tegwick
a9ca0adfcf
Batch evaluation of all 988 entities via OpenRouter. 984 succeeded on first pass; 3 failed (network errors). eval-summary --update-metrics written with per_entity_mean=3.9556. Viability dashboard: 6/6 PASS redundancy_ratio 0.0061 (max 0.10) coverage_ratio 0.6190 (min 0.40) coherence_comps 0.0000 (max 3) consistency_cycles 0.0000 (max 0) granularity_entropy 2.6748 (min 1.0) per_entity_mean 3.9556 (min 3.5) Dimension breakdown (mean across 985 entities): definition_precision 3.62 source_grounding 4.36 domain_placement 4.56 vsm_relevance 3.31 explanatory_value 3.94 Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
63 lines
3.3 KiB
Markdown
63 lines
3.3 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
entity_slug: navigation_acts
|
|
evaluator: null
|
|
evaluated_at: '2026-02-23T06:01:35.835468'
|
|
overall_score: 4.8
|
|
scores:
|
|
- name: definition_precision
|
|
value: 5.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: The definition is highly precise and non-circular, clearly specifying
|
|
the ownership, manning, and construction requirements for ships in colonial trade.
|
|
It captures a distinct regulatory mechanism rather than a vague concept.
|
|
- name: source_grounding
|
|
value: 5.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: This entity is directly grounded in Smith's text from Book IV, Chapter
|
|
8, where he extensively analyzes navigation acts as prime examples of mercantile
|
|
system regulations. The definition accurately reflects Smith's treatment of these
|
|
policies and their effects.
|
|
- name: domain_placement
|
|
value: 5.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: The "Regulation" domain assignment is perfectly appropriate, as navigation
|
|
acts are quintessential government trade regulations. This placement correctly
|
|
categorizes the entity within the broader framework of state intervention in commerce.
|
|
- name: vsm_relevance
|
|
value: 4.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: Navigation acts map well to S3 (internal regulation) as they represent
|
|
systematic control mechanisms over trade flows, and partially to S4 (intelligence/adaptation)
|
|
as they respond to perceived threats to national maritime power. The regulatory
|
|
nature gives it clear VSM relevance.
|
|
- name: explanatory_value
|
|
value: 5.0
|
|
max_value: 5.0
|
|
rationale: This entity provides excellent explanatory power by illuminating the
|
|
specific mechanism through which mercantile systems prioritize producer interests
|
|
over efficiency. It demonstrates the structural tension between national power
|
|
objectives and economic optimization that Smith critiques throughout his work.
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Evaluation: Navigation Acts
|
|
|
|
## definition_precision — 5.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
The definition is highly precise and non-circular, clearly specifying the ownership, manning, and construction requirements for ships in colonial trade. It captures a distinct regulatory mechanism rather than a vague concept.
|
|
|
|
## source_grounding — 5.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
This entity is directly grounded in Smith's text from Book IV, Chapter 8, where he extensively analyzes navigation acts as prime examples of mercantile system regulations. The definition accurately reflects Smith's treatment of these policies and their effects.
|
|
|
|
## domain_placement — 5.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
The "Regulation" domain assignment is perfectly appropriate, as navigation acts are quintessential government trade regulations. This placement correctly categorizes the entity within the broader framework of state intervention in commerce.
|
|
|
|
## vsm_relevance — 4.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
Navigation acts map well to S3 (internal regulation) as they represent systematic control mechanisms over trade flows, and partially to S4 (intelligence/adaptation) as they respond to perceived threats to national maritime power. The regulatory nature gives it clear VSM relevance.
|
|
|
|
## explanatory_value — 5.0 / 5.0
|
|
|
|
This entity provides excellent explanatory power by illuminating the specific mechanism through which mercantile systems prioritize producer interests over efficiency. It demonstrates the structural tension between national power objectives and economic optimization that Smith critiques throughout his work.
|