Files
markitect-main/examples/infospace-with-history/output/evaluations/capital_employed.md
tegwick a9ca0adfcf feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)
Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-23 09:36:46 +01:00

66 lines
3.5 KiB
Markdown

---
entity_slug: capital_employed
evaluator: null
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T04:40:26.614764'
overall_score: 4.4
scores:
- name: definition_precision
value: 4.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: The definition clearly distinguishes capital employed as the total value
of resources (materials and wages) advanced by an investor, which is precise and
non-circular. It could be slightly more precise about whether this includes only
working capital or also fixed capital investments.
- name: source_grounding
value: 5.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: This concept is directly grounded in Book I, Chapter 6 where Smith explicitly
discusses how profits relate to the amount of capital employed rather than labor
supervision. The entity accurately reflects Smith's actual argument with specific
textual support.
- name: domain_placement
value: 5.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: Placement in the "Accumulation" domain is highly appropriate since capital
employed represents the stock of resources committed to productive processes.
This aligns perfectly with Smith's broader discussion of capital accumulation
and investment.
- name: vsm_relevance
value: 3.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: This entity has moderate VSM relevance, primarily mapping to S1 (primary
operations) as the resources directly engaged in production, with some connection
to S3 (internal regulation) regarding resource allocation decisions. However,
it's somewhat abstract as a financial concept rather than an operational system
component.
- name: explanatory_value
value: 5.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: "This entity provides excellent explanatory value by illuminating Smith's\
\ key mechanism for profit determination\u2014that profits are regulated by capital\
\ employed rather than supervisory labor. It reveals a fundamental structural\
\ relationship in Smith's economic theory about how returns are generated."
---
# Evaluation: Capital Employed
## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0
The definition clearly distinguishes capital employed as the total value of resources (materials and wages) advanced by an investor, which is precise and non-circular. It could be slightly more precise about whether this includes only working capital or also fixed capital investments.
## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0
This concept is directly grounded in Book I, Chapter 6 where Smith explicitly discusses how profits relate to the amount of capital employed rather than labor supervision. The entity accurately reflects Smith's actual argument with specific textual support.
## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
Placement in the "Accumulation" domain is highly appropriate since capital employed represents the stock of resources committed to productive processes. This aligns perfectly with Smith's broader discussion of capital accumulation and investment.
## vsm_relevance — 3.0 / 5.0
This entity has moderate VSM relevance, primarily mapping to S1 (primary operations) as the resources directly engaged in production, with some connection to S3 (internal regulation) regarding resource allocation decisions. However, it's somewhat abstract as a financial concept rather than an operational system component.
## explanatory_value — 5.0 / 5.0
This entity provides excellent explanatory value by illuminating Smith's key mechanism for profit determination—that profits are regulated by capital employed rather than supervisory labor. It reveals a fundamental structural relationship in Smith's economic theory about how returns are generated.