tegwick
a9ca0adfcf
Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics written with per_entity_mean=3.9556. Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS redundancy_ratio 0.0061 (max 0.10) coverage_ratio 0.6190 (min 0.40) coherence_comps 0.0000 (max 3) consistency_cycles 0.0000 (max 0) granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0) per_entity_mean 3.9556 (min 3.5) Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities): definition_precision 3.62 source_grounding 4.36 domain_placement 4.56 vsm_relevance 3.31 explanatory_value 3.94 Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
65 lines
3.7 KiB
Markdown
65 lines
3.7 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
entity_slug: ground_expenses
|
|
evaluator: null
|
|
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T05:34:01.985686'
|
|
overall_score: 4.2
|
|
scores:
|
|
- name: definition_precision
|
|
value: 4.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: The definition is quite precise, clearly distinguishing ground expenses
|
|
as landlord-funded improvements (buildings, drains, enclosures) that increase
|
|
productive capacity and eventual rent returns. It avoids circularity and captures
|
|
a distinct economic concept with specific characteristics.
|
|
- name: source_grounding
|
|
value: 5.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: This entity is directly grounded in Smith's text from Book IV, Chapter
|
|
9, where he explicitly discusses the agricultural system's classification of "ground
|
|
expenses" (depenses foncieres) and their treatment as productive investments worthy
|
|
of tax protection. The definition accurately reflects Smith's analysis.
|
|
- name: domain_placement
|
|
value: 5.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: The "Production" domain assignment is correct, as ground expenses directly
|
|
relate to improving the productive capacity of land through capital investments
|
|
in infrastructure and ameliorations. This fits perfectly within production economics
|
|
rather than exchange, distribution, or consumption.
|
|
- name: vsm_relevance
|
|
value: 3.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: Ground expenses map reasonably well to S1 (primary operations) as they
|
|
represent fundamental productive infrastructure investments, but the concept is
|
|
somewhat VSM-neutral since it primarily describes a financial classification rather
|
|
than a systemic function. The mapping is plausible but not compelling.
|
|
- name: explanatory_value
|
|
value: 4.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: This entity provides genuine explanatory value by illuminating the mechanism
|
|
through which landlord investments create a feedback loop between capital improvement,
|
|
increased productivity, and higher rents. It reveals an important structural relationship
|
|
in agricultural economics beyond mere surface description.
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Evaluation: Ground Expenses
|
|
|
|
## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
The definition is quite precise, clearly distinguishing ground expenses as landlord-funded improvements (buildings, drains, enclosures) that increase productive capacity and eventual rent returns. It avoids circularity and captures a distinct economic concept with specific characteristics.
|
|
|
|
## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
This entity is directly grounded in Smith's text from Book IV, Chapter 9, where he explicitly discusses the agricultural system's classification of "ground expenses" (depenses foncieres) and their treatment as productive investments worthy of tax protection. The definition accurately reflects Smith's analysis.
|
|
|
|
## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
The "Production" domain assignment is correct, as ground expenses directly relate to improving the productive capacity of land through capital investments in infrastructure and ameliorations. This fits perfectly within production economics rather than exchange, distribution, or consumption.
|
|
|
|
## vsm_relevance — 3.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
Ground expenses map reasonably well to S1 (primary operations) as they represent fundamental productive infrastructure investments, but the concept is somewhat VSM-neutral since it primarily describes a financial classification rather than a systemic function. The mapping is plausible but not compelling.
|
|
|
|
## explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
This entity provides genuine explanatory value by illuminating the mechanism through which landlord investments create a feedback loop between capital improvement, increased productivity, and higher rents. It reveals an important structural relationship in agricultural economics beyond mere surface description.
|