tegwick
a9ca0adfcf
Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics written with per_entity_mean=3.9556. Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS redundancy_ratio 0.0061 (max 0.10) coverage_ratio 0.6190 (min 0.40) coherence_comps 0.0000 (max 3) consistency_cycles 0.0000 (max 0) granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0) per_entity_mean 3.9556 (min 3.5) Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities): definition_precision 3.62 source_grounding 4.36 domain_placement 4.56 vsm_relevance 3.31 explanatory_value 3.94 Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
65 lines
3.4 KiB
Markdown
65 lines
3.4 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
entity_slug: contract
|
|
evaluator: null
|
|
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T05:02:26.314141'
|
|
overall_score: 4.2
|
|
scores:
|
|
- name: definition_precision
|
|
value: 4.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: The definition is clear and precise, identifying contracts as formal
|
|
agreements establishing mutual obligations and rights. It avoids circularity and
|
|
captures a distinct concept, though it could be slightly more specific about what
|
|
constitutes "formal" in Smith's context.
|
|
- name: source_grounding
|
|
value: 5.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: This entity is well-grounded in Smith's actual text from Book I, Chapter
|
|
2, where he explicitly discusses how humans engage in contractual arrangements
|
|
while animals do not. The definition accurately reflects Smith's use of this distinction
|
|
to illustrate uniquely human economic behavior.
|
|
- name: domain_placement
|
|
value: 5.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: The placement in the "Exchange" domain is entirely appropriate, as contracts
|
|
are fundamental mechanisms that enable and structure exchange relationships. This
|
|
aligns perfectly with Smith's discussion of human propensity to truck, barter,
|
|
and exchange.
|
|
- name: vsm_relevance
|
|
value: 3.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: Contracts have some VSM relevance as they relate to S1 (operational agreements)
|
|
and S2 (coordination mechanisms), but they are primarily foundational legal/social
|
|
structures rather than cybernetic system components. The mapping is possible but
|
|
not particularly natural or illuminating.
|
|
- name: explanatory_value
|
|
value: 4.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: This entity provides genuine explanatory value by identifying a key mechanism
|
|
that distinguishes human economic organization from animal behavior. It illuminates
|
|
how formal agreements enable complex economic relationships, though it represents
|
|
more of a foundational concept than a dynamic process.
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Evaluation: Contract
|
|
|
|
## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
The definition is clear and precise, identifying contracts as formal agreements establishing mutual obligations and rights. It avoids circularity and captures a distinct concept, though it could be slightly more specific about what constitutes "formal" in Smith's context.
|
|
|
|
## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
This entity is well-grounded in Smith's actual text from Book I, Chapter 2, where he explicitly discusses how humans engage in contractual arrangements while animals do not. The definition accurately reflects Smith's use of this distinction to illustrate uniquely human economic behavior.
|
|
|
|
## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
The placement in the "Exchange" domain is entirely appropriate, as contracts are fundamental mechanisms that enable and structure exchange relationships. This aligns perfectly with Smith's discussion of human propensity to truck, barter, and exchange.
|
|
|
|
## vsm_relevance — 3.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
Contracts have some VSM relevance as they relate to S1 (operational agreements) and S2 (coordination mechanisms), but they are primarily foundational legal/social structures rather than cybernetic system components. The mapping is possible but not particularly natural or illuminating.
|
|
|
|
## explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
This entity provides genuine explanatory value by identifying a key mechanism that distinguishes human economic organization from animal behavior. It illuminates how formal agreements enable complex economic relationships, though it represents more of a foundational concept than a dynamic process.
|