification - demonstrating
|
|
Smith's broader point about the institutional foundations of market exchange.
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Evaluation: Aulnagers
|
|
|
|
## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
The definition is precise and captures a distinct historical role - public officials who certified woollen cloth quality and dimensions. The analogy to mint officials effectively clarifies their function without circularity.
|
|
|
|
## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
This entity is directly grounded in Smith's text from Book I, Chapter 4, where he explicitly draws the parallel between aulnagers and mint officials as examples of public quality certification systems.
|
|
|
|
## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
The "Regulation" domain assignment is perfectly appropriate, as aulnagers represent a clear example of government regulatory oversight in commercial markets through quality standardization.
|
|
|
|
## vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
Aulnagers map naturally to S3 (internal regulation/audit) as they perform quality control and standardization functions within the broader economic system. They could also relate to S2 (coordination) through their standardization role.
|
|
|
|
## explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
This entity illuminates an important mechanism - how public institutions create trust and reduce transaction costs through quality certification - demonstrating Smith's broader point about the institutional foundations of market exchange.
|