tegwick
a9ca0adfcf
Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics written with per_entity_mean=3.9556. Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS redundancy_ratio 0.0061 (max 0.10) coverage_ratio 0.6190 (min 0.40) coherence_comps 0.0000 (max 3) consistency_cycles 0.0000 (max 0) granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0) per_entity_mean 3.9556 (min 3.5) Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities): definition_precision 3.62 source_grounding 4.36 domain_placement 4.56 vsm_relevance 3.31 explanatory_value 3.94 Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
65 lines
3.6 KiB
Markdown
65 lines
3.6 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
entity_slug: entail
|
|
evaluator: null
|
|
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T05:23:28.329411'
|
|
overall_score: 4.8
|
|
scores:
|
|
- name: definition_precision
|
|
value: 5.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: The definition is highly precise and non-circular, clearly distinguishing
|
|
entails as a specific legal mechanism that restricts property alienation through
|
|
inheritance constraints. It captures the distinct concept of binding property
|
|
to family lines rather than using vague terminology.
|
|
- name: source_grounding
|
|
value: 5.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: This entity is directly grounded in Smith's actual analysis in Book III,
|
|
Chapter 2, where he explicitly discusses entails as consequences of primogeniture
|
|
and critiques their economic effects. The definition accurately reflects Smith's
|
|
treatment of entails as both historically rational and contemporaneously problematic.
|
|
- name: domain_placement
|
|
value: 5.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: The "Regulation" domain placement is perfectly appropriate, as entails
|
|
represent legal-institutional constraints on property markets and land use. This
|
|
fits squarely within regulatory mechanisms that shape economic behavior through
|
|
legal restrictions.
|
|
- name: vsm_relevance
|
|
value: 4.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: Entails map well to S3 (internal regulation) as institutional constraints
|
|
that govern property allocation within the economic system, and potentially to
|
|
S2 as coordination mechanisms that prevent certain market oscillations. The regulatory
|
|
nature gives it clear VSM relevance rather than being abstractly neutral.
|
|
- name: explanatory_value
|
|
value: 5.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: This entity provides substantial explanatory power by illuminating the
|
|
structural mechanism through which legal institutions constrain efficient resource
|
|
allocation and market function. It reveals how historical institutional forms
|
|
can persist beyond their functional utility and impede economic development.
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Evaluation: Entail
|
|
|
|
## definition_precision — 5.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
The definition is highly precise and non-circular, clearly distinguishing entails as a specific legal mechanism that restricts property alienation through inheritance constraints. It captures the distinct concept of binding property to family lines rather than using vague terminology.
|
|
|
|
## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
This entity is directly grounded in Smith's actual analysis in Book III, Chapter 2, where he explicitly discusses entails as consequences of primogeniture and critiques their economic effects. The definition accurately reflects Smith's treatment of entails as both historically rational and contemporaneously problematic.
|
|
|
|
## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
The "Regulation" domain placement is perfectly appropriate, as entails represent legal-institutional constraints on property markets and land use. This fits squarely within regulatory mechanisms that shape economic behavior through legal restrictions.
|
|
|
|
## vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
Entails map well to S3 (internal regulation) as institutional constraints that govern property allocation within the economic system, and potentially to S2 as coordination mechanisms that prevent certain market oscillations. The regulatory nature gives it clear VSM relevance rather than being abstractly neutral.
|
|
|
|
## explanatory_value — 5.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
This entity provides substantial explanatory power by illuminating the structural mechanism through which legal institutions constrain efficient resource allocation and market function. It reveals how historical institutional forms can persist beyond their functional utility and impede economic development.
|