Files
markitect-main/examples/infospace-with-history/output/evaluations/declining_manufacture.md
tegwick a9ca0adfcf feat(example): add per-entity LLM evaluations for 985 WoN entities (S3.3)
Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on
first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics
written with per_entity_mean=3.9556.

Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS
  redundancy_ratio   0.0061  (max 0.10)
  coverage_ratio     0.6190  (min 0.40)
  coherence_comps    0.0000  (max 3)
  consistency_cycles 0.0000  (max 0)
  granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0)
  per_entity_mean    3.9556  (min 3.5)

Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities):
  definition_precision  3.62
  source_grounding      4.36
  domain_placement      4.56
  vsm_relevance         3.31
  explanatory_value     3.94

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-02-23 09:36:46 +01:00

61 lines
3.0 KiB
Markdown

---
entity_slug: declining_manufacture
evaluator: null
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T05:05:08.920266'
overall_score: 1.6
scores:
- name: definition_precision
value: 1.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: There is no definition provided at all, making it impossible to assess
precision or distinctness. The entity appears to be merely a descriptive phrase
without conceptual boundaries.
- name: source_grounding
value: 2.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: While Smith does discuss declining manufactures in various contexts (particularly
regarding trade restrictions and economic policies), without a definition or source
chapter, it's unclear whether this captures a specific concept from the text or
is just a general descriptive term.
- name: domain_placement
value: 2.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: The domain is unspecified, which is problematic for an economic concept.
"Declining manufacture" could belong to industrial economics, trade policy, or
economic development domains, but without clarification, proper placement is impossible.
- name: vsm_relevance
value: 2.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: This could potentially relate to S1 (operational decline) or S4 (environmental
adaptation failures), but without a clear definition of what constitutes "declining
manufacture" or its systemic role, VSM mapping remains speculative.
- name: explanatory_value
value: 1.0
max_value: 5.0
rationale: As currently formulated, this entity provides no explanatory power since
it lacks definition, context, or mechanism. It appears to merely label a surface
phenomenon without illuminating underlying economic structures or relationships.
---
# Evaluation: Declining Manufacture
## definition_precision — 1.0 / 5.0
There is no definition provided at all, making it impossible to assess precision or distinctness. The entity appears to be merely a descriptive phrase without conceptual boundaries.
## source_grounding — 2.0 / 5.0
While Smith does discuss declining manufactures in various contexts (particularly regarding trade restrictions and economic policies), without a definition or source chapter, it's unclear whether this captures a specific concept from the text or is just a general descriptive term.
## domain_placement — 2.0 / 5.0
The domain is unspecified, which is problematic for an economic concept. "Declining manufacture" could belong to industrial economics, trade policy, or economic development domains, but without clarification, proper placement is impossible.
## vsm_relevance — 2.0 / 5.0
This could potentially relate to S1 (operational decline) or S4 (environmental adaptation failures), but without a clear definition of what constitutes "declining manufacture" or its systemic role, VSM mapping remains speculative.
## explanatory_value — 1.0 / 5.0
As currently formulated, this entity provides no explanatory power since it lacks definition, context, or mechanism. It appears to merely label a surface phenomenon without illuminating underlying economic structures or relationships.