tegwick
a9ca0adfcf
Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics written with per_entity_mean=3.9556. Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS redundancy_ratio 0.0061 (max 0.10) coverage_ratio 0.6190 (min 0.40) coherence_comps 0.0000 (max 3) consistency_cycles 0.0000 (max 0) granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0) per_entity_mean 3.9556 (min 3.5) Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities): definition_precision 3.62 source_grounding 4.36 domain_placement 4.56 vsm_relevance 3.31 explanatory_value 3.94 Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
65 lines
3.3 KiB
Markdown
65 lines
3.3 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
entity_slug: fruit_wall
|
|
evaluator: null
|
|
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T05:32:26.449205'
|
|
overall_score: 4.0
|
|
scores:
|
|
- name: definition_precision
|
|
value: 4.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: The definition is clear and specific, describing a concrete physical
|
|
structure with a defined purpose (protecting fruit trees and creating microclimates).
|
|
It avoids circularity and captures a distinct concept rather than a vague umbrella
|
|
term.
|
|
- name: source_grounding
|
|
value: 4.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: Smith does discuss fruit-walls in Book I, Chapter 11 as examples of agricultural
|
|
improvements that increase land value by enabling production of higher-value crops.
|
|
The entity accurately reflects Smith's use of this example in his analysis of
|
|
land improvements.
|
|
- name: domain_placement
|
|
value: 5.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: The "Production" domain assignment is exactly correct, as fruit-walls
|
|
are a capital improvement that directly affects agricultural production capacity
|
|
and output quality. This fits perfectly within Smith's discussion of productive
|
|
investments.
|
|
- name: vsm_relevance
|
|
value: 3.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: Fruit-walls map reasonably well to S1 (primary operations) as they are
|
|
operational infrastructure that directly supports production activities. However,
|
|
the mapping is not particularly strong or illuminating for VSM analysis.
|
|
- name: explanatory_value
|
|
value: 4.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: "This entity illuminates an important mechanism in Smith's theory\u2014\
|
|
how capital investments in agricultural infrastructure can increase land productivity\
|
|
\ and value by enabling cultivation of crops that wouldn't otherwise be viable.\
|
|
\ It demonstrates the relationship between investment, environmental modification,\
|
|
\ and economic returns."
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Evaluation: Fruit Wall
|
|
|
|
## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
The definition is clear and specific, describing a concrete physical structure with a defined purpose (protecting fruit trees and creating microclimates). It avoids circularity and captures a distinct concept rather than a vague umbrella term.
|
|
|
|
## source_grounding — 4.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
Smith does discuss fruit-walls in Book I, Chapter 11 as examples of agricultural improvements that increase land value by enabling production of higher-value crops. The entity accurately reflects Smith's use of this example in his analysis of land improvements.
|
|
|
|
## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
The "Production" domain assignment is exactly correct, as fruit-walls are a capital improvement that directly affects agricultural production capacity and output quality. This fits perfectly within Smith's discussion of productive investments.
|
|
|
|
## vsm_relevance — 3.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
Fruit-walls map reasonably well to S1 (primary operations) as they are operational infrastructure that directly supports production activities. However, the mapping is not particularly strong or illuminating for VSM analysis.
|
|
|
|
## explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
This entity illuminates an important mechanism in Smith's theory—how capital investments in agricultural infrastructure can increase land productivity and value by enabling cultivation of crops that wouldn't otherwise be viable. It demonstrates the relationship between investment, environmental modification, and economic returns.
|