tegwick
a9ca0adfcf
Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics written with per_entity_mean=3.9556. Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS redundancy_ratio 0.0061 (max 0.10) coverage_ratio 0.6190 (min 0.40) coherence_comps 0.0000 (max 3) consistency_cycles 0.0000 (max 0) granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0) per_entity_mean 3.9556 (min 3.5) Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities): definition_precision 3.62 source_grounding 4.36 domain_placement 4.56 vsm_relevance 3.31 explanatory_value 3.94 Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
66 lines
3.5 KiB
Markdown
66 lines
3.5 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
entity_slug: hop_garden
|
|
evaluator: null
|
|
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T05:35:10.972122'
|
|
overall_score: 4.2
|
|
scores:
|
|
- name: definition_precision
|
|
value: 4.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: The definition is clear and specific, identifying hop gardens as specialized
|
|
agricultural land for hop cultivation used in beer production. It avoids circularity
|
|
and distinguishes this from general agricultural land through its specialized
|
|
nature and higher rent potential.
|
|
- name: source_grounding
|
|
value: 5.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: This entity is well-grounded in Smith's actual text from Book I, Chapter
|
|
11, where he specifically discusses hop gardens as examples of specialized agricultural
|
|
production that command higher rents due to their intensive cultivation requirements
|
|
and valuable output.
|
|
- name: domain_placement
|
|
value: 5.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: The "Production" domain assignment is entirely appropriate, as hop gardens
|
|
represent a specific form of agricultural production with distinct economic characteristics.
|
|
This fits naturally within Smith's analysis of different types of productive activities
|
|
and their economic returns.
|
|
- name: vsm_relevance
|
|
value: 3.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: Hop gardens map most naturally to S1 (primary operations) as a specific
|
|
productive activity, but the concept is relatively VSM-neutral. While it represents
|
|
operational production, it doesn't strongly illuminate coordination, regulation,
|
|
intelligence, or policy functions within an economic system.
|
|
- name: explanatory_value
|
|
value: 4.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: This entity provides good explanatory value by illustrating Smith's broader
|
|
principle that specialized, intensive agricultural production can command higher
|
|
rents and returns than general farming. It demonstrates the economic mechanism
|
|
linking specialization, investment intensity, and rental returns in agricultural
|
|
markets.
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Evaluation: Hop Garden
|
|
|
|
## definition_precision — 4.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
The definition is clear and specific, identifying hop gardens as specialized agricultural land for hop cultivation used in beer production. It avoids circularity and distinguishes this from general agricultural land through its specialized nature and higher rent potential.
|
|
|
|
## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
This entity is well-grounded in Smith's actual text from Book I, Chapter 11, where he specifically discusses hop gardens as examples of specialized agricultural production that command higher rents due to their intensive cultivation requirements and valuable output.
|
|
|
|
## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
The "Production" domain assignment is entirely appropriate, as hop gardens represent a specific form of agricultural production with distinct economic characteristics. This fits naturally within Smith's analysis of different types of productive activities and their economic returns.
|
|
|
|
## vsm_relevance — 3.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
Hop gardens map most naturally to S1 (primary operations) as a specific productive activity, but the concept is relatively VSM-neutral. While it represents operational production, it doesn't strongly illuminate coordination, regulation, intelligence, or policy functions within an economic system.
|
|
|
|
## explanatory_value — 4.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
This entity provides good explanatory value by illustrating Smith's broader principle that specialized, intensive agricultural production can command higher rents and returns than general farming. It demonstrates the economic mechanism linking specialization, investment intensity, and rental returns in agricultural markets.
|